Brifing çerçevesini iyileştirme stratejileri: sektör uygulayıcıları ile yapılan bir değerlendirme çalışması

Öz

Brifing, yapı sektöründe yatırımcı ve kullanıcılardan gereksinim bilgilerini toplamak için kullanılan önemli süreçlerden biridir. Brifing sürecine ek olarak, tasarımcılar, müşteri isteklerini anlamak, tanımlamak, doğrulamak ve izlemek için çeşitli teknikler ve teknolojiler kullanır. Ortaya çıkan gereksinimleri projelerini geliştirmek için bu süreçlerde kullanırlar. Bilgi/teknoloji alanındaki gelişmeler ve brifing üzerine yapılan araştırmalar, artan bilgi miktarını yönetme ve bunları yapı projelerine yaşam döngüsü süresince kullanma imkânı sağlayarak mesleki çalışmaları etkiler. Tasarımcı mimarların uzmanlıkları ve yaklaşımları, sektör uygulayıcıları olarak aktif rollerinin olması nedeniyle brifing süreçleri için strateji ve yöntem geliştirmede önemlidirler. Bu çalışma, bir brifing çerçevesi önerisinin mimarlar tarafından mülakat aracılığı ile değerlendirilmesine odaklanmaktadır. Makale, konu hakkındaki teorik arka planını sunarak, mülakat yapısını ve çerçeve önerisini anlatmaktadır. Sektör uygulayıcılarının yorumları, önerileri ve görüşleri verilmiş, tartışılarak kapsamlı bir brifing çerçevesi geliştirmek için önemli unsurlar ortaya konulmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• UML
• Brifing
• Uygulamada Mimarlar
• Bilgi Yönetimi
• Gereksinim Belirleme

Strategies for improving briefing framework: an evaluation study with industry practitioners

Öz

Briefing is one of the important processes for capturing requirement knowledge from investor and user clients in the construction industry. In addition to briefing, designers use various techniques and technologies to capture, identify, validate, and track the client's wishes and apply them as requirements to develop projects with these processes. Developments in the information/knowledge technologies and research for briefing frameworks affect professional practice by giving the capability and possibility to manage the increasing amount of knowledge and to implement them into building projects through a life cycle. The expertise and approaches of designer architects are important for developing strategies and methods on briefing because of their acting role as industry practitioners. This study focuses on the evaluation of architects on a briefing framework proposal via interviews. The paper then explores the theoretical background and presents the interview structures and framework proposal. Comments, suggestions, and thoughts on the benefits of industry practitioners are presented and discussed to state important facts to develop a comprehensive briefing framework.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Briefing
• Architects in Practice
• Knowledge Management
• Requirement Elicitation
• UML

Kaynakça

1. Baldauf, J. P., Formoso, C. T., Tzortzopoulos, P., Miron, L. I. G., & Soliman, J. (2020). Using building information modelling to manage client requirements in social housing projects. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(7), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072804
2. Barrett, P. S., Hudson, J., & Stanley, C. (1999). Good practice in briefing: the limits of rationality. Automation in Construction, 8, 633–642. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-5805(98)00108-3
3. Barrett, P., & Stanley, C. (1999). Better Construction Briefing. In Blackwell Science, Oxford.
4. Bechhofer, F., & Paterson, L. (2000). Principles of Research in the Social Sciences. In Social Reseach Today. Routledge
5. Bray, I. (2002). An introduction to requirements engineering. Addison-Wesley.
6. buildingSMART. (2022). The International Home of BIM. https://www.buildingsmart.org/
7. Çalışkan, E. B., & Pekeriçli, M. K. (2023). Client briefing issues and problems for requirement elicitation and validation: A survey among architects. Journal of Construction Engineering, Management & Innovation, 6(3), 141–160. https://doi.org/10.31462/jcemi.2023.03141160
8. Chimay J. Anumba, Charles O. Egbu, P. M. C. (2005). Knowledge management in construction. https://doi.org/10.4018/jitpm.2010040102

9. CIB. (1997). Briefing the Team: A Guide to Better Briefing for Clients. Thomas Telford.
10. Ghannad, P., Lee, Y. C., Dimyadi, J., & Solihin, W. (2019). Automated BIM data validation integrating open-standard schema with visual programming language. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 40(January), 14–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2019.01.006
11. Kamara, J. M., Anumba, C. J., & Evbuomwan, N. F. O. (2002). Capturing Client Requirements in Construction Projects. In Capturing Client Requirements in Construction Projects. https://doi.org/10.1680/ccricp.31036
12. Narayanswamy, H., Liu, H., & Al-Hussein, M. (2019). BIM-based automated design checking for building permit in the light-frame building industry. Proceedings of the 36th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction, ISARC 2019, Isarc, 1042–1049. https://doi.org/10.22260/isarc2019/0139
13. Object Management Group. (2022). Visual Paradigm. https://www.visual-paradigm.com/
14. Olatokun, E. O. (2017). Requirement Elicitation Using Knowledge Capturing (Kc) Techniques During the Client Briefing Process for Improved Client Satisfaction in The UK Construction Industry. The University of Salford.
15. Olatokun, E., & Pathirage, C. (2015). Importance of Knowledge Capturing (KC) in the Design Briefing Process in the Construction Industry. 12th International Postgraduate Research Conference (IPGRC 2015), 1–16.
16. OMG. (2017). Unified Modeling Language, v2.5.1 (Issue December). Object Management Group.
17. Pegoraroa, C., & Carísio, I. de P. (2017). Requirements processing for building design: A systematic review. Producao, 27, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6513.212116
18. Quintas, P., Lefrere, P., & Jones, G. (1997). Knowledge management : A strategic agenda. Long Range Planning, 30(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/s0024-6301(97)00018-6
19. Ryd, N. (2004). The design brief as carrier of client information during the construction process. Design Studies, 25(3), 231–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2003.10.003
20. Shen, Q., Li, H., Chung, J., & Hui, P. Y. (2004). A framework for identification and representation of client requirements in the briefing process. Construction Management and Economics, 22(2), 213–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144619042000201411
21. Tan, H. C., Anumba, C. J., Carrillo, P. M., Bouchlaghem, D., Kamara, J., & Udeaja, C. (2010). Capture and Reuse of Project Knowledge in Construction. In Capture and Reuse of Project Knowledge in Construction. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444315448
22. Tan, H. C., Carrillo, P. M., Anumba, C. J., Bouchlaghem, N., Kamara, J. M., & Udeaja, C. E. (2007). Development of a methodology for live capture and reuse of project knowledge in construction. Journal of Management in Engineering, 23(1), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2007)23:1(18)
23. Webb, S. P. (2017). Knowledge management: Linchpin of change. Routledge.
24. Zhong, B., Gan, C., Luo, H., & Xing, X. (2018). Ontology-based framework for building environmental monitoring and compliance checking under BIM environment. Building and Environment, 141(December 2017), 127–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.05.046