The Relationship Between Urban Furniture and Urban Identity in Open Spaces: Sazova Park, Kent Park, Hamamyolu Urban Deck

Öz

Urban open spaces, where social and cultural needs are met, offer many opportunities for individuals' daily lives. At the same time, urban open spaces are an important component in the formation of urban identity. Urban open spaces have an impact on the city's image and help in the recognition of the city. Urban furniture within urban open spaces, defined as parks, squares, streets, etc., is designed to meet users' needs for rest, entertainment, transportation, and so on. Urban furniture integrates with the spaces they are located in and becomes a part of the city. Urban furniture also emphasizes the urban identity. Starting from the relationship between urban furniture and urban identity, an attempt has been made to determine the relationship between urban furniture in Sazova, Hamamyolu Urban Desk, and Kent Park and urban identity. In this direction, firstly, the elements that affect the urban identity of Eskişehir are identified, and then the relationship between urban furniture in the designated areas and urban identity is evaluated.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Urban Identity
• Kent Park
• Sazova
• Hamamyolu Urban Deck
• Urban Furniture

Kaynakça

1. [1] TDK Urban Sciences Dictionary, (1980)
2. [2] Oldenburg, R., The Great Good Place. New York: Paragon. (1989).
3. [3] Woolley, H., Urban Open Spaces. Spon Press London and New York. (2003).
4. [4] Korkmaz, E., User's Evaluations of Urban Open Spaces: Beşiktaş Sample. Master Thesis. İTU. (2001).
5. [5] Oktay, D., The Nature of Urban Public Spaces and Their Role in City Life, Journal of Yapı, 207:53-61. (1999). [6] Lynch, K., Good City Form. MIT Press. Cambridge. (1984).
6. [7] Gehl, J., Life Between Buildings, Van Nostrand Reinhold. New York. (1987).
7. [8] İnan, Z., Desing of Urban Open Spaces for User Needs. Artvin Çoruh University, Faculty of Forestry Journal, 9[1-2]:12-23. (2008).
8. [9] Gürbüz, H., and Yılmaz, V., Investigation Of Factors Effecting The Using Preferences Of Kent Park Which is a Recreational Field in Eskişehir. Researcher: Social Science Studies. 5[9]. 187-200. (2017).

9. [10] Büyükbayraktar, N., Researches on The Development and Quality Criterias of Urban Open Spaces: A Case Study of Eskisehir. Master Thesis. İstanbul University. (2019).
10. [11] Karakaya, N., The Importance of Urban Parks in Increasing Quality of Life: Examination in the Case of Eskisehir Province. Master Thesis. Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University. (2019).
11. [12] Şahin F., and Tavşan, C., Seeking Identity in Urban Design: The Case of Eskişehir Hamamyolu Street. SETSCI Conference Indexing System, Volume:3. P:795-801. (2018).
12. [13] Kasapoğlu, K., and İnceoğlu M., Legibility of Hamamyolu Urban Deck Through the Accessibility. International Journal of Engineering Research and Development. 14[3]. 145-153. (2022).
13. [14] İlgar, E., City İdentity and City İdentity Dimension of Urban Transformation: Example of Eskisehir. Master Thesis. Anadolu University. (2008).
14. [15] Hakyemez, D., Changing Identity: Case of Eskişehir. Master Thesis. METU. (2016).
15. [16] Sadioğlu, U. & Yürük, E., The Effects of Eskisehirs Industrial Heritage, the Factory Zone, on the City Identity. İdealkent, Special Issue on Urbanization and Economy, 1049-1072. (2020).
16. [17] Çakmak, Ş., The Artifacts Which Have A Determining Role Of The Urban Formation And Creating Urban İdentity: The research on the city of Eskişehir. Master Thesis. Eskişehir Osmangazi University. (2008).
17. [18] Öncü, H. Katırcı, H. Yüce, A., Relatıon Between Cıty Brand Percetıon And Recreatıon: Case Of Eskısehır Provınce. GSI Journals Serie B: Advancements in Business and Economics. 1:85-98. (2020).
18. [19] Büyüktaş, Ö., Reading The Changing Urban Memory Elements Through Shopping Spaces:Example Of Hamamyolu Bazaar. Master Thesis. Eskişehir Osmangazi University. (2022).
19. [20] Şimşek, G. An Approach to Urban River Rehabilitation For Coexistence of River and its Respective City: Porsuk River Case and City of Eskişehir, Doctoral Thesis, METU. (2011).
20. [21] URL 1: Eskişehir Kent Park: https://www.arkitera.com/proje/eskisehir-kent-parki/. Last Accessed: 20.04.2023.
21. [21] Yıldız, M. Conservation and Revitalization Proposals for Eskişehir Sugar Factory Social Facilities Area. Master Thesis. METU. (2016).
22. [23] URL 2: Starting the Super City Eskişehir File: https://www.arkitera.com/haber/super-kent-eskisehir-dosyasi-basliyor/ Last Accessed: 20.04.2023.
23. [24] URL 3: II. National Landscape Architecture Award 2010: Urban Parks: https://v3.arkitera.com/y1170-ii-ulusal-peyzaj-mimarligi-odulu--2010--kent-parklari--.html Last Accessed: 20.04.2023.
24. [25] Kentsel Planlama Encyclopedic Dictionary. Ninova Publications. (2012).
25. [26] Lynch, K. Urban Image. Translator: İrem Başaran. Turkish Iş Bank. Kültür Publications. (2018).
26. [27] Özdemir, Z., The Analysis of the Integration Problems of River Cities With The River in Terms of Planning and Design. Master Thesis. Gazi University (2013).
27. [28] Kodal, G., The evaluation of the historical district between Atapark and Tabakhane Bridge in terms of the elements of urban identity. Master Thesis. KATU. (2014).
28. [29] Çelikyay S., and Karayılmazlar, S, A., Examınatıon Of Publıc Spaces In Bartın Cıty Center Wıth The Aspect Of Urban Ergonomıcs And Urban Identıty.Journal of Bartın Faculty of Forest. 18[2]. 224-238. (2016).
29. [30] Bayraktar, N., Tekel, A., Ercoşkun Y, Ö., An Evaluatıon And Classıfıcatıon Of Urban Furnıture On Ankara Atatürk Boulevard And Relatıon Wıth Urban Identıty. Journal of Faculty Architecture Gazi University. 23[1]: 105-118. (2008).
30. [31] Bekar, M., Acar, C., Şahin, K., E., Examınatıon Of Urban Furnıture Desıgn Based On Urban Adaptatıon And Evaluatıon Of User’s Opinion. Journal of the International Scientific Researches. 2[2]:178-185. (2017).
31. [32] Şişman, E, E., and Yetim, L., An Examination of Urban Furniture of Tekirdağ on the Point of View Landscape Architecture. Trakya University Journal of Science. 5[1]:43-51. (2004).
32. [33] Göncü, N., The Effect Of Urban Elements On Urban İdentity. Master Thesis. Marmara University. (2007).
33. [34] Yücel, G, F., The Use of Furnishing Elements in Public Open Spaces. Ege Architecture 4-59: 2 6-28. (2006).
34. [35] URL 4: Hamamyolu Park ve Meydan Düzenlemesi [Hamamyolu Urban Deck]: https://www.arkitera.com/proje/hamamyolu-park-ve-meydan-duzenlemesi-hamamyolu-urban-deck/ Last Accessed: 20.04.2023.
35. [36] Kurtaslan, B., Ö., Relationship and Design of Sculpture-Environment in Open Spaces. Erciyes University Journal of Social Sciences Institute. 1[18], 193-222. (2005).
36. [37] http://www.eskisehirliyiz.biz/haber/?sec=1&newscatid=1&newsid=161729 Last Accessed: 20.04.2023.
37. [38] Karaca, O., Bolkaner, M. K., İnançoğlu, S., & Asilsoy, B. Kent Mobilyası üzerine Bir Çalışma: Yakın Doğu Üniversitesi Kampüsü. Yakın Doğu Üniversitesi Yakın Mimarlık Dergisi, 4(1), 34-44. (2020).
38. [39] Başal, M. Donatı elemanları, Basılmamış ders notları. Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Peyzaj Mimarlığı Bölümü. Ankara (2002).
39. [40] Gülen, M. Donatı Elemanlarının Kentsel Alanlara Etkisi: Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Kampüsü Örneği. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 26(1), 34-44. (2021).
40. [41] Tel, H. Ö. Kent Kimliği ile Uyumlu Kent Mobilyası Tasarımı ve Uygulaması; Şanlıurfa, Divanyolu Caddesi Örneği. Duzce Universitesi Orman Fakultesi Ormancilik Dergisi, 17(2). 225-240. (2021).
41. [42] Akın, E. S., and Kavasoğulları, A. Kent Mobilyalarının Kent Kimliği ile İlişkisi: Yozgat Çapanoğlu Kent Park Örneği. Turkish Journal Of Forest Science, 6(1), 60-79. (2022).
42. [43] Akyol, E. Kent Mobilyaları Tasarım ve Kullanım Süreci. Master Thesis. İTÜ.2006