Effects of Polypropylene in Different Forms on the Static and Dynamic Properties of Cohesive Soils

Öz

Soil improvement methods hold a significant place in civil engineering, and numerous soil improvement techniques exist. In soil improvement studies, the use of polypropylene fibers in the soil is quite common, because it increases soils compressive and tensile strength and deformation capacity, and allows for better performance under dynamic loads. Furthermore, polypropylene fibers, being resistant to chemical and biological effects, ensure the longevity of the improvement. In this study, the changes in the static and dynamic properties of a cohesive soil were investigated by adding two different lengths (6 and 12 mm) of polypropylene fibers and granular polypropylene in different ratios (0.2%, 0.4%, 0.6%, 0.8%). Bender element tests were performed on the prepared mixture samples, and the change in the highest shear modulus was determined. Unconfined compression tests were also conducted to determine the undrained shear strength of the samples. According to the results obtained, it was observed that increasing the polypropylene content in the soil increased the shear strength, shear wave velocity, and highest shear modulus of the samples. Furthermore, the highest increase in unconfined compressive strength was observed when using 12 mm long polypropylene fibers, while the lowest increase was observed when using 6 mm long polypropylene fibers.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• soil improvement
• polypropylene fiber
• bender element
• shear strength

Proje Numarası

23LÖP233

Farklı Formlardaki Polipropilenin Kohezyonlu Zeminin Statik ve Dinamik Özellikleri Üzerine Etkileri

Öz

Zemin iyileştirme yöntemleri inşaat mühendisliğinde önemli yere sahip olmakla birlikte birçok zemin iyileştirme tekniği bulunmaktadır. Zemin iyileştirme çalışmalarında, basınç ve çekme mukavemeti ile deforme olma kapasitesini artırması, dinamik yükler altında daha iyi performans göstermesini sağlaması nedeniyle zemin içerisinde polipropilen lif kullanımı oldukça yaygındır. Aynı zamanda kimyasal ve biyolojik etkilere karşı dayanıklı olan polipropilen lifler, yapılan iyileştirmenin uzun ömürlü olmasını da sağlamaktadır. Bu çalışmada, kohezyonlu bir zemine iki farklı (6 ve 12 mm) uzunlukta polipropilen lif ve granül polipropilen farklı oranlarda (%0.2, %0.4, %0.6, %0.8) ilave edilerek, zeminin statik ve dinamik özelliklerinde meydana getirdiği değişimler araştırılmıştır. Hazırlanan karışım numuneleri üzerinde bender element deneyi yapılmış ve en yüksek kayma modülündeki değişim belirlenmiştir. Numunelerin drenajsız kayma mukavemeti için ise serbest basınç deneyleri gerçekleştirilmiştir. Elde edilen sonuçlara göre, zemin içerisindeki polipropilen içeriğinin artmasıyla numunelerin kayma dayanımının, kayma dalgası hızının ve en yüksek kayma modülünün arttığı gözlemlenmiştir. Ayrıca, serbest basınç dayanımında en yüksek artış 12 mm uzunluğundaki polipropilen lif kullanıldığı zaman gözlemlenirken, en az artış ise 6 mm uzunluğundaki polipropilen kullanılması durumunda gözlenmiştir. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

• zemin iyileştirme
• polipropilen lif
• bender element
• kayma mukavemeti

Destekleyen Kurum

Eskişehir Teknik Üniversitesi

Proje Numarası

23LÖP233

Teşekkür

Bu çalışma Eskişehir Teknik Üniversitesi BAP birimi tarafından 23LÖP233 proje numarası ile desteklenmiştir. Yazarlar ayrıca bu çalışmada kullanılan granül polipropileni sağlayan Petkim’e, lif polipropileni sağlayan Macrolif’e teşekkür eder.

Kaynakça

1. [1] A. Abou Diab, S. S. Najjar, S. Sadek, H. Taha, H. Jaffal, M. Alahmad, Effect of compaction method on the undrained strength of fiber-reinforced clay. Soils and Foundations, 58: 2 (2018) 462-480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2018.02.013.
2. [2] ASTM D698 – 12. (2021). Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Standard Effort (12,400 ft-lbf/ft3 (600 kN-m/m3)). ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
3. [3] ASTM D854 – 14. (2016). Standard Test Methods for Specific Gravity of Soil Solids by Water Pycnometer. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
4. [4] ASTM D2166. (2010). Standard test method for unconfined compressive strength of cohesive soil. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
5. [5] ASTM D2487 – 11. (2020). Standard Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil Classification System). ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
6. [6] ASTM D4318-17E1. (2017). Standard Test Methods forLiquid Limit, Plastic Limit, and Plasticity Index of Soils. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
7. [7] ASTM D6913 – 17. (2017). Standard Test Methods for Particle-Size Distribution (Gradation) of Soils Using Sieve Analysis. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
8. [8] ASTM D7928-21e1. (2021). Standard Test Method for Particle-Size Distribution (Gradation) of Fine-Grained Soils Using the Sedimentation (Hydrometer) Analysis. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.

9. [9] ASTM D8295 (2019) Standard Test Method for Determination of Shear Wave Velocity and Initial Shear Modulus in Soil Specimens using Bender Elements. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
10. [10] B. Amir-Faryar, M. S. Aggour, Effect of fibre inclusion on dynamic properties of clay. Geomechanics and geoengineering, 11: 2 (2016) 104-113. https://doi.org/10.1080/17486025.2015.1029013.
11. [11] M. Chen, S. L. Shen, A. Arulrajah, H. N. Wu, D. W. Hou, Y. S. Xu, Laboratory evaluation on the effectiveness of polypropylene fibers on the strength of fiber-reinforced and cement-stabilized Shanghai soft clay. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 43: 6 (2015) 515-523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2015.05.004.
12. [12] N. C. Consoli, L. Festugato, K. S. Heineck, Strain-hardening behaviour of fibre-reinforced sand in view of filament geometry. Geosynthetics International, 16: 2 (2009) 109–115. https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.2009.16.2.109.
13. [13] N. S. Correia, S. A. Rocha, P. C. Lodi, J. S. McCartney, Shear strength behavior of clayey soil reinforced with polypropylene fibers under drained and undrained conditions. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 49: 5 (2021) 1419-1426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2021.05.005.
14. [14] A. C. Anagnostopoulos, D. Tzetzis, K. Berketis, Shear strength behaviour of polypropylene fibre reinforced cohesive soils. Geomechanics and Geoengineering, 9: 3 (2014) 241-251. https://doi.org/10.1080/17486025.2013.804213.
15. [15] A. Darvishi, A. Erken, Effect of polypropylene fiber on shear strength parameters of sand. In Proceedings of the 3rd World Congress on Civil, Structural, and Environmental Engineering (CSEE’18) 2018 5-12. https://doi.org/10.11159/icgre18.123.
16. [16] I. Develioglu, H. F. Pulat, Shear strength of alluvial soils reinforced with PP fibers. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 80: 12 (2021) 9237-9248 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-021-02474-1.
17. [17] C. A. F. Saldarriaga, D. L. Vega, J. E. S. Fontalvo, S. P. Jimeno, Influence of polypropylene derivatives on soil mechanical properties. Civil Engineering and Architecture, 11: 2 (2023) 741-751 https://doi.org/10.13189/cea.2023.110216
18. [18] Z. Gao, J. Zhao, Evaluation on failure of fiber-reinforced sand. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 139: 1 (2013) 95-106 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000737.
19. [19] K. M. Girija, Behaviour of Randomly Distributed Fiber-Reinforced Soil. International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology, (2013)
20. [20] S. M. Hejazi, M. Sheikhzadeh, S. M. Abtahi, A. Zadhoush, A simple review of soil reinforcement by using natural and synthetic fibers. Construction and Building materials, 30 (2012) 100-116 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.11.045.
21. [21] S. H. Jafari, S. H. Lajevardi, M. Sharifipour, M. Kamalian, Evaluation of small strain stiffness characteristics of soft clay treated with lime and nanosilica and correlation with UCS (qu). Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment 80 (2021) 3163-3175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-021-02115-7.
22. [22] I. Kafodya, F. Okonta, Cyclic and post-cyclic shear behaviours of natural fibre reinforced soil. International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/19386362.2019.1611720.
23. [23] H. L. Kou, J. H. Liu, W. Guo, S. D. Hua, Y. T. Pan, Effect of freeze–thaw cycles on strength and ductility and microstructure of cement-treated silt with polypropylene fiber. Acta Geotechnica, 16: 11 (2021) 3555-3572 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-021-01325-3.
24. [24] E. Kravchenko, J. K. Liu, W. W. Niu, S. J. Zhang, Performance of clay soil reinforced with fibers subjected to freeze-thaw cycles. Cold Regions Science Technology, 153 (2018) 18–24 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2018.05.002.
25. [25] H. Li, K. Senetakis, A. Khoshghalb, On the small-strain stiffness of polypropylene fibre-sand mixtures. Geosynthetics International, 26: 1 (2019) 66-80 https://doi.org/10.1680/jgein.18.00037.
26. [26] M. H. Maher, Y. C. Ho, Mechanical-properties of kaolinite fiber soil composite. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 129: 2 (1994) 1381-1393 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1994)120:8(1381).
27. [27] M. H. Maher, R. D. Woods, Dynamic response of sand reinforced with randomly distributed fibers. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 116: 7 (1990) 1116-1131 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1990)116:7(1116).
28. [28] M. Mirzababaei, A. Arulrajah, A. Haque, S. Nimbalkar, A. Mohajerani, Effect of fiber reinforcement on shear strength and void ratio of soft clay. Geosynthetics International, 25: 4 (2018) 471-480 https://doi.org/10.1680/jgein.18.00023.
29. [29] O. Ple, T. N. H. Lê, Effect of polypropylene fiber-reinforcement on the mechanical behavior of silty clay. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 32 (2012) 111-116 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2011.11.004.
30. [30] S. Reehana, M. Muthukumar, (2023). Undrained response of fibre reinforced expansive soil subjected to cyclic loading. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 173 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2023.108154.
31. [31] W. Shao, B. Cetin, Y. Li, J. Li, L. Li, Experimental investigation of mechanical properties of sands reinforced with discrete randomly distributed fiber. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 32: 4 (2014) 901-910 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-014-9766-3.
32. [32] M. M. Taha, C. P. Feng, S. H. Ahmed, Influence of polypropylene fibre (PF) reinforcement on mechanical properties of clay soil. Advances in Polymer Technology, 1 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/9512839.
33. [33] T. Taleb, Y. S. Unsever, Study on Strength and Swell Behavioral Change and Properties of the Clay–Fiber Mixtures. Sustainability, 14: 11 (2022) https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116767.
34. [34] C. Tang, B. Shi, W. Gao, F. Chen, Y. Cai, Strength and mechanical behavior of short polypropylene fiber reinforced and cement stabilized clayey soil. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 25: 3 (2007) 194-202 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2006.11.002.
35. [35] J. Wang, P. N. Hughes, C. E. Augarde, Towards a predictive model of the shear strength behaviour of fibre reinforced clay. European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering, 28: 2 (2024) 380-400 https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2023.2214596.
36. [36] R. Wu, G. Yang, S. Li, Q. Xiang, Experimental Study on the Effects of Matric Suction on Shear Properties of Polypropylene Fiber Reinforced Unsaturated Clay. Materials, 15 (2022) https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15228223.
37. [37] Z. Yang, Z. Sun, G. Cai, C. Wang, X. Ling, R. Wang, Elastic–Plastic Constitutive Relationship of Polymer Fiber–Reinforced Clay Considering the Effect of Anisotropic Distribution. International Journal of Geomechanics, 24: 10 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1061/IJGNAI.GMENG-9712.
38. [38] Y. Zhao, Y. Yang, X. Ling, W. Gong, G. Li, L. Su, Dynamic behavior of natural sand soils and fiber reinforced soils in heavy-haul railway embankment under multistage cyclic loading. Transportation Geotechnics, 28 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2020.100507.
39. [39] L. Zhou, J. F. Chen, M. Peng, Y. Zhu, Liquefaction behavior of fiber-reinforced calcareous sands in unidirectional and multidirectional simple shear tests. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 50:4 (2022) 794-806 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2022.04.003.
40. [40] I. M. C. F. G. Falorca, M. I. M. Pinto, Effect of short, randomly distributed polypropylene microfibres on shear strength behaviour of soils. Geosynthetic International, 18: (1) (2011) 2-11 https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.2011.18.1.2.
41. [41] A. Diambra, E. Ibraim, A. R. Russell, D. M. Wood, Modelling the undrained response of fibre reinforced sands. Soils and Foundations, 51: 4 (2011) 625-636.
42. [42] H. Li, K. Senetakis, M. R. Coop, Medium-strain dynamic behavior of fiber-reinforced sand subjected to stress anisotropy. Soil Dymanics and Earthquake Engineering, 126 (2019).
43. [43] M. M. Benziane, N. Della, S. Denine, S. Sert, S. Nouri, Effect of randomly distributed polypropylene fiber reinforcement on the shear behavior of sandy soil. Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica, 41: 3 (2019) 151-159 https://doi.org/10.2478/sgem-2019-0014.
44. [44] R. Noorzad, S. T. G. Zarinkolaei, Comparison of mechanical properties of fiber-reinforced sand under triaxial compression and direct shear. Open Geosci, 1 (2015) 547-558
45. [45] L. Festugato, J. H. F. Galvez, G. D. Miguel, N. C. Consoli, Cyclic response of fibre reinforced dense sand. Transportation Geotechnics, 37 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2022.100811.
46. [46] P. Jamsawang, T. Suansomjeen, P. Sukontasukkul, P. Jongpradist, D. T. Bergado, Comparative flexural performance of compacted cement-fiber-sand. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 46 (2018) 414-425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2018.03.008
47. [47] N. C. Consoli, M. D. T. Casagrande, M. R. Coop, Effect of fiber reinforcement on the isotropic compression behavior of a sand. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng, 131: 11 (2005) 1434-1436. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:11(1434)
48. [48] A. M. Rajabi, S. M. S. Ghorashi, M. Mahdavi, Effect of freezing soil temperatures on strength parameters of clayey sand soils stabilized by poly propylene and poly vinyl alcohol fiber. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 208 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2023.103797
49. [49] N. Gul, B. A. M, Parametric study of glass fiber reinforced fine-grained soil with emphasis on microstructural analysis. International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 16:6 (2022) 716-728. https://doi.org/10.1080/19386362.2022.2049524
50. [50] P. Chindaprasirt, P. Jamsawang, P. Sukontasukkul, P. Jongpradist, S. Likitlersuang, Comparative mechanical performances of cement-treated sand reinforced with fiber for road and pavement application. Transportation Geotechnics, 30 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2021.100626
51. [51] H. Li, K. Senetakis, Dynamic properties of polypropylene fibre-reinforced silica quarry sand. Soil Dynamics and Engineering, 100 (2017). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.05.035
52. [52] Y. Heidarizadeh, S. H. Lajevardi, M. Sharifipour, Small strain stiffness properties of cement-stabilized sand reinforced with polypropylene fibre, Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 59:2 (2022). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11204-022-09795-7
53. [53] E. Kravchenko, J. Liu, Artem Krainiukov, D. Chang, Dynamic behavior of clay modified with polypropylene fiber under freeze thaw cycles. Transportation Geotechnics, 21 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2019.100282
54. [54] Y. Zhao, Y. Yang, X. Ling, W. Gong, G. Li, L. Su, Dynamic behavior of natural sand soils and fiber reinforced soils in heavy haul railway embankment under multistage cyclic loading. Transportation Geotechnics, 28 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2020.100507
55. [55] S. S. Park, Unconfined compressive strength and ductility of fiber-reinforced cemented sand. Construction and Building Materials, 25 (2011) 1134-1138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.07.017
56. [56] Y. Zhao, Z. Lu, J. Liu, J. Zhang, C. Tang, R. Zhang, H. Yao, Utilization of single‑use face masks for sand reinforcement: insight from experimental and numerical studies. Environmental Earth Sciences 83:453 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-024-11605-2
57. [57] M. H. Maher, Y. C. Ho, Mechanical properties of kaolinite/fiber composite. J. Geotech. Engrg, 120:8 (1994) 1381-1393.
58. [58] A. Kumar, B. S. Walia, J. Mohan, Compressive strength of fiber reinforced highly compressible clay. Construction and Building Materials 20 (2006) 1063-1068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.02.027
59. [59] Y. Yılmaz, Experimental investigation of the strength properties of sand-clay mixtures reinforced with randomly distributed discrete polypropylene fibers. Geosynthetics International 16:5 (2009) 354-363. https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.2009.16.5.354
60. [60] N. S. Correia, S. A. Rocha, P. C. Lodi, J. S. McCartney, Shear strength behavior of clayey soil reinforced with polypropylene fibers under drained and undrained conditions. Geotextile and Geomembranes 49 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2021.05.005
61. [61] R. Kumar, V. K. Kanaujia, D. Chandra, Engineering behavior of fibre-reinforced pond ash and silty sand. Geosynthetics International 6:6 (1999) 509-518. https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.6.0162
62. [62] P. K. Pradhan, R. K. Kar, A. Naik, Effect of random inclusion of polypropylene fibers on strength characteristics of cohesive soil. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering 30 (2012) 15-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-011-9445-6