Ticari Açıklığın Enerji Tüketimi Üzerindeki Etkisi: Panel Veri Analizi

Öz

Bu çalışma, 2000-2020 yılları arasındaki panel verilerini kullanarak 39 gelişmekte olan ülkede ticari açıklık ve enerji tüketimi arasındaki ilişkiyi araştırmaktadır. Araştırmada yatay kesit bağımlılığı ve heterojenliği hesaba katmak için ikinci nesil panel birim kök testleri ve Dinamik En Küçük Kareler Ortalama Grup (DOLSMG) tahmincisi dahil olmak üzere gelişmiş ekonometrik yöntemler kullanılmaktadır. Ampirik sonuçlar, ticari açıklığın enerji tüketimi üzerinde istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir negatif etkiye sahip olduğunu ve ticari açıklıktaki %1’lik bir artışın enerji tüketiminde %0,29’luk bir düşüşle ilişkili olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Bu bulgu, artan uluslararası ticaret entegrasyonunun teknoloji transferi ve daha verimli üretim süreçlerine erişim yoluyla enerji verimliliğini teşvik ettiğini göstermektedir. Bununla birlikte GSYİH ve işgücüne katılımın enerji tüketimi üzerinde sırasıyla %0,79 ve %1,89’luk güçlü pozitif etkileri olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Ülkeye özgü analizler, ticari açıklığın incelenen 39 ülkenin 32’sinde enerji tüketimini azalttığı sadece 2 ülkede olumlu etiler gösterdiğini ortaya koymaktadır. Bu sonuçlar, ticari serbestleşmenin enerji verimliliğini artırmak için bir mekanizma olarak hizmet edebileceğini, ancak ekonomik faaliyetlerdeki genel büyümenin gelişmekte olan ülkelerde enerji talebini yükseltmeye devam ettiğini göstermektedir. Bulgular, gelişmekte olan ülkelerdeki politika yapıcıları için önemli çıkarımlara sahip olup, hızla büyüyen ekonomilerde enerji verimliliği ve sürdürülebilir uygulamaları artırmaya yönelik tedbirleri uygularken aynı zamanda ticari açıklığı teşvik eden dengeli politikalara ihtiyaç duyulduğunu göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Ticari açıklık
• Enerji tüketimi
• Dinamik En Küçük Kareler Ortalama Grup Tahmincisi (DOLSMG)

The Impact of Trade Openness on Energy Consumption: Panel Data Analysis

Öz

This study investigates the relationship between trade openness and energy consumption in 39 developing countries using panel data from 2000 to 2020. It employs advanced econometric methods, including second-generation panel unit root tests and the Dynamic Least Squares Mean Group (DOLSMG) estimator to account for cross-sectional dependence and heterogeneity. The empirical results reveal that trade openness has a statistically significant negative impact on energy consumption and that a 1% increase in trade openness is associated with a 0.29% decrease in energy consumption. This finding suggests that increased international trade integration promotes energy efficiency through technology transfer and access to more efficient production processes. In addition, GDP and labor force participation are found to have strong positive effects of 0.79% and 1.89% on energy consumption, respectively. Country-specific analysis reveals that trade openness reduces energy consumption in 32 of the 39 countries analyzed, with positive effects in only 2 countries. These results suggest that trade liberalization can serve as a mechanism to improve energy efficiency, but overall growth in economic activity continues to drive up energy demand in developing countries. The findings have important implications for policymakers in developing countries, suggesting the need for balanced policies that promote trade openness while implementing measures to increase energy efficiency and sustainable practices in rapidly growing economies.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Trade openness
• Energy consumption
• DOLSMG

Kaynakça

1. Alkhateeb, T. T. Y. ,Mahmood, H. (2019), Energy Consumption and Trade Openness Nexus in Egypt: Asymmetry Analysis. Energies, 12(10).
2. Antweiler, W., Copeland, B. R., Taylor, M. S. (2001), Is Free Trade Good for the Environment? American Economic Review, 91(4), 877-908.
3. Anwar, N., Elfaki, K. E. (2021), Examining The Relationship Between Energy Consumption, Economic Growth And Environmental Degradation in Indonesia: Do Capital snd Trade Openness Matter?. International Journal of Renewable Energy Development, 10(4), 769-778.
4. Cole, M.A. (2006), Does Trade Liberalization Increase Energy Use? Economics Letters, 92, 108-112.
5. Danish, Saud, S., Baloch, M.A., Lodhi, R.N. (2018), The Nexus Between Energy Consumption And Financial Development: Estimating The Role Of Globalisation in Next-11 Countries, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Control Ser. 25 18651–18661.
6. Das, D., Ghosh, P., Mamun, T. M. (2022), Causality Among Energy Price, Trade Openness And Economic Growth in Emerging Countries: A Panel Cointegration Analysis. Khulna University Studies, 163-180.
7. Demirtaş, I., & Baş, B. (2023). An Econometric Analysis On The Determinants of Energy Consumption in Turkey. Journal of Management and Economics Research, 21(3), 393-409.
8. Dowrick, S., Golley, J. (2004), Trade Openness and Growth: Who Benefits? Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 20(1), 38-56.

9. Etokakpan, M.U., Adedoyin, F.F., Vedat, Y., Bekun, F.V., (2020), Does Globalization in Turkey Induce Increased Energy Consumption: Insights Into Its Environmental Pros And Cons. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 27, 26125-26140.
10. Fraihat, B.A.M., Al-Amarneh, A., Yaseen, H., Samarah, M.R., Alkhawaldeh, Y., Buraik, O. (2023), Trade Openness, Energy Consumption, and Financial Development Influence on Jordan’s Economy: Evidence from ARDL and Non-Granger Causality Test Approach. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 13(6), 659-665.
11. Ghani, G.M. (2012), Does Tradeliberalization Effect Energy Consumption? Energy Policy, 43 285–290.
12. Grossman, G. M., Krueger, A. B. (1991), Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series, No. 3914.
13. Halıcıoğlu, F. (2011), A Dynamic Econometric Study Of Income, Energy And Exports in Turkey. Energy, 36(5), 3348-3354.
14. Hossain, M. S. (2011), Panel Estimation For CO2 Emissions, Energy Consumption, Economic Growth, Trade Openness And Urbanization Of Newly Industrialized Countries. Energy Policy, 39(11), 6991-6999.
15. Huang, G., Pan, W., Hu, C., Pan, W., Dai, W. (2021), Energy Utilization Efficiency Of China Considering Carbon Emissions—Based On Provincial Panel Data. Sustainability, 13(2), 877.
16. Im, K.S., Pesaran, M.H., Shin, Y. (2003), Testing for Unit Roots in Heterogeneours Panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115, 53-74.
17. Koengkan, M., Fuinhas, J. A., Vieira, I. (2021), Measuring The Effect Of Trade Liberalisation On The Consumption Of Non-Renewable Energy Sources in Latin America &Amp; The Caribbean Countries. Economics and Business Letters, 10(4), 349-358.
18. Law, C. H., Sek, S. K. (2021). Panel Evidence Of The Dynamics Between Energy Consumption and Trade Openness in Asean And East Asia. Energy &Amp; Environment, 33(3), 449-471.
19. Osabuohien-Irabor, O, Drapkin, I.M (2022), The Impact of Technological Innovation on Energy Consumption in OECD Economies: The Role of Outward Foreign Direct Investment and International Trade Openness. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy,12(4), 317-333.
20. Persyn, D., Westerlund, J. (2008), Error-Correction–Based Cointegration Tests Forpanel Data. The Stata Journal, 8(2), 232-241.
21. Pesaran, M. H., Ullah, A., Yamagata, T. (2008), A Bias-Adjusted LM Test of Error Cross Section Indipendence. Econometric Journal, 11, 105-127.
22. Pesaran, M.H., Yamagata, T. (2008), Testing Slope Homogeneity in Large Panels. Journal of Econometrics, 142(1), 50-93.
23. Rafiq, S., Salim, R., Nielsen, I. (2016), Urbanization, Openness, Emissions, And Energy Intensity: A Study Of Increasingly Urbanized Emerging Economies. Energy Economics, 56, 20-28.
24. Rahman, M.M., Khan Z., Khan, S., Tariq, M., (2023), How Is Energy Intensity Affected By Industrialisation, Trade Openness And Financial Development? A Dynamic Analysis For The Panel Of Newly Industrialized Countries. Energy Strategy Reviews, 49, 101182.
25. Sadorsky P. (2013), Energy Consumption, Output And Trade in Southamerica. Energy Econ; 34:476–88.
26. Sbia, R., Shahbaz, M., Hamdi, H. (2014), A Contribution Of Foreign Direct Investment, Clean Energy, Trade Openness, Carbon Emissions and Economic Growth To Energy Demand İn UAE. Economic Modelling,36, 191-197.
27. Shahbaz M, Nasreen S,Ling CH, Sbia R.( 2014), Causality Between Trade Openness And Energy Consumption: What Causes What in High, Middle And Low İncome Countries. Energy Policy; 70:126–43.
28. Shahbaz M., Khaan, S., Tahir, M.I. (2013), The Dynamic Links Between Energy Consumption, Economic Growth, Financial Development And Trade in China: Fresh Evidence From Multivariate Framework Analysis. Energy Economics, 40, 8-21.
29. Shahbaz, M., Alam, M. M., Uddin, G. S.Loganathan, N. (2019). The Effect Of Scale, Technique, Composition And Trade Openness On Energy Demand: Fresh Evidence From Malaysia. Bulletin of Energy Economics, Vol. 4(3), pp. 280-296.
30. Westerlund, J. (2007), Testing for Error Correction in Panel Data. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 69(6), 709-748.
31. Yıldırım, D. Ç., Yıldırım, S., & Demirtas, I. (2019). Investigating energy consumption and economic growth for BRICS-T countries. World Journal of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development, 16(4), 184-195.