Araştırma Makalesi

Assessment of the Relationship Between the Risk Perception and Preparedness Attitudes of Search & Rescue and Firefighting Teams Against Event Site Hazards in CBRN Events: Adana Province Case

Cilt: 11 Sayı: Ek 31 Aralık 2020
PDF İndir
TR EN

Assessment of the Relationship Between the Risk Perception and Preparedness Attitudes of Search & Rescue and Firefighting Teams Against Event Site Hazards in CBRN Events: Adana Province Case

Öz

CBRN events can put first responders at risk in the form of hazardous chemical, biological, radioactive, nuclear agents. This study aims to measure the risk perceptions of search & rescue and firefighters involved in the first response in CBRN events against the hazards at the scene and to evaluate the relationship between their attitudes towards pre-event preparedness. Within the scope of our study, we designed a survey to address the risk perception and preparedness for CBRN events based on a 5-Likert scale. The study was conducted on 134 search & rescue and fire brigade workers who had the potential to take part in responding to CBRN incidents in Adana province, who agreed to fill out a questionnaire. As a result of the study, participants were found to have a significant positive linear relationship between CBRN crime scene hazard risk perception levels and preparedness levels. First responders should know and identify hazardous materials they may encounter in any CBRN event. During the preparedness process, attention should be pay to the fact that the pieces of training on CBRN hazards increase the risk perception of first responders.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

  1. Barratt, P., Stephens, L., & Palmer, M. (2018). When Helpıng Hurts: PTSD in Fırst Responders, Report following a high-level roundtable About Australia21.
  2. Bhardwaj, L. G. J. (2010). Chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear disaster management. Journal of pharmacy and bioallied sciences, 2(3), 157-158
  3. Bubeck, P., Botzen, W. J. W., & Aerts, J. C. (2012). A review of risk perceptions and other factors that influence flood mitigation behavior. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 32(9), 1481-1495.
  4. Calder, A., & Bland, S. (2018). CBRN considerations in a major incident. Surgery (Oxford), 36(8), 417-423.
  5. Coppola D.P. (2015), Risk and Vulnerability in Introduction to International Disaster Management (Third Edition), Butterworth-Heinemann, 150-223.
  6. Ingram RJ. (2018). Emergency Response to Radiological Releases: Have We Communicated Effectively to the First Responder Communities to Prepare Them to Safely Manage These Incidents? Health Phys. 114(2):208-213.
  7. International Committee of the Red Cross. (2014). Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear Response: Introductory Guidance. [Available online at: https://shop.icrc.org/chemical-biological-radiological-and-nuclear-response-introductory-guidance-pdf-en], Retrieved on March 22, 2019.
  8. Iyama, K., Takano, Y., Takahashi, T., & Hasegawa, A. (2020). Factors associated with the intention to participate in activities during a nuclear disaster situation among firefighters. Journal of radiation research, 61(6), 871–875.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

-

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

31 Aralık 2020

Gönderilme Tarihi

8 Aralık 2020

Kabul Tarihi

28 Aralık 2020

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2020 Cilt: 11 Sayı: Ek

Kaynak Göster

APA
Yücel, H., & Cengiz, S. (2020). Assessment of the Relationship Between the Risk Perception and Preparedness Attitudes of Search & Rescue and Firefighting Teams Against Event Site Hazards in CBRN Events: Adana Province Case. Gümüşhane University Journal of Social Sciences, 11(Ek), 347-354. https://doi.org/10.36362/gumus.842580
AMA
1.Yücel H, Cengiz S. Assessment of the Relationship Between the Risk Perception and Preparedness Attitudes of Search & Rescue and Firefighting Teams Against Event Site Hazards in CBRN Events: Adana Province Case. GUSBID. 2020;11(Ek):347-354. doi:10.36362/gumus.842580
Chicago
Yücel, Hasan, ve Sevil Cengiz. 2020. “Assessment of the Relationship Between the Risk Perception and Preparedness Attitudes of Search & Rescue and Firefighting Teams Against Event Site Hazards in CBRN Events: Adana Province Case”. Gümüşhane University Journal of Social Sciences 11 (Ek): 347-54. https://doi.org/10.36362/gumus.842580.
EndNote
Yücel H, Cengiz S (01 Aralık 2020) Assessment of the Relationship Between the Risk Perception and Preparedness Attitudes of Search & Rescue and Firefighting Teams Against Event Site Hazards in CBRN Events: Adana Province Case. Gümüşhane University Journal of Social Sciences 11 Ek 347–354.
IEEE
[1]H. Yücel ve S. Cengiz, “Assessment of the Relationship Between the Risk Perception and Preparedness Attitudes of Search & Rescue and Firefighting Teams Against Event Site Hazards in CBRN Events: Adana Province Case”, GUSBID, c. 11, sy Ek, ss. 347–354, Ara. 2020, doi: 10.36362/gumus.842580.
ISNAD
Yücel, Hasan - Cengiz, Sevil. “Assessment of the Relationship Between the Risk Perception and Preparedness Attitudes of Search & Rescue and Firefighting Teams Against Event Site Hazards in CBRN Events: Adana Province Case”. Gümüşhane University Journal of Social Sciences 11/Ek (01 Aralık 2020): 347-354. https://doi.org/10.36362/gumus.842580.
JAMA
1.Yücel H, Cengiz S. Assessment of the Relationship Between the Risk Perception and Preparedness Attitudes of Search & Rescue and Firefighting Teams Against Event Site Hazards in CBRN Events: Adana Province Case. GUSBID. 2020;11:347–354.
MLA
Yücel, Hasan, ve Sevil Cengiz. “Assessment of the Relationship Between the Risk Perception and Preparedness Attitudes of Search & Rescue and Firefighting Teams Against Event Site Hazards in CBRN Events: Adana Province Case”. Gümüşhane University Journal of Social Sciences, c. 11, sy Ek, Aralık 2020, ss. 347-54, doi:10.36362/gumus.842580.
Vancouver
1.Hasan Yücel, Sevil Cengiz. Assessment of the Relationship Between the Risk Perception and Preparedness Attitudes of Search & Rescue and Firefighting Teams Against Event Site Hazards in CBRN Events: Adana Province Case. GUSBID. 01 Aralık 2020;11(Ek):347-54. doi:10.36362/gumus.842580