Determinants of Trade in Latin American Countries

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1, 44 - 57, 05.07.2024

Yağmur Sağlam Filiz Erataş Sönmez

https://doi.org/10.62001/gsijses.1360814

Öz

The main purpose of this study is to determine the macroeconomic components of trade with a new method for Latin American Countries, taking into account the structural characteristics of the series. Because there are a few quantitative examples in the literature that have been studied with the Gravity model. In addition to macroeconomic variables, to determine the region's place in world trade, a variable representing commercial integration added to the model. In this regard, long-term coefficient estimation ran for ten selected Latin American countries using the dynamic panel data analysis method. According to the findings, while the unemployment rate and real interest rates negatively affect foreign trade, the main determinants of foreign trade in the long term are official exchange rates, binding tariffs and per capita national income, respectively. The two countries in the region that are best integrated in foreign trade are Mexico and Chile. Therefore, trade liberalization and integration are still a problem in this region and studies in this context need to be continued.

Anahtar Kelimeler

International Trade, Latin American Countries, Panel Data Analysis, Common Correlated Effects Model

Latin Amerika Ülkelerinde Ticaretin Belirleyicileri

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı ticaretin makro iktisadi bileşenlerinin Latin Amerika Ülkeleri için belirlenmesidir. Bu doğrultuda, on Latin Amerika ülkesi için ekonometrik bir model oluşturulmuş ve ampirik analiz için durağan olmayan panel veri yönteminden yararlanılmıştır. Öncelikle değişkenlerin eğim katsayısının heterojenliği ve yatay kesit bağımlılığı araştırılmıştır. İkinci nesil birim kök ve eş-bütünleşme testine yer verilen çalışmada uzun dönem regresyon katsayı tahmincisi olarak ortak ilişkili etkiler modeli tercih edilmiştir. Elde edilen bulgulara göre işsizlik oranı ve reel faiz oranları dış ticareti olumsuz yönde etkilerken, dış ticaretin uzun dönemde temel belirleyicileri sırasıyla resmi kur oranları, bağlayıcı tarifeler ve kişi başına düşen milli gelirdir. Bölgede dış ticarete en iyi bütünleşmiş olan iki ülke ise Meksika ve Şili'dir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Ortak Etkili İlişkiler Modeli, Panel Veri Analizi, Latin Amerika Ülkeleri

Kaynakça

• Arespa, M. (2015). Macroeconomic volatility and international integration. Bulletin of Economic Research, October 2015, 393-410.
• Beaton, K., Cebotari, A., Ding, X. & Komaromi, A. (2017). Trade integration in Latin America: A network perspective. International Monetary Fund Working Paper, WP/17/148.
• Calvo, G., Leider L. & Reinhart C. (1992). Capital inflows and real exchange rate appreciation. IMF Working Paper, 94/62.
• Curran-L. & Zignago S. (2013). Regional integration of trade in South America: how far has it progressed and in which sectors?. The International Trade Journal, 27(1): 3-35.
• El Dahrawy Sánchez-Albornoz, A & Timini, J (2019). The impact of China on Latin America: trade and foreign direct investment channels, Economic Bulletin, June, No 14.
• El Dahrawy Sánchez-Albornoz, A & Timini, J (2021). Trade agreements and Latin American trade (creation and diversion) and welfare. World Econ. 44: (2004–2040), https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.13126.
• Edwards, S. (1994). International monetary fund, policies for growth: The Latin American experience: Proceedings, Chapter 7, Mangaratiba, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, March 16-19, https://doi.org/10.5089/9781557755179.071.
• Flores-Marcias, G. A. & Kreps, S. E. (2013). The foreign policy consequences of trade: China’s Commercial Relations with Africa and Latin America, 1992–2006. The Journal of Politics, 75(2): 357-371.
• Mulder, N, Saez, S, Camino, C. & Finot, A.(2007). Trade in services in Latin America and the Caribbean: An analysis of the recent trends, ECLAC-CEPAL, Comercio Internacional, Serie 84.
• Narins. T. P. (2018) Chinese trade in Latin America compared to the European Union and the United States: The case of technology-ıntensive exportsç The Professional Geographer, 70(2): 219-229, doi: 10.1080/00330124.2017.1347797.
• Nowak, W. (2014). Sino-European trade competition in Latin America and the Caribbean, Chinese Business Review, 13(9).
• Pöstenyi, A. (2016). Analysis of foreign trade of the 6 largest Latin American Countries using gravity model, published PhD Thesis, University of Debrecen, Supervisor: Dr. Erdley
• Laszlo,https://dea.lib.unideb.hu/dea/bitstream/handle/2437/232881/Postenyi_Andrea_Tezisfuzet_ENG_pub_titkositott.pdf?sequence=3 &isAllowed=y.
• Pesaran H. M. (2004). General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. Working Paper No:0435. University of Cambridge. 1-39.
• Pesaran, H. M. (2006). Estimation and inference in large heterogeneous panels with a multifactor error structure. Econometrica, 74(4): 967-1012.
• Pesaran H. M. & Yamagata T. (2008). Testing slope homogeneity in large panels. Journal of Econometrics. 142: 50-93.
• Westerlund, J. (2008). Panel cointegration tests of the fisher effect. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 23, 193-233.
• World Bank, Development Indicators, https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators# (12.09.2023).
• Yıldırım, A. & Gökalp, M. F. (2016). Institutions and economic performance: A review on the developing countries. Procedia Economics and Finance, 347-359.