İmparatorluk Dönemi Küçük Asya'sında Senatörlere Ait Mülkler - Sorunun Durumu, Metodolojik Sorunlar ve Gelecekteki Araştırmalara İlişkin Perspektifler

Yıl 2023, , 169 - 196, 12.11.2023

Andreas Klingenberg

https://doi.org/10.37095/gephyra.1356511

Öz

Genç Plinius'un da vurguladığı gibi (epist. 3,19,8), imparatorluk döneminde Romalı senatörlerin servet ve mülkleri ağırlıklı olarak toprak mülkiyetinden oluşuyordu. Senatoryal toprak mülkiyetinin yeri ve bazen kapsamı hakkında bize bilgi veren esas olarak epigrafik belgelerdir. Özellikle Küçük Asya'da, Helmut Halfmann'ın 1979'da bir kısmını derlediği çok sayıda kanıt vardır. O zamandan beri birçok yeni tanıklık keşfedildi ve yayınlandı. Bunun dışında, kökeni Küçük Asya'da olmayan senatörlerin toprak mülkiyetine ilişkin daha önce yayınlanmış kanıtlar da eklenebilir. Bununla birlikte, Küçük Asya'daki senatoryal toprak mülkiyetinin bir bütün olarak sistematik bir çalışması henüz mevcut değildir.
Bu makale böyle bir çalışmaya ön hazırlık niteliğindedir. Böylece Küçük Asya'daki senatoryal toprak mülkiyetinin kapsamı, dağılımı ve arka planı hakkında genel bir bakış sunuyorum. Bu mülkiyet nadiren Magnesia tapu sicilindeki kadar açık bir şekilde belirtilmiştir (I.Magnesia 122, c2). Genellikle sadece farklı yazıtların kombinasyonu senatoryal toprak sahiplerinin kimliğini doğrulamaktadır. Bu nedenle, bu tür bilgilerden nasıl güvenilir bulgular elde edilebileceğine dair metodolojik ilkeleri özetliyorum. Toprak mülkleri sahip değiştirebilir, senatoryal mülkler genellikle imparatorların mülkiyetine geçer ve bu konu çok daha iyi araştırılmıştır. Önemli sorular, bir aile içinde mülkiyetin devamlılığı ve mülkiyet değişikliklerinin koşullarıyla ilgilidir. Bu bağlamda, senatörlerin mülklerine nasıl sahip olduklarını da tartışıyorum. Özellikle Roma İmparatorluğu'nun diğer bölgelerinden gelen senatörler söz konusu olduğunda, Küçük Asya'da neden ve nasıl toprak mülkiyeti edindikleri sorusu ortaya çıkmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Küçük Asya, Roma senatörleri, senatoryal mülkler, metodolojik sorunlar, epigrafik veriler, onomastik

Senatorial Estates in Imperial Asia Minor – State of the Question, Methodological Issues and Perspectives on Future Research

Öz

The wealth and possessions of Roman senators in the imperial period consisted predominantly in land property, as emphasized by Pliny the Younger (epist. 3,19,8). It is mainly epigraphic documents that give us information about the location and sometimes extent of senatorial land ownership. Especially in Asia Minor there is plenty of evidence, of which Helmut Halfmann already compiled quite some in 1979. Since then many new testimonies have been discovered and published. Apart from that, further, earlier published evidence for the land ownership of senators whose origin was not in Asia Minor can be added. However, a systematic study of senatorial land ownership in Asia Minor as a whole is not yet at hand.
The paper provides prolegomena to such a study. I thus give an overview of the extent, distribution and background of senatorial land ownership in Asia Minor. Rarely is this property so clearly indicated as in the land register of Magnesia (I.Magnesia 122, c2). Usually only the combination of different inscriptions confirms the identification of senatorial landowners. Therefore, I outline methodological guidelines on how to obtain reliable findings from such information. Landed properties could change owners, senatorial estates often passed into the possession of the emperors, which is much better researched. Important questions relate to continuity of ownership within a family and to the circumstances of changes of possession. In this context, I also discuss how the senators came to their property. Especially in the case of senators from other parts of the Roman Empire, the question arises as to why and how they acquired landed property in Asia Minor.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Asia Minor, Roman senators, senatorial estates, methodological issues, epigraphic evidence, onomastics

Teşekkür

This paper originates from a talk given at the 16th International Congress of Greek and Latin Epigraphy (XVI Congressus Internationalis Epigraphiae Graecae et Latinae) in Bordeaux, in the section “Epigraphy and land ownership in the Roman world: overviews and methodological reflections for the 21st century” chaired by Alberto dalla Rosa and Davide Faoro to whom I would like to express my gratitude for the invitation and for discussing my propositions. I would also like to thank Ségolène Demougin for the helpful conversation after my talk and N. Eda Akyürek Şahin for inviting me to publish my paper in Gephyra.

Kaynakça

• W. Ameling, Der Sophist Rufus, EA 6, 1985, 27-33.
• A. M. Andermahr, Totus in praediis. Senatorischer Grundbesitz in Italien in der Frühen und Hohen Kaiserzeit, Bonn 1998.
• A. Arjarva, Zum Gebrauch der griechischen Rangprädikate des Senatorenstandes in den Papyri und Inschriften, Tyche 6, 1991, 17-35.
• M. T. W. Arnheim, The Senatorial Aristocracy in the Later Roman Empire, Oxford 1972.
• H. Bengtson, Zu den Proskriptionen der Triumvirn [SBMünchen 1972/3], Munich 1972.
• T. Boulay – A.-V. Pont, Chalkètôr en Carie [Mémoires de l’Académie des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres 48], Paris 2014.
• G. Boulvert, Domestique et fonctionnaire sous le Haut-Empire romain, Paris 1974.
• M. R. R. Broughton, Roman Landholding in Asia Minor, TAPhA 65, 1934, 207-239.
• M. R. R. Broughton, Roman Asia Minor, in: T. Frank (ed.), An Economic Survey of Ancient Rome, vol. IV: Africa, Syria, Greece, Asia Minor, Baltimore 1938, 499-916.
• L. Bruzza, Iscrizioni dei marmi grezzi, Rome 1870.
• W. M. Calder, The Eastern Boundary of the Province Asia, CR 22, 1908, 213-215.
• W. M. Calder, A Journey round the Proseilemmene, Klio 10, 1910, 232-242.
• W. M. Calder, A Galatian Estate of the Sergii Paulli, Klio 24, 1931, 59-62.
• E. Champlin, Notes on the Heirs of Commodus, AJPh 100, 1979, 288-306.
• A. Chastagnol, Les fastes de la Préfecture de Rome au Bas-Empire [Études Prosopographique II], Paris 1962.
• M. Christol, Procurateurs en Asie et en Phrygie: le bornage de Papirius Iustus et de September, affranchi de l'empereur (MAMA X 255 et 259), ZPE 205, 2018, 283-290.
• M. Christol – S. Demougin, De Lugo à Pergame: la carrière de l'affranchi Saturninus dans l'administration impériale, MEFRA 120, 1990, 159-211.
• T. Corsten, Estates in Roman Asia Minor. The Case of Kibyratis, in: S. Mitchell – C. Katsari (edd.), Patterns in the Economy of Roman Asia Minor, Swansea 2005, 1-51.
• T. Corsten – T. Drew-Bear – M. Özsait, Forschungen in der Kibyratis, EA 30, 1998, 47-80.
• H. S. Cronin, First Report of a Journey in Pisidia, Lycaonia, and Pamphylia. Part II, JHS 22, 1902, 339-376.
• A. Dalla Rosa, Prolegomeni allo studio della proprietà imperiale in Asia Minore: la questione dell'imperatore come acquirente, SCO 60, 2014, 329-348.
• A. Dalla Rosa, From Exploitation to Integration: Imperial Quarries, Estates and Freedmen, and the Integration of Rural Phrygia, Studi Ellenistici 30, 2016, 305-330.
• A. Dalla Rosa, Propriété familiale, pouvoir impérial: origine et gestion du patrimoine d'Auguste en Asie Mineure, in: L. Cavalier – M.-C. Ferriès – F. Delrieux (edd.), Auguste et l’Asie Mineure, Bordeaux 2017, 102-116.
• S. Demougin, Titres officiels, titres officieux, in: A. Kuhn (ed.), Social Status and Prestige in the Graeco-Roman World, Stuttgart 2015, 63-85.
• R. Duncan-Jones, The Economy of the Roman Empire. Quantitative Studies, Cambridge ²1982.
• L. P. Eberle – E. Le Quéré, Landed Traders, Trading Agriculturalists? Land in the Economy of the Italian Diaspora in the Greek East, JRS 107, 2017, 27-59.
• W. Eck, L. Marcius Celer M. Calpurnius Longus Prokonsul von Achaia und Suffektkonsul unter Hadrian, ZPE 86, 1991, 97-106.
• W. Eck, Ordo senatorius und Mobilität: Auswirkungen und Konsequenzen im Imperium Romanum, in: E. Lo Cascio – L. E. Tacoma (edd.), The Impact of Mobility and Migration in the Roman Empire. Proceedings of the Twelfth Workshop of the International Network Impact of Empire (Rome, June 17-19, 2015) [Impact of Empire 22], Leiden 2016, 100-115.
• P. Erdkamp – K. Verboven – A. Zuiderhoek (edd.), Ownership and Exploitation of Land and Natural Resources in the Roman World, Oxford 2015.
• T. Frank, ‘Dominium in Solo Provinciali,’ and ‘Ager Publicus’, JRS 17, 1927, 141-161.
• H. Güney, New inscriptions from the Choria Considiana: Çalçak Roman necropolis, AS 66, 2016, 125-139.
• H. Güney, Ancient Quarries and Stonemasonry in Northern Choria Considiana, in: D. Matetić Poljak – K. Marasović (edd.), ASMOSIA XI, Interdisciplinary Studies on Ancient Stone, Proceedings of the XI International Conference of ASMOSIA, Split 2018, 621-631.
• H. Güney, The Sanctuary of Zeus Sarnendenos and the Cult of Zeus in Northeastern Phrygia, AS 69, 2019, 155-174.
• H. Güney, The Imperial Estate Choria Considiana and “Zeus of the Seven Villages” in North-West Galatia, in: A. Coşkun (ed.), Victories and Other Studies into the Agency and Identity of the Galatians in the Hellenistic and Early-Roman Periods, Leuven 2022, 277-291.
• C. Habicht, Zwei neue Inschriften aus Pergamon, MDAI(I) 9-10, 1959-1960, 109-127.
• H. Halfmann, Die Senatoren aus dem östlichen Teil des Imperium Romanum bis zum Ende des 2. Jahrhunderts n. Chr. [Hypomnemata 58], Göttingen 1979.
• H. Halfmann, Die Senatoren aus den kleinasiatischen Provinzen des Römischen Reiches vom 1. bis 3. Jahrhundert (Asia, Pontus-Bithynia, Lycia-Pamphylia, Galatia, Cappadocia, Cilicia), Atti del Colloquio Internazionale AIEGL su Epigrafia e Ordine Senatorio, Roma, 14 - 20 maggio 1981, Rome 1982, vol. II [Tituli 5], 603-650.
• K. Harper, The Greek Census Inscriptions of Late Antiquity, JRS 98, 2008, 83-119.
• P. Heather, Senators and Senates, CAH XIII, 1998, 184-210.
• M. Heil, Die Genese der Rangtitel in den ersten drei Jahrhunderten, in: A. Kuhn (ed.), Social Status and Prestige in the Graeco-Roman World, Stuttgart 2015, 45-62.
• H. Hepding, Die Arbeiten zu Pergamon 1908-1909, II: Die Inschriften, MDAI(A), 1910, 401-493.
• F. Hinard, Les proscriptions de la Rome républicaine [Publications de l’École française de Rome 83], Rome 1985.
• O. Hirschfeld, Die kaiserlichen Verwaltungsbeamten bis auf Diocletian, Berlin ²1905.
• U. Huttner, Pagane Relikte in der Spätantike: Griechische Katasterinschriften als religionsgeschichtliche Quellen, in: C. Breytenbach – J. M. Ogereau (edd.), Authority and Identity in Emerging Christianities in Asia Minor and Greece, Leiden 2018, 3-32.
• P. Jacobsthal, Die Arbeiten zu Pergamon 1906-1907, II: Die Inschriften, MDAI(A) 33, 1908, 375-420.
• S. Jameson, Cornutus Tertullus and the Plancii of Perge, JRS 55, 1965, 54-58.
• A. H. M. Jones, Census Records of the Later Roman Empire, JRS 43, 1953, 49-64.
• D. Kehoe, Allocation of Risk and Investment on the Estates of Pliny the Younger, Chiron 18, 1988, 15-42.
• F. Kirbihler, Die Italiker in Kleinasien, mit besonderer Berücksichtigung von Ephesos (133 v. Chr. – 1. Jh. n. Chr.), in: M. Meyer (ed.), Neue Zeiten – Neue Sitten. Zu Rezeption und Integration römischen und italischen Kulturguts in Kleinasien [Wiener Forschungen zur Archäologie 12], Vienna 2007, 19-35.
• A. Klingenberg, Sozialer Abstieg in der römischen Kaiserzeit. Risiken der Oberschicht in der Zeit von Augustus bis zum Ende der Severer, Paderborn 2011.
• A. Krieckhaus, Senatorische Familien und ihre patriae (1./2. Jahrhundert n. Chr.), Hamburg 2006.
• G. Laminger-Pascher, Die kaiserzeitlichen Inschriften Lykaoniens, Faszikel I: Der Süden [Ergänzungsbände zu den Tituli Asiae Minoris 15], Vienna 1992.
• B. Levick, Roman Colonies in Southern Asia Minor, Oxford 1967.
• E. LoCascio, The Imperial Property and its Development, in: P. Erdkamp – K. Verboven – A. Zuiderhoek (edd.), Ownership and Exploitation of Land and Natural Resources in the Roman World, Oxford 2015, 62-70.
• C. Marek, In the Land of a Thousand Gods. A History of Asia Minor in the Ancient World, Princeton 2019.
• S. Mitchell, The Plancii in Asia Minor, JRS 64, 1974, 27-39.
• S. Mitchell, Population and the Land in Roman Galatia, ANRW II.7.2, Berlin/New York 1980, 1053-1081.
• S. Mitchell, Anatolia. Land, Men, and Gods in Asia Minor, 2 vols., Oxford 1993.
• S. Mitchell, The Administration of Roman Asia from 133 BC to AD 250, in: W. Eck (ed.), Lokale Autonomie und römische Ordnungsmacht in den kaiserzeitlichen Provinzen vom 1. bis 3. Jahrhundert [Schriften des Historischen Kollegs 42], Munich 1999, 17-46.
• S. Mitchell, Olive Cultivation in the Economy of Roman Asia Minor, in: S. Mitchell – C. Katsari (edd.), Patterns in the Economy of Roman Asia Minor, Swansea 2005, 83-113.
• S. Mratschek-Halfmann, Divites et praepotentes. Reichtum und soziale Stellung in der Literatur der Prinzipatszeit [Historia Einzelschriften 70], Stuttgart 1993.
• G. M. Parassoglou, Imperial Estates in Roman Egypt [American Studies in Papyrology 18], Amsterdam 1978.
• C. C. Petolescu, Nouvelles remarques sur la carrière militaire équestre de T. Antonius Claudius Alfenus Arignotus, ZPE 110, 1996, 253-258.
• H. G. Pflaum, Les carrières procuratoriennnes équestres sous le Haut-Empire romain, Paris 1960.
• N. Purcell, The Apparitores: A Study in Social Mobility, PBSR 51, 1983, 125-173.
• M.-T. Raepsaet-Charlier, Prosopographie des femmes de l'ordre sénatorial (Ier-IIe siècles), Leuven 1987.
• W. M. Ramsay, Antiquities of Southern Phrygia and the Border Lands (II), AJA 4, 1888, 6-21.
• W. M. Ramsay, Laodicea Combusta and Sinethandos, MDAI(A) 13, 1888, 233-272.
• W. M. Ramsay, The Cities and Bishoprics of Phrygia, Oxford 1895.
• W. M. Ramsay, Studies in the Roman Province Galatia, X. The Romans in Galatia, JRS 16, 1926, 201-215.
• L. Robert, Hellenica XIII. Recueil d’épigraphie, de numismatique et d’antiquités grecques, Paris 1965.
• J.-M. Roddaz, Marcus Agrippa [BEFAR 253], Rome 1984.
• A. H. Sayce – W. M. Ramsay, Notes on a Tour in Asia Minor, JHS 8, 1887, 216-267.
• D. Schlinkert, Ordo senatorius und nobilitas. Die Konstitution des Senatsadels in der Spätantike, Stuttgart 1996.
• H. Schwarz – K. Stauner, Die Parapompé des Kaisers und seines Heeres im nordwestlichen Kleinasien, Gephyra 4, 2007, 1-35.
• I. Shatzman, Senatorial Wealth and Roman Politics [Collection Latomus 142], Brussels 1975.
• V. M. Strocka, Wechselwirkungen der stadtrömischen und kleinasiatischen Architektur unter Trajan und Hadrian, MDAI(I) 38, 1988, 291-307.
• J. H. M. Strubbe, The Imperial Cult at Pessinous, in: L. de Blois – P. Funke – J. Hahn (edd.), The Impact of Imperial Rome on Religions, Ritual and Religious Life in the Roman Empire. Proceedings from the Fifth Workshop of the International Network Impact of Empire (Roman Empire, 200 B.C. - A.D. 476) Münster, June 30 - July 4, 2004 [Impact of Empire 5], Leiden 2006, 160-121.
• R. D. Sullivan, The Dynasty of Commagene, ANRW II 8, Berlin 1978, 732-798.
• R. Syme, The Roman Revolution, Oxford ²1952.
• R. Syme, An Eccentric Patrician, Chiron 10, 1980, 427-448.
• R. Syme, The Marriage of Rubellius Blandus, AJPh 103, 1982, 62-85.
• B. Takmer, Kotiaion Yazıtları Üzerine Notlar I – Kotiaion Civarında İmparator Azatlıları ve İmparator Arazileri, Phaselis 4, 2018, 423-445.
• J. Tan, Power and Public Finance at Rome, 264-49 BCE, Oxford 2017.
• P. Thonemann, Estates and the Land in Late Roman Asia Minor, Chiron 37, 2007, 435-478.
• P. Thonemann, The Lives of Ancient Villages. Rural Society in Roman Anatolia, Oxford 2022.
• H. Uzunoğlu, Roman Soldiers and Imperial Properties in the Galatian-Phrygian Borderland: A New Inscription from the Eskişehir Museum, Gephyra 21, 2021, 65-89.
• M. Waelkens, Die kleinasiatischen Türsteine. Typologische und epigraphische Untersuchungen der kleinasiatischen Grabreliefs mit Scheintür, Mainz 1986.
• K. Wojciech, Die Stadtpräfektur im Prinzipat [Antiquitas Reihe 1 - Abhandlungen zur Alten Geschichte 59], Bonn 2010.
• F. Zucker, Ἐπίτροπος χαρτηρᾶς Ἀλεχανδρείας, Philologus 70, 1911, 79-105.