Sosyal Girişimsel Liderlik Ölçeği (SGLO) Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması

Yıl 2023, , 588 - 615, 31.10.2023

Hamza Öz , Nuri Baloğlu

https://doi.org/10.46778/goputeb.1268093

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, yükseköğretim kurumlarında görevli akademik yöneticilerin sosyal girişimsel liderlik becerilerini öğrenci görüşleriyle ortaya koyabilecek bir ölçme aracı geliştirmektir. Çalışma Orta Anadolu’da bulunan bir üniversitenin iki farklı katılımcı grubu üzerinde yürütülmüştür. Birinci grupta Meslek Yüksekokullarında öğrenim görmekte olan ve kolayda örnekleme yöntemiyle örnekleme dâhil edilen 254 ön lisans öğrencisi yer almıştır. İkinci grupta ise aynı üniversitenin farklı fakültelerinde öğrenim görmekte olan ve aynı yöntemle çalışmaya katılan 305 lisans öğrencisi yer almıştır. Araştırmanın ilk verileri araştırmacılar tarafından literatür temelli hazırlanan madde havuzundaki sorulardan seçilen 50 maddelik bir taslak ölçek yardımıyla toplanmıştır. Taslak ölçek hakkında uzman görüşleri alınmış ve pilot uygulama yapılmıştır. Bu işlemler sonucunda ölçek gerekli düzeltmelerden geçirilmiştir. Ana kütleden toplanan veriler açımlayıcı ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizi teknikleri yardımı ile çözümlenmiştir. Güvenirlik analizi için Cronbach Alfa ve McDonald’s Omega yöntemi tercih edilmiştir. Sonuçlar yöneticilerdeki sosyal girişimsel liderlik becerisini ölçebilecek dört faktörlü ve 24 maddeli bir ölçek yapısının uygunluğuna ilişkin bulgular ortaya koymuştur. Bulgular, ilgili literatür temelinde tartışılmış ve araştırma sonuçlarına göre ölçeğin kullanımına ilişkin bazı öneriler de sunulmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Liderlik, Girişimcilik, Sosyal Girişimcilik, Sosyal Girişimsel Liderlik

Validity and Reliability Study of the Social Entrepreneurial Leadership Scale (SGLO)

Öz

The purpose of this study is to develop a measurement tool that can assess the social entrepreneurial leadership skills of academic administrators in higher education institutions, based on the perspectives of students. The study was conducted at a university in Central Anatolia, involving two different participant groups. The first group consisted of 254 associate degree students studying at Vocational Schools, who were selected through convenience sampling. The second group included 305 undergraduate students from various faculties of the same university, who were recruited using the same method. The initial data for the research were collected using a 50-item draft scale prepared by the researchers from a pool of questions based on the literature. Expert opinions were sought, and a pilot study was conducted with the draft scale. As a result of these procedures, the scale was revised accordingly. The data collected from the main sample were analyzed using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis techniques. For reliability analysis, Cronbach's Alpha and McDonald’s Omega methods were preferred. The findings revealed a four-factor and 24-item scale structure that can measure the social entrepreneurial leadership skills of administrators. The results were discussed in light of relevant literature, and some recommendations for the use of the scale were provided based on the research findings.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Leadership, Entrepreneurship, Social Entrepreneurship, Social Entrepreneurial Leadership

Kaynakça

• Abu-Saifan, S. (2012). Social entrepreneurship: definition and boundaries. Technology Innovation Management Review, 2(2), 22-27.
• Adeagbo, A. (2008). Social enterprise and social entrepreneurship in practice. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Bournemouth University.
• Aldawood, A. (2020). Women leaders in social entrepreneurship: leadership perception, and barriers. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Seattle University.
• Balcı, A. (2018). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntem, teknik ve ilkeler [Research methods, techniques and principles in social sciences (13st ed)]. Pegem A.
• Baloglu, N. (2017). The effects of family leadership orientation on social entrepreneurship, generativity and academic success of college students. Educational Research and Reviews, 12(1), 36-44.
• Besler, S. (2010). Sosyal girişimcilik [Social entrepreneurship], In S. Besler (Ed.), Sosyal girişimcilik [Social entrepreneurship]. Beta Publishing..
• Bodolica, V., Spraggon, M. & Badi, H. (2021). Extracurricular activities and social entrepreneurial leadership of graduating youth in universities from the middle east. The International Journal of Management Education, 19(2).
• Boulding, K. E. (1956). The image: Knowledge in life and society ( 47), University of Michigan Press.
• Brinckerhoff, P. C. (2000). Social entrepreneurship: The art of mission-based venture development. John Wiley ve Sons.
• Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied researchers. Guilford Press.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2002). Faktör analizi: Temel kavramlar ve ölçek geliştirmede kullanımı [Factor analysis: Basic concepts and its use in scale development]. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 32(32), 470-483.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2008). Sosyal bilimlerde veri analizi el kitabı [Data analysis handbook in social sciences(9st ed)]. Pegem A.
• Byrne, B. M. (1994). Structural equation modeling with EQS and EQS/Windows: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Sage Publications.
• Comrey, A. & Lee, H. (1992). A first course in factor analysis. Lawrence Eribaum Associates.
• Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G. & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2018). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik: SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları [Multivariate statistics for social sciences: SPSS and LISREL applications (2st ed)]. Pegem A.
• Dees, J. G. (2009). Social ventures as learning laboratories in innovations: technology, governance, and globalization. MIT Press Journal.
• Denizalp, H. (2009). Toplumsal dönüşüm için sosyal girişimcilik [Social entrepreneurship for social transformation]. Fersa Publishing.
• Doğan, N., Soysal, S. & Karaman H. (2017). Aynı örnekleme açımlayıcı ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizi uygulanabilir mi? [Can exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis be applied to the same sampling?], In Demirel, Ö. ve Dinçer, S., (Ed.), Küreselleşen dünyada eğitim[Education in a globalizing world]. Pegem A.
• Drayton, W. (2006). Everyone a changemaker: Social entrepreneurship's ultimate goal. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 1(1), 80-96.
• Duncan, E. L. (2007). A grounded theory study on social entrepreneurship. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Phoenix.
• Gandy, J. D. (2012). The relationship between social entrepreneurship and organizational effectiveness. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Dallas Baptist University.
• George, D. & Mallery, M. (2010). SPSS for windows step by step: A simple study guide and reference. Boston: Pearson Education.
• Grilo, R. & Moreira, A. C. (2022). The social as the heart of social innovation and social entrepreneurship: An emerging area ar an old crossroads? International Journal of Innovation Studies, 6(2), 53-66.
• Gül, M. (2019). A study on the effect of personality and entrepreneurial personality traits on social entrepreneurship orientation in TR 63 region: a sample of university students. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Gaziantep University.
• Güler, B. K. (2010). Sosyal girişimcilik[Social entrepreneurship]. Efil Publishing.
• Hein, R. (2022). Beyond a balanced view of social entrepreneurship within a social–commercial dichotomy: Towards a four-dimensional typology. Sustainability, 14(8), 4454.
• Helm, S. (2007). Social entrepreneurship: Defining the nonprofit behavior and creating an instrument for measurement. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Missouri - Kansas City.
• Hooper, D., Coughlan, J. & Mullen, M. (2008). Structural equation modelling, fit indices, covariance structure modelling; reporting structural equation modelling; model fit. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6, 53-60.
• Johnson, S. (2003). Literature review of social entrepreneurship. New Academy Review, 2,1-17.
• Jöreskog, K. G. & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Scientific Software International.
• Karasar, N. (2012). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi [Scientific research method]. Nobel Publishing.
• Kargın, M., Aktaş, H. & Gökbunar, R. (2018). Üniversitelerde sosyal girişimcilik: fırsatlar ve öneriler [Social entrepreneurship in universities: opportunities and recommendations]. Socıal Entrepreneurshıp in Unıversıtıes: Opportunıtıes and Suggestıons, 25(1), 155-170.
• Kerr, C. (2020). Üniversitenin kullanımları [Uses of university]. Küre Publishing.
• Kılıç Kırılmaz, S. (2013). Dönüştürücü liderliğin sosyal girişimcilik üzerine etkilerinin belirlenmesine yönelik bir araştırma [A study to determine the effects of transformational leadership on social entrepreneurship]. The Sakarya Journal Of Economics, 2(3), 34-64.
• Kırılmaz, S. (2012). Investigation of success factors of social entrepreneurship in the context of entrepreneurial personality and transformative leadership.[Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University.
• Klarin, A. & Suseno, Y. (2023). An integrative literature review of social entrepreneurship research: mapping the literature and future research directions. Business & Society, 62(3), 565–611.
• Konaklı, T. & Göğüş, N. (2013). Aday öğretmenlerin sosyal girişimcilik özellikleri ölçeği: geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması [Social entrepreneurship characteristics scale of novice teachers: validity and reliability study]. Gazi University Journal of Gazi Educational Faculty (GUJGEF), 33(2), 373-391.
• Kümbül Güler, B. (2008). Sosyal girişimciliği etkileyen faktörlerin analizi [Analysis of factors affecting social entrepreneurship]. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Dokuz Eylül University.
• Leadbeater, C. (1997). The rise of the social entrepreneur. Demos.
• Martin, R. L. & Osberg, S. (2007). Social entrepreneurship: the case for definition. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 5(2), 28-39.
• Nga, J. K. H. & Shamuganathan, G. (2010). The influence of personality traits and demographic factors on social entrepreneurship start up intentions. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(2), 259-282.
• Ojeda, D. P. (2021). Design by Social Entrepreneurs: The Analysis of Four Chilean Social Entrepreneurs. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Lancaster University (United Kingdom),
• Özdamar, K. (2002). Paket programlarla istatistiksel veri analizi-1 [Statistical data analysis with package programs-1(4st ed]. Kaan Publishing.
• Özdevecioğlu, M. & Cingöz, A. (2015). Sosyal girişimcilik ve sosyal girişimciler: teorik çerçeve [Social entrepreneurship and social entrepreneurs: theoretical framework]. Erciyes University Journal of Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 32, 81-95.
• Prabhu, G. (1999). Social entrepreneurial leadership. Career Development International, 4, 140-145.
• Safa, C. S. & Oumelbanine, E. (2022). Social entrepreneurship or corporate social responsibility and ethics. African Scientific Journal, 3(11), 368-368.
• Scherer, R. F., Luther, D. C., Wiebe, F. A. & Adams, J. S. (1988). Dimensionality of coping: Factor stability using the ways of coping questionnaire. Psychological reports, 62(3), 763-770.
• Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H. & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23-74.
• Shane, S. A. (2003). A general theory of entrepreneurship: The individual-opportunity nexus. Edward Elgar Publishing.
• Stevens, J. P. (2002). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (4st ed). Hillsdale, NS: Erlbaum.
• Sümer, N. (2000). Yapısal eşitlik modelleri: Temel kavramlar ve örnek uygulamalar [Structural equation models: Basic concepts and examples]. Turkish Psychology Articles, 3, 49-74.
• Tabachnick, B. G. & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6st ed). Allyn and Bacon.
• Taş, H. Y. & Şemşek, İ. (2017). Türkiye ve dünyadan sosyal girişimcilik örnekleri ve istihdama katkıları [Examples of social entrepreneurship from Türkiye and the world and their contribution to employment]. Hak İş International Journal of Labor and Society, 6(16), 480-497.
• Tavşancıl, E. (2005). Tutumların ölçülmesi ve SPSS ile veri analizi[Measuring attitudes and data analysis with SPSS]. Nobel Publishing.
• Tishler, B. J. (2018). Exploring knowledge and awareness of social entrepreneurship. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Nova Southeastern University.
• Titrek, A. (2019). School administrators' views on leadership styles and social entrepreneurship skills (Kocaeli example ). (Unpublished master’s thesis). Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University.
• Turner, R. C. & Carlson, L. (2003). Indexes of item-objective congruence for multidimensional items. International Journal of Testing, 3(2), 163-171.
• Ural, A. & Kılıç, İ., (2011). Bilimsel araştırma süreci ve spss ile veri analizi[Scientific research process and data analysis with spss]. Detay Publishing.
• Veneziano, L. & Hooper, J. (1997). A method for quantifying content validity of health-related questionnaires. American Journal of Health Behavior, 21(1), 67-70.
• Weerawardena, J. & Mort, G. S. (2006). Investigating social entrepreneurship: A multidimensional model. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 21-35.
• Zorlu, K. & Tetik, F. (2018). Girişimci liderlik davranışının çalışan yaratıcılığına etkisi [The effect of entrepreneurial leadership behavior on employee creativity]. Selcuk University Social Sciences Institute Journal, 39, 297-307.