2010-2021 Yıllarında Teknolojik Pedagojik Alan Bilgisi Üzerine Yapılan Çalışmaların İncelenmesi

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2, 54 - 70, 31.12.2022

Rumeysa Yılmaz , Ayten Pınar Bal

Öz

Bu araştırmada teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi üzerine yapılan çalışmaların eğilimlerinin belirlenmesi amaçlanmaktadır. Araştırmanın örneklemini 2010-2021 yılları arasında yayınlanmış 112 makale oluşturmaktadır. Araştırmada "Yayın Sınıflandırma Formu" kullanılmıştır. Bu form, araştırma kapsamında incelenen çalışmalar, çalışmanın disiplin alanları, konusu, yöntemi, veri toplama sürecinde kullanılan araçlar, örneklem ve veri analiz türleri hakkında tanımlayıcı bilgileri içerir. Araştırma sonucunda; araştırmaların sayısı yıllara göre değişmekte, belirli bir alana özgü olmayan çalışmaların büyük çoğunluğunun TPAB'a yönelik yeterlilik, tutum ve algıların incelenmesi olduğu, en çok nicel yöntemin tercih edildiği, genellikle ölçeklerin tercih edildiği Veri toplama aracı olarak, çalışmalarda öğretmen adaylarının sıklıkla çalışıldığı ve veri analiz yöntemi olarak nicel veri analiz yöntemlerinin tercih edildiği ortaya çıkmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi, pedagojik alan bilgisi, doküman incelemesi

Examination Of the Studies Made on Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge İn the Years of 2010-2021

Öz

In this research, it is aimed to determine the trends of the studies on technological pedagogical content knowledge. The sample of the research consists of 112 articles published between 2010-2021. "Publication Classification Form" was used in the research. This form includes descriptive information about the studies examined within the scope of the research, the discipline areas of the study, the subject, the method, the tools used in the data collection process, the sample and the types of data analysis. As a result of the research; the number of studies varies according to years, the majority of studies that are not specific to a certain field, the most preferred subject is the examination of competence, attitudes and perceptions towards TPCK, the quantitative method is mostly preferred, the scales are generally preferred as a data collection tool, It has been revealed that in studies, pre-service teachers are frequently studied and quantitative data analysis methods are preferred as data analysis method.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Technological pedagogical content knowledge, pedagogical content knowledge, document review

Kaynakça

• Abbitt, J. T. (2011). Measuring technological pedagogical content knowledge in preservice teacher education: A review of current methods and instruments. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(4), 281–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2011.10782573
• Akbulut, Y. (2013). Analysis of data. A. Simsek (Ed.). Scientific research methods (139-165). Eskisehir: Anadolu University Press.
• Anderson, T. (2008). Towards a theory of online learning, in Anderson, T. (Ed.) Theory and Practice of Online Learning (pp. 45–74). Canada: AU Press.
• Bakirci, H, Kutlu, E. (2018). Determination of science teachers’ views on STEM approach. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 9 (2), 367-389. https://doi.org/10.16949/turkbilmat.417939
• Baran, E., Canbazoğlu Bilici,S. (2015). Review of the research on technological pedagogical content knowledge: The case of Turkey. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 30(1), 15-32.
• Bozan, M. A. & Anagün, S. Ş. (2019). STEM focused professional development process of elementary school teachers: An action research. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International, 9(1), 279-313. https://doi.org/10.18039/ajesi.520851
• Carr, A. A., Jonassen, D. H., Litzinger, M. E., & Marra, R. M. (1998). Good ideas to foment educational revolution: The role of systematic change in advancing situated learning, constructivism, and feminist pedagogy. Educational Technology, 38(1), 5–14.
• Chai, C.-S., Koh, J. H.-L., & Tsai, C.-C. (2013). A Review of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Educational Technology & Society, 16(2), 31–51.
• Calık, M. & Sozbilir, M. (2014). Parameters of Content Analysis. Education and Science, 39(174), 33-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.15390/EB.2014.3412
• Dedebali, N. C., Ulaş, K. & Dursun, F. (2018). The quality of any educational system can not exceed the quality of the teacher. Turkish Studies, 13(27), 531-546. http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.14582
• Demirezen, S, Keles, H. (2020). Examination of social studies teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge competencies according to various variables. International Journal of New Approaches in Social Studies, 4(1), 131-150. https://doi.org/10.38015/sbyy.750007
• Dikmen, C, Demirer, V. (2016). Trends in studies on technological pedagogical content knowledge in Turkey between 2009 and 2013 years. Turkish Journal of Education, 5(1), 33-46. https://doi.org/10.19128/turje.77632
• Dogru, E., & Aydın, F. (2017). Examining the skills of geography teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of History Culture and Art Research, 6(2), 485- 506. https://doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v6i2.686
• Dundar, E. & Unaldı Eser, U. (2020). Developing an achievement test prepared to measure the TPACK (TPACK) competencies of geography teachers. Anatolian Journal of Cultural Studies, 4(3), 215-232. https://doi.org/10.15659/ankad.v4i3.107
• Horzum, M. B. (2011). Adaptation of web pedagogical content knowledge survey to Turkish. Elementary Education Online, 10(1), 257-272. Jang, S. J., & Tsai, M. F. (2012). Exploring the TPACK of Taiwanese elementary mathematics and science teachers with respect to use of interactive whiteboards. Computers & Education, 59(2), 327-338.
• Kabakci-Yurdakul, I., Odabasi, H. F., Kiliçer, K., Coklar, A. N., Birinci, G., Kurt, A.A. (2012). The development, validity and reliability of TPACK-deep: A technological pedagogical content knowledge scale. Computers & Education, 58(3), 964-977. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/66817/
• Kaleli- Yılmaz, G. (2015). Türkiye’deki TPAB çalışmalarının analizi Education and Science, 40(178), 103-122. http://dx.doi.org/10.15390/EB.2017.6444
• Kaya, Z., Emre, I. ve Kaya, O. N. (2010). Determination of Self-Confidence Levels of Classroom Teacher Candidates in Terms of TPACK. 9th Grade Teacher Education Symposium,643-651, Elazığ.
• Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teachers design e ucational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(2), 131-152.
• Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60-70.
• Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., Kereluik, K., Shin, T. S., & Graham, C. (2014). The technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) framework. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Ellen, & M. Derya Aygün, Mihriban Hacısalihoğu Karadeniz & Suphi Önder Bütüner 213 J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 101–111). New York, NY: Springer.
• Korucu, A , Usta, E, Atun, H. (2017). Trends in research on TPACK for the period 2010-2016 . Journal of Amasya University Faculty of Education,6 (1), 104-133. http://dx.doi.org/10.31704/ijocis.2020.001
• Lee, M. H., Wu, Y. T. ve Tsai, C. C. (2009). Research Trends in Science Education from 2003 to 2007: A Content Analysis of Publications in Selected Journals. International Journal of Science Education, 31 (15), 1999-2020.
• Metin, M., Birisci, S., & Coskun, K. (2013). Examination of teacher candidates' attitudes towards instructional technologies in terms of different variables. Kastamonu Journal of Education, 21(4), 1345-1364.
• Mishra, P., & M. J. Koehler. 2006. “Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge.” Teachers College Record, 108 (6): 1017–1054. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x.
• Ozgen, K., Narli, S. & Alkan, H. (2013). Examination of pre-service mathematics teachers' perceptions of technological pedagogical content knowledge and frequency of technology use. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 12(44), 31-51.
• Oztürk, E. (2013). Evaluation of the technological pedagogical content knowledge of primary school teacher candidates in terms of some variables. Uşak University Journal of Social Sciences, 6 (2). doi:10.12780/UUSBD163
• Sancar Tokmak, H., Yavuz Konokman, G., & Yanpar Yelken, T. (2013). Examining TPACK (TPACK) self-confidence perceptions of Mersin University pre-school teacher candidates. Journal of Ahi Evran University Kirsehir Education Faculty, 14(1), 35-51.
• Saykal, A. ve Ulucınar Sağır, Ş. (2021). Teacher competences and technological pedagogical content knowledge researches in Turkey. Gazi Journal of Educaional Science, 7(2), 115-137. https://dx.doi.org/10.30855/gjes.2021.07.02.001.
• Schmidt, D., Baran, E., Thompson, A., Mishra, P., Koehler,M. J. Ve Shin, T. S. Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): the development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 123-149
• Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14. Sözbilir, M. (2009). Nitel veri analizi. https://fenitay.files.wordpress.com/2009/02/1112-nitel-arac59ftc4b1rmada-veri-analizi.pdf adresinden erişildi (6 Mayıs 2021).
• Sözbilir, M., Güler, G. ve Çiltaş, A. (2012). Mathematics education research in Turkey: A content analysis study. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 12(1), 565-580.
• Tatlı, Z, Akbulut, H. (2017). Teacher candidates technology using competence in the field Ege Education Journal, 18(1), 31-55. DOI: 10.12984/egeefd.328375
• Timur, B. ve Tasar, M. F. (2011). The adaptation of the technological pedagogical content knowledge confidence survey into Turkish. University of Gaziantep Journal of Social Sciences, 10(2), 839-856.
• Ucak, S, Erdem, H. (2020). On the skills of 21st century and philosophy of education in terms of searching a new aspect in education. Uşak Üniversitesi Journal of Educational Research, 6(1), 76-93. doi: 10.29065/usakead.690205
• Usta, I. (2018). Changes in teacher training undergraduate programs and suggestions for open and distance learning courses. Journal of Open Education Practices and Research, 4(4), 58-68.
• Ültay, E, Akyurt, H, Ültay, N. (2021). Descriptive Content Analysis in Social Sciences. IBAD Journal of Social Sciences, 10, 188-201. doi: 10.21733/ibad.871703
• Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Pareja-Roblin, N., Tondeur, J. ve Braak, J. (2013). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29, 109-121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00487.x
• Wach, E. (2013). Learning about qualitative document analysis. https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/20.500.12413/2989 adresinden erişilmiştir (6 Mayıs 2021)
• Willermark S. Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge: A Review of Empirical Studies Published From 2011 to 2016.Journal of Educational Computing Research. 2018;56(3):315-343. doi:10.1177/0735633117713114
• Wu, Y.-T. (2013). Research trends in technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) research: A review of empirical studies published in selected journals from 2002 to 2011. British Journal of Educational Technology 44 (3) 73-76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01349.x.