The Impacts of Perception Criteria on Aesthetic Response to Urban Streets: A Case Study in Downtown Ankara, Turkey

Year 2018, Volume: 31 Issue: 4, 996 - 1005, 01.12.2018

Ayşe Tekel , Aybike Ceylan Kızıltas , Sara Afshar

Abstract

Man-environment relations-
more specifically the aesthetic response of people to certain qualities of
their environment- is a significant research area for urban design, as such
studies provide for a solid ground for urban design criteria. The purpose of this
study is to investigate the perception criteria that have greater impact for
satisfactory streets. For this, a web-based 'virtual tour' was used to elicit
response to scenes of three urban streets in downtown Ankara, Turkey; each one
exhibiting a range of different characteristics. The 70 subjects who
participated in the study were selected from undergraduate student population.
Our analysis resulted in categorizing variables of perception according to
their relationship with aesthetic response to urban streets and to find out
criteria that mostly effect sense of aesthetics toward urban streets. Findings
of the study are significant as they can show urban planners and designers
criteria for designing streets to reinforce the satisfaction derived from urban
streets.

Keywords

Street, Aesthetic Response, Perception Criteria

References

• Referans 1 Carmona et al. , Public spaces – Urban places: The dimensions of urban design. Architecture Press, (2003).
• Referans 2 Rapaport, A., Human Aspects of Urban Form, Oxford: Pergamon Press, (1977).
• Referans 3 Nasar, JL., Urban design aesthetics: The evaluative quality of building exteriors, Environment and Behavior, 26, 377-401, (1994)
• Referans 4 Lynch, K., The Image of The City, MA: MIT Press, Cambridge, (1960).
• Referans 5 Nasar, J.L., Perception and Evaluation of Residential Street Scenes, In: J.L Nasar (ed.) Environmental Aesthetics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 275-289, (1998).
• Referans 6 Kaplan R., Kaplan S, and Ryan RL., With People in Mind: Design and Management of Everyday Nature, Washington, DC: Island. (1998).
• Referans 7 Kaplan R, Kaplan S, The experience of nature: A psychological perspective, Cambridge Univ. Pr. (1989).
• Referans 8 Kaplan, S., and Kaplan, R., Cognition and Environment: Functioning in An Uncertain World, Praeger, New York, (1982).
• Referans 9 Wertheimer, M. Laws of Organization in Perceptual Forms (1923), Classics in the History of Psychology, an internet resource developed by Christopher D. Green, York University, Toronto, Ontario: Last revised February 2000.
• Referans 10 Günay, B., Gestalt Theory and City Planning Education. METU Journal of Faculty of Architecture, 24(1), 93-113,(2007).
• Referans 11 Markovic, S. Components of aesthetic experience: Aesthetic fascination, aesthetic appraisal, and aesthetic emotion. i-Perception, 3(1), 1. (2012).
• Referans 12 Russell James A. and Geraldine Pratt, A Description of the Affective Quality Attributed to Environments, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 38, No. 2, 311-322, (1980)