Araştırma Makalesi

In silico simulation of pathogen interaction with bee probiotics

Cilt: 15 Sayı: 4 15 Aralık 2025
PDF İndir
EN TR

In silico simulation of pathogen interaction with bee probiotics

Abstract

Honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) colonies face serious biological threats from bacterial pathogens such as Paenibacillus larvae and Melissococcus plutonius. This study evaluated the inhibitory potential of bacteriocins derived from Apilactobacillus kunkeei strains against multiple virulence factors of these pathogens using in silico methods. Bacteriocins identified by BAGEL4, including Ak-Bac1 (class IIa) and Ak-Bac2 (class III), were subjected to protein–protein docking analyses using ClusPro and HDOCK platforms with three virulence-associated proteins: the amidase enzyme and spore coat protein CotE from P. larvae, and the surface adhesin protein from M. plutonius. The docking results revealed strong binding affinities, particularly between Ak-Bac2 and the P. larvae amidase enzyme, as well as between Ak-Bac1 and the CotE spore protein, suggesting both enzymatic inhibition and spore suppression effects. These findings indicate that A. kunkeei bacteriocins exhibit broad-spectrum antagonistic potential against honeybee pathogens, providing a molecular basis for the development of probiotic-based biocontrol strategies to support honeybee health.

Keywords

Apilactobacillus kunkeei , Bacteriocin , Bee health , in silico docking , Paenibacillus larvae

Kaynakça

  1. Aziz, T., Naveed, M., Makhdoom, S. I., Ali, U., Mughal, M. S., Sarwar, A., & Alhomrani, M. (2023). Genome investigation and functional annotation of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum YW11 revealing streptin and ruminococcin-A as potent nutritive bacteriocins against gut symbiotic pathogens. Molecules, 28(2), 491. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28020491
  2. Dang, T., Loll, B., Müller, S., Skobalj, R., Ebeling, J., Bulatov, T., & Süssmuth, R. D. (2022). Molecular basis of antibiotic self-resistance in a bee larvae pathogen. Nature Communications, 13(1), 2349. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-29829-w
  3. Endo, A., & Salminen, S. (2013). Honeybees and beehives are rich sources for fructophilic lactic acid bacteria. Systematic and Applied Microbiology, 36(6), 444–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.syapm.2013.06.002
  4. Forsgren, E. (2010). European foulbrood in honey bees. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, 103(S1), S5–S9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jip.2009.06.016
  5. Genersch, E. (2010). Honey bee pathology: Current threats to honey bees and beekeeping. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 87(1), 87–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-010-2573-8
  6. Kozakov, D., Hall, D. R., Xia, B., Porter, K. A., Padhorny, D., Yueh, C., & Vajda, S. (2017). The ClusPro web server for protein–protein docking. Nature protocols, 12(2), 255-278. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2016.169
  7. Olofsson, T. C., Butler, È., Markowicz, P., Lindholm, C., Larsson, L., & Vásquez, A. (2016). Lactic acid bacterial symbionts in honeybees–an unknown key to honey's antimicrobial and therapeutic activities. International Wound Journal, 13(5), 668-679. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.12345
  8. Stepniak-Konieczna, E., Konieczny, P., Cywoniuk, P., Dluzewska, J., & Sobczak, K. (2020). AON-induced splice-switching and DMPK pre-mRNA degradation as potential therapeutic approaches for Myotonic Dystrophy type 1. Nucleic Acids Research, 48(5), 2531-2543. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkaa007
  9. Sunny, S., & Jayaraj, P. B. (2022). Protein–protein docking: Past, present, and future. The protein journal, 41(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10930-021-10031-8
  10. Tian, B., Fadhil, N. H., Powell, J. E., Kwong, W. K., & Moran, N. A. (2021). Long-term exposure to antibiotics has lasting effects on honeybee gut microbiota. Nature Communications, 12, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22516-5

Kaynak Göster

APA
Usta, M. (2025). In silico simulation of pathogen interaction with bee probiotics. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 15(4), 1125-1132. https://doi.org/10.17714/gumusfenbil.1752884