A Study on The User Satisfaction with The Configuration of Housing Interior Spaces

Öz

Aim: This study aims to analyze and present satisfaction levels of users of housing interior spaces as per the variables of the housing ownership structure, the housing size, the number of rooms in the housing unit, and the housing type. Also, the study aims to address the housing features and quality as factors affecting satisfaction with the housing unit. Method: In the context of this study designed as quantitative research, to form the research sample, approximately 134 households were contacted, and a survey form was administered to these households on a face-to-face basis. For the administration of the survey form, all research participants were selected with the simple random sampling technique, and the ethical endorsement for the research was received from the Ethics Committee. The research data collected with the survey form were analyzed with computer software, the Statistical Package for Social Science. Findings: In the study, it was found that participants had high levels of satisfaction with all spaces of the housing unit as per the housing size and the number of rooms in the housing unit. Upon the analysis of the levels of satisfaction with the landscape configuration of the living spaces, it was discerned that housing renters had higher levels of satisfaction with the landscape configuration of the living spaces than housing owners. The data on levels of satisfaction with the landscape configuration of the living spaces indicate that participants residing in detached houses in low-rise housing estates and participants residing in apartments in housing estates had higher levels of satisfaction with the landscape configuration of the living spaces than those residing in apartments in single buildings. Conclusion: At the end of the analysis, it was discerned that the variable of the housing ownership structure had no effect on the satisfaction of the housing interior space user.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Housing Unit
• Interior Space Configuration
• User Satisfaction
• Satisfaction Level
• Pendik

Kaynakça

1. [1] Rapoport, A. (2000). Theory, culture and housing. Housing, theory and society, 17(4), 145-165. Doi: 10.1080/140360900300108573
2. [2] So, A., & Hu, Leung A. (2004). Survey of attitudes towards buildings in three Chinese cities: Hong Kong, Shanghai and Taipei. Facilities, Bradford 22(3/4):100-108. Doi: 10.1108/02632770410527833
3. [3] Doxiadis Associates International (1978) Lagos State Regional Plan Final Draft. Report No. 4 Volume 1.
4. [4] Zorlu, T., & Sağsöz, A., (2010). Müstakil konut sitelerinde kullanıcı tercihlerine bağlı fiziki müdahaleler: Trabzon örneği. Metu Jfa, 1/27(2):189-206. Doi: 10.4305 / ME-TU.JFA.2010.2.10
5. [5] Kellekci, Ö. L., & Berköz, L., (2006). Konut ve çevresel kalite memnuniyeti yükselten fak-törler. İTÜ Dergisi/A, Mimarlık, Planlama, Tasarım, 5(2):167-178. ISSN: 1307-1645
6. [6] Güremen, L., (2016). Konut ve yerleşim alanı kullanıcı algısının memnuniyet ve tercih dav-ranışına etkisi üzerine bir araştırmada amasya örneği. Technological Applied Sciences, 11(2):24-64. Doi:10.12739/NWSA.2016.11.2.2A0093 [7] Yıldız Kuyrukçu, E., & Ulusoy, M., (2014). Yeni konutlaşma eğilimi olan dışa kapalı konut yerleşmelerinde kullanıcı memnuniyeti analizi: Konya örneği. Selçuk Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, 2(3):1-12 Doi: 10.15317/Scitech.201439625 [8] Mohit, M., Ibrahim, M., & Rashid, Y., (2010). Assessment of residential satisfaction in newly designed public low-cost housing in kuala lumpur, Malaysia. Habitat International, 34(1):18-27. Doi: 10.1016/J.HABITATINT.2009.04.002 [9] Salleh, A. G., (2008). neighbourhood factors in private low-cost housing in malaysia. Habitat International, 1(2):1-9. Doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2008.01.002
7. [10] Gülaydın, D., (2004). Konutta Memnuniyet ve Tasarım İlişkisi Açısından Çekirdek Konutlar-da Esneklik Araştırması [Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi] İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi.
8. [11] Galster, G., (1987). Identifying the correlates of dwelling satisfaction: an empirical critique. Environment and Behaviour, 19(5):539-568 Doi: 10.1177/0013916587195001

9. [12] Kaitilla, S., (1993). Satisfaction with public housing in Papua New Guinea: The case of west taraka housing sheme. Environment and Behaviour, 25(3):514-545 Doi: 10.1177/0013916593253005
10. [13] Ogu, V. I., (2002). Urban residential satisfaction and the planning implications in a develo-ping world context: The example of Benin City, Nigeria. International Planning Studies, 7(1):37-53 Doi: 10.1080/13563470220112599
11. [14] Morris, E. W., Winter, M., (1978). Housing, family and society. New York: John Wiley & Sons Doi: 10.1093/sf/57.3.1021
12. [15] Galster, G. C., Hesser, G. W., (1981). Residential satisfaction: Compositional and contextual correlates. Environment and Behavior, 13(6):735–758 Doi: 10.1177/0013916581136006
13. [16] Michelson, W., (1977). Environmental choice, human behavior, and residential satisfaction. United States, ss.1354-1355 Doi: 10.1126/science.197.4311.135
14. [17] Li, G., Wu, F., (2013). Residential satisfaction in China’s informal settlements: A case study of Beijing, Shanghai, and Guangzhou. Urban Geography, 34(7):923–949 Doi: 10.1080/02723638.2013.778694
15. [18] Ibem, E. O., Amole, D., (2013). Residential satisfaction in public core housing in Abeokuta, Ogun State, Nigeria. Social Indicators Research, 113(1):563–581 Doi: 10.1007/S11205-012-0111-Z
16. [19] Jacobs, A., Appleyard, D., (1987). Toward an urban design manifesto. Journal of the Ameri-can Planning Association, 53(1):112–120 Doi: 10.1080/01944368708976642
17. [20] Hourihan, K., (1984). Context dependent models of residential satisfaction: An analysis of hou-sing groups in cork, Ireland. Environment and Behavior, 16(3):369-393. Doi: 10.1177/0013916584163004
18. [21] Cho, J. E., & Hu, H., (2009). The effect of service quality on trust and commitment varying ac-ross generations. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 33(4):468–476. Doi: 10.1111/j.1470-6431.2009.00777.x
19. [22] URL-1. https://gezilecekyerlertr.com/pendilk-nerede/ Last Accessed: 01.02.2023
20. [23] Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., & Büyüköztürk, Ş., (2012). Sosyal Bilimler İçin Çok Değişkenli İsta-tistik: SPSS ve Lisrel Uygulamaları. 6. Baskı Ankara, Türkiye: Pegem Akademi Yayıncı-lık.
21. [24] Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y., (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16:74-94. Doi:10.1007/BF02723327
22. [25] Kim, J. O., & Jin, B., (2001). Korean customers ‘patronage of discount stores: domestic vs multinational discount store shoppers’ profiles. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18:236–255. Doi: 10.1108/07363760110393092
23. [26] Karasar, N., (1995). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemi. Ankara, Türkiye: 3A Araştırma, Eğitim, Danışmanlık Ltd. Şti.
24. [27] Tan, T. H., & Khong, K. W., (2012). The link between homeownership motivation and hou-sing satisfaction. International Journal of Economics and Management, 6(1):1-20. [28] Mohit, M. A., & Azim, M., (2012). Assessment of residential satisfaction with public housing in hulhumale, Maldives. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 50:756-770. Doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.08.078
25. [29] Baum, A., & Davis, G. E., (1980). Reducing the stress of high density living: An architectural ıntervention. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(3), 466-471. Doi: 10.1177/00139165042676
26. [30] Omole, F. K. (2001). Basic ıssues in housing development. Ondo, Nigeria: Femo Bless Publi-cation.
27. [31] Barutçular, T., & Dostoğlu, N. (2019). Üst gelir grubu konutlarda kullanıcı memnuniyetinin aidiyet üzerinden incelenmesi: Ataköy örneği. Megaron, 14(1), 39-52. Doi: 10.14744/MEGARON.2019.95815