Associating the Variables Related to Innovation with the Process of Developing Organizational Resilience

Yıl 2022, , 1 - 13, 27.06.2022

Olcay Okun

https://doi.org/10.31006/gipad.1068200

Cited By: 2

Öz

Today, the covid-19 pandemic, natural disasters, newly developing virtual currency exchanges, turmoil, which can be exemplified by sudden economic fluctuations, push organizations to struggle to exist in an unpredictable environment. Organizations have become much more fragile in this new field of struggle, which requires determining the direction of change at the strategic management level. The flexibility of organizations can be expressed with the concept of organizational resilience framework. Organizations that can turn the turbulences in their favor for innovation and change by giving flexible responses in the face of the turbulences will be able to survive. The main purpose of the research is to correlate the organizational resilience development process with the variables related to innovation. At the end of the study, it has been revealed that the most critical component of the adaptation capacity, which is the source of flexible responses, is innovation and that the resilience of the organization will increase if the culture of innovation is a strong component of the organizational culture. It has also been suggested that innovation culture is one of the general indicators of organizational resilience. In this context, it becomes the basic condition for organizations to develop this capacity by investing in their innovation culture.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Organizational Resilience, Innovation, Process Innovation, Innovation Culture.

Örgütsel Dayanıklılığın Geliştirilmesi Süreci ile İnovasyona İlişkin Değişkenlerin İlişkilendirilmesi

Öz

Günümüzde Covid-19 pandemisi, doğal afetler, yeni gelişen sanal para borsaları, ani ekonomik dalgalanmalar ile örneklenebilecek çalkantılar örgütleri öngörülemeyen bir çevrede var olma mücadelesine itmektedir. Stratejik yönetim seviyesinde değişimin yönünü belirlemeyi gerektiren bu yeni mücadele sahasında örgütler çok daha kırılgan hale gelmiştir. Örgütlerin esneklikleri örgütsel dayanıklılık çatı kavramı ile ifade edilebilir. Yaşanan çalkantılar karşısında esnek tepkiler vererek çalkantıları inovasyon ve değişim için lehine çevirebilen örgütler varlıklarını sürdürebilecektir. Araştırmanın temel amacı örgütsel dayanıklılığın geliştirilmesi süreci ile inovasyona ilişkin değişkenlerin ilişkilendirilmesidir. Çalışma sonucunda esnek tepkilerin kaynağı olan adaptasyon kapasitesinin en kritik bileşeninin inovasyon olduğu ve inovasyon kültürünün örgüt kültürünün güçlü bir bileşeni olması halinde örgütün dayanıklılığın artacağı ortaya koyulmuştur. Ayrıca inovasyon kültürünün örgütsel dayanıklılık genel göstergelerinden biri olduğu önerilmiştir. Bu bağlamda örgütlerin inovasyon kültürlerine yatırım yaparak bu kapasiteyi geliştirmeleri varlıklarını sürdürmeleri için temel şart haline gelmektedir. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Örgütsel Dayanıklılık, İnovasyon, Süreç İnovasyonu, İnovasyon Kültürü.

Kaynakça

• Ahmed, P. K. (1998). Culture and climate for innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 1(1), 30-43. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601069810199131
• Annarelli, A., ve Nonino, F. (2016). Strategic and operational management of organizational resilience: Current state of research and future directions. Omega, 62, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2015.08.004
• Baer, M., ve Frese, M. (2003). Innovation is not enough: Climates for initiative and psychological safety, process innovations, and firm performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(1), 45-68. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.179
• Bandyopadhyay, S., ve Acharyya, R. (2004). Process and Product Innovation: Complementarity in a Vertically Differentiated Monopoly with Discrete Consumer Types. Japanese Economic Review, 55(2), 175-200. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5876.2004.00301.x
• Bellot, J. (2011). Defining and Assessing Organizational Culture: Defining and Assessing Organizational Culture. Nursing Forum, 46(1), 29-37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6198.2010.00207.x
• Bozkurt, R., (2005). Süreç İyileştirme. Milli Prodüktivite Merkezi Yayınları, No: 661, Ankara.
• Coulter, M. K. (2003). Entrepreneurship in action (2nd ed). Prentice Hall.
• D’Adderio, L. (2014). The Replication Dilemma Unravelled: How Organizations Enact Multiple Goals in Routine Transfer. Organization Science, 25(5), 1325-1350. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2014.0913
• Deverell, A., L., Astrid, H. Ahmed P.K. (1998). Culture and climate for innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 1(1), 30-43. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601069810199131
• Dobni, C. B. (2008). Measuring innovation culture in organizations: The development of a generalized innovation culture construct using exploratory factor analysis. European Journal of Innovation Management, 11(4), 539-559. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601060810911156
• Drucker, P. F. (1985). Innovation and entrepreneurship: Practice and principles (1st ed). Harper ve Row.
• Duchek, S. (2015). Enhancing Absorptive Capacity for Innovation and Change: The Role of Structural Determinants. Journal of Change Management, 15(2), 142-160. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2014.988637
• Elçi, S. (2007). Inovasyon: Kalkinmanin ve rekabetin anahtari. Technopolis Group.
• Engemann, K. J., ve Henderson, D. M. (2012). Business continuity and risk management: Essentials of organizational resilience. Rothstein Ass.
• Fisher, M.M. (2001) The effect of resistance exercise on recovery blood pressure in normotensive and borderline hypertensive women. J. Strength Cond. Res. 15(2):210–216.
• Friedman, T. L. (2005). The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century (1st ed). Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
• Hamel, G. ve Valikangas, L. (2003). The Quest for Resilience. Harvard Business Review, (68:3), September 2003, pp. 52–63.
• Hull, C. E., ve Rothenberg, S. (2008). Firm performance: The interactions of corporate social performance with innovation and industry differentiation. Strategic Management Journal, 29(7), 781-789. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.675
• Kaçmaz,Y.Y. (2021). Öğrenen Örgütlerin Kurumsallaşma Aracılığı İle Örgütsel Dayanıklılık Üzerindeki Etkisi: Alanya’da Konaklama İşletmeleri Yöneticileri Üzerine Bir Uygulama. (Doktora Tezi). Alaaddin Keykubat Üniversitesi, Alanya.
• Kantur, D. (2015). Measuring Organizational Resilience: A Scale Development. Pressacademia, 4(3), 456-456. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2015313066
• Kantur, D., ve İşeri-Say, A. (2012). Organizational resilience: A conceptual integrative framework. Journal of Management ve Organization, 18(6), 762-773. https://doi.org/10.5172/jmo.2012.18.6.762
• Kırım, A. (2007). Süreç İnnovasyonu, Maliyetleri Sistemin Dışına Çıkarmak, İstanbul: Sistem Yayıncılık, 2007
• Künü, B.(2020). Günümüz Rekabet Ortamında Kurumsallaşmanın Örgütsel Dayanıklılığa Etkisi Üzerine Bir Araştırma. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Pamukkale Üniversitesi, Denizli.
• Lambertini, L., ve Mantovani, A. (2009). Process and product innovation by a multiproduct monopolist: A dynamic approach. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 27(4), 508-518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2008.12.005
• Leavy, B. (2005). A leader’s guide to creating an innovation culture. Strategy ve Leadership, 33(4), 38-45. https://doi.org/10.1108/10878570510608031
• Lee, A. V., Vargo, J., ve Seville, E. (2013). Developing a Tool to Measure and Compare Organizations’ Resilience. Natural Hazards Review, 14(1), 29-41. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000075
• Leflar, J. J., Siegel, M. H., ve Siegel, M. H. (2013). Organizational resilience: Managing the risks of disruptive events ; a practitioner’s guide. CRC Press.
• Martín-de Castro, G., Delgado-Verde, M., Navas-López, J. E., ve Cruz-González, J. (2013). The moderating role of innovation culture in the relationship between knowledge assets and product innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(2), 351-363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.08.012
• McManus, S., Seville, E., Vargo, J., ve Brunsdon, D. (2008). Facilitated Process for Improving Organizational Resilience. Natural Hazards Review, 9(2), 81-90. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2008)9:2(81)
• Moore GA. (2004). Darwin and the demon: innovating within established enterprises. Harvard Business Review, 2004 Jul-Aug;82(7-8):86-92, 187. PMID: 15241955.
• OECD ve Eurostat (2005), Oslo manual: Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data, 3rd Edition, The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities. Paris: OECD.
• Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press ; Collier Macmillan.
• Porter ME. (1996). What is strategy? Harvard Business Review, 74(6): 61–79.
• Rahi, K. (2019). Indicators to assess organizational resilience – a review of empirical literature. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 10(2/3), 85-98. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJDRBE-11-2018-0046
• Roberts, L. (1994). Process Reengineering: The Key to Achieving Breakthrough Success. Milwaukee, WI: ASQ Press.
• Rousseau, D. M. (1990). Assessing organizational culture: The case for multiple methods. In B. Schneider (Ed.), Organizational climate and culture (pp. 153- 193). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
• Sadegh Sharifirad, M., ve Ataei, V. (2012). Organizational culture and innovation culture: Exploring the relationships between constructs. Leadership ve Organization Development Journal, 33(5), 494-517. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437731211241274
• Satı, Z. E.. ve Işık, Ö. (2011). İnovasyon ve Stratejik Yönetim Sinerjisi: Stratejik İnovasyon . Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi , 9 (2) , 538-559 .
• Sevimli, M.C. (2021). Kurumsal Yönetim ve Örgütsel Dayanıklılık Arasındaki İlişki. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi, İstanbul.
• Schumpeter, J., (1934). The Theory Of Economic Development, New York, Oxford University Press
• Sheffi, Y. (2005). The resilient enterprise: Overcoming vulnerability for competitive advantage. MIT Press.
• Sullivant, J. (2016). Building a corporate culture of security: Strategies for strengthening organizational resiliency. Butterworth-Heinemann.
• Starr, R., Newfrock, J. ve Delurey, M. (2003). Enterprise: Managing Risk in The Networked Economy. Strategy and Business, 30, 70-79.
• Teixeira, E. de O., ve Werther, W. B. (2013). Resilience: Continuous renewal of competitive advantages. Business Horizons, 56(3), 333-342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2013.01.009
• Tillement, V., Remy, M.-H., Raynaud-Messina, B., Mazzolini, L., Haren, L., ve Merdes, A. (2009). Spindle assembly defects leading to the formation of a monopolar mitotic apparatus. Biology of the Cell, 101(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1042/BC20070162
• Tierney, K.J. (2003). Conceptualizing and Measuring Organizational and Community Resilience: Lessons from the Emergency Response Following the September 11, 2001 Attack on the World Trade Center. University of Delaware Disaster Research Center.
• Tushman, M. ve Nadler, D. (1986).Organizing for innovation. California Management Review, 28, 2:74-92.
• Wagner, D., ve Disparte, D. (2016). Global risk agility and decision making: Organizational resilience in the era of man-made risk. Palgrave Macmillan.