Türkiye İçin Yeni Nesil Acil Çağrı Sistemi

Öz

Avrupa Parlamentosu tarafından kabul edilen 2015/758 sayılı yasa tasarısı ile acil çağrı

ünitelerinin araçlarda kullanımı 2018 yılı itibari ile zorunlu hale gelecek ve bu üniteler 2018

sonrası yakın bir zaman dilimi içerisinde Türkiye’de de devreye alınacaktır. Türkiye, Avrupa

Acil Çağrı Birliği 2 seviyeli çağrı merkezi modeline sahip bir ülke olarak mevcut trafik ve

yol yönetim sistemleri ve araç ve trafik acil yardım alt yapılarını yeni nesil modele uyarlamak

zorundadır. Bu çalışmada yeni nesil akıllı araç sistemlerinin yapılanması konusu tanıtılmakta

ve Türkiye için en uygun model gerek maliyet gerekse altyapısal olarak ilk kez ele

alınmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Acil Yardım Sistemi,112 Servisi,Kurtarma Servisleri,Kaza Uyarı Sistemi,Acil Çağrı Unitesi

Next Generation Emergency Call System For Turkey

Abstract

Next Generation Emergency Notification System after emergency call (eCall) equipped

vehicle regulations with the legislation EU-2015/758 will be an obligation in EU in 2018 and

eCall units are set up into the vehicles in Turkey after 2018. ‘Data Gathering by stage PSAP1

and resource Dispatching by stage PSAP2 in an integrated control room’ which is applied in

Turkey will be modified via Turkey’s traffic management. Traffic and vehicle infrastructures

will be updated after eCall equipped vehicle regulations. In this study, next generation

emergency call system in vehicles is introduced and Optimal traffic infrastructure in Turkey

is analysed via cost modeling.

Keywords

• Emergency Call System,112 PSAP,Rescue Services,Emergency Response Organizer,Emergency Call Unit

Kaynakça

1. [1] The IRTAD road safety annual report 2015. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/ transport/road-safety-annual-report-2015_irtad-2015-en. Yayın tarihi Ekim 12, 2015. Erişim tarihi Şubat 28, 2017.
2. [2] T.C. Ulaştırma ve Denizcilik Bakanlığı Ulaştırma Kaza İstatistikleri 2013. http://www.ubak.gov.tr/BLSM_WIYS/KAIK/tr/Belgelik/20140312_103823_76347_1_76648.pdf. Yayın tarihi Mart 12, 2014. Erişim tarihi Şubat 28, 2017.
3. [3] Official Journal of the European Union. Regulation (Eu) 2015/758 of the European Parliament and of the council. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2015/758/oj. Yayın tarihi Nisan 29, 2015. Erişim tarihi Şubat 28, 2017.
4. [4] ERTICO, HeERO, Harmonised eCall European Pilot. D6.2 eCall deployment enablers and opportunities and challenges: Final Report. 2014.
5. [5] Antalya Valiliği, Turkish 112 single emergency call number project http://www.eena.org/ressource/static/files/112_in_turkey.pdf. Yayın tarihi Haziran 20, 2016. Erişim tarihi Şubat 28, 2017.
6. [6] European Committee for Standardization, Standard: CEN–EN–15722, Intelligent Transport Systems – eSafety – eCall Minimum Set of Data, 2015.
7. [7] European Automobile Manufacturers Assosiation, ACEA, Consolidated Registrations – by country”, http://www.acea.be/statistics/tag/category/by-country-registrations, Yayın tarihi Aralık, 2016. Erişim tarihi Mart 15, 2017.
8. [8] TOBB Türkiye Ulaştırma ve Lojistik Meclisi Sektör Raporu, TOBB Yayın Sıra No: 2015/260, 14 –16, 2014

9. [9] Abele J., Kerlen C., Krüger S., The Assessment of the Socio-economic Impact of the Introduction of Intelligent Safety Systems in Road Vehicles – Findings of the EU Funded Project SeiSS, Advanced Microsystems for Automotive Applications, Editörler: Valldorf J., Gessner W., Springer, Berlin, Almanya, 49 – 57, 2005.
10. [10] McLaughlin S.B., Analytic Assessment of Collision Avoidance Systems and Driver Dynamic Performance in Rear-End Crashes and Near-Crashes, Doktora Tezi, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, A.B.D., 2007.
11. [11] Andre, M., Hammarstrom, U., Reynaud, I., Driving Statistics for the Assessment of Pollutant Emissions from Road Transport, INRETS Report LTE 9906, 170 – 172, Bron, France, 1999.
12. [12] UDH Bakanlığı, Karayolları Genel Müdürlüğü, kgm.gov.tr/Sayfalar/KGM/SiteTr/ Kurumsal/YolAgi.aspx,Yayın tarihi Ocak 25, 2015. Erişim tarihi Mart 15, 2017.
13. [13] Geels A., E-MERGE compiled evaluation results. E-MERGE Final report, deliverable 6.3. Cap Gemini Ernst & Young, 2004
14. [14] Bodek, K., Heywood, J., Europe’s evolving passenger vehicle fleet: Fuel use and GHG emission scenarios through 2035, Cambridge: Laboratory for the Energy and Environment, MIT, A.B.D. 29 – 31, 2008.
15. [15] Commission of the European Communities, Extended impact assessment of the proposal for a decision amending decision, The trans-European transport network, No: 1692/96/EC, Brüksel, Belçika, 2003.
16. [16] Planco Consulting GmbH, Numerische Aktualisierung interner und externer Beförderungskosten für die Bundesverkehrswegeplanung (BVWP) auf den Preisstand des Jahres 1998, Almanya Ulaştırma, İmar ve İskân Bakanlığı Kapanış Raporu, No: 537, 16 – 17, Berlin, Almanya, 2000.
17. [17] FGSV, Empfehlungen für Wirtschaftlichkeitsuntersuchungen an Straßen: Forschungsgesellschaft für Straßen- und Verkehrswesen, Yol ve Ulaşım Araştırma Derneği Yayını, EWS-97, 12 – 13, Köln, Almanya, 1997.
18. [18] Continental Worldwide Emission Standards and Related Regulations March 2015 Passenger Cars, Light and Medium Duty Vehicles, http://www.continental-automotive.com/www/download/automotive_de_en/general/contact_services/downloads/passenger_cars/powertrain/common/p_emission_booklet_pdf_en.pdf
19. [19] Bickel P., Friedrich R., Externalities of Energy, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 253 – 259, Lüksemburg, 2005.
20. [20] European Commission Research Directorate General, Policy for Travel Expenses, https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/rules_on_travel_expenses_for_applicants_0.pdf Yayın tarihi Aralık 07, 2016. Erişim tarihi Mart 16, 2017.
21. [21] Miller J., Thompson P., PSAP Merger Analyse for Wisconsin Agencies: Pierce and St.Croix Counties, PSC Alliance, Wisconsin, A.B.D., 30 – 35, 2014.
22. [22] Biggs D.C., Akçelik R.: ‘Estimating effect of vehicle characteristics on fuel consumption, ASCE Journal of Transportation Engineering, 1987, Vol. 113, No: 1, pp.101-106