Öz
Kant’s philosophical approach until the Critique of Pure Reason published at 1781 is generally designated in the history of philosophy as Kant’s “pre-critical” period. The determinative matter of this phase is a deep and continuous struggle of him with both Newtonian physics and metaphysics of LeibnizWolff school. Although he never clearly formulated those problems and solution proposals about the basic philosophical and metaphysical ideas of his “critical” period, there are some conceptual-patterns in his early writings that can be seen as pioneer ideas with respect to his posterior thoughts. The aim of this study is to present a general perspective about Kant’s “pre-critical” period by following his early texts
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- BEISER Frederick C., (1992), “Kant’s Intellectual Development: 1764-1781,” (Ed. Paul GUYER), The Cambridge Companion to Kant, pp. 26-61, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- CARL Wolfgang, (1989), “Kant’s First Drafts of the Deduction of the Categories,” (Ed. Eckart FÖRSTER), pp. 3-20, Kant’s Transcendental Deductions: The Three Critiques and the Opus Postumum, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
- CASSIRER Ernst, (1996), Kant’ın Yaşamı ve Öğretisi, (Çev. Doğan ÖZLEM), İstanbul: İnkılâp Kitabevi.
- CAYGILL Howard, (1995), A Kant Dictionary, USA: Blackwell Publishing.
- FÖRSTER Eckart, (1989), Kant’s Transcendental Deductions: The Three Critiques and the Opus Postumum, (Ed. Eckart FÖRSTER), Stanford: Stanford University Press.
- GARDNER S., (1999), Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Kant and the Critique of Pure Reason, London & New York: Routledge.
- HEIDEGGER Martin, (1997), Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, (Trans. by Parvis EMAD & Kenneth MALY), Indiana: Indiana University Press.
- HEIMSOETH Heinz, (1986), Immanel Kant’ın Felsefesi, (Çev. Takiyettin MENGÜŞOĞLU), İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi.
- KANT Immanuel, (1990ff), Immanuel Kants gesammelte Schriften, Hrsg.: Bd. 1-22 Preussische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Bd. 23 Deutsche Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, ab Bd. 24 Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, Berlin, 1900ff.
- KANT Immanuel, (1999a), Critique of Pure Reason, (Ed. & Trans. by Paul Guyer & Allen W. Wood), Cambridge University Press.
- KANT Immanuel, (1999b), Correspondence, (Trans. by Arnulf Zweig), Cambridge University Press.
- KANT Immanuel, (2003), Theoretical Philosophy, 1755–1770, (Trans. & Ed. by David Walford, in collaboration with Ralf Meerbote), Cambridge University Press.
- KOVANLIKAYA, Aliye (2002), A Critical Approach to Kant's Conception of Experience in View of Leibniz's Ontology, (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi), Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
- LONGUENESSE Beatrice, (2000), Kant and the Capacity to Judge: Sensibility and Discursivity in the Transcendental Analytic of the Critique of Pure Reason, (Trans. by. Charles T. Wolfe), Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Öz
Kant’ın 1781 tarihli Saf Aklın Eleştirisi adlı çalışmasına kadar geçen felsefî kariyeri, genel olarak literatürde, onun “eleştiri öncesi” dönemi olarak adlandırılır. Bu dönemin belirleyici unsuru, Kant’ın bir taraftan Newton fiziki diğer taraftan da Leibniz-Wolff metafiziki ile sürekli boğuşmasıdır. Bu süreç içerisinde Kant, aynı zamanda, hernekadar berrak ve keskin bir biçimde formüle edilmese de “eleştirel felsefe”ye doğru giden ilk açılımları da sunar. Bu çalışmanın amacı, Kant’ın sözü edilen düşünce dönemini mercek altına alarak onun “eleştiri öncesi” düşüncelerine dâir genel bir perspektif çizmektir.
Kaynakça
- BEISER Frederick C., (1992), “Kant’s Intellectual Development: 1764-1781,” (Ed. Paul GUYER), The Cambridge Companion to Kant, pp. 26-61, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- CARL Wolfgang, (1989), “Kant’s First Drafts of the Deduction of the Categories,” (Ed. Eckart FÖRSTER), pp. 3-20, Kant’s Transcendental Deductions: The Three Critiques and the Opus Postumum, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
- CASSIRER Ernst, (1996), Kant’ın Yaşamı ve Öğretisi, (Çev. Doğan ÖZLEM), İstanbul: İnkılâp Kitabevi.
- CAYGILL Howard, (1995), A Kant Dictionary, USA: Blackwell Publishing.
- FÖRSTER Eckart, (1989), Kant’s Transcendental Deductions: The Three Critiques and the Opus Postumum, (Ed. Eckart FÖRSTER), Stanford: Stanford University Press.
- GARDNER S., (1999), Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Kant and the Critique of Pure Reason, London & New York: Routledge.
- HEIDEGGER Martin, (1997), Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, (Trans. by Parvis EMAD & Kenneth MALY), Indiana: Indiana University Press.
- HEIMSOETH Heinz, (1986), Immanel Kant’ın Felsefesi, (Çev. Takiyettin MENGÜŞOĞLU), İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi.
- KANT Immanuel, (1990ff), Immanuel Kants gesammelte Schriften, Hrsg.: Bd. 1-22 Preussische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Bd. 23 Deutsche Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, ab Bd. 24 Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, Berlin, 1900ff.
- KANT Immanuel, (1999a), Critique of Pure Reason, (Ed. & Trans. by Paul Guyer & Allen W. Wood), Cambridge University Press.
- KANT Immanuel, (1999b), Correspondence, (Trans. by Arnulf Zweig), Cambridge University Press.
- KANT Immanuel, (2003), Theoretical Philosophy, 1755–1770, (Trans. & Ed. by David Walford, in collaboration with Ralf Meerbote), Cambridge University Press.
- KOVANLIKAYA, Aliye (2002), A Critical Approach to Kant's Conception of Experience in View of Leibniz's Ontology, (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi), Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
- LONGUENESSE Beatrice, (2000), Kant and the Capacity to Judge: Sensibility and Discursivity in the Transcendental Analytic of the Critique of Pure Reason, (Trans. by. Charles T. Wolfe), Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Ayrıntılar
| Birincil Dil | Türkçe |
|---|---|
| Bölüm | Araştırma Makalesi |
| Yazarlar | |
| Yayımlanma Tarihi | 30 Ekim 2014 |
| Gönderilme Tarihi | 5 Ocak 2015 |
| Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2014 |
Tarandığımız Dizinler:
e-ISSN: 2148-5232