Aile İşletmelerinde Sosyo-Duygusal Zenginliğin Rekabet Avantajina ve Sürdürülebilir Yaşama Etkisi: İnovasyon Yeteneğinin Aracilik Rolü

Ömer Samet Kazdal; Cemal Yükselen

Aile İşletmelerinde Sosyo-Duygusal Zenginliğin Rekabet Avantajina ve Sürdürülebilir Yaşama Etkisi: İnovasyon Yeteneğinin Aracilik Rolü

Öz

Çalışmada, Türkiye ve dünya ekonomisinde büyük bir önem arz eden aile işletmelerinin sürdürülebilir bir işletme yaşamı benimsemelerinde etkili olan inanç ve değerler bilincinin ve ailenin işletmedeki kontrol konumundan elde ettiği ekonomik olmayan değerler olarak algılanan sosyo-duygusal zenginlik (SEW) kavramının etkin rolü incelenmiştir. Aynı zamanda önemli bir girişimcilik kaynağı olan aile işletmelerinin durumunun şekillenmesinde özellikle etkili olan sürdürülebilir başarı anahtarına sahip olmak için rekabet avantajı ve sürdürülebilir yaşam kavramları ele alınarak aile işletmelerindeki heterojenliğe odaklanılmıştır. Literatürde konuyla ilgili araştırma sonuçlarına dayanarak, bu araştırmada, İstanbul ilindeki küçük girişimlerden orta ölçekli işletmelere ve hatta büyük küresel işletmelere kadar değişen büyüklüklerde faaliyet gösteren aile işletmelerinin kavramsal olarak özellikleri, inovasyon yetenekleri, rekabet avantajları ve sürdürülebilir yaşamları incelenmiş; hedef kitle olarak İstanbul Sanayi Odası’ndan alınan veriler doğrultusunda 193 anket değerlendirmeye alınmıştır. Elde edilen veriler SPSS kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Analiz sonucunda SEW rekabet avantajı ve sürdürülebilir işletme yaşamını olumlu ve anlamlı yönde etkilerken, inovasyon yeteneğinin kısmi bir aracılık rolü olduğu görülmüştür. Bu çerçevede, SEW’in aile işletmesi davranışını anlamada yararlı bir yapı olduğu öne sürülmüş; SEW tarafından yansıtılan aile ile ilgili hedefler, işletme için daha önemli hale geldiğinde aile işletmelerinin sürdürüebilir bir işletme uzun ömürlülüğü ile rekabet avantajı elde ettiği görülmüştür.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Destekleyen Kurum

Beykent Üniversitesi

Kaynakça

AGHA, S., ALRUBAIEE, L., ve JAMHOUR, M. (2012). “Effect of Core Competence on Competitive Advantage and OrganizationalPerformance”, International Journal of Business and Management, 7(1): 192-204. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v7n1p192
AHMAD, S., OMAR, R., ve QUOQUAB, F. (2019). “Corporate Sustainable Longevity: Scale Development and Validation”, SAGE Open, 9(1): 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018822379
AHMAD, S., OMAR, R., ve QUOQUAB, F. (2020). “Family firms’ sustainable longevity: the role of family involvement in business and innovation capability”, Journal of Family Business Management, 11(1): 86–106. https://doi.org/10.1108/jfbm-12-2019-0081
AKUME, B. ve IGUISI, O. (2020). “Developing capabilities for sustainability in family owned SMEs: An emerging market scenario”, Research in Business & Social Science, 9(6): 24-36. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v9i6.840
BARNEY, J. (1991). “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage”, Journal of Management, 17(1): 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
BEDNARZ, J., BIELINSKO, T., NIKODEMSKA-WOŁOWIK, A. M., ve OTUKOYA, A. (2017). “Sources of the Competitive Advantage of Family Enterprises: An International Approach Focusing on China, Nigeria and Poland”, EntrepreneurialBusiness and Economics Review, 5(2): 124-142. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2017.050207
BERRONE, P., CRUZ, C., GOMEZ-MEJIA, L. R., ve LARRAZA-KINTANA, M. (2010). Socioemotional Wealth and Corporate Responses to Institutional Pressures: Do Family-Controlled Firms Pollute Less?”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(1): 82–113. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2010.55.1.82
BERRONE, P., CRUZ, C., ve GOMEZ-MEJIA, L. R. (2012). “Socioemotional Wealth in Family Firms: Theoretical Dimensions, Assessment Approaches, and Agenda for Future Research”, Family Business Review, 25(3): 258–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486511435355

BIRD, B., WELSCH, H., ASTRACHAN, J., H., ve PISTRUI, D. (2002). “Family Business Research: The Evolution of an Academic Field”, Family Business Review, 15(4): 337-50. https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1741-6248.2002.00337.x BIRLEY, S., NG, D., ve GODFREY, A. (1999). “The family and the business”, Long Range Planning, 32(6): 598–608. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0024-6301(99)00076-x
BREZNIK L. ve D. HISRICH, R. D. (2014). “Dynamic capabilities vs. innovation capability: are they related?”, Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 21(3): 368 – 384. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-02-2014-0018
BRATNICKA-MYŚLIWIEC, K., WRONKA-POŚPIECH, M., ve INGRAM, T. (2019). “Does socioemotional wealth matier for competitive advantage? A case of polish family businesses”, Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation (JEMI), 15(1): 123-146. https://doi.org/10.7341/20191515
BRICE, W. D., ve RICHARDSON, J. (2009). “Culture in family business: a two‐country empirical investigation”, European Business Review, 21(3): 246–262. https://doi.org/10.1108/09555340910956630
CARNEY, M. (2005). “Corporate Governance and Competitive Advantage in Family-Controlled Firms”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(3): 249–265. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00081.x
CHAHARBAGHI, K., ve LYNCH, R. (1999). “Sustainable competitive advantage: towards a dynamic resource‐based strategy”, Management Decision, 37(1): 45–50. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251749910252012
CHEN, S., CHEN, X., ve CHENG, Q. (2008). “Do Family Firms Provide More or Less Voluntary Disclosure?”, Journal of Accounting Research, 46(3): 499–536. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679x.2008.00288.x
CHENG, C. C. J., ve CHEN, J. (2013). “Breakthrough innovation: the roles of dynamic innovation capabilities and open innovation activities”, Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 28(5): 444–454. https://doi.org/10.1108/08858621311330281
CHRISMAN, J. J., ve PATEL, P. C. (2012). “Variations in R&D Investments of Family and Nonfamily Firms: Behavioral Agency and Myopic Loss Aversion Perspectives”, Academy of Management Journal, 55(4): 976–997. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0211
COHEN, W. M., ve LEVINTHAL, D. A. (1990). “Absorptive capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and İnnovation”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1): 128-152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
CONANT, J. S., SMART, D. T., ve SOLANO-MENDEZ, R. (1993). “Generic retailing types, distinctive marketing competencies, and competitive advantage”, Journal of Retailing, 69(3): 254–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4359(93)90008-7
DAMANPOUR, F., ve SCHNEIDER, M. (2006). “Phases of the Adoption of Innovation in Organizations: Effects of Environment, Organization and Top Managers”, British Journal of Management, 17(3): 215–236. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467- 8551.2006.00498.x
DEBICKI, B. J., RAMIREZ-SOLIS, E. R., BAÑOS-MONROY, V. I., ve GUTIÉRREZ-PATRÓN, L. M. (2020). “The impact of strategic focus on relational capital: A comparative study of family and non-family firms”, Journal of Business Research, 119: 585-598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.07.016
DEEPHOUSE, D. L., ve JASKIEWICZ, P. (2013). “Do Family Firms Have Better Reputations Than Non-Family Firms? An Integration of Socioemotional Wealth and Social Identity Theories”, Journal of Management Studies, 50(3): 337–360. https://doi:10.1111/joms.12015
DE FALCO, S. E., ve VOLLERO, A. (2015). “Sustainability, longevity and transgenerational value in family firms. The case of Amarelli”, Sinergie Italian Journal of Management, 33(97): 291-309.
DHARMADASA, P. (2009). Organisational learning, innovation and performance in family-controlled manufacturing small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in Australia, Doctoral Dissertation, Bond University.
DYER, W. G., ve WHETTEN, D. A. (2006). “Family Firms and Social Responsibility: Preliminary Evidence from the S&P 500”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(6): 785–802. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00151.x
FAHY, J. (2000). “The resource‐based view of the firm: some stumbling‐blocks on the road to understanding sustainable competitive advantage”, Journal of European Industrial Training, 24(2/3/4): 94–104. https://doi.org/10.1108/030905 90010321061
FATOKI, O. (2013). “The Determinants of Longevity of Micro Enterprises in South Africa”, Journal of Economics, 4(2): 133-143. https://doi.org/10.1080/09765239.2013.11884973
FERREIRA, J. J., FERNANDES, C. I., SCHIAVONE, F., ve MAHTO, R. V. (2021). “Sustainability in family business – A bibliometric study and a research agenda”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 173: 2-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121077
FIOL, C. M. (2001). “Revisiting an identity-based view of sustainable competitive advantage”, Journal of Management, 27(6):691–699. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630102700606
FITZ-KOCH, S., ve NORDQVIST, M. (2017). “The Reciprocal Relationship of Innovation Capabilities and Socioemotional Wealth in a Family Firm”, Journal of Small Business Management, 55(4): 547–570.
FOON, L. S., ve NAIR, P. B. (2010). “Revisiting the Concept of Sustainable Competitive Advantage: Perceptions of Managers in Malaysian MNCs”, International Journal of Business & Accountancy, 1(1): 63-78.
GÓMEZ-MEJÍA, L. R., HAYNES, K. T., NÚÑEZ-NİCKEL, M., JACOBSON, K. J. L., ve MOYANO-FUENTES, J. (2007). “Socioemotional Wealth and Business Risks in Family-controlled Firms: Evidence from Spanish Olive Oil Mills”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1): 106–137. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.52.1.106
GÓMEZ-MEJİA, L. R., CRUZ, C., BERRONE, P., ve DE CASTRO, J. (2011). “The bind that ties: Socioemotional wealth preservation in family firms”, The Academy of Management Annals, 5(1): 653–707. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2011.593320
GUAN, J., ve MA, N. (2003). “Innovative capability and export performance of Chinese firms”, Technovation, 23(9): 737–747. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0166-4972(02)00013-5
HARMON, P. (2007). Business Process Change: A Guide for BusinessManagers and BPM and Six Sigma Professionals. Second Edition: Morgan Kaufmann.
HERNÁNDEZ-PERLİNES, F., ARİZA-MONTES, A., ve ARAYA-CASTİLLO, L. (2020). “Socioemotional wealth, entrepreneurial orientation and international performance of family firms”, Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 33(1): 3125-3145. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677x.2019.1685398
HII, J. ve NEELY, A. (2000). “Innovative Capacity of Firms: On why some firms are more innovative than others [Conference present abstract]. 7th International Annual EurOMA Conference, Ghent, Belgium, https://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/ bitstream/handle/1826/3788/Innovative_capacity_of_firms-2000.pdf?sequence=3&isAllowed=y
IRAWAN, D., PRABOWO, H., KUNCORO, E. A., ve THOHA, N. (2021). “Operational Resilience And Human Capital Toward Corporate Sustainable Longevity In Indonesian”, The Journal Of Asian Finance, Economics And Business, 8(3): 1035- 1044. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no3.1035
KALLMUENZER, A., HORA, W., ve PETERS, M. (2018). “Strategic decision-making in family firms: an explorative study”, European Journal of International Management, 12(5-6): 655-675. https://doi.org/10.1504/EJIM.2018.10014765
KALM, M., ve GOMEZ-MEJİA, L. R. (2016). “Socioemotional wealth preservation in family firms”, Revista de Administração, 51(4): 409–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rausp.2016.08.002
KAY, J. (1993). “The structure of strategy”, Business strategy review, 4(2): 17-37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8616.1993.tb00049.x
KLEIN, S. B. (2000). “Family businesses in Germany: Significance and structure”, Family Business Review, 13(3): 157-182.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2000.00157.x
KOTLAR, J., SIGNORI, A., DE MASSIS, A., ve VISMARA, S. (2017). “Financial Wealth, Socioemotional Wealth, and IPO Underpricing in Family Firms: A Two-stage Gamble Model”, Academy of Management Journal, 61(3): 1073–1099.https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.0256
KUMETO, G. (2020). “Behavioural agency theory and the family business, Theoretical Perspectives on Family Businesses”,Edward Elgar Publishing, 78–98. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781783479665.00012
KUŞAT, N. (2012). “Sürdürülebilir İşletmeler İçin Sürdürülebilirlik ve İçsel Unsurları”, Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 14(2): 227-242.
KWEE, Z., VAN DEN BOSCH, F. A. J., ve VOLBERDA, H. W. (2007). “Coevolutionary competence in the realm of corporate longevity: How long-lived firms strategically renew themselves”, On Fundamental Issues in Competence Theory Development A Focused Issue, 4, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 281–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1744- 2117(08)04008-5
LAN, Q. (2015). Understanding Socioemotional Wealth – Examining SEW and Its Effect on Internationalization, Master Thesis,Jönköping University, Sweden.
LAU, R. S. M. (2002). “Competitive factors and their relative importance in the US electronics and computer industries” International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 22(1): 125–135. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570210412105
LE BRETON-MILLER, I., VE MILLER, D. (2013). “Socioemotional Wealth Across the Family Firm Life Cycle: A Commentary on Family Business Survival and the Role of Boards”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(6), 1391–1397. https:// doi:10.1111/etap.12072
LIN, R., CHEN, R., ve KUAN‐SHUN CHIU, K. (2010). “Customer relationship management and innovation capability: an empirical study”, Industrial Management & Data Systems, 110(1): 111–133. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635571011008434
LIN, W.-T., ve WANG, L. C. (2019). “Family firms, R&D, and internationalization: the stewardship and socio-emotional wealth perspectives”, Asia Pacific Journal of Management. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-018-9636-2
LUBINSKI, C, FERNANDEZ, P, ve MOYA M. F. (2011). Standing the Test of Time. Factors Influencing Family Firms’ Longevity in Germany and Spain During the TwentiethCentury. In 15th Annual Conference EBHA, Athens (24-26), https://ebha.org/ebha2011/files/Papers/StandingTestTime_M%20Fernandez_P%20Fernandez_C%20Lubinsky.pdf, (ErişimTarihi: 20.01.2022).
MARTÍNEZ-ROMERO, M. J., ve ROJO-RAMÍREZ, A. A. (2016). “SEW: Looking for a definition and controversial issues”, European Journal of Family Business, 6(1): 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejfb.2015.09.001
MILLER, D., ve LE BRETON-MILLER, I. (2014). “Deconstructing Socioemotional Wealth”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(4): 713–720. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12111
MONTUORI, L. A. (2000). “Organizational longevity ‐ Integrating systems thinking, learning and conceptual complexity”, Journal of Organizational Change Management, 13(1): 61–73. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534810010310249
NAPOLITANO, M. R., MARINO, V., ve OJALA, J. (2015). “In search of an integrated framework of business longevity”, Business History, 57(7): 955-969. https://doi.org/10.1080/00076791.2014.993613
NÉMETH K.ve NÉMETH S. (2018). “The Relationship Between The Socioemotional Wealth And The Family Business, Sustainability”, Integrated Economy and Society: Diversity, Creativity, and Technology, 515-523.
NNABUIFE, E. K., ve ONWUZULIGBO, L. T. (2015). “Sustainability and corporate longevity of firms in Nigeria: A study of selected firms”, Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 6(18): 213-223.
OLSSON, A., WADELL, C., ODENRICK, P., ve BERGENDAHL, M. N. (2010). “An action learning method for increased innovation capability in organisations”, Action Learning: Research and Practice, 7(2): 167–179. https://doi.org/10.10 80/14767333.2010.488328
PARASHAR, M., ve SINGH, S. K. (2005). “Innovation capability”, IIMB Management Review, 17(4): 115-123.
POERNOMO, D., NIMRAN, U., HAMİD, D., ve ALMUSADIEQ, M. (2013). “The effect of the resources and capabilities to competitive advantage and company’s performance of Batik Micro”, European Journal of Business and Management, 5(23): 152-159.
PORTER, M., ve SIGGELKOW, N. (2008). “Contextuality Within Activity Systems and Sustainability of Competitive Advantage”, Academy of Management Perspectives, 22(2): 34–56. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2008.32739758
RAJAPATHIRANA, R. J., ve HUI, Y. (2018). “Relationship between innovation capability, innovation type, and firm performance”, Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 3(1): 44-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2017.06.002
REED, R., ve DEFILLİPPI, R. J. (1990). “Causal Ambiguity, Barriers to Imitation, and Sustainable Competitive Advantage”, Academy of Management Review, 15(1): 88–102. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1990.4308277
RIVIEZZO, A., SKIPPARI, M., ve GAROFANO, A. (2015). “Who wants to live forever: exploring 30 years of research on business longevity”, Business History, 57(7): 970–987. https://doi.org/10.1080/00076791.2014.993617
ROBINSON, L., ve MİNİKİN, B. (2012). “Understanding the competitive advantage of National Olympic Committees”, Managing Leisure, 17(2-3): 139–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/13606719.2012.674391
RUMELT, R. P. (2003). “What in the world is competitive advantage”, Policy working paper, 105(3): 1-5.
SADALIA, I., IRAWATI, N. ve KOPERTIS, I. S. (2018). The Influence of Intellectual Capital on Competitive Advantage on Universities in Medan City, Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research (AEBMR), 46(1), 1stEconomics and Business International Conference 2017 (EBIC 2017), 599-602.
SAMSON, D., GLOET, M., ve SINGH, P. (2017). “Systematic Innovation Capability: Evidence From Case Studies And A Large Survey”, International Journal Of Innovation Management, 21(07), 1750058. https://doi.org/10.1142/S136391961750058X
SAUNILA, M. (2014). “Innovation capability for SME success: perspectives of financial and operational performance”, Journal of Advances in Management Research, 11(2): 163 – 175.
SCHMIDTS, T. (2013). “Social identity theory and the family business: A contribution to understanding family business dynamics”, Small Enterprise Research, 20(2): 76-86. https://doi.org/10.5172/ser.2013.20.2.76
SONGINI, L., GNAN, L., ve MALMI, T. (2013). “The role and impact of accounting in family business”, Journal of Family Business Strategy, 4(2): 71–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2013.04.002
TANYERİ, M., ve FIRAT, A. (2005). “Rekabet değişkeni olarak dış kaynak kullanımı (Outsourcing)”, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 7(3): 268-279.
WAGNER, M. (2010). “Corporate Social Performance and Innovation with High Social Benefits: A Quantitative Analysis”, Journal of Business Ethics, 94(4): 581–594. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0339-y
YÜKSELEN, C. (2017). Pazarlama Araştırmaları, 7. Baskı, Detay Yayıncılık, Ankara.
ZELLWEGER, T. M., NASON, R. S., NORDQVIST, M., VE BRUSH, C. G. (2011). “Why do family firms strive for nonfinancial goals? An organizational identity perspective”, Entrepreneurship Theory and practice, 37(2): 1-20.
ZELLWEGER, T. M., KELLERMANNS, F. W., CHRISMAN, J. J., ve CHUA, J. H. (2012). “Family Control and Family Firm Valuation by Family CEOs: The Importance of Intentions for Transgenerational Control”, Organization Science, 23(3): 851–868. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0665
ZOLLO, M., ve WINTER, S. G. (2002). “Deliberate Learning and the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities”, Organization Science,13(3): 339–351. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.3.339.2780

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Türkçe

Konular

-

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Ömer Samet Kazdal ^*
0000-0002-3059-5952
Türkiye

Cemal Yükselen Bu kişi benim
0000-0001-5871-7280
Türkiye

Erken Görünüm Tarihi

9 Ağustos 2023

Yayımlanma Tarihi

9 Ağustos 2023

Gönderilme Tarihi

31 Ocak 2023

Kabul Tarihi

13 Temmuz 2023

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2023 Cilt: 18 Sayı: 1

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA24BA55GL

Kaynak Göster

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Kazdal, Ö. S., & Yükselen, C. (2023). Aile İşletmelerinde Sosyo-Duygusal Zenginliğin Rekabet Avantajina ve Sürdürülebilir Yaşama Etkisi: İnovasyon Yeteneğinin Aracilik Rolü. Girişimcilik ve Kalkınma Dergisi, 18(1), 1-36. https://izlik.org/JA24BA55GL

AMA

1.Kazdal ÖS, Yükselen C. Aile İşletmelerinde Sosyo-Duygusal Zenginliğin Rekabet Avantajina ve Sürdürülebilir Yaşama Etkisi: İnovasyon Yeteneğinin Aracilik Rolü. GKD. 2023;18(1):1-36. https://izlik.org/JA24BA55GL

Chicago

Kazdal, Ömer Samet, ve Cemal Yükselen. 2023. “Aile İşletmelerinde Sosyo-Duygusal Zenginliğin Rekabet Avantajina ve Sürdürülebilir Yaşama Etkisi: İnovasyon Yeteneğinin Aracilik Rolü”. Girişimcilik ve Kalkınma Dergisi 18 (1): 1-36. https://izlik.org/JA24BA55GL.

EndNote

Kazdal ÖS, Yükselen C (01 Ağustos 2023) Aile İşletmelerinde Sosyo-Duygusal Zenginliğin Rekabet Avantajina ve Sürdürülebilir Yaşama Etkisi: İnovasyon Yeteneğinin Aracilik Rolü. Girişimcilik ve Kalkınma Dergisi 18 1 1–36.

IEEE

[1]Ö. S. Kazdal ve C. Yükselen, “Aile İşletmelerinde Sosyo-Duygusal Zenginliğin Rekabet Avantajina ve Sürdürülebilir Yaşama Etkisi: İnovasyon Yeteneğinin Aracilik Rolü”, GKD, c. 18, sy 1, ss. 1–36, Ağu. 2023, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA24BA55GL

ISNAD

Kazdal, Ömer Samet - Yükselen, Cemal. “Aile İşletmelerinde Sosyo-Duygusal Zenginliğin Rekabet Avantajina ve Sürdürülebilir Yaşama Etkisi: İnovasyon Yeteneğinin Aracilik Rolü”. Girişimcilik ve Kalkınma Dergisi 18/1 (01 Ağustos 2023): 1-36. https://izlik.org/JA24BA55GL.

JAMA

1.Kazdal ÖS, Yükselen C. Aile İşletmelerinde Sosyo-Duygusal Zenginliğin Rekabet Avantajina ve Sürdürülebilir Yaşama Etkisi: İnovasyon Yeteneğinin Aracilik Rolü. GKD. 2023;18:1–36.

MLA

Kazdal, Ömer Samet, ve Cemal Yükselen. “Aile İşletmelerinde Sosyo-Duygusal Zenginliğin Rekabet Avantajina ve Sürdürülebilir Yaşama Etkisi: İnovasyon Yeteneğinin Aracilik Rolü”. Girişimcilik ve Kalkınma Dergisi, c. 18, sy 1, Ağustos 2023, ss. 1-36, https://izlik.org/JA24BA55GL.

Vancouver

1.Ömer Samet Kazdal, Cemal Yükselen. Aile İşletmelerinde Sosyo-Duygusal Zenginliğin Rekabet Avantajina ve Sürdürülebilir Yaşama Etkisi: İnovasyon Yeteneğinin Aracilik Rolü. GKD [Internet]. 01 Ağustos 2023;18(1):1-36. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA24BA55GL