Investigating Variables Predicting Environmental Awareness in the Context of Education for Sustainable Development: An Analysis Based on TIMSS 2019 Data

Neslihan Üstün; Mustafa Ürey

doi:10.46778/goputeb.1320538

TR EN

Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma için Eğitim Bağlamında Çevre Farkındalığını Yordayan Değişkenlerin İncelenmesi: TIMSS 2019 Verisine Dayalı Bir Analiz

Öz

TIMSS uygulamaları, dünyanın dört bir tarafındaki dördüncü ve sekizinci sınıf öğrencilerinin yeterliklerini ve tutumlarını araştırmak için eşsiz ve detaylı bilgiler sunmaktadır. Bununla birlikte, TIMSS 2019 döngüsünde öğrencilerin çevre farkındalığını ölçmek amacıyla ilk defa “Çevre Farkındalık Ölçeği” geliştirilmiştir. Bu ölçek, bilişsel bir ölçek olup öğrencilerin bazı çevre sorunları ile ilgili bilimsel anlayışlarına ilişkin hem ulusal hem de uluslararası düzeyde çok değerli bilgiler vermektedir. Bu bağlamda, bu ölçeğin kullanılarak öğrencilerin çevre farkındalıklarının araştırılması, sürdürülebilir kalkınma için eğitimin (ESD) iyileştirilmesine yönelik katkı sağlayacaktır. Çünkü elde edilen veriler, öğrencilerin çevre farkındalıklarını geliştirmek için hangi faktörlerin dikkate alınması gerektiğinin yanında, eğitim politikacılarına ülkelerin en çok ihtiyaç duyulan çevre eğitim konularını, kavramlarını müfredatlarına entegre etmeleri konusunda güvenilir veri sağlamaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, TIMSS 2019 uygulamasına katılan Türkiye’deki sekizinci sınıf öğrencilerinin çevre farkındalıklarını fen ile ilişkili fen benlik kavramı değişkeni ile demografik değişkenlerden cinsiyet ve sosyoekonomik statü (SES) değişkenlerinin ne derece yordadıklarını araştırmaktadır. Bu amaçla, öğrencilerin çevre farkındalıkları ile fen benlik kavramı, cinsiyet ve SES arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemek için kuramsal bir model oluşturularak Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi (YEM) ile analiz edilmiştir. Analiz sonucunda, fen benlik kavramı, SES ve cinsiyet değişkenlerinin birlikte öğrencilerin çevre farkındalığının %36’sını açıkladığı saptanmıştır. Ayrıca, fen benlik kavramının öğrencilerin çevre farkındalığını en güçlü yordayan değişken olduğu bulunurken, SES düzeyinin de öğrencilerin çevre farkındalığını açıklayan önemli bir değişken olduğu saptanmıştır. Öte yandan, kız ve erkek öğrencilerin çevre farkındalığı arasında önemli bir farklılık olmadığı görülmüştür. UNESCO’nun, veriye dayalı olarak ESD’nin uygulanmasındaki ilerlemenin periyodik olarak izlenmesine ve değerlendirilmesine yönelik vurgusu esas alınarak çalışmanın bulguları tartışılmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Çevre Farkındalığı , Sürdürülebilirlik , Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma için Eğitim , Fen Benlik Kavramı , Sosyoekonomik Statü

Investigating Variables Predicting Environmental Awareness in the Context of Education for Sustainable Development: An Analysis Based on TIMSS 2019 Data

Abstract

Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) provides unique and detailed information to explore the competencies and attitudes of fourth and eighth-grade students worldwide. The "Environmental Awareness Scale" was developed for the first time in the TIMSS 2019 cycle to measure students' environmental awareness. This cognitive scale gives essential information on students' scientific understanding of some environmental problems at the national and international levels. Using this scale to assess students' environmental awareness will improve education for sustainable development (ESD) in this setting since the obtained data provide reliable information that education policymakers use to integrate the most important environmental education topics and concepts into their curricula and identify the factors that should be considered to raise students' environmental awareness. This study aims to investigate to what extent the science self-concept variable from science-related factors, as well as the gender and socioeconomic status (SES) variables from demographic characteristics, predict the environmental awareness of eighth-grade students in Türkiye participating in the TIMSS 2019. For this purpose, a theoretical model was developed and analyzed with Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to investigate the association between students' environmental awareness and science self-concept, gender, and SES. The analysis revealed that science self-concept, SES, and gender variables together explained 36% of students' environmental awareness. Furthermore, while science self-concept appears to be the strongest predictor of students' environmental awareness, SES level was also a significant variable explaining students' environmental awareness. On the other hand, there was no significant difference in environmental awareness between male and female students. The study's findings are discussed based on the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO)'s emphasis on the periodic monitoring and evaluation of progress in implementing ESD based on data.

Keywords

Environmental Awareness , Sustainability , Education for Sustainable Development , Science Self-Concept , Socioeconomic Status

References

Adrogué, C., & Orlicki, E. (2022). How much are students aware of environmental issues? Is this awareness related to their socioeconomic status? A look from PISA 2006 and 2015 (Document No: 202). RedNIE.
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
Bamberg, S., & Möser, G. (2007). Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(1), 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.12.002
Bong, M., & Skaalvik, E. M. (2003). Academic self-concept and self-efficacy: How different are they really? Educational Psychology Review, 15(1), 1–40.
Broer, M., Bai, Y., & Fonseca, F. (2019). Socioeconomic inequality and educational outcomes: Evidence from twenty years of TIMSS. SpringerOpen.
Byrne, B. M. (2013). Structural equation modeling with Amos: Basic concepts, applications, and programming, second edition (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Carmines, E. G., & Mciver, J. P. (1983). An introduction to the analysis of models with unobserved variables society for political methodology an introduction to the analysis of models with unobserved variables. Political Methodology, 9(1), 51–102.
Centurino, V. A. S., & Jones, L. R. (2017). TIMSS 2019 science framework. In I. V. S. Mullis & M. O. Martin (Eds.), TIMSS 2019 assessment frameworks (pp. 59–78). TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.
Coertjens, L., Boeve-de Pauw, J., De Maeyer, S., & Van Petegem, P. (2010). Do schools make a difference in their students’ environmental attitudes and awareness? Evidence from Pisa 2006. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(3), 497–522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9200-0
Cowan, C. D., Hauser, R. M., Kominski, R. A., Levin, H. M., Lucas, S. R., Morgan, S. L., Spencer, M. B., & Chapman, C. (2012). Improving the measurement of socioeconomic status for the national assessment of educational progress: A theoretical foundation. Recommendations to the National Center for Education Statistics.

Craven, R. G., Marsh, H. W., & Burnett, P. (2003). Cracking the self-concept enhancement conundrum. International Advances in Self Research, 1, 91–126.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Pearson.
Didham, R. J., & Ofei-Manu, P. (2015). The role of education in the sustainable development agenda: Empowering a learning society for sustainability through quality education. In M. Bengtsson, S. H. Olsen & E. Zusman (Eds.), Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals: From agenda to action. (pp. 94–129). Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES).
Fishbein, B., Foy, P., & Yin, L. (2021a). TIMSS 2019 environmental awareness results. TIMSS & PIRLS Boston College.
Fishbein, B., Foy, P., & Yin, L. (2021b). TIMSS 2019 user guide for the international database. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.
Gokmenoglu, T., Eret, E., & Kiraz, E. (2011). The link between environmental awareness and Science-related factors: Suggestions for science curriculum. [Conference presentation]. Evaluation in Education in the Balkan Countries, Belgrade.
Graham, J. W. (2009). Missing data analysis: making it work in the real world. Annual Review of Psychology, 60(1), 549–576. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085530
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson.
Haring, T. (2021). World environment day: How much did students learn about environmental topics? IEA. https://www.iea.nl/publications/press-release/world-environment-day-how-much-did-students-learn-about-environmental.
Hastedt, D. (2022, April). Environmental awareness, just like mathematics, can’t be learned in a day. The PIE Blog. https://blog.thepienews.com/2022/04/environmental-awareness-just-like-mathematics-cant-be-learned-in-a-day/
Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.21427/D7CF7R
Hooper, M., Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., & Fishbein, B. (2017). TIMSS 2019 context questionnaire framework. In I. V. S. Mullis & M. O. Martin (Eds.), TIMSS 2019 assessment frameworks (pp. 59–78). TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.
Hox, J. J., & Bechger, T. M. (1998). An introduction to structural equation models. Family Science Review, 11, 354–373.
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
IEA. (2019). Using TIMSS Science for the measurement of indicator 4.7.5. https://gaml.uis.unesco.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2019/02/4.7.5_Using-TIMSS-Science-for-the-measurement-of-indicator-4.7.5.pdf
IEA. (2020). Measuring global education goals: How TIMSS helps. http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2019/international-results/%0Ahttps://unesdoc.unesco.org/notice?id=p::usmarcdef_0000375119
Jang-Jones, A., & Webber, A. (2019). How environmentally aware are New Zealand students? Ministry of Education. https://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/193564/He-Whakaaro-How-environmentally-aware-are-New-Zealand-students.pdf
Khine, M. S. (2013). Application of structural equation modeling in educational research and practice. Sense Publishers.
Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). The Guilford Press.
Leicht, A., Heiss, J., & Byun, W. J. (2018). Issues and trends in education for sustainable development. In UNESCO Publishing. UNESCO publishing. https://www.bic.moe.go.th/images/stories/ESD1.pdf
List, M. K., Schmidt, F. T. C., Mundt, D., & Föste-Eggers, D. (2020). Still green at fifteen? Investigating environmental awareness of the PISA 2015 population: Cross-national differences and correlates. Sustainability, 12(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072985
Marsh, H. W. (1987). The big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(3), 280–295. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.79.3.280
Marsh, H. W., & Martin, A. J. (2011). Academic self-concept and academic achievement: relations and causal ordering: Academic self-concept. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(Pt 1), 59–77. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709910X503501
Marsh, H. W., & Shavelson, R. (1985). Self-concept: Its multifaceted, hierarchical structure. Educational Psychologist, 20(3), 107–123. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2003_1
Martin, M. O., Davier, M., & Mullis, I. V. S. (2020). Methods and Procedures: TIMSS 2019 technical report. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA). https://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2019/methods/
MEB. (2022). Çevre eğitimi ve iklim değişikliği dersi öğretim programı [Environmental education and climate change course curriculum]. MEB
Michaelides, M. P., Brown, G. T. L., Eklöf, H., & Papanastasiou, E. C. (2019). Motivational Profiles in TIMSS Mathematics: Exploring student clusters across countries and time. SpringerOpen.
Mullis, I. V. S., Martins, M. O., Foy, P., Kelly, D. L., & Fishbein, B. (2020). TIMMS 2019 international results in mathematics and science. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.
OECD. (2017). PISA 2015 technical report. OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2021). Gender and the environment building evidence and policies to achieve the SDGs: Building evidence and policies to achieve the SDGs. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/3d32ca39-en
Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 543–578. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543066004543
Pallant, J. (2011). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using the SPSS program. Allen & Unwin.
Reynolds, K. A., & Komakhidze, M. (2022). TIMSS 2023 environmental attitudes and behaviors framework. IEA.
Sandoval-Hernández, A., & Carrasco, D. (2020). A measurement strategy for SDG thematic indicators 4.7.4 and 4.7.5 using international large scale assessments in education. https://tcg.uis.unesco.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2020/06/Measurement-Strategy-for-474-and-475-using-ILSA_20200625.pdf
Sandoval-Hernández, A., Isac, M. M., & Miranda, D. (2019). Measurement Strategy for SDG Scale Assessments in Education Proposal. https://gaml.uis.unesco.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2019/08/GAML6-REF-9-measurement-strategy-for-4.7.1-4.7.4-4.7.5.pdf
Schleicher, A. (2019). Insights and Interpretations PISA 2018. OECD Publishing.
Schleicher, A. (2021). Green at fifteen – what schools can do to support the climate. OECD Education and Skills Today.
Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A., & King, J. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(6), 323–338. https://doi.org/10.3200/joer.99.6.323-338
Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2010). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Sirin, S. R. (2005). Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Review of Educational Research, 75(3), 417–453. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543075003417
Susperreguy, M. I., Davis-Kean, P. E., Duckworth, K., & Chen, M. (2018). Self‐concept predicts academic achievement across levels of the achievement distribution: Domain specificity for math and reading. Child Development, 89(6), 2196–2214. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12924
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Pearson.
UNEP. (2015). Gender equality and the environment: Policy and strategy. https://wedocs.unep.org/20.500.11822/7655.
UNESCO. (2016a). Global Education Monitoring Report Summary 2016: Education for people and planet: Creating sustainable futures for all. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0024/002457/245745e.pdf
UNESCO. (2016b). Unpacking sustainable development goal 4 education 2030: Guide. https://www.campaignforeducation.org/docs/post2015/SDG4.pdf
UNESCO. (2018). UNESCO global action programme on education for sustainable development. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0024/002462/246270e.pdf
UNESCO. (2020). Education for sustainable development: A roadmap. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000374802
UNESCO. (2022). Learn for our planet: What you need to know. https://www.oneplanetnetwork.org/news-and-events/news/learn-our-planet-what-you-need-know
Wang, J., Hefetz, A., & Liberman, G. (2017). Applying structural equation modelling in educational research. Cultura y Educacion, 29(3), 563–618. https://doi.org/10.1080/11356405.2017.1367907
Wheaton, B., Muthen, B., Alwin, D. F., & Summers, G. F. (1977). Assessing Reliability and Stability in Panel Models. Sociological Methodology, 8, 84. https://doi.org/10.2307/270754
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2002). The development of competence beliefs, expectancies for success, and achievement values from childhood through adolescence. In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 91–120). https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-012750053-9/50006-1
Yin, L., & Fishbein, B. (2020). Creating and interpreting the TIMSS 2019 context questionnaire scales. In M. O. Martin, M. Davier, & I. V. S. Mullis (Eds.), Methods and Procedures: TIMSS 2019 Technical Report. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.
Yin, L, & Foy, P. (2020). Constructing the TIMSS 2019 environmental awareness scales. In M. O. Martin, M. Davier, & I. V. S. Mullis (Eds.), Methods and Procedures: TIMSS 2019 Technical Report. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.
Zhang, F., & Bae, C. L. (2020). Motivational factors that influence student science achievement: a systematic literature review of TIMSS studies. International Journal of Science Education, 42(17). https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1843083

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Specialist Studies in Education (Other)

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Neslihan Üstün ^*
0000-0002-4760-2696
Türkiye

Mustafa Ürey
0000-0002-7753-7936
Türkiye

Publication Date

March 29, 2024

Submission Date

June 30, 2023

Acceptance Date

August 31, 2023

Published in Issue

Year 2024 Volume: 12 Number: 1

DOI

https://doi.org/10.46778/goputeb.1320538

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA66AZ84XF

APA

Üstün, N., & Ürey, M. (2024). Investigating Variables Predicting Environmental Awareness in the Context of Education for Sustainable Development: An Analysis Based on TIMSS 2019 Data. International Journal of Turkish Education Sciences, 12(1), 85-129. https://doi.org/10.46778/goputeb.1320538

Cited By

Development of Sustainable Lifestyle Project E-Module As Strengthening Environmental Awareness of Elementary School Students

Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental

https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v18n10-103

Preschool children's mental models of the environment: A cross-level study

Journal of Turkish Science Education

https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2024.027