Aga Khan Ödülü'nde Kadın Mimarların Tasarım Kriterlerinin Değerlendirilmesi

Öz

Aga Khan Mimarlık Ödülleri, topluma fayda sağlayan ve sürdürülebilirliği teşvik eden projelere öncelik vererek mimarlık alanında önemli bir rol oynamıştır. Bununla birlikte, Orta Doğu’daki erkek egemen mimari ortam göz önüne alındığında, bu ödülü kazanan kadın mimarların katkılarının daha ayrıntılı bir şekilde incelenmesi, bu çalışmanın temel odak noktasını oluşturmaktadır. Bu araştırma, kadın mimarların Aga Khan Mimarlık Ödülü’nü kazandıkları projeleri, tasarım yaklaşımlarını, öne çıkan özelliklerini ve ödüllerin niteliğini incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Ayrıca, mimarların yaşadıkları mekanlara ve şehirlere katkılarını değerlendirmek amacıyla mimarların ülkeleri, eğitim geçmişleri ve ekonomik koşulları da incelenmektedir. Çalışmanın temel amacı, Orta Doğu’da kadın mimarlar tarafından yürütülen ödüllü projelerin şehirler ve topluluklar üzerindeki etkisini ortaya koyarken, geleneksel olarak erkek egemen bir mesleki bağlamda kadınların başarılarını öne çıkararak mimaride cinsiyet temsiline ilişkin farkındalığı artırmaktır. Bu çalışmada, Aga Khan Mimarlık Ödülleri’ni kazanan veya finale kalan projeler arasından, tek yazar olarak kadınların yer aldığı altı proje seçilmiştir. Bu projeler, Moscatelli, Raffa ve Ulusoy Shipstone tarafından belirlenen bağlamsal bağlantı, toplumsal katılım, kültürel duyarlılık ve sağlanan olanaklar kriterlerine göre sistematik olarak değerlendirilmiştir. Çalışma, mimarlık dünyasındaki kadınların başarılarını ve ödüllerini öne çıkarmayı ve görünür kılmayı amaçlamaktadır. Böylelikle, mimarlık alanındaki diğer kadınlar için rol modeller sunmayı ve onları cesaretlendirmeyi hedeflemektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Kadın Mimarlar
• Aga Han Mimarlık Ödülleri
• Kültürel Duyarlılık
• Bağlamsal Bağlantı

Evaluation of the Design Criteria of Women Architects in the Aga Khan Award

Öz

The Aga Khan Architecture Awards have played a significant role in the field of architecture by prioritizing projects that benefit society and promote sustainability. However, considering the male-dominated architectural environment in the Middle East, further examination of the contributions of female architects who have received this award constitutes the primary area of concern for this study. This research aims to examine the projects for which female architects have received the Aga Khan Architecture Award, their design approaches, prominent features, and the nature of the awards. Additionally, it examines the architects’ countries, educational backgrounds, and economic conditions to assess their contributions to the spaces and cities they inhabit. The main aim of the study is to reveal the impact of award-winning projects led by female architects in the Middle East on cities and communities, while also raising awareness of gender representation in architecture by highlighting women’s achievements within a traditionally male-dominated professional context. In this study, six projects were selected from among those that won or were shortlisted for the Aga Khan Architecture Awards, featuring women as the sole authors. These projects were systematically evaluated based on the criteria of contextual connectivity, community engagement, cultural sensitivity, and provided amenities, as established by Moscatelli, Raffa, and Ulusoy Shipstone. It aims to highlight and make visible the achievements and awards of women in the architectural world. By doing so, it seeks to encourage and present role models for other women in the architecture field.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Women Architects
• Aga Han Architecture Award
• Cultural Sensitivity
• Contextual Connection

Kaynakça

1. [1] Bozdoğan, S. (2001). Modernism and nation building: Turkish architectural culture in the early republic. University of Washington Press.
2. [2] Fowler, B., & Wilson, F. (2004). Women architects and their discontents. Sociology, 38(1),101– 119. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038504039363SAGE Journals+2
3. [3] De Graft-Johnson, A., Manley, S., & Greed, C. (2003). Why do women leave architecture? Royal Institute of British Architects. https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/1073899/why-dowomen-leave-architecture
4. [4] URL-1 Thevarajah, P. (2024, March 29). Unpacking the erasure of women of color in architecture. Architectural Digest. https://www.architecturaldigest.com/story/unpacking-the-erasure-of-womenof-color-in-architecture Last Accessed:20.04.2025
5. [5] Ertürkmen-Aksoy, B. S. (2024). European women’s gaze on both Ottoman Istanbul and the(ir) other. Gender, Place & Culture, 31(8), 1050–1071. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2023.2232562
6. [6] Elakad L. (2023), Understandıng Vernacular Archıtecture Wısdom In Türkiye Through The Aga Khan Award For Archıtecture, Masters Dissertation, İstanbul Altınbaş Üniversitesi
7. [7] Salkhı Khasraghı S. & Mehan A.(2023), Glocalızatıon Challenges And The Contemporary Archıtecture: Systematıc Revıew Of Common Global Indıcators In Aga Khan Award’s Wınners, Journal of Architecture and Urbanism, Volume 47 ,Issue 2: 135–145, https://doi.org/10.3846/jau.2023.17176
8. [8] Mohammadjavad S. (2024), The Aga Khan Award For Archıtecture: An Inquıry On Changıng Narratıves, Doctoral Dissertation, Ortadoğu Teknik Üniversitesi

9. [9] Demir E.,(2023) ,Bursa’da Kadın Mimar Olmak: Serbest Mimarlık Pratiğinde Kadın Mimarların Yeri [Being a Female Architect in Bursa: The Role of Women Architects in Private Architectural Practice], Masters Dissertation, Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi
10. [10] Büyükbayram T. (2023), Kadın ve Mimarlık: Türkiye’de Kadın Mimarların Görünürlüğü Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme[Women and Architecture: An Evaluation on the Visibility of Women Architects in Turkey],Masters Dissertation, Başkent Üniversitesi
11. [11] URL-2 Yıldız Kuyrukçu, E., & Özkan, H. (2023). Eleştirel Bölgeselcilik Kapsamında Ağa Han Mimarlık Ödülleri’nin Analizi. PLANARCH - Design and Planning Research, 7(1), 19-33. https://doi.org/10.5152/Planarch.2023.23123 LastAccessed:29.12.2025
12. [12] URL-3 Hasol, D. (1983). Ağa Han 1983 Mimarlık Ödülleri. Yapı – Mimarlık Kültür ve Sanat Dergisi (Mayıs, 51). https://www.doganhasol.net/aga-han-1983-mimarlik-odulleri-2.html LastAccessed:29.12.2025
13. [13] Chang, L. C., (2014), Where are the women? Measuring progress on gender in architecture. Association of Collegiate Schools of Architecture. https://www.acsa-arch.org/resource/where-arethe-women-measuring-progress-on-gender-in-architecture/
14. [14] Nicholson, K. A. (2020), Where are the women? Measuring progress on gender in architecture. Association of Collegiate Schools of Architecture.https://www.acsa-arch.org/resource/where-arethe-women-measuring-progress-on-gender-in-architecture-2/
15. [15] Türkün Dostoğlu, N.& Erdoğdu Erkaslan, Ö. ―Türkiye’de Kadın Mimarların Statüsü Üzerine Niceliksel Analiz‖, Dosya: 19 Cinsiyet ve Mimarlık, Ankara, 2010
16. [16] Grimes, S. E. (2007). Women in the studios of men: Gender, architectural practice, and the careers of Sophia Hayden Bennett and Marion Mahony Griffin, 1870–1960 (Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi). Saint Louis Üniversitesi.
17. [17] Ginige, K. N., Thurairajah, N., Amaratunga, D., & Haigh, R. (2008, Şubat). Role of women leaders in the UK construction industry and their career barriers. CIB W89 International Conference on Building Education and Research (BEAR), Sri Lanka.
18. [18] Architects Registration Board. (2024, November). New research published by ARB reveals staggering levels of discrimination and sexual misconduct experienced by architecture professionals. https://arb.org.uk/new-research-published-by-arb-reveals-staggering-levels-ofdiscrimination-and-sexual-misconduct-experienced-by-architecture-professionals
19. [19] Stott, R. (2018, 8 Şubat). 1 in 7 women in architecture have experienced sexual harassment in past 12 months, reports AJ. ArchDaily. https://www.archdaily.com/888734/1-in-7-women-inarchitecture-have-experienced-sexual-harassment-in-past-12-months-reports-aj
20. [20] Akyol, M. (2022), Constructing Individual Architectural Knowledge through Architect’s Travel. Materiart: Architectural Design, Research and Technology, Portugal: Caleidoscópio.
21. [21] Taş, A.& Üstün, G. Ö. & Cengizoğlu, F. P. (2024). The changing role of the architect from craftsmanship to artificial intelligence environment in historical context. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 25(3), 614–627.
22. [22] Aygın F.S, (2023), Geleneksellik ve Yerellik Unsurunun Çağdaş Konut Tasarımında Analizi: Aga Han Mimarlık Yarışmaları Bağlamında Bir İnceleme [An Analysis of the Elements of Tradition and Locality in Contemporary Housing Design: A Study within the Context of Aga Khan Architecture Awards], Masters Dissertation, Antalya Bilim Üniversitesi
23. [23] Kuyrukçu E.Y & Özkan H.(2023), Eleştirel Bölgeselcilik Kapsamında Ağa Han Mimarlık Ödülleri’nin Analizi [An Analysis of the Aga Khan Architecture Awards within the Scope of Critical Regionalism,], Atatürk Üniversitesi Yayınları,7,19-33, https://doi.org/10.5152/Planarch.2023.23123
24. [24] Büyükbayram T, & Bayraktar A.N.(2023), Mimarlık Ortamında Kadın Mimarların Görünür Olma Durumları Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme [An Evaluation on the Visibility of Women Architects in the Architectural Environment] , Proceedings of DARCH 2023 April 4th International Conference on Architecture & Design, 17-18 April, 116-126
25. [25] Erel A.İ.(2024), Kadın Mimarların Şantiyelerdeki Görünürlükleri Üzerine Bir Araştırma [A Study on the Visibility of Women Architects on Construction Sites], Masters Dissertation, İzmir Demokrasi Üniversitesi
26. [26] İgüs E. (2023), Mimar Olmak ya da Kadın Olmak Tezahürleriyle,Cumhuriyetin İlk Kadın Mimarlarından Leyla Asım Turgut [To Be an Architect or a Woman: Through the Manifestations of Leyla Asım Turgut, One of the First Female Architects of the Republic], VAKANÜVİSUluslararası Tarih Araştırmaları Dergisi, Vol. 8, Özel Sayı, 2730-2777
27. [27] Öztürk B.& Salman Y. (2023), Öncü Bir Modern Figür: Leyla Turgut’un Mimarlık Üretimi [A Pioneering Modern Figure: The Architectural Production of Leyla Turgut], Tasarım Kuram 2023;140. Yıl Sayısı: 85-103, doi: 10.14744/tasarimkuram.413 / ARAŞTIRMA
28. [28] Bektaş N.(2024), Toplumsal Cinsiyet Ve Mimarlığın Etkileşimi: Japon Mekan Okumalarında Kadının Varoluşu, Etkisi ve Dokunuşu [The Interaction of Gender and Architecture: The Presence, Influence, and Touch of Women in Japanese Spatial Readings], Internatıonal Interdıscıplınary Congress Of Women In Scıence-II, April 27-28, 416-424
29. [29] Moscatelli M., Raffa A., Ulusoy Shipstone A., ―Revitalisation Of Urban Spaces By Womenarchitects: Enhancing Cultural Heritage İn The Gulf Region (2023), Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, Vol. 18 No. 3, 624-653
30. [30] URL-4 Aga Khan Award for Architecture. (2024). https://www.akdn.org/architecture Last Accessed:15.08.2025
31. [31] Hasol, D. (2001), Ağa Han Mimarlık Ödülleri 2001[Aga Khan Architecture Awards 2001],Yapı Dergisi, (241), 37-38
32. [32] URL-5 Naji, Salima. (n.d.). Salim Anaji Architecture Studio. https://salimanaji.com/?lang=en Last Accessed:20.04.2025
33. [33] URL-6 Çınar, F. (2022, Haziran 21). Issy Vadisi İyileştirme Projesi. Arkitera. https://www.arkitera.com/proje/issy-vadisi-iyilestirme-projesi/ Last Accessed:20.04.2025
34. [34] URL-7 Aga Khan Development Network. (n.d.). Issy Valley Improvement. https://the.akdn/en/how-we-work/our-agencies/aga-khan-trust-culture/akaa/issy-valleyimprovement LastAccessed:20.04.2025
35. [35] URL-8 Rajesh A., ArchitectureLive: ―Minakshi Jain, India’s Prominent Conservation Architect, Passes Away https://architecture.live/minakshi-jain-indias-prominent-conservation-architectpasses-away/ , 14 Haziran 2023, Last Accessed:23.04.2025
36. [36] URL-9 Aga Khan Award For Architecture https://the.akdn/en/how-we-work/our-agencies/agakhan-trust-culture/akaa/rehabilitation-nagaur-fort. Last Accessed:23.04.2025
37. [37] URL-10 UNESCO, Asia-Pacific Awards for Cultural Heritage Conservation, https://webarchive.unesco.org/web/20160713071136/http://www.unescobkk.org/index.php?id=216 3. Last Accessed:23.04.2025
38. [38] URL-11 Architexturez https://architexturez.net/doc/az-cf-166701-8#off-canvas . Last Accessed: 23.04.2025
39. [39] URL-12 Aga Khan Development Network (2016). Bait Ur Rouf Mosque. Aga Khan Award for Architecture.https://www.akdn.org/architecture/project/bait-ur-rouf-mosque LastAccessed:23.04.2025
40. [40] URL-13 Tabassum, M. (2016). Bait Ur Rouf Mosque: Architecture and Light—the Architectural Review.https://www.architectural-review.com/buildings/bait-ur-rouf-mosque-dhaka-bangladeshby-marina-tabassum Last Accessed:23.04.2025
41. [41] Grichting Solder, A., Hempel, A., & Ottmann, D. A. (2024). Guest editorial: Women and Gulf Cities. The transformative impact of women influencing the architectural and urban developments of the Gulf region. Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 18(3), 473–480.https://doi.org/10.1108/ARCH-02-2024-0044
42. [42] URL-14 Aga Khan Development Network. (2016). Sharjah Art Foundation Art Spaces.https://www.akdn.org/architecture/project/sharjah-art-foundation-art-spaces Last Accessed:23.04.2025
43. [43] URL-15 Sharjah Art Foundation. (n.d.). Sharjah Art Spaces – Al Mureijah. https://sharjahart.org Last Accessed:23.04.2025
44. [44] Khan, H. (2017). Preserving the past, shaping the future: Adaptive reuse in the Gulf. Journal of Architecture and Urbanism, 41(4), 233–245.
45. [45] URL-16 Tmarch. (n.d.). Our team. https://tmarch.com/team Last Accessed:20.04.2025
46. [46] URL-17 Castro, F. (2015, March 11). New artist residency in Senegal. ArchDaily. https://www.archdaily.com/608096/new-artist-residency-in-senegal-toshiko-mori
47. [47] URL-18 Aga Khan Development Network. (n.d.). Thread: Artist Residency and Cultural Centre. https://the.akdn/en/how-we-work/our-agencies/aga-khan-trust-culture/akaa/thread-artist-residencyand-cultural-centre Last Accessed:20.04.2025
48. [48] URL-19 Mori, T. (2020, November 6). Architecture for resource stability.Domus. https://www.domusweb.it/en/architecture/gallery/2020/11/06/architecture-for-resourcestability.html
49. [49] URL-20 Zaha Hadid Architects https://www.zaha-hadid.com/people/zaha-hadid/. Last Accessed: 20.04.2025
50. [50] URL -21 Wikipedia https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zaha_Hadid. Last Accessed:20.04.2025
51. [51] URL-22 Aga Khan Award For Architecture https://the.akdn/en/how-we-work/our-agencies/agakhan-trust-culture/akaa/issam-fares-institute-public-policy-and-international-affairs. Last Accessed: 20.04.2025
52. [52] URL-23 Zaha Hadid Architects https://www.zaha-hadid.com/architecture/issam-fares-institute-forpublic-policy-international-affairs/ Last Accessed: 20.04.2025 [53] Aycı, H. (2021). 2000 Sonrası Aga Khan Mimarlık Ödülleri’nde Teknoloji Kavramının Değerlendirilmesi [Evaluation of the Concept of Technology in the Aga Khan Architecture Awards After 2000], European Journal of Science and Technology Special Issue, 22, pp. 331-341, doı: 10.31590/ejosat.849811