The Mediating Role of Organizational Commitment in the Organizational Justice’s Effect on Job Satisfaction and Turnover Intention: A Research on Academic Staff
Öz
Over the last couple of decades, surge in the
number of universities established in Turkey has become significant which leads
to increased attention to the faculty members responsible for helping young
individuals prepare for their professional career. The retention of high-skilled
academic staff seeking continual and frequent support from the faculty
management has long been a central objective of the institutions involved in
higher education system. Within this respect, facilitating organizational
justice among faculty members appears to be one of the prime issues due to its
impact on their levels of organizational commitment, job satisfaction and
turnover intention. From an organizational behavioral context, the major
purpose of this study is to examine the effects of organizational justice and
organizational commitment on job satisfaction and turnover intention in a
sample consist of 235 academicians of a foundation university. The study
reveals that the levels of organizational commitment and job satisfaction of
the academic staff may increase while the level of turnover intention may
decrease when their perception on organizational justice increases. Data
obtained from this study were analyzed by SPSS 25 package software. The
quantitative research methods including frequency, correlation and regression
analyses were utilized and the reliability of the scales was validated through
Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficients in this study. The study aims to
provide an extensive understanding on how organizational justice directly
impacts retention rates of the academic staff through essential organizational
behaviors such as organizational commitment, job satisfaction and turnover
intention which are critical indications of employee well-being.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- Abu Elanain H. M. (2010). Testing the direct and indirect relationship between organizational justice and workout comes in a non-Western Context of the UA, Journal of Management Development, 29(1), 5-27.
- Adams, J.S. (1965). Inequity in Social Exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, (pp.267-299). New York, NY: Academic Press.
- Al-Hussami M. (2008). A study of nurses’ job satisfaction: The relationship to organizational commitment, perceived organizational support, transactional leadership, transformational leadership, and level of education. European Journal of Scientific Research, 22(2), 286-295.
- Alexander, S., & Ruderman, M. (1987). The role of procedural and distributive justice in organization behavior. Social Justice Research, 1(2), 177-198.
- Ambrose, M., Hess, R.L., & Ganesan, S. (2007). The relationship between justice and attitudes: An examination of justice effects on event and system related attitudes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 103(7), 21-36.
- Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
- Bies, R.J. (2001). Interactional (In)justice: The Sacred and The Profane. In J. Greenberg and R. Cropanzano (Eds.), Advances in organizational justice (pp. 89-118). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
- Bies, R.J., & Moag, J.F. (1986). Interactional Justice: Communication Criteria of Fairness. In R.J. Lewicki, B.H. Sheppard, and Bazerman, M.H. (Eds.), Research on Negotiations in Organizations (pp. 43-55). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
İngilizce
Konular
İşletme
Bölüm
Araştırma Makalesi
Yayımlanma Tarihi
24 Ekim 2019
Gönderilme Tarihi
28 Haziran 2019
Kabul Tarihi
9 Eylül 2019
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2019 Cilt: 5 Sayı: 3