Integrating Adaptation Strategies of Businesses with Community Resilience: A Case from Turkey
Öz
In developing countries bounded by traditional approaches of disaster management, post-disaster policies may not lead to resilience at aggregate level. Turkey exemplifies the case with its experience in the 1999 Izmit earthquake. The policies applied following the 1999 trajectory to create a safer built environment incorporated resettlement and reconstruction efforts, yet businesses were largely unregulated by local and national governments during the recovery process which leads to development of their own adaptive strategies to survive after the disaster. This paper aims to analyse the adaptation strategies of private enterprises in the face of disasters. In this respect, a case study research was undertaken in Adapazari, Turkey to inquire their adaptive strategies after the disaster with respect to the independent variables of business size and occupancy status. This paper contributes to the field of disaster studies by showing businesses’ adaptive capacities that enable them to survive following a disaster. The key findings of this study present that businesses adapt for survival after a natural disaster in accordance with their business size and occupancy status. Although small firms and lease-holder firms challenge with organizational and financial problems, they are able to develop locational strategies which increase their survival change and adaptability against their larger and owner occupied counterparts.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- Alesch, D.J, Holly, J.N, Mittler, E, and Nagy, R. (2001), “Organizations at Risk: what Happens when Small Businesses and Non-for-Profits Encounter Natural Disasters”, Small Organizations Natural Hazards Project, First Year Technical Report, University of Wisconsin-Green Bay: the Public Entity Risk Institute, Fairfax, Virginia, USA.
- Bibbee, A, Gonenc, R, Jacobs, S, Konvitz, J, and Price, R. (2000), “Economic Effects of the 1999 Turkish Earthquakes: An Interim Report”. OECD Economics Department Working Paper no. 247, An Interim Report, OECD Publishing.
- Boin, A, and Mc Connell, A. (2007), “Preparing for critical infrastructure breakdowns: the limits of crisis management and the need for resilience”, Journal of Contingencies and crisis management, vol.15, no.1, pp. 50-59.
- Brooks, N, Adger, W.N, and Kelly, P.M. (2005), “The determinants of vulnerability and adaptive capacity at the national level and the implications for adaptation”, Global Environmental Change. vol. 15, pp. 151-163.
- Chang, S.E, and Falit-Baiamonte, A, (2002), “Disaster Vulnerability of Businesses in the 2001 Nisqually Earthquake”. Environmental Hazards, vol. 4, pp. 59-71.
- Cutter, S.L, Barnes, L, Berry, M, Burton, C, Evans, E, Tate, E, and Webb, J. (2008), “A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters”. Global environmental change, Vol 18, pp. 598-606.
- Dahlhamer, J.M, and Tierney, K.J. (1998), “Rebounding from Disruptive Events: Business Recovery Following the Northridge Earthquake”, Sociological Spectrum, Vol.18, pp. 121-141.
- Dahlhamer, J.M, and D’Souza, M.J. (1995), “Determinants of Business Disaster Preparedness in Two U.S. Metropolitan Areas”. University of Delaware, Disaster Research Centre, Newark, DE: Preliminary paper no. 224.
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
İngilizce
Konular
-
Bölüm
Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar
Ezgi Orhan
*
ÇANKAYA ÜNİVERSİTESİ
0000-0002-9124-7812
Türkiye
Yayımlanma Tarihi
14 Temmuz 2018
Gönderilme Tarihi
20 Kasım 2017
Kabul Tarihi
10 Temmuz 2018
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2018 Cilt: 1 Sayı: 2