ELPIF E-LOGISTICS PERFORMANCE MEASURE EXTENSION AND ITS BENEFITS

Ruhet Genç

ELPIF E-LOGISTICS PERFORMANCE MEASURE EXTENSION AND ITS BENEFITS

Öz

ELPIF presents a promising architecture as a generic, multinational and multicultural platform for e logistics. Such generality requires a Performance Measure method to reveal further potentials of the system. Using several metrics available in the logistics literature for evaluating performance of logistics services, uncover a good source of potentially very valuable information. The knowledge gained by interpretation of these findings can be utilized as a further feedback mechanism by the customers of the system. With this motivation this article presents a proposal of an extension to the ELPIF architecture with a Performance Measure Layer and potential benefits of the extension.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

ALAN S. (1997). Logistics - a productivity and performance perspective. Supply Chain Management. 52 - 62.
CLARKE, R.L. (1991). The Measurement of Physical Distribution Productivity: South Carolina, a Case in Point. Transportation Journal. 14 - 21.
COOPER, J.C., Browne, M. & Peters, M. (1990). Logistics Performance in Europe: The Challenge of 1992. International Journal of Logistics Management.
GARLAND C., Trevor D. H. & Henriksson, L.E. (1994). Logistics Performance: Definition and Measurement. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management. 17 - 28.
GASSENHEİMER, J.B., Sterling, J.U. & Robicheaux, R.A. (1989). Long-term Channel Member Relationships. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management. 94 - 116.
GREGORY N., Stock, Noel P. Greis, J. & Kasarda, D. (1999). Logistics Strategy and Structure. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management. 37 - 52.
HARRİNGTON, T.C., Lambert, D.M. & Christopher, M. (1991). A Methodology for Measuring Vendor Performance. Journal of Business Logistics. 83 - 104.
LİANG-JİE Z. & POOJA Y. (2001). ELPIF: An Elogistics Processes Integration Framework Based on Web Services.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Türkçe

Konular

İşletme

Bölüm

Diğer

Yazarlar

Ruhet Genç ^*
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi

16 Haziran 2008

Gönderilme Tarihi

15 Nisan 2008

Kabul Tarihi

15 Haziran 2008

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2008 Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA76MH99BU

Kaynak Göster

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Genç, R. (2008). ELPIF E-LOGISTICS PERFORMANCE MEASURE EXTENSION AND ITS BENEFITS. Girişimcilik ve Kalkınma Dergisi, 3(1), 25-31. https://izlik.org/JA76MH99BU

AMA

1.Genç R. ELPIF E-LOGISTICS PERFORMANCE MEASURE EXTENSION AND ITS BENEFITS. GKD. 2008;3(1):25-31. https://izlik.org/JA76MH99BU

Chicago

Genç, Ruhet. 2008. “ELPIF E-LOGISTICS PERFORMANCE MEASURE EXTENSION AND ITS BENEFITS”. Girişimcilik ve Kalkınma Dergisi 3 (1): 25-31. https://izlik.org/JA76MH99BU.

EndNote

Genç R (01 Haziran 2008) ELPIF E-LOGISTICS PERFORMANCE MEASURE EXTENSION AND ITS BENEFITS. Girişimcilik ve Kalkınma Dergisi 3 1 25–31.

IEEE

[1]R. Genç, “ELPIF E-LOGISTICS PERFORMANCE MEASURE EXTENSION AND ITS BENEFITS”, GKD, c. 3, sy 1, ss. 25–31, Haz. 2008, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA76MH99BU

ISNAD

Genç, Ruhet. “ELPIF E-LOGISTICS PERFORMANCE MEASURE EXTENSION AND ITS BENEFITS”. Girişimcilik ve Kalkınma Dergisi 3/1 (01 Haziran 2008): 25-31. https://izlik.org/JA76MH99BU.

JAMA

1.Genç R. ELPIF E-LOGISTICS PERFORMANCE MEASURE EXTENSION AND ITS BENEFITS. GKD. 2008;3:25–31.

MLA

Genç, Ruhet. “ELPIF E-LOGISTICS PERFORMANCE MEASURE EXTENSION AND ITS BENEFITS”. Girişimcilik ve Kalkınma Dergisi, c. 3, sy 1, Haziran 2008, ss. 25-31, https://izlik.org/JA76MH99BU.

Vancouver

1.Ruhet Genç. ELPIF E-LOGISTICS PERFORMANCE MEASURE EXTENSION AND ITS BENEFITS. GKD [Internet]. 01 Haziran 2008;3(1):25-31. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA76MH99BU