KORUYUCU AĞIZ SAĞLIĞI DAVRANIŞLARINI ETKİLEYEN FAKTÖRLER: PLANLANMIŞ DAVRANIŞ TEORİSİ VE SAĞLIK İNANÇ MODELİ UYGULAMASI

Yıl 2026, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 1 , 30 - 49 , 30.03.2026

Faten Alqaifi , Kemal Gürkan Küçükergin , Dilaver Tengilimoğlu , İlknur Arslan Aras , Nurperihan Tosun

https://doi.org/10.52881/gsbdergi.1879883

https://izlik.org/JA99WZ35SE

Öz

Giriş: Koruyucu ağız sağlığı bakımı, ağız hastalıkları riskinin azaltılmasında ve genel sağlığın desteklenmesinde önemli bir rol oynamaktadır. Ancak Türkiye’de koruyucu diş hekimliği hizmetleri henüz istenilen düzeyde değildir ve sağlık inançları, güven ve diş hekimi kaygısının koruyucu davranışlar üzerindeki birlikte etkilerine dair çalışmalar sınırlıdır. Amaç: Bu çalışma, Planlı Davranış Teorisi (PDT), Sağlık İnanç Modeli (SİM), kaygı ve güven değişkenlerini bütüncül bir çerçevede birleştirerek bireylerin koruyucu bakım davranışlarını etkileyen faktörleri incelemektedir. Yöntem: Araştırmada kesitsel bir yöntem kullanılmış ve Ankara’da 523 katılımcıdan anket yoluyla veri toplanmıştır. Veriler, güvenilirlik ve geçerlilik değerlendirmeleri, hipotez testi için önyükleme, aracılık analizi ve tahmin değerlendirmesini içeren kısmi en küçük kareler yapısal eşitlik modellemesi kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Bulgular: Bulgular, algılanan engeller dışında tüm SİM bileşenlerinin, algılanan davranışsal kontrol (ADK) hariç tüm PDT bileşenlerinin ve kaygının koruyucu bakım niyetini anlamlı şekilde etkilediğini göstermektedir. Koruyucu davranış ise ADK, güven ve kaygı değişkenlerinden anlamlı biçimde etkilendiği belirlenmiştir. Güven, kaygı ve algılanan engellerle negatif; koruyucu diş hekimi ziyareti dâhil olmak üzere PDT ve SİM’e ait diğer tüm bileşenlerle ise pozitif yönde ilişkili olduğu görülmüştür. Bununla birlikte güven, koruyucu bakım niyetiyle doğrudan anlamlı bir ilişki göstermemektedir.  Aracılık analizleri, kaygı ile birlikte PDT ve SİM bileşenlerinin (ADK ve engeller hariç) güven ile niyet arasındaki ilişkiyi tam aracılık yoluyla açıkladığını göstermektedir. Ayrıca, kaygı ve ADK güven ile davranış arasındaki ilişkide kısmi aracılık rolü üstlendiği belirlenmiştir. Sonuç: Bu araştırma, koruyucu ağız sağlığı hizmeti sunucularına, bireylerin koruyucu bakım arayışını engelleyebilecek diş kaygısı ve güven gibi çeşitli zorlukları ele alarak hedefe yönelik koruyucu ve eğitici girişimler tasarlamaları için değerli bilgiler sunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Diş hekimine gitme , Planlı Davranış Teorisi , Sağlık İnanç Modeli , Güven , Önleyici ağız bakımı. , Diş hekimi kaygısı

Etik Beyan

Bu çalışma için etik onay, Atılım Üniversitesi Etik Kurulu’ndan alınmıştır (Onay No: E-59394181-604.01-96735; Tarih: 3 Ekim 2024). Çalışma, Helsinki Bildirgesi ilkelerine uygun olarak yürütülmüştür. Araştırmaya dâhil edilmeden önce tüm katılımcılardan yazılı bilgilendirilmiş onam alınmıştır.

Destekleyen Kurum

yok

Proje Numarası

E-59394181-604.01-96735

Teşekkür

yok

FACTORS INFLUENCING PREVENTIVE ORAL CARE BEHAVIORS: APPLYING THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR AND HEALTH BELIEF MODEL

https://izlik.org/JA99WZ35SE

Öz

Background: Preventive oral care is crucial for reducing the risk of oral diseases and promoting overall health. However, in Turkey, preventive care services have not yet reached the desired level and studies on the impact of health beliefs, trust, and dental anxiety on preventive dental attendance intentions and behaviors remains limited. Aim: This study examined the factors influencing individuals' behaviors in seeking preventive care, using a model that integrated the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), Health Belief Model (HBM), anxiety, and trust. Method: The study employed a cross-sectional design, and data were collected through a survey from 523 participants in Ankara. Data were analyzed using partial least squares structural equation modeling, including reliability and validity assessment, bootstrapping for hypothesis testing, mediation analysis, and predictive assessment. Results: The findings showed that HBM constructs (except barriers), TPB constructs (except perceived behavioral control [PBC]), and anxiety predicted intention, while PBC, trust, and anxiety predicted behavior. Trust is negatively associated with anxiety and HBM barriers, while being positively associated with all other HBM and TPB constructs, including dental attendance, but shows no significant association with intention. Accordingly, anxiety and all TPB and HBM constructs (except PBC and barriers) fully mediated the relationship between trust and intention, whereas anxiety and PBC partially mediated the relationship between trust and behavior. Conclusion: This research provides valuable insights for oral healthcare providers to design targeted prevention and education initiatives, addressing various challenges like dental anxiety and trust that may hinder seeking preventive care.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Preventive oral care , Dental attendance , Dental anxiety , Planned Behavior Theory , Health Belief Model , Trust

Etik Beyan

Ethics approval for this study was obtained from the Atılım University Ethics Committee (Approval No.: E-59394181-604.01-96735; Date: October 3, 2024). The study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to their inclusion in the study.

Destekleyen Kurum

none

Proje Numarası

E-59394181-604.01-96735

Teşekkür

none

Kaynakça

• 1. World Health Organization. Global oral health status report: towards universal health coverage for oral health by 2030. Regional summary of the African Region. Geneva: WHO; 2023. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/364538 (cited 2025 Jul 1).
• 2. Berezovsky B, Bencko V. Oral health in a context of public health: Prevention-related issue. Cent Eur J Public Health. 2021; 29 (4): 317-21. doi:10.21101/cejph.a6940
• 3. Warreth A. Dental caries and its management. Int J Dent. 2023; 2023:9365845.doi:10.1155/2023/9365845
• 4. Kapila YL. Oral health’s inextricable connection to systemic health: Special populations bring to bear multimodal relationships and factors connecting periodontal disease to systemic diseases and conditions. Periodontol 2000. 2021; 87 (1): 11-6. doi:10.1111/prd.12398
• 5. Petersen PE. Oral cancer prevention and control–the approach of the World Health Organization. Oral Oncol. 2009; 45(4-5): 454-60. doi:10.1016/j.oraloncology.2008.05.023
• 6. Ekici O, Tengilimoglu D, Isik O. Evaluating the current situation of oral and dental healthcare services in Turkey and recommending solutions. Health Policy Technol. 2017;6(3):368-78. doi:10.1016/j.hlpt.2017.07.006
• 7. Orhan AI, Alkan A, Orhan K, Tezel A, Karaoglanoglu S, Oztas D. Dental caries and associated factors among Turkish children and adults: Findings from the 3rd National Oral Health Survey. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2024; 52(4): 499-508. doi:10.1111/cdoe.12943
• 8. World Life Expectancy. Oral cancer death rate by country. World Health Rankings. 2024. Available from: https://www.worldlifeexpectancy.com/cause-of-death/oral-cancer/by-country/ (cited 2025 Jan 10).
• 9. Åstrøm AN, Lie SA, Gülcan F. Applying the theory of planned behavior to self-report dental attendance in Norwegian adults through structural equation modelling approach. BMC Oral Health. 2018; 18 (1): 95. doi:10.1186/s12903-018-0558-7
• 10. Wu L, Buchanan H, Topcu G. Are dental-related psychological variables important for dental attendance in China? A cross-sectional study. J Public Health Dent. 2022; 82 (4): 437-44. doi:10.1111/jphd.12479
• 11. Yuan S, Freeman R, Hill K, Newton T, Humphris G. Communication, trust and dental anxiety: a person-centered approach for dental attendance behaviors. Dent J. 2020; 8 (4): 118. doi:10.3390/dj8040118
• 12. Shmueli L. Predicting intention to receive COVID-19 vaccine among the general population using the health belief model and the theory of planned behavior model. BMC Public Health. 2021; 21: 804. doi:10.1186/s12889-021-10816-7
• 13. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1991; 50 (2): 179-211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
• 14. Servidio R, Malvaso A, Vizza D, Valente M, Campagna MR, Iacono ML, et al. The intention to get COVID-19 vaccine and vaccine uptake among cancer patients: An extension of the theory of planned behavior (TPB). Support Care Cancer. 2022; 30 (10): 7973-82. doi:10.1007/s00520-022-07238-5
• 15. Trifiletti E, Shamloo SE, Faccini M, Zaka A. Psychological predictors of protective behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic: theory of planned behavior and risk perception. J Community Appl Soc Psychol. 2022; 32 (3): 382-97. doi:10.1002/casp.2509
• 16. Alfansuri AF, Soetjipto B. Integrating dimension of trust into the theory of planned behavior: A case study of electronic wallet amidst the Coronavirus outbreak. SSRN Electron J. 2020. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3750767
• 17. Borhan MN, Ibrahim ANH, Miskeen MAA. Extending the theory of planned behavior to predict the intention to take the new high-speed rail for intercity travel in Libya: Assessment of the influence of novelty seeking, trust and external influence. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract. 2019; 130: 373-84. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2019.09.058
• 18. Hall MA, Camacho F, Dugan E, Balkrishnan R. Trust in the medical profession: conceptual and measurement issues. Health Serv Res. 2002; 37 (5): 1419-29. doi:10.1111/1475-6773.01070
• 19. Song Y, Luzzi L, Brennan DS. Trust in dentist-patient relationships: mapping the relevant concepts. Eur J Oral Sci. 2020; 128 (2): 110-9. doi:10.1111/eos.12686
• 20. Armfield JM, Ketting M, Chrisopoulos S, Baker SR. Do people trust dentists? Development of the Dentist Trust Scale. Aust Dent J. 2017; 62 (3): 355-62. doi:10.1111/adj.12514
• 21. Tiwari T, Wright CD, Heaton LJ, Santoro M, Tranby EP. Dental anxiety and oral health in American Indian and Alaska natives. J Public Health Dent. 2025; 85 (2): 192-6. doi:10.1111/jphd.12633
• 22. Liu P, Yang R, Xu Z. Public acceptance of fully automated driving: Effects of social trust and risk/benefit perceptions. Risk Anal. 2019; 39 (2): 326-41. doi:10.1111/risa.13143
• 23. Alzahrani SH. The impact of health beliefs and trust in health information sources on SARS-CoV-2 vaccine uptake. Front Public Health. 2024; 12: 1340614. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2024.1340614
• 24. Rosenstock IM. The health belief model and preventive health behavior. Health Educ Monogr. 1974; 2 (4): 354-86. doi:10.1177/109019817400200405
• 25. Goren T, Vashdi DR, Beeri I. Count on trust: the indirect effect of trust in government on policy compliance with health behavior instructions. Policy Sci. 2022; 55 (4): 593-630. doi:10.1007/s11077-022-09481-3
• 26. Tsunematsu M, Kawasaki H, Masuoka Y, Kakehashi M. Factors affecting breast cancer screening behavior in Japan: assessment using the health belief model and conjoint analysis. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2013; 14 (10) :6041-8. doi:10.7314/APJCP.2013.14.10.6041
• 27. Suess C, Maddock JE, Dogru T, Mody M, Lee S. Using the Health Belief Model to examine travelers’ willingness to vaccinate and support for vaccination requirements prior to travel. Tour Manag. 2022; 88: 104405. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2021.104405
• 28. Hoffmann B, Erwood K, Ncomanzi S, Fischer V, O'Brien D, Lee A. Management strategies for adult patients with dental anxiety in the dental clinic: a systematic review. Aust Dent J. 2022; 67 Suppl 1: S3-13. doi:10.1111/adj.12926
• 29. Vanhee T, Mourali S, Bottenberg P, Jacquet W, Vanden Abbeele A. Stimuli involved in dental anxiety: what are patients afraid of? A descriptive study. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2020; 30 (3): 276-85. doi:10.1111/ipd.12595
• 30. Saba Z, Katirci G. Relationship between dental anxiety levels and oral health among dental patients in Turkey: a cross-sectional study. BMC Oral Health. 2023; 23 (1): 328. doi:10.1186/s12903-023-03041-8
• 31. Jaakkola S, Lahti S, Räihä H, Saarinen M, Tolvanen M, Aromaa M, et al. Dental fear affects adolescent perception of interaction with dental staff. Eur J Oral Sci. 2014; 122 (5): 339-45. doi:10.1111/eos.12142
• 32. Turkish Statistical Institute (TÜİK). Address Based Population Registration System (ADNKS): Population by province and age group. 2024. Available from: https://veriportali.tuik.gov.tr/tr/databrowser/tuik/categories/11/11_1/11_1_1/TR,DF_ADNKS_T16,1.0 (cited 2025 Jul 1).
• 33. Hair JF, Risher JJ, Sarstedt M, Ringle CM. When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. Eur Bus Rev. 2019; 31 (1): 2-24. doi:10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
• 34. Ringle CM, Wende S, Becker JM. SmartPLS 4. Bönningstedt: SmartPLS; 2024. Available from: https://www.smartpls.com
• 35. Sarstedt M, Ringle CM, Hair JF. Partial least squares structural equation modeling. In: Homburg C, Klarmann M, Vomberg A, editors. Handbook of Market Research. Cham: Springer; 2022. 587-632.
• 36. Sarstedt M, Hair JF Jr, Cheah JH, Becker JM, Ringle CM. How to specify, estimate, and validate higher-order constructs in PLS-SEM. Australas Mark J. 2019; 27 (3): 197-211.
• 37. Podsakoff PM, Podsakoff NP, Williams LJ, Huang C, Yang J. Common method bias: It's bad, it's complex, it's widespread, and it's not easy to fix. Annu Rev Organ Psychol Organ Behav. 2024; 11: 17-61.
• 38. Champion VL. Instrument development for health belief model constructs. Adv Nurs Sci. 1984; 6 (3): 73-85.
• 39. Chen MS, Land KC. Testing the health belief model: LISREL analysis of alternative models of causal relationships between health beliefs and preventive dental behavior. Soc Psychol Q. 1986; 49 (1): 45-60. doi:10.2307/2786856
• 40. Lee WL, Chinna K, Lim Abdullah K, Zainal Abidin I. The forward‐backward and dual‐panel translation methods are comparable in producing semantic equivalent versions of a heart quality of life questionnaire. Int J Nurs Pract. 2019; 25 (1): e12715. doi:10.1111/ijn.12715
• 41. Humphris GM, Morrison T, Lindsay SJ. The Modified Dental Anxiety Scale: validation and United Kingdom norms. Community Dent Health. 1995; 12 (3): 143-50.
• 42. Ilgüy D, Ilgüy M, Dinçer S, Bayirli G. Reliability and validity of the Modified Dental Anxiety Scale in Turkish patients. J Int Med Res. 2005; 33 (2): 252-9. doi:10.1177/147323000503300214
• 43. Tunc EP, Firat D, Onur OD, Sar V. Reliability and validity of the Modified Dental Anxiety Scale (MDAS) in a Turkish population. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2005; 33 (5): 357-62. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0528.2005.00229.x
• 44. Henseler J, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. J Acad Mark Sci. 2015; 43(1): 115-135.
• 45. Sharma PN, Liengaard BD, Hair JF, Sarstedt M, Ringle CM. Predictive model assessment and selection in composite-based modeling using PLS-SEM: extensions and guidelines for using CVPAT. Eur J Mark. 2022; 57 (6): 1662-77.