A comparative decision-making for electronic product purchases during a pandemic

Ali Köseoğlu

doi:10.17714/gumusfenbil.1001904

EN TR

A comparative decision-making for electronic product purchases during a pandemic

Öz

During the Covid-19 pandemic, almost all courses from elementary education to universities are being modified for online education. Accordingly, the need for electronic products shows an increase in this pandemic condition. When students want to buy electronic products, i.e., tablets, laptops etc., they are faced with many different possible choices that vary in quality, features, and price. Multi-criteria decision-making methods are very usable tools for choosing the best possible alternative among many others in such situations. Therefore, in this work, two well-known method is taken into consideration so that students can choose the best possible electronic product to use them in online classes.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Multicriteria decision making, Pandemic, TODIM, TOPSIS

Kaynakça

Abdel-Basset, M., Mohamed, R., Sallam, K., & Elhoseny, M. (2020). A novel decision-making model for sustainable supply chain finance under uncertainty environment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 269, 122324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122324
Alali, F., & Tolga, A. C. (2019). Portfolio allocation with the TODIM method. Expert Systems with Applications, 124, 341–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2019.01.054
Araz, O. U., Eski, O., & Araz, C. (2008). Determining the parameters of dual-card kanban system: An integrated multicriteria and artificial neural network methodology. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 38(9–10), 965–977. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-007-1138-1
Behzadian, M., Khanmohammadi Otaghsara, S., Yazdani, M., & Ignatius, J. (2012). A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications. In Expert Systems with Applications (Vol. 39, Issue 17, pp. 13051–13069). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.05.056
Berger, P. A. (2006). Generating agricultural landscapes for alternative futures analysis: A multiple attribute decision-making model. Transactions in GIS, 10(1), 103–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9671.2006.00246.x
Boran, F. E., Genç, S., Kurt, M., & Akay, D. (2009). A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making for supplier selection with TOPSIS method. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(8), 11363–11368. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ESWA.2009.03.039
Celik, M. (2010). A key decision-making process on logistic support to merchant ships based on operational requirements: Marine supplier selection. Naval Engineers Journal, 122(1), 125–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-3584.2010.00235.x
Chakravorty, R., Gauri, S. K., & Chakraborty, S. (2013). Optimization of multiple responses of ultrasonic machining (USM) process: A comparative study. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, 4(2), 285–296. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijiec.2012.012.001
Chang, C.-W. (2012). Collaborative decision making algorithm for selection of optimal wire saw in photovoltaic wafer manufacture. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 23, 533–539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-010-0391-6
Chang, T. W., Pai, C. J., Lo, H. W., & Hu, S. K. (2021). A hybrid decision-making model for sustainable supplier evaluation in electronics manufacturing. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 156, 107283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.107283

Chatterjee, P., & Stević, Ž. (2019). A two-phase fuzzy AHP-fuzzy TOPSIS model for supplier evaluation in manufacturing environment. Operational Research in Engineering Sciences: Theory and Applications, 2(1), 72–90. https://doi.org/10.31181/oresta1901060c
Churchman, C. W., Ackoff, R. L., & Arnoff, E. L. (1957). Introduction to operations research. Wiley.
Du, Y., Zhang, D., & Zou, Y. (2020). Sustainable supplier evaluation and selection of fresh agricultural products based on IFAHP-TODIM model. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/4792679
Gao, H., Ju, Y., Santibanez Gonzalez, E. D. R., & Zhang, W. (2020). Green supplier selection in electronics manufacturing: An approach based on consensus decision making. Journal of Cleaner Production, 245, 118781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118781
Gomes, L. F. A. M., & Lima, M. M. P. P. (1991). Todim: Basic and application to multicriteria ranking of projects with environmental impacts. Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences, 16(4), 113–127.
Hezer, S., Gelmez, E., & Özceylan, E. (2021). Comparative analysis of TOPSIS, VIKOR and COPRAS methods for the COVID-19 Regional Safety Assessment. Journal of Infection and Public Health, 14(6), 775–786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2021.03.003
Hsu, C. W., Kuo, R. J., & Chiou, C. Y. (2014). A multi-criteria decision-making approach for evaluating carbon performance of suppliers in the electronics industry. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 11(3), 775–784. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-013-0265-5
Hwang, C.-L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Methods for Multiple Attribute Decision Making. In Multiple Attribute Decision Making (pp. 58–191). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9_3
Jasiulewicz-Kaczmarek, M., Antosz, K., Wyczółkowski, R., Mazurkiewicz, D., Sun, B., Qian, C., & Ren, Y. (2021). Application of micmac, fuzzy ahp, and fuzzy topsis for evaluation of the maintenance factors affecting sustainable manufacturing. Energies, 14(5), 1436. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14051436
Ji, P., Zhang, H. yu, & Wang, J. qiang. (2018). A projection-based TODIM method under multi-valued neutrosophic environments and its application in personnel selection. Neural Computing and Applications, 29(1), 221–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-016-2436-z
Junaid, M., Xue, Y., Syed, M. W., Li, J. Z., & Ziaullah, M. (2020). A neutrosophic ahp and topsis framework for supply chain risk assessment in automotive industry of Pakistan. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(1), 154. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12010154
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). An analysis of decision under risk. In Econometrica (Vol. 47, Issue 2, pp. 263–292). World Scientific.
Kahraman, C., Büyüközkan, G., & Ateş, N. Y. (2007). A two phase multi-attribute decision-making approach for new product introduction. Information Sciences, 177(7), 1567–1582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2006.09.008
Kaur, P., Pradhan, B. L., & Priya, A. (2022). TODIM approach for selection of inventory policy in supply chain. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5959116
Köseoğlu, A. (2022). Intuitionistic multiplicative set approach for green supplier selection problem using TODIM method. Journal of Universal Mathematics, 5(2), 149–158. https://doi.org/10.33773/jum.1134398
Köseoğlu, A., & Şahin, R. (2019). An intuitionistic multiplicative TOPSIS method for a supplier selection problem. 3rd International Conference on Advanced Engineering Technologies, 1076–1082.
Köseoğlu, A., Şahin, R., & Merdan, M. (2020). A simplified neutrosophic multiplicative set-based TODIM using water-filling algorithm for the determination of weights. Expert Systems, 37(4), e12515. https://doi.org/10.1111/exsy.12515
Loganathan, A., & Mani, I. (2018). A fuzzy based hybrid multi criteria decision making methodology for phase change material selection in electronics cooling system. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 9(4), 2943–2950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2017.11.005
Mathew, M., Chakrabortty, R. K., & Ryan, M. J. (2020). A novel approach integrating AHP and TOPSIS under spherical fuzzy sets for advanced manufacturing system selection. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 96, 103988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2020.103988
Ortiz-Barrios, M., Miranda-De la Hoz, C., López-Meza, P., Petrillo, A., & De Felice, F. (2020). A case of food supply chain management with AHP, DEMATEL, and TOPSIS. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 27(1–2), 104–128. https://doi.org/10.1002/mcda.1693
Qin, Q., Liang, F., Li, L., Chen, Y. W., & Yu, G. F. (2017). A TODIM-based multi-criteria group decision making with triangular intuitionistic fuzzy numbers. Applied Soft Computing Journal, 55, 93–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2017.01.041
Rajak, M., & Shaw, K. (2019). Evaluation and selection of mobile health (mHealth) applications using AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS. Technology in Society, 59, 101186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.101186
Rani, P., & Mishra, A. R. (2020). Novel single-valued neutrosophic combined compromise solution approach for sustainable waste electrical and electronics equipment recycling partner selection. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2020.3033121
Tzeng, G. H., Lin, C. W., & Opricovic, S. (2005). Multi-criteria analysis of alternative-fuel buses for public transportation. Energy Policy, 33(11), 1373–1383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2003.12.014
Wang, X. Kang, Zhang, H. Yu, Wang, J. Qiang, Li, J. Bo, & Li, L. (2021). Extended TODIM-PROMETHEE II method with hesitant probabilistic information for solving potential risk evaluation problems of water resource carrying capacity. Expert Systems, 38(4), e12681. https://doi.org/10.1111/exsy.12681
Wu, Q., Liu, X., Qin, J., Zhou, L., Mardani, A., & Deveci, M. (2022). An integrated generalized TODIM model for portfolio selection based on financial performance of firms. Knowledge-Based Systems, 249, 108794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2022.108794
Zhang, L., Gao, L., Shao, X., Wen, L., & Zhi, J. (2010). A PSO-Fuzzy group decision-making support system in vehicle performance evaluation. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 52(11–12), 1921–1931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2010.03.042
Zulqarnain, R. M., Xin, X. L., Siddique, I., Asghar Khan, W., & Yousif, M. A. (2021). TOPSIS method based on correlation coefficient under pythagorean fuzzy soft environment and its application towards green supply chain management. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(4), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041642

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Mühendislik

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Ali Köseoğlu ^*
0000-0002-2131-7141
Türkiye

Erken Görünüm Tarihi

8 Ağustos 2023

Yayımlanma Tarihi

30 Eylül 2022

Gönderilme Tarihi

29 Eylül 2021

Kabul Tarihi

19 Eylül 2022

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2022

DOI

https://doi.org/10.17714/gumusfenbil.1001904

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA53FT46FD

APA

Köseoğlu, A. (2022). A comparative decision-making for electronic product purchases during a pandemic. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 109-118. https://doi.org/10.17714/gumusfenbil.1001904

AMA

1.Köseoğlu A. A comparative decision-making for electronic product purchases during a pandemic. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi. Published online 01 Eylül 2022:109-118. doi:10.17714/gumusfenbil.1001904

Chicago

Köseoğlu, Ali. 2022. “A comparative decision-making for electronic product purchases during a pandemic”. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, Eylül 1, 109-18. https://doi.org/10.17714/gumusfenbil.1001904.

EndNote

Köseoğlu A (01 Eylül 2022) A comparative decision-making for electronic product purchases during a pandemic. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 109–118.

IEEE

[1]A. Köseoğlu, “A comparative decision-making for electronic product purchases during a pandemic”, Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, ss. 109–118, Eyl. 2022, doi: 10.17714/gumusfenbil.1001904.

ISNAD

Köseoğlu, Ali. “A comparative decision-making for electronic product purchases during a pandemic”. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi. 01 Eylül 2022. 109-118. https://doi.org/10.17714/gumusfenbil.1001904.

JAMA

1.Köseoğlu A. A comparative decision-making for electronic product purchases during a pandemic. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi. 2022;:109–118.

MLA

Köseoğlu, Ali. “A comparative decision-making for electronic product purchases during a pandemic”. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, Eylül 2022, ss. 109-18, doi:10.17714/gumusfenbil.1001904.

Vancouver

1.Ali Köseoğlu. A comparative decision-making for electronic product purchases during a pandemic. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi. 01 Eylül 2022;109-18. doi:10.17714/gumusfenbil.1001904

e-ISSN: 2146-538X Yayın Modeli: Sürekli Yayın Atıf Dizinleri: TR Dizin , SCOPUS

A comparative decision-making for electronic product purchases during a pandemic

A comparative decision-making for electronic product purchases during a pandemic

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

Salgın sırasındaki elektronik ürün alımlarında karşılaştırmalı bir karar verme

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Konular

Bölüm

Yazarlar

Erken Görünüm Tarihi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

Gönderilme Tarihi

Kabul Tarihi

Yayımlandığı Sayı

DOI

IZ

Kaynak Göster

Cited By

Aggregation operators of complex fuzzy Z-number sets and their applications in multi-criteria decision making

Evaluating Usability in mHealth Applications A TOPSIS Approach to Enhancing User Engagement and Health Outcomes

Extension of the PROBID Method to the Pythagorean Fuzzy Sets for Multi-Criteria Decision Making