Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Do Political Budget Cycles Exist in Advanced Democracies?

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 3, 728 - 743, 25.10.2020

Öz

In this study, it has been explored whether there have been any manipulation attempts on fiscal instruments in order to the reelection of politicians during the electoral periods dominated by advanced democracy for 42 countries selected by various criteria. For this aim, a balanced panel data set covering the period 2001-2018 was used in the study. The methods applied in econometric methodology have been the difference between dynamic, and generalized moments models. Fiscal balance, fiscal revenue and government expenditure are considered as fiscal indicators. According to econometric results, it has been shown that the election variable has a positive and statistically significant effect only on the government expenditure variable both in the difference between dynamic and generalized moments models. In other words, political budget cycles are observed in the election periods and it is confirmed that for the reelection purpose politicians make benefit of manipulation.

Kaynakça

  • Akay, E.Ç. (2018), Uygulamalı Panel veri ekonometrisi. Ed. Selahattin Güriş, Der Yayınları.
  • Alesina, A. (1988). Macroeconomics and politics. NBER macroeconomics annual, 3, 13-52.
  • Alesina, A. & Paradisi, M. (2017). Political budget cycles: Evidence from Italian cities. Economics & Politics, 29(2), 157-177.
  • Alesina, A., Roubini, N., & Cohen, G. D. (1997). Political cycles and the macroeconomy. MIT press.
  • Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The review of economic studies, 58(2), 277-297.
  • Arellano, M., & O. Bover (1995), Another Look at the İnstrumental Variables Estimation of Error components Models, Journal of Econometrics, 68, 29–51.
  • Baldi, G., & Forster, S. (2019). Political Budget Cycles: Evidence from Swiss Cantons, Working Paper
  • Baltagi, B. ( 2014), Econometric analysis of panel data, Fifth Edition, Wiley.
  • Block, S. A. (2002). Political business cycles, democratization, and economic reform: the case of Africa. Journal of Development economics, 67(1), 205-228.
  • Blundell, R. & S. Bond (1998), Initial Conditions and Moment Restrictions in Dynamic Panel Data Models, Journal of Econometrics, 87, 11–143.
  • Brender, A., & Drazen, A. (2005). Political budget cycles in new versus established democracies. Journal of monetary Economics, 52(7), 1271-1295.
  • Buchanan, J. M., & Wagner, R. E. (1977). Democracy in deficit: The political legacy of Lord Keynes.
  • Buti, M., & Van den Noord, P. (2003). Discretionary Fiscal Policy and Elections, OECD Department of Economics Working Paper.
  • Cebeci, İ. (2019). Politik Konjonktür Teorileri: Literatür Taraması. Journal of International Social Research, 12(62).
  • De Haan, J.,& Klomp, J. (2013). Conditional political budget cycles: a review of recent evidence. Public Choice, 157(3-4), 387-410.
  • Drazen, A. (2000). The political business cycle after 25 years. NBER macroeconomics annual, 15, 75-117.
  • Dubois, E. (2016). Political business cycles 40 years after Nordhaus. Public Choice, 166(1-2), 235-259.
  • Dünya Bankası, Dünya Kalkınma Göstergeleri. Erişim Adresi https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators
  • Efthyvoulou, G. (2012). Political budget cycles in the European Union and the impact of political pressures. Public Choice, 153(3-4), 295-327.
  • Eslava, M. (2011). The political economy of fiscal deficits: a survey. Journal of Economic Surveys, 25(4), 645-673.
  • Fair, R. C. (1978). The effect of economic events on votes for president. The review of economics and statistics, 159-173.
  • Greene, W.H. (2000) Econometric analysis. 4th Edition, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
  • Hallerberg, M., de Souza, L. V., & Clark, W. R. (2002). Political business cycles in EU accession countries. European Union Politics, 3(2), 231-250.
  • Hibbs, D. A. (1977). Political parties and macroeconomic policy. American political science review, 71(4), 1467-1487.
  • Hurlin, C., & Mignon, V. (2007). Second generation panel unit root tests.
  • Im, K. S., & Pesaran, M. H. (2003). On the panel unit root tests using nonlinear instrumental variables. Available at SSRN 482463.
  • İnsani Gelişmişlik Raporu (2016). Erişim Adresi http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/human-development-index-hdi
  • Jaggers, K., Marshall, M. & Gurr, T. (2007), Polity IV: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800-2007, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research, Ann Arbor.
  • Katsimi, M., & Sarantides, V. (2012). Do elections affect the composition of fiscal policy in developed, established democracies?. Public Choice, 151(1-2), 325-362.
  • Kramer, G. H. (1971). Short-term fluctuations in US voting behavior, 1896–1964. American political science review, 65(1), 131-143.
  • Lewis-Beck, M. S. (1990). Economics and elections: The major Western democracies. University of Michigan press.
  • Lohmann, S. (1998). Rationalizing the political business cycle: a workhorse model. Economics & Politics, 10(1), 1-17.
  • Mandon, P. & Cazals, A. (2019). Political Budget Cycles: Manipulation by Leaders Versus Manipulation by Researchers? Evidence from a Meta‐Regression Analysis. Journal of Economic Surveys, 33(1), 274-308.
  • Manifesto Projesi. Erişim Adresi: https://manifestoproject.wzb.eu
  • Mink, M., & De Haan, J. (2006). Are there political budget cycles in the euro area?. European Union Politics, 7(2), 191-211.
  • Nordhaus, W. D. (1975). The political business cycle. The review of economic studies, 42(2), 169-190.
  • Paldam, M. (1979) Is there an election cycle? A comparative study of national accounts. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 81(2): 323-342.
  • Paldam, M. (1981). An essay on the rationality of economic policy: The test-case of the electional cycle. Public Choice, 37(2), 287-305.
  • Parlamentolar Arası Birlik. Erişim Adresi: https://www.ipu.org
  • Parlemantalor ve Hükümetler Veri Tabanı. Erişim Adresi: http://www.parlgov.org
  • Persson, T., & Tabellini, G. (2001). Political institutions and policy outcomes: what are the stylized facts?.
  • Persson, T., & Tabellini, G. E. (2003). Do electoral cycles differ across political systems?. Innocenzo Gasparini Institute for Economic Research.
  • Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross‐section dependence. Journal of applied econometrics, 22(2), 265-312.
  • Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels.
  • Pesaran, M. Hashem, (2003) “A Simple Panel Unit Root Test in the Presence of Cross Section Dependence”, Erişim Adresi: http://www.econ.cam.ac.uk/faculty/pesaran/panelcadf.pdf
  • Politika 4 Projesi. Erişim Adresi: https://www.systemicpeace.org/polityproject.html
  • Rogoff , K., 1990, Equilibrium Political Budget Cycles, American Economic Review 80, 21-36.
  • Rogoff, K., & Sibert, A. (1988). Elections and macroeconomic policy cycles. The review of economic studies, 55(1), 1-16.
  • Schuknecht, L. (1996). Political business cycles and fiscal policies in developing countries. Kyklos, 49(2), 155-170.
  • Shi, M., & Svensson, J. (2002). Political budget cycles in developed and developing countries. Institute for International Economic Studies, Stockholm University, 18.
  • Shi, M., & Svensson, J. (2006). Political budget cycles: Do they differ across countries and why?. Journal of public economics, 90(8-9), 1367-1389.
  • Tufte, E. R. (1978). Political control of the economy. Princeton University Press.
  • Tujula, M., ve Wolswijk, G. (2007). Budget balances in OECD countries: what makes them change?. Empirica, 34(1), 1-14.
  • Wooldridge, J. M. 2002. Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

İleri Demokrasilerde Politik Bütçe Dalgalanmaları Ortaya Çıkar Mı?

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 3, 728 - 743, 25.10.2020

Öz

Bu çalışmada çeşitli kriterlere göre seçilmiş 42 adet ülke için ileri demokrasinin hakim olduğu seçim dönemlerinde politikacıların yeniden seçilebilmek amacı ile mali araçlar üzerinde herhangi bir manipülasyon girişiminin olup olmadığı araştırılmıştır. Bu amaçla çalışmada 2001-2018 yılları arasını kapsayan dengeli panel veri seti kullanılmıştır. Ekonometrik metodolojide başvurulan yöntem farklarda dinamik ve genelleştirilmiş momentler modelleri olmuştur. Mali gösterge olarak ise mali denge, mali gelir ve kamu harcamaları kalemleri göz önüne alınmıştır. Seçim odaklı dalgalanmaların varlığının araştırıldığı bu çalışmadan elde edilen sonuçlara göre, seçim değişkeninin hem farklarda dinamik model hem de genelleştirilmiş momentler modeli için sadece kamu harcaması değişkeni üzerinde pozitif ve istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir etkisi olduğu gösterilmiştir. Diğer bir deyişle seçim zamanlarında kamu harcamaları üzerinde politik bütçe dalgalanmalarının görülmekte olduğu ve ileri demokrasiye sahip ülkelerde politikacıların seçimi kazanabilmek amacı ile manipülasyona başvurduğu tespit edilmiştir.

Kaynakça

  • Akay, E.Ç. (2018), Uygulamalı Panel veri ekonometrisi. Ed. Selahattin Güriş, Der Yayınları.
  • Alesina, A. (1988). Macroeconomics and politics. NBER macroeconomics annual, 3, 13-52.
  • Alesina, A. & Paradisi, M. (2017). Political budget cycles: Evidence from Italian cities. Economics & Politics, 29(2), 157-177.
  • Alesina, A., Roubini, N., & Cohen, G. D. (1997). Political cycles and the macroeconomy. MIT press.
  • Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The review of economic studies, 58(2), 277-297.
  • Arellano, M., & O. Bover (1995), Another Look at the İnstrumental Variables Estimation of Error components Models, Journal of Econometrics, 68, 29–51.
  • Baldi, G., & Forster, S. (2019). Political Budget Cycles: Evidence from Swiss Cantons, Working Paper
  • Baltagi, B. ( 2014), Econometric analysis of panel data, Fifth Edition, Wiley.
  • Block, S. A. (2002). Political business cycles, democratization, and economic reform: the case of Africa. Journal of Development economics, 67(1), 205-228.
  • Blundell, R. & S. Bond (1998), Initial Conditions and Moment Restrictions in Dynamic Panel Data Models, Journal of Econometrics, 87, 11–143.
  • Brender, A., & Drazen, A. (2005). Political budget cycles in new versus established democracies. Journal of monetary Economics, 52(7), 1271-1295.
  • Buchanan, J. M., & Wagner, R. E. (1977). Democracy in deficit: The political legacy of Lord Keynes.
  • Buti, M., & Van den Noord, P. (2003). Discretionary Fiscal Policy and Elections, OECD Department of Economics Working Paper.
  • Cebeci, İ. (2019). Politik Konjonktür Teorileri: Literatür Taraması. Journal of International Social Research, 12(62).
  • De Haan, J.,& Klomp, J. (2013). Conditional political budget cycles: a review of recent evidence. Public Choice, 157(3-4), 387-410.
  • Drazen, A. (2000). The political business cycle after 25 years. NBER macroeconomics annual, 15, 75-117.
  • Dubois, E. (2016). Political business cycles 40 years after Nordhaus. Public Choice, 166(1-2), 235-259.
  • Dünya Bankası, Dünya Kalkınma Göstergeleri. Erişim Adresi https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators
  • Efthyvoulou, G. (2012). Political budget cycles in the European Union and the impact of political pressures. Public Choice, 153(3-4), 295-327.
  • Eslava, M. (2011). The political economy of fiscal deficits: a survey. Journal of Economic Surveys, 25(4), 645-673.
  • Fair, R. C. (1978). The effect of economic events on votes for president. The review of economics and statistics, 159-173.
  • Greene, W.H. (2000) Econometric analysis. 4th Edition, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
  • Hallerberg, M., de Souza, L. V., & Clark, W. R. (2002). Political business cycles in EU accession countries. European Union Politics, 3(2), 231-250.
  • Hibbs, D. A. (1977). Political parties and macroeconomic policy. American political science review, 71(4), 1467-1487.
  • Hurlin, C., & Mignon, V. (2007). Second generation panel unit root tests.
  • Im, K. S., & Pesaran, M. H. (2003). On the panel unit root tests using nonlinear instrumental variables. Available at SSRN 482463.
  • İnsani Gelişmişlik Raporu (2016). Erişim Adresi http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/human-development-index-hdi
  • Jaggers, K., Marshall, M. & Gurr, T. (2007), Polity IV: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800-2007, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research, Ann Arbor.
  • Katsimi, M., & Sarantides, V. (2012). Do elections affect the composition of fiscal policy in developed, established democracies?. Public Choice, 151(1-2), 325-362.
  • Kramer, G. H. (1971). Short-term fluctuations in US voting behavior, 1896–1964. American political science review, 65(1), 131-143.
  • Lewis-Beck, M. S. (1990). Economics and elections: The major Western democracies. University of Michigan press.
  • Lohmann, S. (1998). Rationalizing the political business cycle: a workhorse model. Economics & Politics, 10(1), 1-17.
  • Mandon, P. & Cazals, A. (2019). Political Budget Cycles: Manipulation by Leaders Versus Manipulation by Researchers? Evidence from a Meta‐Regression Analysis. Journal of Economic Surveys, 33(1), 274-308.
  • Manifesto Projesi. Erişim Adresi: https://manifestoproject.wzb.eu
  • Mink, M., & De Haan, J. (2006). Are there political budget cycles in the euro area?. European Union Politics, 7(2), 191-211.
  • Nordhaus, W. D. (1975). The political business cycle. The review of economic studies, 42(2), 169-190.
  • Paldam, M. (1979) Is there an election cycle? A comparative study of national accounts. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 81(2): 323-342.
  • Paldam, M. (1981). An essay on the rationality of economic policy: The test-case of the electional cycle. Public Choice, 37(2), 287-305.
  • Parlamentolar Arası Birlik. Erişim Adresi: https://www.ipu.org
  • Parlemantalor ve Hükümetler Veri Tabanı. Erişim Adresi: http://www.parlgov.org
  • Persson, T., & Tabellini, G. (2001). Political institutions and policy outcomes: what are the stylized facts?.
  • Persson, T., & Tabellini, G. E. (2003). Do electoral cycles differ across political systems?. Innocenzo Gasparini Institute for Economic Research.
  • Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross‐section dependence. Journal of applied econometrics, 22(2), 265-312.
  • Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels.
  • Pesaran, M. Hashem, (2003) “A Simple Panel Unit Root Test in the Presence of Cross Section Dependence”, Erişim Adresi: http://www.econ.cam.ac.uk/faculty/pesaran/panelcadf.pdf
  • Politika 4 Projesi. Erişim Adresi: https://www.systemicpeace.org/polityproject.html
  • Rogoff , K., 1990, Equilibrium Political Budget Cycles, American Economic Review 80, 21-36.
  • Rogoff, K., & Sibert, A. (1988). Elections and macroeconomic policy cycles. The review of economic studies, 55(1), 1-16.
  • Schuknecht, L. (1996). Political business cycles and fiscal policies in developing countries. Kyklos, 49(2), 155-170.
  • Shi, M., & Svensson, J. (2002). Political budget cycles in developed and developing countries. Institute for International Economic Studies, Stockholm University, 18.
  • Shi, M., & Svensson, J. (2006). Political budget cycles: Do they differ across countries and why?. Journal of public economics, 90(8-9), 1367-1389.
  • Tufte, E. R. (1978). Political control of the economy. Princeton University Press.
  • Tujula, M., ve Wolswijk, G. (2007). Budget balances in OECD countries: what makes them change?. Empirica, 34(1), 1-14.
  • Wooldridge, J. M. 2002. Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Toplam 54 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Sedef Şen 0000-0003-4426-8861

Yayımlanma Tarihi 25 Ekim 2020
Gönderilme Tarihi 30 Aralık 2019
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2020 Cilt: 11 Sayı: 3

Kaynak Göster

APA Şen, S. (2020). İleri Demokrasilerde Politik Bütçe Dalgalanmaları Ortaya Çıkar Mı?. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 11(3), 728-743. https://doi.org/10.36362/gumus.666968