Alt Ekstremite Derin ven Trombozunda Medikal Tedavi: Retrospektif Çalışma

Öz

Amaç: Derin ven trombozu (DVT) zamanında teşhis edilip tedavi edilmediği zaman ciddi morbidite ve mortalite ile sonuçlanabilen bir hastalıktır. İlimiz devlet hastanesi kalp ve damar cerrahisi polikliniğine başvuran alt ekstremite DVT nedeniyle tedavi edilen hastalar retrospektif olarak incelendi.

Gereç ve Yöntem: Kliniğimize Ocak 2010 - Aralık 2016 tarihleri arasında alt ekstremitelerinde ağrı ve şişlik şikayetleri ile başvuran 424 hastaya Wells skorlaması uygulandı. Wells skoru 2' nin üzerinde olan hastalara alt ekstremite renkli venöz doppler ultrasonografi çekildi. DVT tanısı alanlar yatırıldı.

Bulgular: Tüm hastaların Wells skoru 2'nin üzerindeydi ve çekilen doppler ultrasonografi sonucunda 323 (%76,1) hastada DVT tespit edildi. Tromboz saptanan olguların 165’i kadın (%51), 158’i erkek (%48,9) olup ortalama yaş 57 idi. DVT oluşumunda 77 (%23.8) hastada belirli bir risk faktörü bulunamazken, belirlenen risk faktörlerinden en sık olarak 56’sında (%17,3) obstetrik nedenler ve 56’sında (%17,3) immobilizasyon tespit edilmiştir. Olguların 157’ sine (%48,6) standart heparin infüzyonu, 154’üne (%47,6) ise günde 2 kez düşük molekül ağırlıklı heparin uygulandı. Massiv iliyak trombozlu 12 (%3,7) hastaya ise trombolitik tedavi verildi. Hastaların 8’inde (%2.4) pulmoner emboli gelişti. Bu hastalardan 4’ü massif pulmoner emboli nedeniyle kaybedildi (%1.2).

Sonuç: Komplikasyonlarının önlenmesi açısından klinik olarak DVT düşünülen hastalarda doppler ultrasonografi ile tanı kesinleştirilmeli ve erken dönemde uygun tedavi başlanmalıdır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Derin ven trombozu,Doppler Ultrasonografi,Heparin

Medical Treatment of Lower Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis: Retrospective Study

Öz

Objective: Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality world wide unless treated on time. This retrospective study aimed to share our experience with our collegues regarding lower extremity DVT treatments in our hospital.

Materials and Methods: Between January2010- December, 2016; 424 patients applied at our hospital as suffering from pain and swallow. Clinical signs and symptoms of DVT were classified according to the Wells scoreing. If wells scoreing is higher than 2,  patients were examined with lower extremity venous doppler ultrasonography. The ones at whom  thrombosis were detected, were hospitalized.

Results: It was found that Wells score of all patients was above 2 and DVT was observed in 323 patients (76,1%). 165 patients (51%) were females and of the 158 patients (48,9%) were males, and avarage age 57. There was no risk factors for DVT in the 77 (23,8%) patients. The most common risk factors for DVT were obstetric causes in 56 patients; (17,3%) and immobilization in 56 patients (17,3%). Standart heparin infusion was administered to 157 patients (48,6%) while the remaining patients 154 (47,6%) had low molecular weight heparin twice a day. 12 patients (3.7%) with massive iliac thrombosis were treated with thrombolytic therapy. Pulmonary embolus was developed in the 8 patients (2.4%) and four of them died due to massive pulmonary emboli (1.2%).

Conclusion: These data indicate that early suitable treatment of DVT is necessary to prevent its complications after a definitive detection of DVT with a doppler ultrasonography.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Deep vein thrombosis,Doppler Ultrasonography,Heparin

Kaynakça

1. 1. Oger E. Incidence of venous thromboembolism: a community based study in Western France. EPI-GETBP Study Group. Groupe d'Etude de la Thrombose de Bretagne Occidentale. J Thromb Haemost. 2000;83:657-660.
2. 2. Brill-Edwards P, Lee A. D-Dimer testing in the diagnosis of acute venous thromboembolism. J Thromb Haemost. 1999;82:688–694.
3. 3. Bilkay O, Cağırıcı U, Engin C. Derin ven trombozu ve pulmoner tromboemboli. Duran E (editor). Kalp ve Damar Cerrahisi. 1. Baskı, Istanbul: Capa Tıp Kitapevi, 2004:863-878.
4. 4. Heit JA, Silverstein MD, Mohr DN, et al. The epidemiology of venous thromboembolism in the community. J Thromb Haemost. 2001;86:452-463.
5. 5. Silverstein MD, Heit JA, Mohr DN ve ark. Trends in the incidence of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a 25-year population-based study. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158:585-593.
6. 6. Heim SW, Schectman JM, Siadaty MS, Philbrick JT. D-dimer testing for deep venous thrombosis: a metaanalysis. Clin Chem. 2004;50:1136-1147.
7. 7. Hyers TM, Agnelli G, Hull RD, et al. Antithrombotic therapy for venous thromboembolic disease. Chest. 2001;119:176–193.
8. 8. LaPorte D, Farber S, Sorin S, et al. When deep venous thrombosis fails to respond to therapy. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2003;16:246-250.

9. 9. Blum A, Roche EA. Endovascular management of acute deep vein thrombosis. J Med. 2005;118:31-36.
10. 10. Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M ve ark. Evaluation of D-dimer in the diagnosis of suspected deep vein thrombosis. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:1227 1235.
11. 11. Wells PS, Anderson DR, Bormanis J, et al. Value ofassessment of pretest probability of deep-vein thrombosis inclinical management. Lancet. 1997;350:1795– 1798.
12. 12. Kassai B, Boissel JP, Cucherat M, et al. A systematic review of the accuracy of ultrasound in the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis in asymptomatic patients. J Thromb Haemost. 2004;91:655-666.
13. 13. Kearon C, Ginsberg JS, Hirsh J. The role of venous ultrasonography in the diagnosis of suspected deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Ann Intern Med 1998; 129: 1044-1049.
14. 14. Kearon C, Julian JA, Newman TE, et al. Noninvasive diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis. Ann Intern Med. 1998;128:663-677.
15. 15. Tick LW, Ton E, van Voorthuizen T, et al. Practical diagnostic management of the patients with clinically suspected deep vein thrombosis by clinical probability test, compression ultrasonography, and D-dimer test. Am J Med. 2002;113:630-635.
16. 16. Beyer J, Schellong S. Deep vein thrombosis: Current diagnostic strategy. Eur J Inter Med. 2005:238-246.
17. 17. Ziegler S, Schillinger M, Maca TH, Minar E. Postthrombotic syndrome after primary event of deep venous thrombosis 10 to 20 years ago. Thromb Res. 2001;101:23–33.
18. 18. Elliot MS, Immelman EJ, Jeffery P, et al. A comparative randomized trial of heparin versus streptokinase in the treatment of acute proximal venous thrombosis: an interim report of a prospective trial. Br J Surg. 1979;66:838–843.
19. 19. Arnesen H, Hiseth A, Ly B. Streptokinase or heparin in the treatment of deep vein thrombosis: follow-up results of a prospective study. Acta Med Scand. 1982;211:65– 68.
20. 20. Merli G. Anticoagulants in the treatment of deep vein thrombosis. Am J Med. 2005;118:13-20.
21. 21. Hull RD, Raskob GE, Brant RF, et al. Optimal therapeutic level of heparin therapy in patients with venous thromboembolism. Arch Intern Med. 1992;152:1589-1595.
22. 22. Rasche RA, Reilly BM, Guıdry JR, et al. The weight-based heparin dosing nomogram compared with a”Standard care” nomogram:a randomized controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 1993;119:874-881.
23. 23. Leizorovicz A. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of low molecular weight heparins and unfractionated heparin in the initial treatment of deep venous thrombosis: an updated meta-analysis. Drugs. 1996;52:30-37.
24. 24. McRae SJ, Ginsberg JS. Initial treatment of venous thromboembolism. Circulation. 2004;110:3-9.
25. 25. Lensing AWA, Prins MH, Davidson BL, Hirsh J. Treatment of deep venous thrombosis with low molecular weight heparins: a meta analysis. Arch Intern Med. 1995;155:601-607.
26. 26. Hull RD, Raskob GE, Pineo, et al. Subcutaneous low-molecularweight heparin compared with continuous intravenous heparin in the treatment of proximal vein thrombosis. N Engl J Med. 1992;326:975-982.
27. 27. Weitz JI. Low molecular-weight heparins. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:688-698.
28. 28. Hirsh J, Warkentin TE, Shaughnessy SG, et al. Heparin and low molecular-weight heparin: mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetics, dosing, monitoring, efficacy, and safety. Chest. 2001;119:64-94.
29. 29. Comerota AJ, Chahwan S. Thrombolytic therapy for Acute Venous Thrombosis. In: Bergan JJ (Editor). The Vein Book. USA, Elsevier academic Pres, 2007:455-464.
30. 30. Comerota AJ, Gale SS. Operative venous thrombectomy. In: Bergan JJ (Editor). The Vein Book. USA, Elsevier academic Pres, 2007:405-416.
31. 31. Decousus H, Leizorovicz A, Parent F, et al. A clinical trial of venacaval filters in the prevention of pulmonary embolism in patients with proximal deep-vein thrombosis. Prevention du Risqued'Embolie Pulmonaire par Interruption Cave Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1998;338:409-415.
32. 32. Levine MN, Hirsh J, Gent M, et al. Optimal duration of oral anticoagulation therapy: a randomized trial comparing four weeks with three months of warfarin in patients with proximal deep vein thrombosis. J Thromb Haemost. 1995;74:606-611.
33. 33. Kearon C, Ginsberg JS, Kovacs MJ, et al. Comparision of lowintensity warfarin therapy for long therm prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:63.