EVALUATION OF ACCESSIBILITY TO HEALTH FACILITIES PROBLEMATIQUE VIA SPACE SYNTAX METHOD IN THE CONTEXT OF TURKIYE LEGISLATION

Öz

The regulation on the Preparation of Spatial Plans guides health infrastructure planning at the zoning scale, including provisions for minimum per capita land requirements in Türkiye. However, at the local level, the spatial distribution and accessibility of health facilities play a critical role in ensuring equitable and efficient healthcare service delivery. This study aims to evaluate the adequacy of health facility areas at the neighborhood scale in the Central District of Kastamonu Province. First, the health facility area per capita was calculated for each neighborhood to assess compliance with the legal standards. Subsequently, spatial intelligibility was analyzed using DepthMapX-0.29 software by generating connectivity and integration maps and calculating their correlation coefficient (R²). The findings reveal that while the Saraçlar neighborhood had the highest intelligibility value (R² = 0.48), it was found to be insufficient regarding the allocated health facility area. These findings indicate that although the area is perceptually accessible, there is a spatial deficiency in healthcare provision. Ensuring access to health services is a fundamental human right, and from this perspective, transportation and spatial planning must prioritize enhancing access to public services. The results underline the necessity of revising spatial planning regulations by incorporating perceptual accessibility considerations to address local healthcare needs better.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Accessibility
• space syntax method
• connectivity
• integration
• health facilities.

Sağlık Tesislerine Erişilebilirlik Sorunsalının Türkiye Mevzuatı Çerçevesinde Mekân Dizim Yöntemi İle Değerlendirilmesi

Öz

Türkiye’de sağlık altyapısının imar ölçeğinde planlanmasında “Mekânsal Planlar Yapım Yönetmeliği” uygulanmakta olup yönetmeliğe göre kişi başına düşen alan koşulu bulunmaktadır. Ancak sağlık tesis alanları yerel ölçekte sağlık arzı açısından önemli olup erişebilir konumda yer seçmesi verimli hizmet sunumu açısından oldukça önemlidir. Bu bağlamda araştırmanın amacı Kastamonu İli Merkez İlçesinde mahalle ölçeğinde sağlık tesis alanlarının yeterliliğini analiz etmektir. Araştırmada öncelikle her mahalle için kişi başına düşen sağlık tesisi alanı hesaplanarak mevzuata bağlı yeterlilik durumu tespit edilmiştir. Ardından DepthMapX-0.29 yazılımı kullanılarak bağlantısallık ve bütünleşiklik haritalarının korelasyon katsayısı (R²) elde edilerek okunabilirlik analizi yapılmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda Saraçlar Mahallesi’nde R² değeri en yüksek (0.48) iken sağlık tesislerinin alansal açıdan yeterliliği düşük bulunmuştur. Sağlık tesis alanı eksikliği olduğu belirlenen mahallede yüksek okunabilirlik değeri alanın algısal erişilebilirlik açısından iyi düzeyde olduğunu göstermektedir. Günümüzde de önemli olan sağlık tesislerine erişim kolaylığı tüm insanların temel haklarından birisidir. Bu bağlamda, insanların yaşam kalitelerini de etkileyen ulaşım planlamasının “kamusal mekânlara geçişin artırılması” çerçevesinde ele alınması önemli bir gerekliliktir. Sonuçlar aynı zamanda algısal erişilebilirlik boyutunda mekânsal planlara ilişkin mevzuatın geliştirilmesi gerekliliğini ortaya koymaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Erişilebilirlik
• mekân dizim yöntemi
• bağlantısallık
• bütünleşiklik
• sağlık tesisleri.

Kaynakça

1. Alrashed, A. (2021). Public Experience of Modern Saudi Mega Hospitals: a Space Syntax Case Study of King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia (Doctoral dissertation). DOI: https://hdl.handle.net/2346/87466
2. Arca, D. (2012). Geographic Information System and Remote Sensing in Disaster Management. Karaelmas Science and Engineering Journal 2 (2), 53-61. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/karaelmasfen/issue/57130/806051
3. Baran, P. K., Rodríguez, D. A., & Khattak, A. J. (2008). Space syntax and walking in a new urbanist and suburban neighbourhoods. Journal of Urban Design, 13(1), 5-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574800701803498
4. Belir, O. (2021). The Effect of the Landmark on the Symmetry Axis to the Spatial Legibility of the Visually Impaired. MEGARON, 16(3), 574-582. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.14744/megaron.2021.33269
5. Branch, L. G., & Nemeth, K. T. (1985). When elders fail to visit physicians. Medical Care, 23(11), 1265–1275. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-198511000-00005
6. Brondeel, R., Weill, A., Thomas, F., & Chaix, B. (2014). Use of healthcare services in the residence and workplace neighbourhood: The effect of spatial accessibility to healthcare services. Health & Place, 30,127-133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2014.09.004
7. Brudney D. (2016). Is health care a human right? Theor Med Bioeth. 37(4), 249-257. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-016-9376-6
8. Delamater PL. (2013). Spatial accessibility in suboptimally configured health care systems: a modified two-step floating catchment area (M2SFCA) metric. Health & Place, 24: 30–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2013.07.012

9. Doi, K., Kii, M., & Nakanishi, H. (2008). An integrated evaluation method of accessibility, quality of life, and social interaction. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 35(6), 1098-1116. https://doi.org/10.1068/b3315t
10. Dovey, K., & Pafka, E. (2020). What is walkability? The urban DMA. Urban studies, 57(1), 93-108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098018819727
11. Elmaci, D. (2019). Accessibility Implementations in Europe: Examination and Evaluation of Borås and Cardiff Samples. Journal of Social Policy Studies, 43, 33-60. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21560/spcd.v19i46288.453040
12. Gauthier, S., May, B., & Vasseur, L. (2021). Ecosystem-based adaptation to protect avian species in coastal communities in the greater Niagara Region, Canada. Climate, 9(6), 91. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli9060091
13. Geng, S., Chau, H.-W., Yan, S., Zhang, W. and Zhang, C. (2021). Comparative analysis of hospital environments in Australia and China using the space syntax approach. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, Vol. 39 No. 3, pp. 525-546. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBPA-04-2020-0031
14. Guagliardo, M. F. (2004). Spatial accessibility of primary care: concepts, methods and challenges. Int J Health Geogr, 3(1), 3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-072x-3-3
15. Gundogdu, M. (2014). Space Syntax and Researching Issues. The Art-Sanat Journal, 2, 252-274. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/iuarts/issue/8770/109637
16. Hansen, W.G. (1959). How Accessibility Shapes Land-Use. Journal of the American Institute of Planners. 25(2): 73–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01944365908978307
17. Hillier, B. (1996) Space is the machine: a configurational theory of architecture. Space Syntax, London, UK. Retrieved from https://patterns.architexturez.net/system/files/SITM.pdf
18. Hillier, B., Burdett, R., Peponis, J. and A Penn. (1987). Creating life: or does architecture determine anything? Architecture and Behaviour, 3(3), 233-250. Retrieved from https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/101
19. Hillier, B., Hanson, J. (1984). The Social Logic of Space. Cambridge University Press, England, s 26. Retrieved from http://assets.cambridge.org/97805213/67844/frontmatter/9780521367844_frontmatter.pdf
20. Hillier, B., Penn, A., Hanson, J., Grajewski, T. ve Xu, J. (1993). Natural movement: Or configuration and attraction in urban pedestrian movement. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design (20), 29-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068%2Fb200029
21. Horner, M. W. (2004). Exploring metropolitan accessibility and urban structure. Urban Geography, 25(3), 264-284. https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3638.25.3.264
22. Iamtrakul, P., Padon, A., & Klaylee, J. (2022). Measuring spatializing inequalities of transport accessibility and urban development patterns: Focus on megacity urbanization, Thailand. Journal of Regional and City Planning, 33(4), 345-366. http://dx.doi.org/10.5614/jpwk.2022.33.3.4
23. Karimi, K. (2012). A configurational approach to analytical urban design: ‘Space syntax’ methodology. Urban Des Int 17, 297–318 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.2012.19
24. Karlström, A., & Mattsson, L. G. (2009). Place, space syntax and attraction-accessibility. Proceedings of the 7th International Space Syntax Symposium, s. 104(1).
25. Kavanagh, B. E., Beks, H., Versace, V. L., Quirk, S. E., & Williams, L. J. (2022). Exploring the barriers and facilitators to accessing and utilising mental health services in regional, rural, and remote Australia: a scoping review protocol. PLoS One, 17(12), e0278606. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278606
26. Kemec, S., Karahan-Kamaci, E., Mert, Y. (2019). Physical Accessibility Analysis of Emergency Health Units of Van City. Yuzuncu Yil University Journal of the Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences, 24(1), 22-32. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/yyufbed/issue/45184/489743
27. Kim, M. M., Swanson, J. W., Swartz, M. S., Bradford, D. W., Mustillo, S. A., & Elbogen, E. B. (2007). Healthcare barriers among severely mentally ill homeless adults: Evidence from the five-site health and risk study. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 34(4), 363–375. DOI: https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1007/s10488-007-0115-1
28. Long, Y., & Baran, P. K. (2012). Does intelligibility affect place legibility? Understanding the relationship between objective and subjective evaluations of the urban environment. Environment and Behavior, 44(5), 616-640. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916511402059
29. Luo W, Wang F. (2003). Measures of spatial accessibility to health care in a GIS environment: synthesis and a case study in the Chicago region. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 30(6):865–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068%2Fb29120
30. Major, M.D. (2018). The Syntax of City Space: American Urban Grids. New York/London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203732434
31. Mamat, S.E., Sisman, A. (2021). Investigation of Pedestrian Accessibility to Schools and Family Health Centres: Case Study of Rize. Turkish Journal of Geographic Information Systems, 3(2), 60-66. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/tucbis/issue/65820/872149
32. Marcus, L. (2010). Spatial capital. Journal of Space Syntax, 1(1).
33. McCormack, G. R., Koohsari, M. J., Turley, L., Nakaya, T., Shibata, A., Ishii, K., ... & Oka, K. (2021). Evidence for urban design and public health policy and practice: Space syntax metrics and neighborhood walking. Health & Place, 67, 102277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2019.102277
34. McGrail M.R. (2015). Spatial accessibility of primary health care utilising the two step floating catchment area method: an assessment of recent improvements. Int J Health Geogr, 16, 11-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-072x-11-50
35. McGrail, M. R., Humphreys, J. S. (2014). Measuring spatial accessibility to primary health care services: utilising dynamic catchment sizes. Appl Geogr. 54,182-188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-072x-11-50
36. Németh, J., Schmidt, S. (2011). Publicly Accessible Space and Quality of Life: A Tool for Measuring the Openness of Urban Spaces. In: Budruk, M., Phillips, R. (eds) Quality-of-Life Community Indicators for Parks, Recreation and Tourism Management. Social Indicators Research Series, vol 43. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9861-0_4
37. Pearsall, H., Gutierrez-Velez, V. H., Gilbert, M. R., Hoque, S., Eakin, H., Brondizio, E. S., ... & Valletta, R. D. (2021). Advancing equitable health and well-being across urban–rural sustainable infrastructure systems. npj Urban Sustainability, 1(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42949-021-00028-8
38. Penchansky, R., Thomas, J. W., (1981). The concept of access: definition and relationship to consumer satisfaction, Med. Care, 19, 127-140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-198102000-00001
39. Sanchez, J., Byfield, G., Brown, T. T., LaFavor, K., Murphy, D., & Laud, P. (2000). Perceived accessibility versus actual physical accessibility of healthcare facilities. Rehabilitation Nursing, 25(1), 6-9. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.2048-7940.2000.tb01849.x
40. Schraufnagel, A, M., Schraufnagel, W., E, Schraufnagel, D, E. (2017). Is healthcare a human right? Yes. Am J Med Sci, 354(5), 447-448. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjms.2017.10.001
41. Siregar, J. P., Rukmi, W. I., & Kurniawan, E. B. (2021, November). Evaluating accessibility to city parks utilizing a space syntax method. A case study: city parks in Malang city. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 916, No. 1, p. 012015). IOP Publishing. DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/916/1/012015
42. Steadman, P., & Mitchell, L. J. (2010). Architectural morphospace: mapping worlds of built forms. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 37(2), 197-220. https://doi.org/10.1068/b35102t
43. Syed, S. T., Gerber, B. S., & Sharp, L. K. (2013). Traveling towards disease: transportation barriers to health care access. Journal of community health, 38(5), 976-993. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-013-9681-1
44. Tannous, H. O., Major, M. D., & Furlan, R. (2021). Accessibility of green spaces in a metropolitan network using space syntax to objectively evaluate the spatial locations of parks and promenades in Doha, State of Qatar. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 58, 126892. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126892
45. TUIK, 2023. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/ (Date of access: 30.05.2023).
46. Vukovic, T., Salama, A. M., Mitrovic, B., & Devetakovic, M. (2021). Assessing public open spaces in Belgrade–a quality of urban life perspective. Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 15(3), 505-523. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARCH-04-2020-0064
47. Wang J, Deng Y, Song C, Tian D. (2016). Measuring time accessibility and its spatial characteristics in the urban areas of Beijing. J Geogr Sci. 26(12), 1754-1768. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-016-1356-2
48. Wang, F. (2012). Measurement, optimization and impact of healthcare accessibility: a methodological review. Ann Assoc Am Geogr. 102:1104–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2012.657146
49. Wang, J., Deng, Y., Song, C., & Tian, D. (2016). Measuring time accessibility and its spatial characteristics in the urban areas of Beijing. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 26, 1754-1768. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-016-1356-2
50. Wang, X., Yang, H., Duan, Z., & Pan, J. (2018). Spatial accessibility of primary health care in China: a case study in Sichuan Province. Social Science & Medicine, 209, 14-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.05.023
51. Wu, P., Xu, D., Cui, N., Li, X., & Liu, Y. (2025). Study on the Accessibility of Urban Parks Within the Framework of Kunming’s 15-Min Living Circle. Land, 14(5), 933. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14050933
52. Yilmaz, T., Oter, B. (2021). Application of the Space Syntax method in accessibility studies, Antalya city case. International Journal of Agriculture, Environment and Food Sciences, 5(1), 74-77, DOI: https://doi.org/10.31015/jaefs.2021.1.10
53. Zafersoy, H., Batırbaygil, H. (2014). Urban Integrity: The City of Nicosia, Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus. MEGARON, 9(4), 289-311. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5505/MEGARON.2014.00710
54. Zafri, N. M., Nurullah, M., Neema, M. N., & Waliullah, M. (2021). Spatial accessibility to healthcare facilities in coastal region of Bangladesh. The International Journal of Health Planning and Management, 36(3), 643-655. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.3107
55. Zheng, W., Du, N., & Wang, X. (2022). Understanding the city-transport system of urban agglomeration through improved space syntax analysis. International Regional Science Review, 45(2), 161-187. https://doi.org/10.1177/01600176211023879