Hydrogen Production using a Hybrid System Built with Renewable Energy Resources in Yenice

Abstract

Benefits of hybrid renewable energy; has a continuous power supply, has a better return on investment, is independent of the grid, has fewer operating hours of the diesel generator, requires less maintenance than a diesel generator system, and does not need frequent refueling, one-time initial capital required, protects from ever-increasing grid electricity tariffs. On the other hand, the demand for renewable energy sources such as wind, solar, hydrogen, biomass, and geothermal, which are the least harmful to nature and natural life, has increased due to the depletion of fossil fuels used in energy production and the greenhouse gases they have released to the environment. Thus, with the inclusion of renewable energy sources in the system, a rich structure in terms of energy diversity has emerged. An area that simulates a system consisting of renewable energy sources using HOMER Pro software and has an annual average electrical energy need of 3997104 kWh/day was selected. Solar radiation and wind data belonging to the region were taken from NASA Surface and used. The energy system of the area where the feasibility study was conducted consists of a generator, wind turbine, solar panel, hydrogen tank, electrifier inverter, and battery system. The energy produced by the resulting system will be used by 11.26 kg/day hydrogen load and 3997104 kWh/day electrical load. The economic evaluation criteria of the hybrid renewable energy system are the energy unit cost of energy production, the net present value (NPC), and the payback period; The environmental evaluation criteria were determined as the renewable energy rate and emission values evaluation criteria. When the renewable energy rate is at the lowest level, the most economical system is the Gen/PV/WT/Bat/300Htank/ H loaded hybrid system when emissions are not considered, while the Gen/PV/WT/Bat hybrid system has the lowest emissions without considering the cost. When the renewable energy rate is high, the most economical system has been the PV/WT/Bat hybrid system when emissions are not considered.

Keywords

• HOMER
• Zero Emission
• Optimization
• Hybrid Renewable Energy System
• Hydrogen Storage

Kaynakça

1. [1] Chauhan A, Saini R. P. Size optimization and demand response of a stand-alone integrated renewable energy system. Energy, 2017, 124: 59-73.
2. [2] Sharma B, Dahiya R, Nakka J. Effective grid connected power injection scheme using multilevel inverter based hybrid wind solar energy conversion system. Electric Power Systems Research, 2019, 171: 1-14.
3. [3] Sikder P S, Pal N. Modeling of an intelligent battery controller for standalone solar-wind hybrid distributed generation system. Journal of King Saud University-Engineering Sciences, 2020, 32.6: 368-377.
4. [4] Fesli U, Bayir R, Özer M. Design and implementation of a domestic solar-wind hybrid energy system. In: 2009 International Conference on Electrical and Electronics Engineering-ELECO 2009. IEEE, 2009. p. I-29-I-33.
5. [5] Buonomano A, et al. A hybrid renewable system based on wind and solar energy coupled with an electrical storage: Dynamic simulation and economic assessment. Energy, 2018, 155: 174-189.
6. [6] Fathabadi H. Novel standalone hybrid solar/wind/fuel cell power generation system for remote areas. Solar Energy, 2017, 146: 30-43.
7. [7] Genç M S. Economic analysis of large-scale wind energy conversion systems in central anatolian Turkey. Clean energy systems and experiences, 2010, 131-154.
8. [8] Dursun B. Determination of the optimum hybrid renewable power generating systems for Kavakli campus of Kirklareli University, Turkey. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2012, 16.8: 6183-6190.

9. [9] NREL, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Alliance for Sustainable Energy LLC. [Online]Available: https://www.nrel.gov.
10. [10] Homer Software. [Online]. Available: https://www.homerenergy.com/index.html.
11. [11] Altun A F, Kilic, M. Design and performance evaluation based on economics and environmental impact of a PV-wind-diesel and battery standalone power system for various climates in Turkey. Renewable Energy, 2020, 157: 424-443.
12. [12] Bakić V V, Pezo M L, Stojković S M. Technical and economic analysis of grid-connected PV/Wind energy stations in the Republic of Serbia under varying climatic conditions. FME Transactions, 2016, 44.1: 71-82.
13. [13] Khare V, Nema S, Baredar P. Solar–wind hybrid renewable energy system: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016, 58: 23-33.
14. [14] Akarsu B, Genç M S. Optimization of electricity and hydrogen production with hybrid renewable energy systems. Fuel, 2022, 324: 124465.
15. [15] Toklu E. Overview of potential and utilization of renewable energy sources in Turkey. Renewable Energy, 2013, 50: 456-463.
16. [16] Erdil A, Erbiyik H. Renewable energy sources of Turkey and assessment of sustainability. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2015, 207: 669-679.
17. [17] Genç M S, Gökçek, M. Evaluation of wind characteristics and energy potential in Kayseri, Turkey. Journal of Energy Engineering, 2009, 135.2: 33-43.
18. [18] Sharma R, Kodamana H, Ramteke M. Multi-objective dynamic optimization of hybrid renewable energy systems. Chemical Engineering and Processing-Process Intensification, 2022, 170: 108663.
19. [19] Rullo P, et al. Integration of sizing and energy management based on economic predictive control for standalone hybrid renewable energy systems. Renewable energy, 2019, 140: 436-451.
20. [20] Chennaif M, et al. Tri-objective techno-economic sizing optimization of Off-grid and On-grid renewable energy systems using Electric system Cascade Extended analysis and system Advisor Model. Applied Energy, 2022, 305: 117844.
21. [21] Ashtiani M N, et al. Techno-economic analysis of a grid-connected PV/battery system using the teaching-learning-based optimization algorithm. Solar Energy, 2020, 203: 69-82.
22. [22] Al-Falahi M D, Jayasinghe S D G, Enshaei H J E C C. A review on recent size optimization methodologies for standalone solar and wind hybrid renewable energy system. Energy conversion and management, 2017, 143: 252-274.
23. [23] Genç M S. Economic viability of water pumping systems supplied by wind energy conversion and diesel generator systems in North Central Anatolia, Turkey. Journal of Energy Engineering, 2011, 137.1: 21-35.
24. [24] Connolly D, et al. A review of computer tools for analysing the integration of renewable energy into various energy systems. Applied energy, 2010, 87.4: 1059-1082.
25. [25] Sinha S, Chandel S S. Review of software tools for hybrid renewable energy systems. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 2014, 32: 192-205.
26. [26] Bernal-Agustín, J L, Dufo-Lopez R. Simulation and optimization of stand-alone hybrid renewable energy systems. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 2009, 13.8: 2111-2118.
27. [27] Khan M J, Iqbal M T. Pre-feasibility study of stand-alone hybrid energy systems for applications in Newfoundland. Renewable energy, 2005, 30.6: 835-854.
28. [28] Younas M, et al. An overview of hydrogen production: current status, potential, and challenges. Fuel, 2022, 316: 123317.
29. [29] Munuswamy S, Nakamura K, Katta A. Comparing the cost of electricity sourced from a fuel cell-based renewable energy system and the national grid to electrify a rural health centre in India: A case study. Renewable Energy, 2011, 36.11: 2978-2983.
30. [30] Zhang L, et al. A two-stage benefit optimization and multi-participant benefit-sharing strategy for hybrid renewable energy systems in rural areas under carbon trading. Renewable Energy, 2022, 189: 744-761.
31. [31] Mousavi S A, et al. A new decision-making process by integration of exergy analysis and techno-economic optimization tool for the evaluation of hybrid renewable systems. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 2021, 45: 101196.
32. [32] Johannsen R M, Østergaard P A, Hanlin R. Hybrid photovoltaic and wind mini-grids in Kenya: Techno-economic assessment and barriers to diffusion. Energy for Sustainable Development, 2020, 54: 111-126.
33. [33] Mousavi S A, et al. Decision-making between renewable energy configurations and grid extension to simultaneously supply electrical power and fresh water in remote villages for five different climate zones. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 279: 123617.
34. [34] Islam, M S, Akhter R, Rahman M A. A thorough investigation on hybrid application of biomass gasifier and PV resources to meet energy needs for a northern rural off-grid region of Bangladesh: A potential solution to replicate in rural off-grid areas or not?. Energy, 2018, 145: 338-355.
35. [35] Mandal S, Das B K, Hoque N. Optimum sizing of a stand-alone hybrid energy system for rural electrification in Bangladesh. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 200: 12-27.
36. [36] Saha P, et al. Performance optimization of hybrid renewable energy system for small scale micro-grid. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2022, 63: 527-534.
37. [37] Kumar R, Channi H K. A PV-Biomass off-grid hybrid renewable energy system (HRES) for rural electrification: Design, optimization and techno-economic-environmental analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022, 349: 131347.
38. [38] Shiroudi A, et al. Case study: Simulation and optimization of photovoltaic-wind-battery hybrid energy system in Taleghan-Iran using homer software. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, 2012, 4.5.
39. [39] Amutha W M, Rajini V. Cost benefit and technical analysis of rural electrification alternatives in southern India using HOMER. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016, 62: 236-246.
40. [40] Genç G, Çelik M, Genç, M S. Cost analysis of wind-electrolyzer-fuel cell system for energy demand in Pınarbaşı-Kayseri. International journal of hydrogen energy, 2012, 37.17: 12158-12166.
41. [41] Genç, M S, Çelik M, Karasu İ. A review on wind energy and wind–hydrogen production in Turkey: A case study of hydrogen production via electrolysis system supplied by wind energy conversion system in Central Anatolian Turkey. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 2012, 16.9: 6631-6646.
42. [42] Genç, M S, et al. Suitable site selection for offshore wind farms in Turkey’s seas: GIS-MCDM based approach. Earth Science Informatics, 2021, 14.3: 1213-1225.
43. [43] Karipoğlu F, Genç M S, Koca K. Determination of the most appropriate site selection of wind power plants based Geographic Information System and Multi-Criteria Decision-Making approach in Develi, Turkey. International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management, 2021.
44. [44] Açıkel H H, Bayır E. Evaluation of capacity of hybrid energy systems to decrease the environmental pollution. Fuel, 2022, 328: 125356.
45. [45] Arslan O, Acikkalp Emin, Genc G. A multi-generation system for hydrogen production through the high-temperature solid oxide electrolyzer integrated to 150 MW coal-fired steam boiler. Fuel, 2022, 315: 123201.
46. [46] Türkiye İstatiktik Kurumu,[Online]. Available: https://www.tuik.gov.tr.
47. [47] T.C. Enerji ve Tabii Kaynaklar Bakanlığı, [Online]. Available: https://enerji.gov.tr/bilgi-merkezi-enerji-gunes.
48. [48] T.C. Enerji ve Tabii Kaynaklar Bakanlığı, [Online]. Available: https://repa.enerji.gov.tr/REPA/iller/KARABUK-REPA.