On Philip Abrams and a Multi-Faceted “Historical Event”: The Urabi Movement (1879-1882) in Egypt

Yıl 2018, , 170 - 184, 30.04.2018

Ozan Aşık

https://doi.org/10.18795/gumusmaviatlas.418526

Öz

This article explores the Urabi Revolt (1879-1882) in
Egypt as a unique historical event from Philip Abrams’ theoretical perspective.
Abrams argues that the extent of the complexity and uniqueness of a historical
event can be assessed based on the conjunction of various elements and aspects
the event embodies. The Urabi movement represents a “puzzle of the complex
factors”, to use Abrams’ terminology, which impacts a large-scale social
transformation – the transition of Egypt from a Middle Eastern monarchy to a
modern nation-state. Departing from this point of view, in the article, I argue
that the Urabi movement was a convergence of a range of loosely related
developments over the course of a historical event. Hence the question here is
not about choosing a single development among a variety of them and focusing on
it to explain the whole process, but about capturing how each development
shaped the course and character of the event and to what degree.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Egypt, Historical Sociology, Historical Event, Philip Abrams, Urabi Revolt

Philip Abrams ve Çok Yönlü Bir “Tarihsel Olay” Üzerine: Mısır’daki Urabi Hareketi (1879-1882)

Öz

Bu makale,
Philip Abrams’ın teorik perspektifinden Mısır’daki Urabi İsyanı’nı (1879-1882) özgün
bir tarihsel olay olarak incelemektedir. Abrams tarihsel bir olayın
özgünlüğünün ve karmaşıklığının boyutunun o olayın temsil ettiği çeşitli öğe ve
özelliklerinin bileşimi üzerinden değerlendirilebileceğini tartışmaktadır.
Abrams’ın terminolojisini kullanacak olursak, Urabi Hareketi büyük çaplı bir
toplumsal dönüşümü – Mısır’ın bir Orta Doğu monarşisinden modern ulus-devlete
geçişi – etkileyen karmaşık faktörlerden oluşan bir bulmaca şeklinde ortaya
çıkar. Bu bakış açısından hareketle, bu makalede Urabi Hareketi’nin tarihsel
bir olay sürecinde bir araya gelen birbiriyle ilintili farklı gelişmelerin bir
bütünü olduğunu tartışmaktayım. Dolayısıyla buradaki mevzu, bütün bir süreci
açıklamada bir çok gelişme arasından tek bir tarihsel gelişmeyi seçip ona odaklanmak
değil, her bir gelişmenin olayın karakteri ve sürecini nasıl ve ne derece
şekillendirdiğini kavramaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Mısır, Tarihsel Sosyoloji, Tarihsel Olay, Philip Abrams, Urabi İsyanı

Kaynakça

• ABRAMS, Philip (1980). “History, Sociology, Historical Sociology”, The Past and Present, 87: 3-16.
• ABRAMS, Philip (1982). Historical Sociology, Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
• BARNES, Harry Elmer (1972). The New History and the Social Studies (first published in 1925), New York: The Century Co.
• BURKE, Peter (1993). History and Social Theory, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
• CLEVELAND, W. & M. BUNTON (2009). A History of the Modern Middle East, Boulder, Philadelphia: Westview Press.
• COLE, Juan R. (1999). Colonialism and Revolution in the Middle East: Social and Cultural Origins of Egypt’s Urabi Movement, Cairo: American University in Cairo Press.
• COLE, Juan R.I. (1989). Of Crowds and Empires: Afro-Asian Riots and European Expansion, 1857-1882”, Comparative Studies in Society and History, 31(1): 106-133.
• FARNIE, Anthony D. (1969). East and West of Suez: the Suez Canal in History, 1854-1956, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
• GALBRAITH, John S. & A. L. AL-SAYYID-MARSOT (1978). “The British Occupation of Egypt: Another View”, International Journal of Middle East Studies, 9(4): 471-488.
• GELVIN, James (2011). The Modern Middle East: A History, New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• GRAN, Peter (1978). “Modern Trends in Egyptian Historiography: A Review Article”, International Journal of Middle East Studies, 9 (3): 367-371.
• HALSTEAD, John P. (1969). “A Comparative Historical Study of Colonial Nationalism in Egypt and Morocco”, African Historical Studies, 2(1): 85-100.
• HOBSBAWM, Eric (1997). On History, New York: The New Press.
• HOPKINS, A.G. (1986). “The Victorians and Africa: A Reconsideration of the Occupation of Egypt, 1882”, The Journal of African History, 27(2): 363-391.
• KEDDIE, Nikki R. (1994). “The Revolt of Islam, 1700-1993: Comparative Considerations and Relations to Imperialism”, Comparative Studies in Society and History, 36(3): 34-59.
• LACOUTURE, Jean & S. Lacouture (1958). Egypt in Transition, New York: Criterion Books.
• MAHFOUZ, Naguib (2001). The Cairo Trilogy: Palace Walk; Palace of Desire; Sugar Street, New York, London: Everyman.
• MOOREHEAD, Alan (1962). The Blue Nile, New York: Harper & Row.
• ROWLATT, Mary (1962). Founders of Modern Egypt, New York: Asia Publication House.
• SCHÖLCH, Alexander (1976). “The ‘Men on the Spot’ and the English Occupation of Egypt in 1882”, The Historical Journal, 19(3): 773-785.
• VATIKIOTIS, Panayiotis (1992). The History of Modern Egypt: From Muhammad Ali to Mubarak, Baltimore, Md.: The John Hopkins University Press.