Review

Comparison of Vocational Education Practices of Some Countries in the Context of OECD Labour Force Participation Statistics

Volume: 13 Number: 2 July 30, 2025
EN TR

Comparison of Vocational Education Practices of Some Countries in the Context of OECD Labour Force Participation Statistics

Abstract

The objective of this study is to undertake a comparative analysis of vocational education practices in Iceland, the Netherlands, Sweden, Switzerland, and Türkiye. These countries have been selected according to their ranking in the labour force participation rates statistics published by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) in 2022, which are organized according to the population aged 15-64. In this statistic, Iceland, the Netherlands, Sweden, and Switzerland have been placed in the top four positions, while Türkiye has been ranked 41st. The underlying assumption of this study is that the vocational education policies of these countries may be associated with labour force participation and employment processes. Moreover, it is acknowledged that there is a paucity of comparative studies on this issue in the existing literature. Consequently, this study was designed with the foresight that it would make an important contribution to the existing body of knowledge. The study employed a qualitative research approach. The data pertaining to the study were collected through document analysis. To enhance the reliability of the findings, statistical data concerning the countries under study were obtained from official reports, institutional websites, international reports and relevant literature. In addition, meticulous attention was paid to ensure that the data obtained were reported in a way to cover the same period. After obtaining the data, demographic and economic structures, compulsory education and education management approaches, the historical process of vocational education practices and current vocational education practices of the examined countries were compared. In the light of the information obtained from this analysis, the labour force participation rates of the countries and the labour force participation status of vocational education graduates were examined. The results revealed that the employment rates of students who have recently graduated from vocational education in Türkiye are in the lowest position among the countries under comparison. In this context, recommendations have been made that echo those made in the context of the aforementioned countries, including the necessity of planning vocational education practices in Türkiye based on job analysis, the encouragement of vocational education, and the increase in public resources allocated to education.

Keywords

Comparative Education , Vocational Education , Labour Force Participation , OECD

References

  1. Ada, Ş., & Üstün, A. (2008). İsveç eğitim sisteminin incelenmesi [Investigation of the Swedish education system]. Atatürk Üniversitesi Kâzım Karabekir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, (17), 146-173.
  2. Afşar, M. (2009). Türkiye’de eğitim yatırımları ve ekonomik büyüme ilişkisi [The relationship between education investments and economic growth in Turkey]. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 9(1), 85-98.
  3. Aimaiti, M. (2023). Türkiye, Çin ve Rusya eğitim sistemlerinin karşılaştırmalı olarak incelenmesi [Comparative analysis of Turkish, Chinese and Russian education systems] [Unpublished Master Thesis]. Fatih Sultan Mehmet Vakıf Üniversitesi.
  4. Akçacı, T. (2013). Eğitim harcamalarının iktisadi büyümeye etkisi [The effect of education expenditures on economic growth]. Kafkas Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 4(5), 65-79.
  5. Akpınar, A. (2004). Türkiye’de temel mesleki ve teknik eğitim [Basic vocational and technical education in Turkey], İŞKUR. https://media.iskur.gov.tr/15334/turkiyede-temel-mesleki-ve-teknik-egitim-raporu.pdf
  6. Akyol, B., & Yeşilbaş Özenç, Y. (2021). Singapur ile Türkiye’de okul yöneticisi ve öğretmen seçme ve yetiştirme sistemlerinin karşılaştırılması [Comparison of school principal and teacher selection and training systems in Singapore and Turkey]. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 19(2), 904-925. https://doi.org/10.37217/tebd.919484
  7. Altunöz, U. (2020). Does education level effective on youth unemployment in Turkish labour market: Empirical analysis. Journal of Ekonomi Türkiye Ekonomisi I. Özel Sayısı, 1-4.
  8. An, R., Sassi, K., & Al Ayyubi, I. I. (2024). Comparative studies: education systems in Germany and Turkey. Studi Multidisipliner Jurnal Kajian Keislaman, 11(2), 71-86. https://doi.org/10.24952/multidisipliner.v11i12.12533
  9. Arabacı, İ. B. (2011). Türkiye’de ve OECD ülkelerinde eğitim harcamaları [Education expenditures in Turkey and OECD countries]. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 10(35), 100-112.
  10. Aslan, A., Hablutluoğlu, B., Gök, A. Ç., & Kaymaz, L. (2023). Comparing the visual arts course programs in Turkey and Iraq. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 7(12), 130-146. https://doi.org/10.56677/MKUEFDER.1395757
APA
Yiğittekin, M., & Mermer, S. (2025). Comparison of Vocational Education Practices of Some Countries in the Context of OECD Labour Force Participation Statistics. International Journal of Turkish Education Sciences, 13(2), 647-698. https://doi.org/10.46778/goputeb.1591923