ESNEKLİĞİN SINIRLARINI KALDIRMAK: DİJİTAL GÖÇEBELER ÜZERİNE ELEŞTİREL BİR DEĞERLENDİRME

Öz

Dijital göçebeler, çalışma hayatındaki teknolojik dönüşümlere paralel olarak boş zaman-çalışma dikotomisinden bağımsız, özgün bir grubu tanımlamaktadır. Farklı karakteristik özelliklere sahip bir grup olarak dijital göçebeler, özgürlüklere dayalı bir yaşam tarzı anlatısı sunmaktadır. Ayrıca küresel hareketliliğe, zaman ve mekândan bağımsız bir çalışma yaşamı eşlik etmektedir. Ancak dijital göçebeliğin özgürlük olgusu üzerinden sunulması, göçebeliği çalışma ve istihdam sürecinden koparmakta ve küresel düzeyde yaşanan neoliberal dönüşümün bu aktörlerin motivasyonları üzerindeki etkisi görünür olmaktan çıkmaktadır. Bu nedenle çalışma, dijital göçebeleri çalışma hayatının küresel ölçekte dönüşümü ile birlikte değerlendirmektedir. Ayrıca, göçebelik ile üretim sürecinin dönüşümü arasındaki bağlantı ve bu değişimin dijital göçebeler üzerindeki sonuçları da incelenmektedir. Dijital göçebelik böyle bir perspektiften analiz edildiğinde, özgürlük ile ilişkilendirilen esnekliğe önemli güvencesizlik süreçlerinin eşlik ettiği ve dijital göçebelerin neoliberal rejimin dijital alandaki girişimci aktörlerine dönüştüğü görülmektedir. Böylece, dijital göçebelerin profesyonel yaşamı giderek geleneksel çalışma biçimlerine yakınsamakta ve sosyal koruma olmaksızın riskleri bireyselleştirmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Dijital Göçebe
• Dijitalleşme
• Küresel Hareketlilik
• Esneklik

REMOVING THE BOUNDARIES OF FLEXIBILITY: A CRITICAL EVALUATION ON DIGITAL NOMADISM

Öz

Digital nomads describe a distinct group that is independent from the leisure-work dichotomy in accordance with the technological transformations in working life. As a group with unique characteristics, digital nomads present a lifestyle narrative based on freedoms. Furthermore, global mobility accompanies a working life that is independent of time and space. However, the presentation of digital nomadism through the phenomenon of freedom disconnects nomadism from the process of work and employment, and the impact of neoliberal transformation at the global level on the motivations of these actors disappears. Therefore, the study evaluates digital nomadism in the context of the global transformation of work life. It examines the connection between nomadism and the transformation of the production process, as well as the consequences of this change on digital nomads. When digital nomadism is analyzed from such a perspective, it is seen that significant processes of precariousness are accompanied by flexibilities associated with freedom, and digital nomads are transformed into entrepreneurial actors of the neoliberal regime in the digital space. Thus, the professional life of digital nomads is gradually converging to traditional forms of work and individualizing risks without social protection.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Digital Nomad
• Digitalization
• Global Mobility
• Flexibility

Kaynakça

1. Akalın, A. (2012), “Açık, Döner, Mühürlü Kapılar: 20. Yüzyılda Batı/Doğu Ekseninde Emek Göçünün Seyri”, Küreselleşme Çağında Göç - Kavramlar, Tartışmalar, Ed. S. G. Ihlamur-Öner and N. A. Şirin Öner, İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları, 89-106.
2. Akgiş İlhan, Ö. (2023), “Uluslararası Hareketlilikte Yeni Bir Eğilim: Dijital Göçebeler”, STS: Bir Disiplin Olarak Kimlik İnşası, Ed. A. Güney, Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi Yayınları: 200, 12-29.
3. Akın, M. Ş. (2021), “Dijital Göçebelik: Deneyim ve Özgürlük”, Sosyal Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 21:1, 41-52. doi: 10.30976/susead.799881.
4. Alacovska, A. (2018), “Informal creative labour practices: A relational work perspective”, Human Relations 71:12. 1563-1589, doi: 10.1177/0018726718754991.
5. Alacovska, A.; Gill, R. (2019), “De-westernizing creative labour studies: The informality of creative work from an ex-centric perspective”, International Journal of Cultural Studies, 22:2, 195-212. doi: 10.1177/1367877918821231.
6. Andino-Frydman, A. (2023), “Who is a Digital Nomad? The Evolving Identities of the New Nomadic Workforce”, Ethnographies of Work (Research in the Sociology of Work, Vol. 35), Ed. R. Delbridge, M. Helfen, A. Pekarek and G. Purser, Leeds: Emerald Publishing Limited, 95-137. doi: 10.1108/S0277-283320230000035005.
7. Angiello, G. (2022), “European cities embracing digital nomads”, Tema. Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 15:1, 157-161. doi: 10.6093/1970-9870/9033.
8. Arısoy, B.; Parlak, Z. (2022), “Standart Dışı Çalışma ve Diğer Çalışma Şekilleri”, Sosyal, Beşeri Ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 5:5, 657 - 669. doi: 10.26677/TR1010.2022.983.

9. Aroles, J.; Bonneau, C.; Shabneez, B. (2023), “Conceptualising ‘Meta-Work’ in the Context of Continuous, Global Mobility: The Case of Digital Nomadism”, Work, Employment and Society, 37:5, 1261-1278.doi: 10.1177/09500170211069797.
10. Başaran, A. (2021), Proje Bazlı Örgütlerde İnsan Kaynakları Yönetimi. İstanbul: Nobel.
11. Bonneau, C.; Aroles, J.; Estagnasié, C. (2023), “Romanticisation and monetisation of the digital nomad lifestyle: The role played by online narratives in shaping professional identity work”, Organization, 30:1, 65-88. doi: 10.1177/13505084221131638.
12. Bozdoğan, M.; Özuz Dağdelen, E. (2022), “Seyahat, Çalışma ve Boş Zamanın Kesişiminde Yeni Bir Grup: Dijital Göçebeler”, İnsan Hareketliliği Uluslararası Dergisi, 2:2, 270-297.
13. Castles, S.; Miller, M. J. (1998), Age of Migration - International Population Movements in the Modern World, 2nd ed. London: Macmillan.
14. Chevtaeva, E.; Denizci-Guillet, B. (2021), “Digital nomads’ lifestyles and coworkation”, Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 21:100633. doi: 10.1016/j.jdmm.2021.100633.
15. Cook, D. (2022), “Breaking the Contract: Digital Nomads and the State”, Critique of Anthropology, 42:3, 304-323. doi: 10.1177/0308275X221120172.
16. Cook, D. (2020), “The Freedom Trap: Digital Nomads and the Use of Disciplining Practices to Manage Work/Leisure Boundaries”, Information Technology & Tourism, 22, 355–390. doi: 10.1007/s40558-020-00172-4.
17. Cook, D. (2023), “What is a digital nomad? Definition and taxonomy in the era of mainstream remote work”, World Leisure Journal, 65, 256-275. doi: 10.1080/16078055.2023.2190608.
18. Çiğdem, S. (2019), “Endüstri 4.0 ve Dijital Emek Platformlarının İnsana Yakışır İş Bağlamında Değerlendirilmesi”, Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi, 77, 157-199. doi: 10.26650/jspc.2019.77.0018.
19. Çömlekçi, M. F. (2021), “Dijital Göçebelik: Gezginin Rüyası Mı, Yeni Bir Yaşam ve Çalışma Biçimi Mi?”, 21. Yüzyıl'da Endüstri İlişkileri - Çalışma Yaşamının Dönüşümü, Aktörler ve Geleceği, Ed. H. Sevgi, İstanbul: NotaBene Yayınları, 77-98.
20. Dardot, P.; Laval, C. (2014), The new way of the world: On neoliberal society, London: Verso.
21. de Almeida, M. A.; de Souza, J. M.; Correia, A.; Schneider, D. (2022), “The Role of Wannabes in the Digital Nomad Ecosystem in Times of Pandemic”, IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC). Prague, Czech Republic, 3354-3359. doi: 10.1109/SMC53654.2022.9945599.
22. De Stefano, V. (2016), “The Rise of the "Just-in-Time Workforce" : On-Demand Work, Crowdwork and Labour Protection in the ‘Gig-Economy’”, Conditions of Work and Employment Series No. 71, Geneva: ILO.
23. Demirel İli, N. (2023), “Dijital Göçebelerin Türkiye Algısı”, Journal of Recreation and Tourism Research, 10:1, 30-56. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7783445.
24. Dreher, N.; Triandafyllidou, A. (2023), Digital Nomads: Toward a Future Research Agenda. Working Paper No. 2023/04. Toronto: TMCIS / CERC.
25. Düzgün, E.; Akın, A. (2022), “Yeni Bir Turist Tipolojisi Önerisi: Dijital Göçebelik”, Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi (AEÜSBED), 8:2, 596-612. doi: doi.org/10.31592/aeusbed.1095735.
26. Ehn, K.; Jorge, A.; Marques-Pita, M. (2022), “Digital Nomads and the Covid-19 Pandemic: Narratives About Relocation in a Time of Lockdowns and Reduced Mobility”, Social Media + Society, 8:1, 1-11. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221084958.
27. Ercan, F. (2000), “Küreselleşme Sürecindeki Yerellikler: Homojenleşme ve Farklılaşma/Güç ve Eşitsizlik İlişkileri Üzerine”, Mübeccel Kıray İçin Yazılar, Ed. F. Atacan, F. Ercan and M. Türkay. Ankara: Bağlam Yayınları, 195-234.
28. Eurofound. (2021), The digital age: Implications of automation, digitisation and platforms for work and employment, Challenges and prospects in the EU series. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
29. Gandini, A. (2016), “Digital work: Self-branding and social capital in the freelance knowledge economy”, Marketing Theory, 16:1, 123-141. doi: 10.1177/1470593115607942.
30. Gerosa, A.; Ceiner, I. M. (2023), “New working spaces and COVID-19: Analyzing the debate through Twitter”, The COVID-19 Pandemic and the Future of Working Spaces, Ed. I. Mariotti, M. Di Marino and P. Bednář, New York: Routledge, 11-24.
31. Güler-Müftüoğlu, B. (2014), “Üretim Sürecinin Vazgeçilmezi Esneklik: Var ve Yok Ettikleri Üzerine Bir Çerçeve”, Türkiye'de Esnek Çalışma, Ed. Ö. Müftüoğlu and A. Koşar, İstanbul: Evrensel Basım Yayın, 17-42.
32. Hannonen, O. (2020), “In search of a digital nomad: defining the phenomenon”, Information Technology & Tourism, 22, 335–353. doi: 10.1007/s40558-020-00177-z.
33. Harvey, D. (2005), A Brief History of Neoliberalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34. Harvey, D. (1990), The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins Cultural Change, Oxford: Blackwell.
35. Hensellek, S.; Puchala, N. (2021), “The Emergence of the Digital Nomad: A Review and Analysis of the Opportunities and Risks of Digital Nomadism”, The Flexible Workplace - Coworking and Other Modern Workplace Transformations, Ed. M. Orel, O. Dvouletý and V. Ratten. Cham: Springer, 195-214.
36. Hermann, I.; Paris, C. M. (2020), “Digital Nomadism: The Nexus of Remote Working and Travel Mobility”, Information Technology & Tourism, 22, 329-337. doi: 10.1007/s40558-020-00188-w.
37. Holleran, M. (2022), “Pandemics and geoarbitrage: digital nomadism before and after COVID-19”, City, 26:(5-6), 831-847. doi: 10.1080/13604813.2022.2124713.
38. Holleran, M.; Notting, M. (2023), “Mobility guilt: digital nomads and COVID-19”, Tourism Geographies, 25:5, 1341-1358. doi: 10.1080/14616688.2023.2217538.
39. Hong, R. (2023), “Road Warriors to Digital Nomads: Portable Computers, Habitats, and Remote Work”, Cultural Studies, 37:3, 508-535. doi: 10.1080/09502386.2021.1992462.
40. Hooper, K.; Benton, M. (2022), The Future of Remote Work: Digital Nomads and the Implications for Immigration Systems, Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute.
41. ILO. (2016), Non-Standard Employment Around the World: Understanding Challenges, Shaping Prospects, Geneva: ILO.
42. ILO. (2021), World Employment and Social Outlook: Trends 2021, Geneva: ILO.
43. İlyas, Ö. (2022), Freelance Emek - Ofissiz Çalışmanın Sınıfsallığı, İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
44. İnneci, A. (2023), “Dijital Çağın Bir Vergi Sorunu: Dijital Göçebelerin Vergilendirilmesi”, Sayıştay Dergisi, 129, 235-257. doi: 10.52836/sayistay.1274266.
45. Jessop, B. (1994), “The Transition to Post-Fordism and the Shumpeterian Workfare State”, Towards a Post-Fordist Welfare State?, Ed. R. Burrows and B. Loader, New York: Routledge, 13-37.
46. Johnson, P. (2022), “Are digital nomads harming the world?”, https://blog.xolo.io/are-digital-nomads-harming-the-world (Accesed: June 2, 2024).
47. Kaya Deniz, A. (2019), “Dijital Çağın Hedonist Çalışanları: Dijital Göçebeler”, IBAD Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 5, 101-113. doi: 10.21733/ibad.603406.
48. Kocaman, S. (2021), “Nomadlist’de Dijital Göçebeler Tarafından 2020’de En Fazla Tercih Edilen Destinasyonların Destinasyon Seçim Kriterlerine Göre Kümelendirilmesi”, Türk Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5:2, 799-815. doi: 10.26677/TR1010.2021.739.
49. Kovács, B.; Morris, J.; Polese, A.; Imami, D. (2017), “Looking at the ‘sharing’ economies concept through the prism of informality”, Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 10:2, 365–378. doi: 10.1093/cjres/rsw046.
50. Lanamäki, A.; Tuvikene, T. (2022), “Framing digital future: Selective formalization and legitimation of ridehailing platforms in Estonia”, Geoforum, 136, 283-292. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.01.016.
51. Leducq, D.; Demazière, C.; Abdo, É. B.; Ananian, P. (2023), “Digital nomads and coworking spaces: reshaped perspectives? The Paris mega city-region after COVID-19”, The COVID-19 Pandemic and the Future of Working Spaces, Ed. I. Mariotti, M. Di Marino and Pavel Bednář, New York: Routledge, 109-121.
52. Linao, P. A. (2022), The Rise of the Asian Female Digital Nomad. The Arctic University of Norway, Department of Tourism and Northern Studies, Master’s thesis in Tourism Studies.
53. Linao, P. A.; Heimtun, B.; Morgan, N. (2024), “Digital nomadism, gender and racial power relations”, Annals of Tourism Research, 106:103770. doi: 10.1016/j.annals.2024.103770.
54. Loonam, J.; O'Regan N. (2022), “Global value chains and digital platforms: Implications for strategy”, Strategic Change, 31, 161-177. doi: 10.1002/jsc.2485.
55. Makimoto, T.; Manners, D. (1997), Digital Nomad, New York: Wiley.
56. Mancinelli, F.; Germann Molz, J. (2024), “Moving with and against the state: digital nomads and frictional mobility regimes”, Mobilities, 19: 2, 189-207. doi: 10.1080/17450101.2023.2209825.
57. Mancinelli, F. (2020), “Digital Nomads: Freedom, Responsibility and the Neoliberal Order”, Information Technology & Tourism, 22, 417-437. doi: 10.1007/s40558-020-00174-2.
58. MBO Partners. (2022), Digital Nomads - Working from the Road: Reality for Digital Nomads, MBO Partners.
59. Merkel, J. (2019), “‘Freelance isn’t free.’ Co-working as a critical urban practice to cope with informality in creative labour markets”, Urban Studies, 56:3, 526-547. doi: 10.1177/0042098018782374.
60. Miguel, C.; Lutz, C.; Majetić, F.; Perez-Vega, R.; Sánchez-Razo, M. (2023), “It’s not All Shiny and Glamorous: Loneliness and Fear of Missing Out among Digital Nomads”, Proceedings of the 56th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 4628-4637.
61. Murillo, D.; Buckland, H.; Val, E. (2017), “When the sharing economy becomes neoliberalism on steroids: Unravelling the controversies”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 125, 66-76. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.024.
62. Müller, A. (2016), “The digital nomad: Buzzword or research category?”, Transnational Social Review, 6:3, 344-348. doi: 10.1080/21931674.2016.1229930.
63. Nambisan, S.; Zahra, S. A.; Luo, Y. (2019), “Global platforms and ecosystems: Implications for international business theories”, Journal of International Business Studies, 50, 1464-1486. doi: 10.1057/s41267-019-00262-4.
64. Nash, C.; Jarrahi, M. H.; Sutherland, W.; Phillips, G. (2018), “Digital Nomads Beyond the Buzzword: Defining Digital Nomadic Work and Use of Digital Technologies”, Transforming Digital Worlds, iConference 2018, Cham: Springer, 207-217. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-78105-1_25.
65. Nichols, A. (2022), “Digital nomads: a savvy enterprise’s newest HR frontier”, Strategic HR Review, 21:6, 185-190. doi: 10.1108/SHR-08-2022-0049.
66. Nomad List. (2024), https://nomadlist.com/ (Accessed: June 10, 2024).
67. OECD. (2024), OECD Digital Economy Outlook 2024 (Volume 1): Embracing the Technology Frontier, Paris: OECD Publishing.
68. OECD. (2019), OECD Employment Outlook 2019: The Future of Work, Paris: OECD Publishing.
69. Omidi, A.; Dal Zotto, C.; Gandini, A. (2023), “Labor process theory and critical HRM: A systematic review and agenda for future research”, European Management Journal, 41:6, 899-913. doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2023.05.003.
70. Orel, M. (2023), “Wanderlust workforce: A journey into understanding”, World Leisure Journal, 65:2, 143-149. doi: 10.1080/16078055.2023.2210017.
71. Poulaki, I.; Mavragani, E.; Kaziani, A.; Chatzimichali, E. (2023), “Digital Nomads: Advances in Hospitality and Destination Attractiveness”, Tour. Hosp., 4, 483-498. doi: 10.3390/tourhosp4030030.
72. Prayana, I. K. R.; Darma, G. S. (2023), “Dynamic Governance as an Effort to Develop Quality Tourism: Heaven for Digital Nomads”, Tec Empresarial, 18:1, 312-331.
73. Rasnača, Z. (2023), “Enforcing the rights of remote workers: the case of digital nomads”, The future of remote Work, Ed. N. Countouris, V. De Stefano, A. Piasna and S. Rainone, Brussels: ETUI, 201-220.
74. Reichenberger, I. (2018), “Digital Nomads – A Quest for Holistic Freedom in Work and Leisure”, Annals of Leisure Research, 21:3, 364-380. doi: 10.1080/11745398.2017.1358098.
75. Ritter, T.; Petersen, C. L. (2020), “Digitization capability and the digitalization of business models in business-to-business firms: Past, present, and future”, Industrial Marketing Management, 86, 180-190. doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.11.019.
76. Salihoğlu, E. (2021), Göçebe. Spain: Master's Thesis, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya.
77. Sánchez-Vergara, J. I.; Orel, M.; Capdevila, I. (2023), “‘Home office is the here and now.’ Digital nomad visa systems and remote work-focused leisure policies”, World Leisure Journal, 65:2, 236-255. doi: 10.1080/16078055.2023.2165142.
78. Sanul, G. (2022), “Digital nomadism and global mobility: Challenges and suggestions for international migration policies”, Int Migr., 60:6, 272-275. doi: 10.1111/imig.13077.
79. Sennett, R. (2007), The culture of the new capitalism, Yale University Press: London.
80. Sezen, H. K.; Eren Şenaras, A. (2022), “Dijitizasyon, Dijitalizasyon, Dijital Dönüşüm Kavramlarina İlişkin Bir Değerlendirme”, Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 51, 49-59. doi: 10.30794/pausbed.871440.
81. Shanahan, G.; Smith, M. (2021), “Fair’s fair: psychological contracts and power in platform work”, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32:19, 4078-4109. doi: 10.1080/09585192.2020.1867615.
82. Stumpf, T. S.; Califf, C. B.; Lancaster, J. (2022), “Digital Nomad Entrepreneurship and Lifestyle Design: A Process Theory”, Proceedings of the 55th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 5201-5210.
83. Sztuk, A. (2023), “Cities’ attractiveness factors from the perspective of digital nomads”, Sci. Pap. Silesian Univ. Technol. Organ. Manag. Ser., 174, 323–336.
84. Thompson, B. Y. (2018), “Digital Nomads: Employment in the Online Gig Economy”, Glocalism: Journal of Culture, Politics and Innovation, 1, 1-26. doi: 10.12893/gjcpi.2018.1.11.
85. Thompson, B. Y. (2019), “The Digital Nomad Lifestyle: (Remote) Work/Leisure Balance, Privilege, and Constructed Community”, International Journal of the Sociology of Leisure, 2, 27-42. doi: 10.1007/s41978-018-00030-y.
86. Thompson, P.; Smith, C. (2009), “Labour Power and Labour Process: Contesting the Marginality of the Sociology of Work”, Sociology, 45:3, 913-930. doi: 10.1177/0038038509340728.
87. Thompson, P.; Newsome, K. (2004), “Labour process theory, work and the employment relationship”, Theoretical perspectives on Work and the Employment Relationship, Ed. B. E. Kaufman, Industrial Relations Research Association, 133-162.
88. Toivanen, M. (2023), “Countercultural Lifestyle No More?: Digital Nomadism and the Commodification of Neo-nomadic Mobilities”, Mobility Humanities, 2, 70-89. doi: 10.23090/MH.2023.07.2.2.070.
89. Vallas, S.; Schor, J. B. (2020), “What Do Platforms? Understanding the Gig Economy”, Annual Review of Sociology, 46, 273-294. doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-121919-054857.
90. Verma, M. (2023), “The Future of Work For Digital Nomads: The Benefits And Risks of Automation”, IJSART, 9:4, 339-343.
91. von Zumbusch, J. S. H.; Lalicic, L. (2020), “The role of co-living spaces in digital nomads’ well-being”, Inf Technol Tourism, 22, 439–453. doi: 10.1007/s40558-020-00182-2.
92. Wang, B.; Schlagwein, D.; Cecez-Kecmanovic, D.; Cahalane, M.C. (2020), “Beyond the Factory Paradigm: Digital Nomadism and the Digital Future(s) of Knowledge Work Post-COVID-19”, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 21:6, 1379-1401. doi: 10.17705/1jais.00641.
93. Webster, J. (2016), “Microworkers of the Gig Economy: Separate and Precarious”, New Labor Forum, 25:3, 56-64. doi: 10.1177/1095796016661511.
94. WYSE. (2018), Digital Nomads – The Next Darling of Tourism Destinations Worldwide?. https://www.wysetc.org/2018/08/digital-nomads-the-next-darling-of-tourism-destinations-worldwide/ (Accessed: May 20, 2024).