Evaluation Of The Expectations, And Acquisitions Of Architectural Project Atelier Participants From Fall 2020 To Spring 2021 Online Education Period Regarding Learning Styles Of Individuals

Öz

This Study emphasizes on the Atelier participant Students’ ideas and opinions of their early Expectations and final Acquisitions from the Architectural Project and how the way of learning types of each student is efected by their expectations and acquisitions (or vica versa) during an online education period between Fall 2020 to Spring 2021. By applying a questionnaire to a group of atelier participants that consist of varying age and experience levels that value their opinions on their personal gains on varying aspects of architectural design at two semesters of one education year. It was possible to understand and evaluate the Atelier participant Students’ ideas and opinions of their early expectations, and final acquisitions from the architectural project and how varying types of learning styles of each student is significantly reflected when their primary expectations and final acquisitions are comparatively evaluated in a fully online education year.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Architectural Education
• Architectural Project Atelier
• Design Studio
• Learning Styles
• Online Education

Kaynakça

1. Grover, R & Wright, A (2020). National Design Studio Survey: Initial Results, Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, University of Bath, Bath, UK 2020
2. Güngör, C . (2020). “Evaluation Of The Expectations, Assignments And Acquisitions Of Architectural Project Atelier Participants”. Gazi University Journal of Science Part B: Art Humanities Design and Planning, 8 (2), 607-624. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/gujsb/issue/55887/754460
3. Güngör, C. (2021). Evaluation Of the Expectations, And Acquisitions of Architectural Project Atelier Participants in Spring 2020 Semester Regarding Learning Styles of Individuals During a Disrupted Education Period . Gazi University Journal of Science Part B: Art Humanities Design and Planning , 9 (3) , 175-191 . Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/gujsb/issue/65203/977423
4. Kolb, D., (1984). “Experiential Learning: Experience As The Source Of Learning And Development”.
5. Mumford. A. and Honey P. (1992), “Questions and Answers on Learning Styles Questionnaire”, Industrial and Commercial Training, Vol. 24 No. 7. https://doi.org/10.1108/00197859210015426
6. Smith, M. K. (2001, 2010). ‘David A. Kolb on experiential learning’, The encyclopedia of pedagogy and informaleducation. [https://infed.org/mobi/david-a-kolb-on-experiential-learning/. Retrieved: 19.4.2022]
7. Wayne Attoe & Robert Mugerauer (1991): Excellent studio teaching in architecture, Studies in Higher Education, 16:1, 41-50 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03075079112331383081
8. https://www2.le.ac.uk/departments/doctoralcollege/training/eresources/teaching/theories/kolb

9. https://reviewing.co.uk/research/experiential.learning.htm
10. http://fcis.oise.utoronto.ca/~daniel_schugurensky/faqs/qa8.html
11. https://www.businessballs.com/self-awareness/kolbs-learning-styles/
12. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/00197859210015426/full/html