Trace of Stigma: A Theoretical Framework for the Concept of Organizational Stigma

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1, 98 - 113, 05.07.2024

Meltem Dil Şahin

https://doi.org/10.62001/gsijses.1475282

Cited By: 1

Öz

The concept of stigma was examined by Goffman in 1963, and its organizational perspective came up in the 2000s. Although the concept of stigma has negative consequences both organizationally and individually, it can be a significant obstacle to the survival of organizations. In this context, the aim of the research is to define the concept of organizational stigma and introduce it to the literature by explaining it in the light of the research conducted, thus laying the foundation for future research on this subject. For this purpose, a literature review and case study method regarding the concept of organizational stigma was followed in the research.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Stigma, Individual Stigma, Organizational Stigm, Organizational Stigmatizing

Damgalamanın İzi: Örgütsel Damga Kavramına İlişkin Kuramsal Bir Çerçeve

Öz

Örgütsel damga kavramı, yabancı alanyazında 1963`te Goffman`la birlikte ortaya çıkmasına rağmen, Türkçe alanyazında ise yeterince ele alınmamış bir alan olarak yer almaktadır. Hem örgütsel hem de bireysel açıdan olumsuz sonuçları olmakla birlikte, özellikle örgütlerin yaşamını devam ettirmesinin önünde önemli bir engel oluşturabilmektedir. Bu kapsamda araştırmanın amacı, örgütsel damga kavramının tanımlanarak ve yapılan araştırmalar ışığında açıklanarak alanyazına kazandırılması ile gelecekte bu konuda yapılacak araştırmalara temel oluşturmaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Damga, Damgalama, Bireysel Damga, Örgütsel Damga

Kaynakça

• Akgündüz Y. (2021). Örgütsel davranış teorileri. Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık, Ankara.
• Coslor E.H., Crawford B., Brents B.G. (2020). Whips, chains, and books on campus: how emergent organizations with core stigma gain official recognition. Journal of Management Inquiry. 29(3), 299-316.
• Devers C.E., Dewett T., Belsito C.A. (2005). Fallıng out of favor: ıllegıtımacy, socıal control, and the process of organızatıonal stıgmatızatıon. Academy of Management Best Conference Paper 2005 SIM: D1.
• Devers C.E., Dewett T., Mishina Y., Belsito C.A. (2009). A general theory of organizational stigma. Organization Science. 20(1), 154-171.
• Ewest T. (2016). Book review, religion and organizational stigma at work. Journal of Biblical Integration in Business. 19,98-100.
• Frandsen S., Morsing M. (2022). Behind the stigma shield: frontline employees’ emotional response to organizational event stigma at work and at home. Journal of Management Studies. 59(8),1987-2023.
• Goffman E. (1986). Stigma notes on the management of the spoiled identity. First Touchstone Edition, Simon and Schuster, Inc., New York.
• Grougiou V., Dedoulis E., Leventis S. (2016). Corporate social responsibility reporting and organizational stigma: the case of “sin” ındustries. Journal of Business Research. 69,905-914
• Goodrick E., Bagdasarian J.L., Jarvis L.C. (2022). Not on skid row: stigma management in addiction treatment organizations. Journal of Management Studies. 59(8), 2067-2100.
• Grosman A., Enrico O., Tumlinson J. (2023). Dissecting organizational stigma: the case of lehman “orphans”. 10.13140/RG.2.2.28848.74249.
• Hampel C.E., Tracey P. (2017). How organizations move from stigma to legitimacy: the case of cook’s travel agency ın victorian britain. Academy of Management Journal, 60(6),2175-2207.
• Helms, W., Patterson, K. (2014). Eliciting acceptance for “illicit” organizations: the positive implications of stigma for mma organizations. Academy of Management Journal. 57 (5), 1453-1484.
• Hudson B.A. (2008). Against all odds: a consideratıon of core-stigmatized organizations. Academy of Management Review. 33(1), 252-266.
• Hudson, B. A., Okhuysen, G. A. (2009). Not with a ten-foot pole: core stigma, stigma transfer, and ımprobable persistence of men’s bathhouses. Organization Science. 20 (1), 134-153.
• Hudson B.A., Okhuysen G.A. (2014). Taboo topics: structural barriers to the study of organizational stigma, Journal of Management Inquiry. 23(3), 242-253.
• Hudson B.A. vd. (2022). Organizational stigma: taking stock and opening new areas for research. Journal of Management Studies. 59(8), 1899-1914.
• Jensen T., Sandström J. (2015). Normal deviants and erving goffman: extending the literature on organizational stigma. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies. 5(4),125-142.
• Kvale G., Murdoch Z. (2022). Making sense of stigmatized organizations: labelling contests and power dynamics in social evaluation processes. Journal of Business Ethics. 178, 675-693.
• Dil Şahin, M. Uluslararası Sosyal ve Ekonomik Çalışmalar Dergisi, 2024; 5, (1) 112
• Law T. (2016). Dirty work and theoretical disorder: toward a cohesive analysis of stigmatized organizations. The International Journal of Interdisiplinary Organizational Studies, 11(1), 1-11.
• Özkalp E., Kırel Ç. (2016). Örgütsel davranış, Ekin Yayınevi, Bursa.
• Pischel S., Felfe J. (2023). “Should ı tell my leader or not?”-health-oriented leadership and stigma as antecedents of employees' mental health ınformation disclosure ıntentions at work. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 65 (1), 85.
• Robbins S.P., Judge T.A. (2015). Örgütsel davranış. Çev.Edt. İnci Erdem, Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık, Ankara.
• Roulet T. (2015). ‘‘What good is wall street?’’ ınstitutional contradiction and the diffusion of the stigma over the finance ındustry. Journal of Business Ethics. 130,389-402.
• Sadri M., Piazza A., Phung K., Helms W. (2023). The disparate economic outcomes of stigma: evidence from the arms ındustry. Strategic Management Journal. 44, 2489-2533.
• Tak Meydan, B. (2019). Sosyal kimlik kuramı. İçinde Örgütsel Davranış Kuramları. Edt. Senay Yürür, Beta Basım Yayım Dağıtım, İstanbul.
• Thomson S.B. (2015). Religion and organizational stigma at work. Palgrave Macmillan, New York.
• Vergne, J. P. (2012). Stigmatized categories and public disapproval of organizations: A mixed-methods study of the global arms industry, 1996–2007. Academy of Management Journal. 55 (5), 1027-1052.