Critical Aspects and Technology of Fixed Automated Spray Technology System

Öz

Fixed automated spray technology (FAST) has been used for years in practice and theory both in Turkey and globally as an alternative to conventional method for struggle against snow and ice on highway superstructure. The purpose of FAST system is a proactive approach to reduce or even eliminate the impact of snow and ice factors that negatively affect the skid resistance on highway superstructure. This approach also plays an important role in decreasing the traffic accidents occurring on highways, prolonging the service life of the construction and minimizing the damage to the environment caused by conventional system. In light of this information, in this study, critical aspects of FAST system, its components, technological features, design and installation in terms of environmental factors are investigated. In addition, the advantages and disadvantages of the system in struggle against snow and ice have been revealed. As a result, superiority of FAST, which is a product of a multidisciplinary study, in prevention of accidents caused by low skid resistance on the highway for struggle against snow and ice over the conventional methods, economic evaluation of FAST system, assessment of the components as technically, and criteria of determination of FAST components are put forward.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Anti-Icing

Kaynakça

1. [1] Yıldız K., Şehir içi asfalt kaplamaların kayma potansiyelinin değerlendirilmesi - bir durum çalışması, Journal of Polytechnic, (2018). DOI: 10.2339/politeknik.407259.
2. [2] Xiao J., Kulakowski B. T., Ei-Gindy M., Prediction of risk of wet-pavement accidents: fuzzy logic model, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1717 No.1 (2000) 28-36. DOI: 10.3141/1717-05.
3. [3] Pan P., Wu S., Xiao F., Pang L., Xiao Y., Conductive asphalt concrete: A review on structure design, performance, and practical applications, Journal of Intelligent Material Systems, 26 No.7 (2015) 755-769. DOI: 10.1177/1045389X14530594.
4. [4] Pisano P. A., U.S. highway crashes in adverse road weather conditions, Proceedings of the the 24th Conference on IIPS , (2008).
5. [5] Kabaoğlu H.,Uçar E., Duran F., Buzlanma tahmini yapan mobil uygulama geliştirilmesi, Journal of Polytechnic, (2020). DOI: 10.2339/politeknik.735408.
6. [6] Ünlü D., Hilmioğlu N. D, Uçaklarda Buzlanma ve buzlanmayi önleyecek yöntemler, Journal of Sustainable Aviation Researches, 2 No.2 (2017) 75-80.
7. [7] Ye Z., Wu J., Ferradi N. E., Shi X. Anti-icing for key highway locations: fixed automated spray technology, Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 40 No.1 (2013) 11-18. DOI: 10.1139/cjce-2012-0226.
8. [8] Xu S., Zhou Z., Feng L., Cui N., Xie N., Durability of pavement materials with exposure to various anti-icing strategies, Processes, 9 No.2 (2021) 291-316. DOI: 10.3390/pr9020291.

9. [9] Veneziano D., Muthumani A., Shi X., Safety Effects of fixed automated spray technology systems, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2482 No.1 (2015) 102-109. DOI: 10.3141/2482-13.
10. [10] Akin M., Fay L., Shi X., Friction and Snow–pavement bond after salting and plowing permeable friction surfaces, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2674 No.11 (2020) 794-805. DOI: 10.1177/0361198120949250.
11. [11] Decker R., Automated bridge deck anti-and deicing system, in Idea Project Final Report,University of Utah, Salt Lake City, (1998).
12. [12] Keranen P. F., Automated bridge deicers for increased safety and decreased salt use in Minnesota, Proceedings of the the Xth PIARC International Winter Road Congress, (1998).
13. [13] Butt A., Ahmad S. S., Shabbir R., Erum S., GIS based surveillance of road traffic accidents (RTA) risk for Rawalpindi city: a geo-statistical approach, Kuwait Journal of Science, 44 No.4 (2017) 129-134.
14. [14] Khattak A. J., Pesti G., Kannan V., McCoy P.T., Guidelines for prioritizing bridge deck anti-icing system installations, in "NDOR Research Project, Nebraska Department of Transportatio, Lincoln, (2002).
15. [15] Duran F., Teke M., Akıllı Yol durum sensörü tasarımı, Uluslararası Muhendislik Arastirma ve Gelistirme Dergisi, (2019) 396-401. DOI: 10.29137/umagd.510777.
16. [16] Seferoğlu A., Seferoğlu M., Akpınar, M. “Karayolu ve havayolu kaplamalarinda kullanilan kar ve buzla mücadele yöntemlerinin mali analizi”, Gazi University Journal of Science Part C: Design and Technology, 3(1):407-416, (2015).
17. [17] Keleştemur O., YILDIZ S., Effect of various NaCl concentration on corrosion of steel in concrete produced by addition of styrofoam, Gazi University Journal of Science, 19 No. 3 (2006) 163-172.
18. [18] Ružinskas A., Bulevičius M., Sivilevičius H., Laboratory investigation and efficiency of deicing materials used in road maintenance, Transport, 31 No. 2 (2016) 147-155. DOI: 10.3846/16484142.2016.119078.
19. [19] Truschke C., Peterson K., Van Dam T., Peshkin D., Dedene C., Dedios R., Investigation of portland cement concrete exposed to automated deicing solutions on Colorado's Bridge decks, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2220 No.1 (2011) 1-11. DOI: 10.3141/2220-01.
20. [20] Asghshahrn M. S., Rahai A., Seismic Assessment of reinforced concrete bridge under chloride-induced corrosion, International Journal of Civil Engineering, 16 No.6 (2018) 681-693. DOI: 10.1007/s40999-017-0146-2.
21. [21] Xie A. M. N., Dang Y., Shi X., Deicer Impacts on concrete bridge decks: a comparative study of field cores from Potassium Acetate and Sodium Chloride environments, Innovative Materials and Design for Sustainable Transportation Infrastructure, (2015) 42-57. DOI: 10.1061/9780784479278.005.