Heyelan Duyarlılık Haritalarının Üretilmesinde Kullanılan Yöntem Ve Parametrelere İlişkin Genel Bir Değerlendirme

S. Dağ; F. Bulut; S. Alemdağ; A. Kaya

TR EN

Heyelan Duyarlılık Haritalarının Üretilmesinde Kullanılan Yöntem Ve Parametrelere İlişkin Genel Bir Değerlendirme

Öz

Heyelanlar insan yaşamını olumsuz yönde etkileyen doğal afetlerden biridir. Ani ve şiddetli yağışlar ve depremlerin yanı sıra, gerekli mühendislik çalışmaları yapılmadan yerleşime açılan yamaçlardaki yapı inşası, değişik amaçlara yönelik yapılan patlatma ve kazı çalışmaları, doğal bitki örtüsünün tahrip edilmesi vb. nedenler herhangi bir alanda meydana gelen heyelanları tetiklemektedir. İnsan yaşamını doğrudan ya da dolaylı olarak olumsuz yönde etkilemesi, konuya olan hassasiyeti gün geçtikçe artırmaktadır. Üniversiteler, araştırma merkezleri ve devlet kurumları, yaptıkları çalışmalarla heyelan tehlike ve risklerini değerlendirmek için, mevcut heyelanların alansal dağılımlarını haritalamışlardır. Daha önceleri yerel duraysızlıkların incelenmesine yönelik olarak yapılan çalışmalar, günümüzde daha geniş alanlara yönelik bölgesel değerlendirmeler yönünde artmıştır

Anahtar Kelimeler

Parametre,yöntem,heyelan,duyarlılık haritaları

Kaynakça

[1] Carrara, A., Cardinali, M., Guzzetti, F. ve Reinhenbach, P., 1995. GIS technology in mapping landslide hazard, Geographical Information Systems in Assessing Natural Hazard, Kluwer Academic Publisher, 173-175.
[2] Soeters, R.S. ve Van Westen, C.J., 1996. Slope instability recognition, analysis and zonation in landslides: Investigation and mitigation, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Special Report-247, National Academy Press, Washington DC, 129-177.
[3] Aleotti, P. ve Chowdhury, R., 1999, Landslide hazard assessment: Summary review and new perspevtives, Bullettion of Engineering Geology Environment, 58, 21-44.
[4] Guzzetti, F., Carrara, A., Cardinali, M. ve Reichenbach, P., 1999. Landslide hazard evaluation: a review of current techniques and their application in a multi-scale study, Central Italy, Geomorphology, 31, 181-216.
[5] Gökçeoğlu, C. ve Ercanoğlu, M., 2001. Heyelan duyarlılık haritalarının hazırlanmasında kullanılan parametrelere ilişkin belirsizlikler, Yerbilimleri, H.Ü. Yerbilimleri Uygulama ve Araştırma Merkezi Bülteni, 23, 201-219.
[6] Dai, F.C., Lee, C.F. ve Xu, Z.W., 2001a. Assessment of Landslide susceptibility on the natural terrain of Lantau Island, Hong Kong, Environmental Geology, 40(3), 381-391.
[7] Gökçeoğlu, C., Okay, A.İ. ve Sezer, E., 2008. International earth science literature from Turkey - 1970-2005: trends and possible causes. Scientometrics, 74(3), 409-423.
[8] Gökçeoğlu, C. ve Sezer, E., 2009. A statistical assessment on international landslide literature (1945-2008), Landslides, 6, 345-351.
[9] Dağ, S., Çayeli (Rize) ve çevresinin istatistiksel yöntemlerle heyelan duyarlılık analizi. K.T.Ü. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Trabzon, Doktora Tezi, 241 s (yayımlanmamış), (2007).
[10] Choubey, V.D. ve Litoria, P.K., 1990. Landslide hazard zonation in the Garhwall Himalaya, A Terrain Evaluation Approach IAEG Congress, 1, Balkema, Rotterdam, 65-72.

[11] Van Westen, C.J. ve Bonilla, J.B.A., 1990. Mountain hazard analysis using a PC-based GIS, Proceeding of the 6th International Congress of Engineering Geology, August Amsterdam, Netherlands, Balkema, 265-271.
[12] Carrara, A., Cardinali, M., Detti, R., Guzzetti, F., Pasqui, V. ve Reichenbach, P., 1991. GIS techniques and statistical models in evaluating landslide hazard, Earth Surf. Proc. and Landf., 16, 427- 445.
[13] Anbalagan, R., 1992. Landslide hazard evaluation and zonation mapping in mountainous terrain, Engineering Geology, 32, 269-277.
[14] Chang, S.C., 1992. The simprecise mapping and evaluation system for engineering geological and landslide hazard zonation, Proceedings of 6th International Symposium on the Landslides, Christchurch, England, Balkema, 65-72.
[15] Choubey, V.D., Chaudhari, S. ve Litoria, P.K., 1992. Landslide hazard zonation in Uttarkashi and Tehri Districts P. Himalaya, India, Proc. 6th Int. Symp. Landslides, Christchurch, 911-917.
[16] Mehrotra, G.S., Sarkar, S. ve Dharmaraju, R., 1992. Landslide hazard assessment in Rishikesh– Tehri Area, Garhwal Himalaya, India, Proceedings of 6th International Symposium on the Landslides, Christchurch, England, Balkema, 1001-1007.
[17] Juang, C.H., Lee, D.H. ve Sheu, C., 1992. Mapping slope failure potential using fuzzy sets, J. Geotech. Eng. Div., ASCE, 118, 475-493.
[18] Pachauri, A.K., ve Pant, M., 1992, Landslide hazard mapping based on geological attributes, Engineering Geology, 32, 81-100.
[19] Guillande, R., Gelugne, P., Bardintzeff, J.M., Brousse, R., Chorowich, J., Deffontaines, B. ve Parrot, J.F., 1993. Cartographie automatique de zones a aleas de mouvement de terrain sur ı’ile de Tahiti a partir de donnees digitales, Bull. Soc. Geol. De France, 164(4), 577-583.
[20] Jade, S. ve Sarkar, S., 1993. Statistical models for slope ınstability classification, Engineering Geology, 36, 91-98.
[21] Maharaj, R., 1993. Landslide processes and landslide susceptibility analysis from an Upland Watershed: A case study from St. Andrew, Jamaica, West Indies. Engineering Geology, 34, 53-79.
[22] Mejia-Navarro, M. ve Wohl, E.E., 1994. Geological hazard and risk evaluation using GIS: Methodology and model applied to modellin, Colombia, Bull. Assoc. Eng. Geol., 31(4), 459-481.
[23] Gökçeoğlu, C. ve Aksoy, H., 1996. Landslide susceptibility mapping of the slopes in the residual soils of the Mengen Region (Turkey) by deterministic stability analyses and ımage processing techniques, Engineering Geology, 44, 147-161.
[24] Abdolmasov, B. ve Obradovic, I., 1997. Evaluation of geological parameters for landslide hazard mapping, Proceeding of the International Symposium on Engineering Geology and the Environment, Greece, Athens, Balkema, 471-476.
[25] Chowdhury, R.N. ve Flentje P., 1997. Relevance of mapping for slope stability in Greater Wollongong Area, New South Wales, Australia, Proc. Int. Symp. Eng. Geol. and Env., Athens, Greece, 569-574.
[26] Fernandez, C.I., Del Castillo, T.F., El Hamdouni, R. ve Montero, J.C., 1999. Verification of landslide susceptibility mapping: A case study, Earth Surface Process and Landforms, 24, 537-544.
[27] Luzi, L. ve Pergalani, F., 1999. Slope ınstability in static and dynamic conditions for urban planning: The “Oltre Po Pavese” case history (Region Lombardia-Italy), Nat. Haz., 20, 57-82.
[28] Nagarajan, R., Roy, A., Vinod Kumar, R., Mukherjee, A. ve Khire, M.V., 2000. Landslide hazard susceptibility mapping based on terrain and climatic factors for tropical monsoon regions, Bull. Eng. Env., 58, 275-287.
[29] Uromeihy, A. ve Mahdafivar, M.R., 2000. Landslide hazard zonation of Khorshrostam Area, Iran., Bull. Eng. Geol. Env., 58, 207-213.
[30] Gupta, R.P. ve Joshi, B.C., 1990. Landslide hazard zoning using the GIS approach: A case study from the Ramganga Catchment, Himalayas, Engineering Geology, 28, 119-131.
[31] Atkinson, P.M. ve Massari, R., 1997. Generalised linear modelling of susceptibility to landsliding in the central appenines, Italy, Comp. and Geosci., 24 (4), 373-385.
[32] Binaghi, E., Luzi, L., Pergalani, F. ve Rampini, A., 1998. Slope instability zonation: A comparision between certainty factor and fuzzy dempster-shafer approaches, Natural Hazards, 17, 77-97.
[33] Prasada, R. ve Saibaba, J., 1999. Landslide hazad zonation mapping using remote sensing and geographic ınformation system techniques: A case study of Pithoragarh Area, U.P. Int. E. El. Eng., 577-579.
[34] Rautella, P. ve Lakhera, R.C., 2000. Landslide risk analysis between giri and ton rivers in Himachal Himalaya (India), J.A.G, 2(3-4), 153-160.
[35] Bulut, F., Boynukalın, S., Tarhan, F. ve Ataoğlu, E., 2000. Reliability of landslide isopleth maps, Bulletin of the International Association of Engineering Geology and Environment, 58(2), 95-98.
[36] Lee, S., Ryu, J., Min, K., Choi, W. ve Won, J., 2000. Development and application of landslide susceptibility analysis techniques using GIS, Int. E. El. Eng., 319-321.
[37] Temesgen, B., Mohammed, M.U. ve Korme, T., 2001. Natural hazard assessment using gıs and remote sensing methods, with particular reference to the landslides in the Wondogenet Area, Ethiophia, Phys.Chem.Earth(C), 26(9), 665-675.
[38] Lee, S., Chang, B., Choi, W. ve Shin, E., 2001. Regional susceptibility, possibility and risk analyses of landslide in Ulsan Metropolitan City, Korea, Int. E. El. Eng., 1690-1692.
[39] Dai, F.C. ve Lee, C.F., 2001. Terrain-based mapping of landslide susceptibility using a geographical ınformation system: A case study, Can. Geotech. J., 38, 911-923.
[40] Dai, F.C., Lee, C.F. ve Xu, Z.W., 2001a. Assessment of Landslide Susceptibility on the Natural Terrain of Lantau Island, Hong Kong, Environmental Geology, 40 (3), 381-391.
[41] Wachal, D.J. ve Hudak, P.F., 2001. Mapping landslide susceptibility in Travis County, Texas, U.S.A., Geo. Journal, 51, 245-253.
[42] Baeza, C. ve Corominas, J., 2001. Assessment of shallow landslide susceptibility by means of multivariate statistical techniques, Earth Surf. Process. and Landforms, 26, 1251-1263.
[43] Lee, C.F., Ye. H., Yeung, M.R., Shan, X. ve Chen, G., 2001. A GIS-based methodology for natural terrain landslide susceptibility mapping in Hong Kong, Episodes, 24(3), 150-159.
[44] Lee, S. ve Min, K., 2001. Statistical analysis of landslide susceptibility at Yongin, Korea, Env. Geol., 40, 1095-1113.
[45] Ercanoğlu, M. ve Gökçeoğlu, C., 2002. Assessment of landslide susceptibility for a landslide-Prone Area (North of Yenice, NW Turkey) by fuzzy approach, Environmental Geology, 41, 720-730.
[46] Lee, S., Choi, J. ve Min, K., 2002. Landslide susceptibility analysis and verication using the bayesian probability model, Enviromental Geology, 43, 120-131.
[47] Donati, L. ve Turrini, M.C., 2002. An objective method to rank the ımportance of the factors predisposing to landslides with the GIS methodology: Application to an area of the Apennines (Valnerina; Perugia, Italy), Eng. Geol., 63, 277-289.
[48] Zhou, C.H., Lee, C.F., Li, J. ve Xu, Z.W., 2002. On the spatial relationship between landslides and causative factors on lantau ısland, Hong Kong, Geomorphology, 43, 197-207.
[49] Kojima, H. ve Obayashi, S., 2002. An inverse analysıs of unobserved trigger factors of the slope failures based on structural equation modeling, Symposium on Geospatial Theory, Proceeding and Application, Ottawa.
[50] Chung, C.J. ve Fabbri, A.G., 2002. Modelling the conditional probability of the occurences of future landslides in a study area characterized by spatial data, Symposium on Geospatial Theory, Processing and Application, Ottava, Canada.
[51] Dai, F.C. ve Lee, C.F., 2002a. Landslides on natural terrain physical characteristics and susceptibility mapping in Hong Kong, Mountain Research and Development, 22(1), 40-47.
[52] Pistocchi, A., Luzi, L. ve Napolitano, P., 2002. The use of predictive modeling techniques for optimal exploitation of spatial databases: A case study in landslide hazard mapping with expert system-like methods, Environmental Geology, 41, 765-775
[53] Clerici, A., Perego, S., Tellini, C. ve Vescovi, P., 2002. A procedure for landslide susceptibility zonation by the conditional analysis method, Geomorphology, 48(4), 349-364.
[54] Dai, F.C. ve Lee, C.F., 2002b. Landslide characteristics and slope ınstability modelling using GIS, Lantau Island, Hong Kong, Geomorphology, 42, 213-228.
[55] Ohlmacher, G.C. ve Davis, J.C., 2003. Using multiple logistic regression and GIS technology to predict landslide hazard in Northeast Kansas, USA, Engineering Geology, 69, 331-343.
[56] Süzen, M.L. ve Doyuran, V., 2004a. Data driven bivariate landslide susceptibility assesment using geographical ınformation system: A method and application to Asarsuyu Catchment, Turkey, Engineering Geology, 71(3-4), 303-321.
[57] Lee, S., Chwae, U. ve Min, K., 2003. Landslide susceptibility mapping by correlation between topography and geological structure: The Janghung Area, Korea, Geomorphology, 46, 9-162.
[58] Santacana, N., Baeza, B., Corominas, J., Paz, A.D. ve Marturia, J., 2003. A GIS-based multivariate statistical analysis for shallow landslide susceptibility maping in La Pobla de Lillet area (Eastern Pyrenees, Spain), Natural Hazards, 30, 281-295.
[59] Fernandez, T., Irigaray, C., El Hamdouni, R. ve Chacon, J., 2003. Methodology for landslide susceptibility mapping by means of a GIS: Application to the Contraviesa Area (Granada Spain), Natural Hazards, 30, 297- 308.
[60] Van Westen, C.J., Rengers, N. ve Soeters, R., 2003. Use of geomorphological ınformation in ındirect landslide susceptibility assesment, Natural Hazards, 30, 399-419.
[61] Remondo, J., Gonzalez, A., Teran, J.R.D.D., Cendrero, A., Fabbri, A. ve Chung, C.J.F., 2003b. Landslide susceptibility models utilising spatial data analysis techniques. A case study from the Lower Deba Valley, Guipuzcoa (Spain), Natural Hazards, 30, 267-279.
[62] Remondo, J., Gonzalez, A., Teran, J.R.D.D., Cendrero, A., Fabbri, A. ve Chung, C.J.F., 2003a. Validation of landslide susceptibility maps. Examples and Applications from a case study in Northern Spain, Natural Hazards, 30, 437-449.
[63] Süzen, M.L. ve Doyuran, V., 2004b. A Comparison of the GIS based landslide susceptibility assesment methods: Multivariate versus bivariate, Envinonmental Geology, 45, 665-679.
[64] Çevik, E. ve Topal, T., 2003. GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping for a problematic segment of the natural gas pipeline, Hendek (Turkey), Environmental Geology, 44, 949-962.
[65] Menendez-Duarte, R., Marquinez, J. ve Devoli, G., 2003. Slope Instability in Nicaragua Triggered by Hurricane Mitch: Distribution of shallow mass movements, Environmental Geology, 44, 290-300
[66] Tangestani, M.H., 2003. Landslide susceptibility mapping using the fuzzy gamma operation in a GIS, Kakan Catchment Area, Iran, Map India Conference.
[67] Lee, S., 2004. Application of likelihood ratio and logistic regression models to landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS, Environmental Management, 34(2), 223-232.
[1]. [68] Moreiras, S.M., 2005. Landslide susceptibility zonation in the Rio Mondeza Valley, Argentina, Geomorphology, 66, 1-4.
[69] Lan, H.X., Zhou, C.H., Wang, L.J., Zhang, H.Y. ve Li, R.H., 2004. Landslide hazard spatial analysis and prediction using GIS in the Xiaojiang Watershed, Yunan, China, Engineering Geology, 76, 109-128.
[70] Ermini, L., Catani, F. ve Casagli, N., 2004. Artificial neural networks applied to landslide susceptibility assessment, Geomorphology, 66, 327-343.
[71] Gomez, H. ve Kavzoğlu, T., 2004. Assessment of shallow landslide susceptibility using artificial neural networks in Jabonosa River Basin, Venezuela, Engineering Geology, 78, 11-27.
[72] Ercanoğlu, M., Gökçeoğlu, C. ve Van Asch., T.W.J., 2003. Landslide susceptibility zoning of north of Yenice (NW Turkey) by multivariate statistical techniques, Natural Hazards, 32, 1-23.
[73] Ercanoğlu, M. ve Gökçeoğlu, C., 2004. Use of Fuzzy relations to produce landslide susceptibility map of a landslide Prone Area (West Black Sea Region), Turkey, Engineering Geology, 75, 229-250.
[74] Ayenew, T. ve Barbieri, G., 2005. Inventory of landslides and susceptibility mapping in the Dessie Area, North Ethiopia, Engineering Geology, 77 (1-2), 1-15.
[75] Casaglı, N., Ctani, F., Puglisi, C., Delmonaco, G., Ermini, L. ve Mangottini, C., 2004. An ınventory-based approach to landslide susceptibility assesment and ıts application to the Virginio River Basin, Italy, Envinonmental and Engineering Geoscience, 10(3), 203-216.
[76] Foumelis, M., Lekkas, E. ve Parcharidis, I., 2004. Landslide susceptibility mapping by gıs-based qualitative weighting procedure in Corinth Area, Bulletin of the Geological Society of Greece, 36.
[77] Ayalew, L., Yamagishi, H. ve Ugawa, N., 2004. Landslide susceptibility mapping using gıs-based weighted linear combination, The case in Tsugawa area of Agano River, Niigate prefecture, Japan, Landslides, 1, 73-81.
[78] Ayalew, L. ve Yamagishi, H., 2005. The application of GIS-based logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Kakuda-Yahiko mountains, Central Japan, Geomorphology, 65(1-2), 15-31.
[79] Lee, S., 2005. Application of logistic regression model and ıts validation for landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS and remote sensing data, Int. J. Remote Sensing, 26(7), 1477-1491.
[80] Yeşilnacar, E. ve Topal, T., 2005. Landslide susceptibility mapping: A comparison of logistic regression and neural networks methods in a medium scale study, Hendek Region (Turkey), Engineering Geology. 79, 251-266.
[81] Yalçın, A. ve Bulut, F., 2007. Landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS and digital photogrametric techniques; a case study from Ardeşen (NE-Turkey), Natural Hazard, 41, 2001-226.
[82] Eeckhaut, M.V.D., Vanwalleghem, T., Poesen, J., Govers, G., Verstraeten, G. ve Vandekerckhove, L., 2006. Prediction of landslide susceptibility using rare events logistic regression: A case study in the Flemish Ardennes (Belgium), Geomorphology, 76(3-4), 392-410.
[83] Çan, T., Nefeslioğlu, H.A., Gökçeoğlu, C., Sönmez, H. ve Duman, T.Y., 2005. Susceptibility assessments of shallow earthflows triggered by heavy rainfall at three catchments by logistic regression analyses, Geomorphology, 72, 250-271
[84] Komac, M., 2006. A Landslide susceptibility model using the analytical hierarchy process method and multivariate statistics in Perialpine Slovenia, Geomorphology, 71(1-4), 17-28.
[85] Pradhan, B., Singh, R.P. ve Buchroithner, M.F., 2005. Estimation of stress and its use in evaluation of landslide prone regions using remote sensing data, Advances in space Research, 37(4), 698-709.
[86] Chau, K.T. ve Chan, J.E., 2005. Regional bias of landslide data in generating susceptibility maps using logistic regression: Case of Hong Kong Island, Landslides, 2, 280-290.
[87] Baum, R.L., Coe, J.A., Godt, J.W., Harp, E.L., Reid, M.E., Savage, W.Z., Schulz, W.H., Brein, D.L., Chleborad, A.F., McKenna, J.P. ve Michael J.A., 2005. Regional landslide-hazard assessment for Seattle, Washington, USA, Landslides, 2, 266-279.
[88] Look, B., 2005. Landslide hazard zonation by GIS Analysis, Connell Wagner, Brisbane, Australia.
[89] Guinau, M., Palas, R. ve Vilaplana, J.M., 2005. A feasible methodology for landslide susceptibility assessment in developing countries: A case study of NW Nicaragua After Hurricane Mitch, Engineering Geology, 80, 316-327.
[90] Wang, H.B. ve Sassa, K., 2005. Comparative evaluation of landslide susceptibility in Minamata Area, Japan, Environmental Geology, 47, 956-966.
[91] Duman, T.Y., Can, T., Gokceoglu, C. ve Nefeslioglu, H.A., 2005. Landslide susceptibility mapping of Cekmece Area (Istanbul, Turkey) by conditional probability, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions, 2, 155-206.
[92] Chung, C.J., 2006. Using Likelihood ratio functions for modeling the conditional probability of occurrence of future landslides for risk assessment, Computers and Geosciences, 32, 1052-1068.
[93] Duman, T.Y., Can, T., Gokceoglu, C., Nefeslioglu, H.A. ve Sonmez, H. 2006. Application of logistic regression for landslide susceptibility zoning of Cekmece Area, İstanbul, Turkey, Environmental Geology, 51, 2.
[94] Lee, S. ve Dan, N.T., 2005. Probabilistic landslide susceptibility mapping in the Lai Chau Province of Vietnam: Focus on the relationship between tectonic fractures and landslides, Environmental Geology, 48, 778- 787.
[95] Havenith, H.B., Strom, A., Caceres, F. ve Pirard, E., 2006. Analysis of landslide susceptibility in the Suusamyr Region, Tien Shan: Statistical and geotechnical approach, Landslides, 3, 39-50.
[96] Clerici, A., Perego, S., Tellini, C. ve Vescovi, P. 2006. A GIS-based automated procedure for landslide susceptibility mapping by the conditional analysis method: The Baganza Valley Case Study (Italian Northern Apennines), Environmental Geology, 50, 941-961.
[97] Lee, S. ve Sambath, T., 2006. Landslide susceptibility mapping in the Damrei Romel Area, Cambodia Using Frequency Ratio and Logistic Regression Models, Environmental Geology, 50, 847-855.
[98] Akgün, A. ve Bulut, F., 2007. GIS-based landslide susceptibility for Arsin-Yomra (Trabzon, North Turkey) region, Environmental Geology, 51, 1377-1387.
[99] Lee, S., 2007. Application and verification of fuzzy algebraic operators to landslide susceptibility mapping, Environmental Geology, 52, 615-623.
[100] Akgün, A., Dağ, S. ve Bulut, F., 2008. Landslide susceptibility mapping for a landslide-prone area (Findikli, NE of Turkey) by likelihood-frequency ratio and weighted linear combination models, Environmental Geology, 54, 1127-1143.
[101] Yalçın, A., 2008. GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using analytical hierarchy process and bivariate statistics in Ardesen (Turkey): Comparisons of results and confirmations, Catena, 72, 1-12.
[102] Nefeslioğlu, H.A., Gökçeoğlu C. ve Sönmez H., 2008. An assessment on the use of logistic regression and artificial neural networks with different sampling strategies for the preparation of landslide susceptibility maps, Engineering Geology, 97, 171-191.
[103] Godt, J.W., Baum, R.L., Savage, W.Z., Salciarini, D., Schulz, W.H. ve Harp, E.L., 2008. Transient deterministic shallow landslide modeling: Requirements for susceptibility and hazard assessments in a GIS framework, Engineering Geology, 102, 214-226.
[104] Liu, C. ve Wu, C., 2008. Integrating GIS and stress transfer mechanism in mapping rainfall-triggered landslide susceptibility, Engineering Geology, 101, 60-74.
[105] Dahal-Ranjan Kumar, R.K., Hasegawa, S., Nonomura, A., Yamanaka, M., Masuda, T. ve Nishino, K., 2008. GIS-based weights-of-evidence modelling of rainfall-induced landslides in small catchments for landslide susceptibility mapping, Environmental Geology, 54, 311-324.
[106] Vijith, H. ve Madhu, G., 2008. Estimating potential landslide sites of an upland sub-watershed in Western Ghat’s of Kerala (India) through frequency ratio and GIS, Environmental Geology, 55, 1397-1405.
[107] Oh, H., Lee, S., Chotikasathien, W., Kim, C.H. ve Kwon, J.H., 2009. Predictive landslide susceptibility mapping using spatial information in the Pechabun area of Thailand, Environmental Geology, 57, 641-651.
[108] Wang, W.D., Xie, C.M. ve Du, X.G., 2009. Landslides susceptibility mapping based on geographical information system, GuiZhou, South-west China, Environmental Geology, 58, 33-43.
[109] Özdemir, A., 2009. Landslide susceptibility mapping of vicinity of Yaka Landslide (Gelendost, Turkey) using conditional probability approach in GIS, Environmental Geology, 57, 1675-1686.
[110] Mathew, J., Jha, V.K. ve Rawat, G.S., 2009. Landslide susceptibility zonation mapping and its validation in part of Garhwal Lesser Himalaya, India, using binary logistic regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic curve method, Landslides, 6, 17-26.
[111] Chen, C., Ke, C., ve Wang, C., 2009. A back-propagation network for the assessment of susceptibility to rock slope failure in the eastern portion of the Southern Cross-Island Highway in Taiwan, Environmental Geology, 57, 723-733.
[112] Yılmaz, I., 2009. A case study from Koyulhisar (Sivas-Turkey) for landslide susceptibility mapping by Artificial Neural Networks, Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 68(3), 297-306.
[113] Yılmaz, I., 2010. Comparison of landslide susceptibility mapping methodologies for Koyulhisar, Turkey: Conditional Probability, Logistic Regression, Artificial Neural Networks and Support Vector Machine. Environmental Earth Sciences, 61(4), 821-836.
[114] Akgün, A. ve Türk, N., 2010a. Landslide susceptibility mapping for Ayvalik (Western Turkey) and its vicinity by multicriteria decision analysis, Environmental Earth Science, 61, 595–611.
[115] Akgün, A. ve Türk, N., 2010b. İki ve çok değişkenli istatistik ve sezgisel tabanlı heyelan duyarlılık modellerinin karşılaştırılması: Ayvalık (Balıkesir, Kuzeybatı Türkiye) örneği, Jeoloji Mühendisliği Dergisi, 34 (2), 85-112.
[116] Yeon, Y., Han, J. ve Ryu, K.H., 2010. Landslide susceptibility mapping in Injae, Korea, using a decision tree, Engineering Geology, 116, 274-283.
[117] Erener, A., Şebnem, H. ve Düzgün, B., 2010. Improvement of statistical landslide susceptibility mapping by using spatial and global regression methods in the case of More and Romsdal (Norway), Landslides, 7, 55- 68.
[118] Pradhan, S. ve Lee, B., 2010. Regional landslide susceptibility analysis using back-propagation neural network model at Cameron Highland, Malaysia, Landslides, 7, 13-30.
[119] Cevri, F., Berti. M., Borgatti, L., Ronchetti, F., Manenti, F. ve Corsini, A., 2010, Comparing predictive capability of statistical and deterministic methods for landslide susceptibility mapping: a case study in the northern Apennines (Reggio Emilia Province, Italy), Landslides, 7, 433-444.
[120] Conforti, M., Pietro P.C.A., Robustelli, G. ve Scarciglia, S., 2011a. Geomorphology and GIS analysis for mapping gully erosion susceptibility in the Turbolo stream catchment (Northern Calabria, Italy), Natural Hazards, 56, 881–898.
[121] Sujatha, E.R. ve Rajamanickam, V., 2011. Landslide susceptibility mapping of Tevankarai Ar subwatershed, Kodaikkanal taluk, India, using weighted similar choice fuzzy model, Natural Hazards, DOI 10.1007/s11069-011-9763-2.
[122] Rozos, D., Bathrellos, G.D. ve Skillodimou, H.D., 2011. Comparison of the implementation of rock engineering system and analytic hierarchy process methods, upon landslide susceptibility mapping, using GIS: a case study from the Eastern Achaia County of Peloponnesus, Greece, Environmental Earth Science, 63, 49–63.
[123] Rapolla, A., Nocera, S.D., Matano, F., Paoletti, V. ve Tarallo, D., 2011. Susceptibility regional zonation of earthquake-induced landslides in Campania, Southern Italy, Natural Hazards, DOI 10.1007/s11069-011- 9790-z.
[124] Conforti, M., Pietro P.C.A., Robustelli, G. ve Scarciglia, S., 2011b. Application and validation of bivariate GIS-based landslide susceptibility assessment for the Vitravo river catchment (Calabria, south Italy), Natural Hazards, DOI 10.1007/s11069-011-9781-0.
[125] Das, I., Stein, A., Kerle, N. ve Dadhwal, V.K., 2011. Probabilistic landslide hazard assessment using homogeneous susceptible units (HSU) along a national highway corridor in the northern Himalayas, India, Landslides, DOI 10.1007/s10346-011-0257-9.
[126] Leroi, E., 1996. Landslide hazard-risk maps at different scales: Ocjectives, tools and developments, Proc. VII. Int. Symp. Landslides, Trondheim, 1, 35-52.
[127] Yalçın, A., Ardeşen (Rize) yöresinin heyelan duyarlılığı açısından incelenmesi. Doktora Tezi, K.T.Ü., Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Trabzon, 170 s., (2005).
[128] Bulut, F., Boynukalın, S., Tarhan, F. ve Ataoğlu, E., 1995. Fındıklı İlçesi (Rize) doğu yöresindeki heyelanların nedenleri, II. Ulusal Heyelan Sempozyumu Bildiriler Kitabı, Adapazarı, 143-152.
[129] Fell, R., Corominas, J., Bonnard, C., Cascini, L., Leroi, E. ve Savage, W.Z., 2008. Guidelines for landslide susceptibility, hazard and risk zoning for land use planning, Engineering Geology, 102, 85-98.
[130] Dai, F.C., Lee, C.F. ve Zhang, X.H., 2001b. GIS-based geo-environmental evaluation for urban land-use planning: A case study, Eng. Geol., 61, 257-271.
[131] Dağ, S., Bulut, F. ve Akgün, A., 2006. İki değişkenli istatistiksel analiz yöntemi ile Çayeli (Rize) ve çevresindeki heyelanların değerlendirilmesi, 1. Heyelan Sempozyumu, Trabzon, Bildiriler Kitabı, 84.
[132] Koukis, G. ve Ziourkas, C., 1991. Slope instability phenomena in Greece: A statistical analysis, Bulletin of International Association of Engineering Geologists, 43, 47-60.
[133] Jakob, M., 2000. The ımpacts of logging on the landslide activity at Clayoquot Soung, British Columbia, Catena, 38, 279-300.
[134] Ercanoğlu, M., Bulanık mantık ve istatistiksel yöntemlerle heyelan duyarlılık haritalarının üretilmesi: Batı Karadeniz Bölgesi (Kumluca Güneyi - Yenice Kuzeyi). Doktora Tezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, 203 s. (yayımlanmamış), (2003).
[135] Peloquin, S. ve Gwyn, Q.H.J., 2000. Using remote sensing, GIS and artificial ıntelligence to evaluate landslide susceptibility levels: Application in the Bolivian Andes, 4th Int. Conf. On Inteq. GIS Env. Mod., Canada, 26-37.
[136] Barnard, P.L., Owen, L.A., Sharma, M.C. ve Finkel, R.C., 2001. Natural and humaninduced landsliding in the Garhwal Himalaya of Northern India, Geomorphology, 40, 21-35.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Türkçe

Konular

-

Bölüm

-

Yazarlar

S. Dağ

F. Bulut Bu kişi benim

S. Alemdağ Bu kişi benim

A. Kaya Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi

1 Ağustos 2011

Gönderilme Tarihi

-

Kabul Tarihi

-

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2011 Cilt: 1 Sayı: 2

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA82GL89HH

APA

Dağ, S., Bulut, F., Alemdağ, S., & Kaya, A. (2011). Heyelan Duyarlılık Haritalarının Üretilmesinde Kullanılan Yöntem Ve Parametrelere İlişkin Genel Bir Değerlendirme. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 1(2), 151-176. https://izlik.org/JA82GL89HH

AMA

1.Dağ S, Bulut F, Alemdağ S, Kaya A. Heyelan Duyarlılık Haritalarının Üretilmesinde Kullanılan Yöntem Ve Parametrelere İlişkin Genel Bir Değerlendirme. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi. 2011;1(2):151-176. https://izlik.org/JA82GL89HH

Chicago

Dağ, S., F. Bulut, S. Alemdağ, ve A. Kaya. 2011. “Heyelan Duyarlılık Haritalarının Üretilmesinde Kullanılan Yöntem Ve Parametrelere İlişkin Genel Bir Değerlendirme”. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 1 (2): 151-76. https://izlik.org/JA82GL89HH.

EndNote

Dağ S, Bulut F, Alemdağ S, Kaya A (01 Ağustos 2011) Heyelan Duyarlılık Haritalarının Üretilmesinde Kullanılan Yöntem Ve Parametrelere İlişkin Genel Bir Değerlendirme. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 1 2 151–176.

IEEE

[1]S. Dağ, F. Bulut, S. Alemdağ, ve A. Kaya, “Heyelan Duyarlılık Haritalarının Üretilmesinde Kullanılan Yöntem Ve Parametrelere İlişkin Genel Bir Değerlendirme”, Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, c. 1, sy 2, ss. 151–176, Ağu. 2011, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA82GL89HH

ISNAD

Dağ, S. - Bulut, F. - Alemdağ, S. - Kaya, A. “Heyelan Duyarlılık Haritalarının Üretilmesinde Kullanılan Yöntem Ve Parametrelere İlişkin Genel Bir Değerlendirme”. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 1/2 (01 Ağustos 2011): 151-176. https://izlik.org/JA82GL89HH.

JAMA

1.Dağ S, Bulut F, Alemdağ S, Kaya A. Heyelan Duyarlılık Haritalarının Üretilmesinde Kullanılan Yöntem Ve Parametrelere İlişkin Genel Bir Değerlendirme. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi. 2011;1:151–176.

MLA

Dağ, S., vd. “Heyelan Duyarlılık Haritalarının Üretilmesinde Kullanılan Yöntem Ve Parametrelere İlişkin Genel Bir Değerlendirme”. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, c. 1, sy 2, Ağustos 2011, ss. 151-76, https://izlik.org/JA82GL89HH.

Vancouver

1.S. Dağ, F. Bulut, S. Alemdağ, A. Kaya. Heyelan Duyarlılık Haritalarının Üretilmesinde Kullanılan Yöntem Ve Parametrelere İlişkin Genel Bir Değerlendirme. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi [Internet]. 01 Ağustos 2011;1(2):151-76. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA82GL89HH

e-ISSN: 2146-538X Yayın Modeli: Sürekli Yayın Atıf Dizinleri: TR Dizin , SCOPUS

Heyelan Duyarlılık Haritalarının Üretilmesinde Kullanılan Yöntem Ve Parametrelere İlişkin Genel Bir Değerlendirme

Heyelan Duyarlılık Haritalarının Üretilmesinde Kullanılan Yöntem Ve Parametrelere İlişkin Genel Bir Değerlendirme

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

A general assesment for methods and parameters used in production of landslide susceptibility maps

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Konular

Bölüm

Yazarlar

Yayımlanma Tarihi

Gönderilme Tarihi

Kabul Tarihi

Yayımlandığı Sayı

IZ

Kaynak Göster