Keşfedici Merak Ölçeğinin Türkçeye Uyarlanması: Motosikletli Turistler Üzerine Bir Araştırma

Öz

Bu araştırmanın temel amacı Chen & Hsu (2021) tarafından geliştirilen keşfedici merak ölçeğinin Türkçeye uyarlanmasıdır. Bu amaç doğrultusunda motosikletli turistler üzerine bir araştırma gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırma kapsamında 195 motosikletli turiste kolayda örnekleme yöntemi ile ulaşılmıştır. Araştırmada elde edilen verilerin geçerlik ve güvenirlik analizleri gerçekleştirilmiştir. Yapılan doğrulayıcı faktör analizi sonucunda keşfedici merak ölçeğinin model uyum değerlerinin iyi uyum gösterdiği belirlenmiştir. 4 boyut ve 18 maddelik ilk tasarlanan haliyle Türkçeye uyarlanan ölçeğin geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçme aracı olarak kullanılabileceği ifade edilebilir. Literatürde farklı keşfedici merak ölçeklerinin var olduğu bilinmektedir. Ancak Chen & Hsu (2021) tarafından geliştirilen ölçeğin özellikle turistlerin keşfedici merak düzeylerini ortaya koymak amacıyla oluşturulduğu ve bu bağlamda turizm literatüründe gelecekte yapılacak çalışmalara bir temel oluşturabileceği düşünülmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Merak
• Keşfedici Merak Ölçeği
• Motosikletli Turistler
• Ölçek Uyarlama

Adaptation of Exploratory Curiosity Scale into Turkish: A Study on Motocycle Tourists

Öz

The main aim of the study is to adapt Exploratory Curiosity Scale developed by Chen & Hsu (2021) into Turkish. Accordingly, a study was conducted on motorcycle tourists. In the study, 195 motorcycle tourists were reached via convenience sampling method. Validity and reliability analyses of the data obtained in the study were carried out. The confirmatory factor analysis revealed that the model fit values of the exploratory curiosity scale were a good fit. It can be stated that the scale, which was adapted into Turkish with 4 dimensions and 18 items, can be used as a valid and reliable measurement tool. There are different exploratory curiosity scales in the literature. However, it is believed that the scale developed by Chen & Hsu (2021) was created specifically to reveal tourists’ exploratory curiosity levels, therefore, it can act as a basis for future tourism studies in the literature.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Curiosity
• Exploratory Curiosity Scale
• Motorcycle Tourists
• Scale Adaptation

Kaynakça

1. Ab Hamid, M. R., Sami, W., & Sidek, M. M. (2017, 09). Discriminant validity assessment: Use of Fornell & Larcker criterion versus HTMT criterion. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 890, No. 1, p. 012163). IOP Publishing.
2. Abutalibov, N., & Türkay, O. (2021). Motosikletle seyahat eden turistler için kritik motivasyon unsurlarının önem düzeyleri. Balıkesir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 24(46), 1169-1184. https://doi.org/10.31795/baunsobed.866820
3. Ainley, M. D. (1987). The factor structure of curiosity measures: Breadth and depth of interest curiosity styles. Australian Journal of Psychology, 39(1), 53-59. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049538708259035
4. Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2009). The HEXACO–60: A short measure of the major dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(4), 340-345. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890902935878
5. Aymar, R. (2006). Basic science in a competitive world symmetry. https://www.symmetrymagazine.org/sites/default/files/legacy/pdfs/200608/commentary.pdf
6. Berlyne D. E. (1960). Conflict, Arousal, and Curiosity. McGraw-Hill
7. Berlyne, D. E. (1965). Structure and Direction in Thinking. McGraw-Hill.
8. Berlyne, D. E. (1966). Curiosity and Exploration: Animals spend much of their time seeking stimuli whose significance raises problems for psychology. Science, 153(3731), 25-33. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.153.3731.25

9. Berlyne, D. E. (1978). Curiosity and Learning. Motivation and Emotion, 2(2), 97–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00993037
10. Berlyne, D. E., & Ditkofsky, J. (1976). Effects of novelty and oddity on visual selective attention. British Journal of Psychology, 67(2), 175-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1976.tb01508.x
11. Brislin, R. W., Lonner, W. J., & Thorndike, R. M. (1973). Cross-cultural research methods. John Wiley & Sons.
12. Brown, T. A., & Moore, M. T. (2012). Confirmatory Factor Analysis In Hoyle, R. H. (Ed.), Handbook of Structural Equation Modelling, (pp. 361-379). Guilford Press.
13. Celik, P., Storme, M., Davila, A., & Myszkowski, N. (2016). Work-related curiosity positively predicts worker innovation. Journal of Management Development, 35(9), 1184-1194. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-01-2016-0013
14. Chen, K. Y., & Hsu, Y. L. (2021). Developing a Model of Backpackers’ Exploratory Curiosity. Tourism and Hospitality Management, 27(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.20867/thm.27.1.1
15. Child, D. (2006). The essentials of factor analysis (3rd edition). Continuum.
16. Collins, R. P., Litman, J. A., & Spielberger, C. D. (2004). The measurement of perceptual curiosity. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 1127–1141. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00205-8
17. Deniz, Z. (2007). Psikolojik ölçme aracı uyarlama. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 40(1), 1-16.
18. Ding, L., Velicer, W. F., & Harlow, L. L. (1995). Effects of estimation methods, number of indicators per factor, and improper solutions on structural equation modeling fit indices. Structural Equation Modeling, A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2(2), 119-143. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519509540000
19. Dorocki, S. (2021). Tourism on a motorcycle: an attempt to describe motorcycle tourism in Poland based on the results of an internet survey conducted before the COVID-19 pandemic. Prace Komisji Geografii Przemysłu Polskiego Towarzystwa Geograficznego, 35(3), 320-332.
20. Dursun, İ., & Alnıaçık, Ü. (2019). Likert ölçeklerinde seçenek etiketleme kararları: Kullanılan etiketler ölçüm sonuçlarını etkiler mi? Adıyaman Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 12(33), 148-196. https://doi.org/10.14520 /adyusbd.549447
21. Erkorkmaz, Ü., Etikan, İ., Demir, O., Özdamar, K., & Sanisoğlu, S. Y. (2013). Doğrulayıcı faktör analizi ve uyum indeksleri. Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Medical Sciences, 33(1), 210-223. https://doi.org/10.5336/medsci.2011-26747
22. Ertaş, M. (2019). Rekreatif gruplara üyelik, üyeliğin devamlılığı ve sosyal kimlik: Motosiklet grupları incelemesi [Doktora Tezi, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi]. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/TezGoster?key=T1mWGp9MngYYkCSgiJvtVkRPA5fHiN6VvpjEQaHuauVOSlerJ8Lzohz3Q3argVPy
23. Everitt, B. S. (1975). Multivariate analysis: The need for data, and other problems. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 126(3), 237-240. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp. 126.3.237
24. Frash Jr., R. E., Blose, J. E., Smith, W. W., & Scherhag, K. (2018). A multidisciplinary marketing profile of motorcycle tourists: explorers escaping routine to find flow on scenic routes. Tourism Recreation Research, 43(4), 432-444. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508281.2018.1492767
25. Frazier, G. W. (2005). Motorcycle touring. Motorbooks.
26. Freyer, W. (2015). Tourismus – Einführung in die Fremdenverkehrsökonomie (11th edition). De Gruyter/Oldenbourg
27. Gaskin, J. & James, M. (2019). HTMT Plugin for AMOS. https://statwiki.gaskination.com/index.php/Plugins
28. George, D., & Mallery, M. (2010). SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference, 17.0 update (10th edition). Pearson.
29. Gök, H. S., Aylan F. K., & Şalvarcı, S. (2021). Yalnız seyahat eden turistlerin seyahat motivasyonu ve deneyimi: Z kuşağı örneği. Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi, 16(62), 698-717. https://doi.org/10.19168/jyasar.826883
30. Güğerçin, U., & Ay, Ü. (2016). Etik konumun örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı üzerindeki etkisi: Etik konum kuramı çerçevesinde bir analiz. KMÜ Sosyal ve Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi 19(32), 34-46.
31. Hair, J., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J. & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th edition) Pearson.
32. Hamilton, D. (2019). Developing and testing inhibitors of curiosity in the workplace with the Curiosity Code Index (CCI). Heliyon, 5(1), e01185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01185
33. Harman, S. (2014). Bağımsız Seyahat Eden Yerli Gezginlerin Seyahat Motivasyonları Üzerine Bir Araştırma. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, 10(21), 107-128. https://doi.org/10.11122/ijmeb.2014.10.21.527
34. Hattingh, L. (2022). Going Out-there: A Literature Review on Drive Tourism within the South African Context. African Journal of Hospitality, Tourism and Leisure, 11(1), 595-616. https://doi.org/10.46222/ajhtl.19770720.245
35. Henderson, B., & Moore, S. G. (1980). Children’s responses to objects differing in novelty in relation to level of curiosity and adult behaviour. Child Development, 51(2), 457–465. https://doi.org/10.2307/1129279
36. Henseler, J., C. M. Ringle, & M. Sarstedt (2015). A New Criterion for Assessing Discriminant Validity in Variance-based Structural Equation Modeling, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
37. Hidi, S., Renninger, K. A., & Krapp, A. (2004). Interest, a motivational variable that combines affective and cognitive functioning. In D. Y. Dai & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Motivation, emotion, and cognition: Integrative perspectives on intellectual functioning and development (pp. 89–115). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
38. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
39. Huck, S. W. (2012). Reading statistics and research (6th Edition). Pearson.
40. Hurley, A. E., Scandura, T. A., Schriesheim, C. A., Brannick, M. T., Seers, A., Vandenberg, R. J., & Williams, L. J. (1997). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Guidelines, issues, and alternatives. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18(6), 667-683.
41. Kaçmaz, C., Cumurcu, B., & Çelik, O. T. (2023). Çocuklar için dijital bağımlılık ölçeğinin Türkçeye uyarlanması: Güvenirlik ve geçerlilik analizi. Bağımlılık Dergisi, 24(4), 495-506. https://doi.org/10.51982/bagimli.1261063.
42. Kalaycı, Ş. (2009). SPSS Uygulamalı Çok Değişkenli İstatistik Teknikleri. Asil Yayın Dağıtım.
43. Kang, M. J., Hsu, M., Krajbich, I. M., Loewenstein, G., McClure, S. M., Wang, J. T. Y., & Camerer, C. F. (2009). The wick in the candle of learning: Epistemic curiosity activates reward circuitry and enhances memory. Psychological Science, 20(8), 963-973. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02402.x
44. Kardaş, F., & Yalçın, İ. (2018). Psikolojik ihtiyaç doyumunda denge ölçeği: Türkçe uyarlama çalışması. Cukurova University Faculty of Education Journal, 47(2), 357-383. https://doi.org/10.14812/cuefd.408515
45. Kashdan, T. B., Rose, P., & Fincham, F. D. (2004). Curiosity and exploration: Facilitating positive subjective experiences and personal growth opportunities. Journal of Personality Assessment, 82(3), 291-305. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa8203_05
46. Kashdan, T. B., Stiksma, M. C., Disabato, D. J., McKnight, P. E., Bekier, J., Kaji, J., & Lazarus, R. (2018). The five-dimensional curiosity scale: Capturing the bandwidth of curiosity and identifying four unique subgroups of curious people. Journal of Research in Personality, 73, 130-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2017.11.011
47. Kashdan, T. B., Goodman, F. R., Disabato, D. J., McKnight, P. E., Kelso, K., & Naughton, C. (2020). Curiosity has comprehensive benefits in the workplace: Developing and validating a multidimensional workplace curiosity scale in United States and German employees. Personality and Individual Differences, 155, 109717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.109717
48. Katırcıoğlu, E. (2022). Epistemik merak, iş becerikliliği ve algılanan örgütsel desteğin yenilikçi iş davranışına etkisi: Beş yıldızlı otel işletmelerinde bir uygulama [Doktora Tezi, Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi]. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/TezGoster?key=CG8WvdvvxJP04Unr7Yecfy27VAv5Rj6L30Xz7rfMs-nDqrHwdg5c99QGVDNQl2rC
49. Kaya, O., & Çoban, Ö. (2018). Motosiklet turizmi: Türk motosiklet turistlerinin profili ve seyahat modelleri. 7. Kırsal Turizm Kongresi, Muğla, Türkiye.
50. Keller, H., & Voss, H. G. (1983). Curiosity and exploration: Theories and results. Academic Press.
51. Litman, J. A., & Pezzo, M. V. (2007). Dimensionality of interpersonal curiosity. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(6), 1448-1459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.04.021
52. Litman, J. A., & Spielberger, C. D. (2003). Measuring epistemic curiosity and its diversive and specific components. Journal of Personality Assessment, 80(1), 75-86. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327752JPA8001_16
53. Litman, J. A., Collins, R. P., & Spielberger, C. D. (2005). The nature and measurement of sensory curiosity. Personality and Individual Differences, 39(6), 1123-1133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.05.001
54. Litman, J. A., Robinson, O. C., & Demetre, J. D. (2017). Intrapersonal curiosity: Inquisitiveness about the inner self. Self and Identity, 16(2), 231-250. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2016.1255250
55. Loewenstein, G. (1994). The psychology of curiosity: A review and reinterpretation. Psychological Bulletin, 116(1), 75-98. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.116.1.75
56. Mehmetoglu, M. (2004). A typology of tourists from a different angle. International Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Administration, 5(3), 69-90. https://doi.org/10.1300/J149v05n03_05
57. Nadler, J. T., Weston, R., & Voyles, E. C. (2015). Stuck in the middle: The use and interpretation of mid-points in items on questionnaires. The Journal of General Psychology, 142(2), 71-89. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.2014.994590
58. Özer, Ö., & Yalçın, İ. (2021). Cooper-Norcross tercih envanteri Türkçe uyarlaması: Bir geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International, 11(1), 26-44. https://doi.org/10.18039/ajesi.790673
59. Park S. H. (2007). The measurement of sport fan curiosity [Doctoral dissertation, University of Louisville]. https://www.proquest.com/docview/304846477/preview PDF/CF7E6CAF4E304B55PQ/1?accountid=15819
60. Park, S. H., Mahony, D. F., & Greenwell, T. C. (2010). The measurement of sport fan exploratory curiosity. Journal of Sport Management, 24(4), 434-455. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.24.4.434
61. Pelit, E., & Katircioglu, E. (2023). Investigating the effects of epistemic curiosity on innovative work behaviour: a study on hotel employees. Tourism and Hospitality Management, 29(1), 73-85. https://doi.org/10.20867/thm.29.1.6
62. Ramoa, C. E. A., Pires, P. S., & Añaña, E. S. (2021). Motorcycle tourism and nature: an analysis of motorcyclists’ motivations to travel. Leisure Studies, 40(3), 407-423. https://doi.org/10.1080/02614367.2020.1858327
63. Reio Jr, T. G., Petrosko, J. M., Wiswell, A. K., & Thongsukmag, J. (2006). The measurement and conceptualization of curiosity. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 167(2), 117-135. https://doi.org/10.3200/GNTP.167.2.117-135
64. Scol, J. (2016). Motorcycle tourism: renewed geographies of a marginal tourism practice. Tourism Review, (9), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.4000/viatourism.356
65. Silvia, P. J., & Christensen, A. P. (2020). Looking up at the curious personality: Individual differences in curiosity and openness to experience. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 35, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.05.013
66. Sykes D., & Kelly K. (2012). A road map for studying motorcycle tourism: impacts and opportunities. International Conference on Tourism and Events: Opportunities, Impacts and Change. Belfast, Northern Ireland.
67. Sykes, D., & G. Kelly, K. (2014). Motorcycle tourism demand generators and dynamic interaction leisure. International Journal of Culture, Tourism and Hospitality Research, 8(1), 92-102. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCTHR-05-2013-0035
68. Sykes, D., & Kelly, K. G. (2016). Motorcycle drive tourism leading to rural tourism opportunities. Tourism Economics, 22(3), 543-557. https://doi.org/10.5367/te.2014.0454.
69. Tabachnick, B. G. & Fidell, L. S. (2012). Using multivariate statistics (6th edition). Pearson. Tavşancıl, E. (2002). Tutumların ölçülmesi ve SPSS ile veri analizi (1. Baskı). Nobel Yayınevi.
70. Totsune, T., Matsudaira, I., & Taki, Y. (2021). Curiosity–tourism interaction promotes subjective wellbeing among older adults in Japan. Humanities & Social Sciences Communications, 8(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00748-3
71. Tripathi, A., & Shaheer, I. (2022). Missing tales of motorcycle backpackers. Tourism Recreation Research, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508281.2022.2059738
72. Van Lieshout, L. L., de Lange, F. P., & Cools, R. (2020). Why so curious? Quantifying mechanisms of information seeking. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 35, 112-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.08.005
73. Voorhees, C. M., Brady, M. K., Calantone, R., & Ramirez, E. (2016). Discriminant validity testing in marketing: an analysis, causes for concern, and proposed remedies. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44, 119-134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-015-0455-4
74. Walker, L. (2011). Tourism and leisure motorcycle riding. In B. Prideaux & D. B. Carson (Eds.), Drive tourism: Trends and emerging markets (pp. 146–158). Routledge.
75. Yan, B. J., Zhang, J., Zhang, H. L., Lu, S. J., & Guo, Y. R. (2016). Investigating the motivation–experience relationship in a dark tourism space: A case study of the Beichuan earthquake relics, China. Tourism Management, 53, 108-121.