Terörizm Çalışmaları: Türkiye’deki Araştırmalara İlişkin Betimsel Bir Analiz

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 13 Sayı: 26, 1 - 44, 30.10.2017

Engin Avcı Cenker Korhan Demir

https://doi.org/10.17752/guvenlikstrtj.356937

Cited By: 2

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, terörizm konusunda Türkiye’de yapılan akademik çalışmaları içerik ve kullanılan bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri açısından inceleyerek genel durumu ortaya koymaktır. Bu çerçevede, öncelikle çağdaş terörizm çalışmaları konusundaki uluslararası araştırmalar incelenmiş; daha sonra Türkiye’deki terörizm çalışmaları boylamsal olarak konu, kapsam ve yöntem açısından nicel ve nitel tekniklerle analiz edilmiştir. Bu maksatla, araştırma kapsamına giren doktora ve yüksek lisans tezleri ile Türkiye’de yayımlanan akademik makaleler taranarak üç farklı veri seti oluşturulmuştur. Ayrıca, terörizm konusunda çalışmaları olan akademisyenlere anket ve mülakat uygulanmıştır. Son olarak, ulaşılan bulgular ışığında alanın zayıf yönleri ile literatüre nasıl katkı yapılabileceği hususları tartışılmıştır. Türkiye’deki terörizm çalışmalarının çok disiplinli bir özellik sergilediği; farklı akademik disiplinlerden ve yeterli sayıda uzman akademisyenin yetiştirilemediği; çoğunlukla ikincil kaynaklara ve literatür taramasına dayandığı; kavramsal ve kuramsal çalışmalar ile ampirik (deneysel) araştırmaların yetersiz olduğu; nitel yöntem ve analiz tekniklerinin baskın bir şekilde kullanıldığı araştırmanın sonuçları arasındadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Terörizm Çalışmaları, Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri, Veri Seti, Doktora Tezi, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Akademik Makale

Terrorism Studies: A Descriptive Analysis on Researches in Turkey

Öz

This study aims to determine the academic disciplinary condition of the terrorism studies in Turkey through analyzing their context and scientific research methods. Firstly, contemporary international terrorism studies have been examined, and then terrorism studies in Turkey have been analyzed longitudinally via qualitative and quantitative techniques according to their topic, context, and methodology. To reach this aim, three different datasets have been generated after examining theses, dissertations, and academic articles published in Turkey. Additionally, interviews have been conducted with and questionnaires have been sent to the academicians who study terrorism and related topics. Further, the study has discussed the problems based on the findings on terrorism researches and how to contribute to the terrorism studies. The study has concluded that terrorism studies in Turkey are multi-disciplined; based on secondary sources and literature review; lack of terrorism experts from different academic disciplines; insufficient in definitional and theoretical discussions, and empirical researches; dominated by qualitative research and analysis techniques and methods.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Terrorism Studies, Scientific Research Methods, Dataset, Doctoral Dissertation, Master’s Thesis, Academic Article

Kaynakça

• AYDINLI, Ersel, Erol KURUBAŞ ve Haluk ÖZDEMİR, Yöntem, Kuram, Komplo: Türk Uluslararası İlişkiler Disiplininde Vizyon Arayışları, Asil Yayın Dağıtım, Ankara, 2009.
• CROZIER, Brian, The Rebels, Chatto and Windus, London, 1960.
• DEMİR, Cenker Korhan, Sebeplerinden Mücadele Yöntemlerine Etnik Ayrılıkçı Terörizmin Analizi: PIRA, ETA, PKK, Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık, Ankara, 2017.
• DAY, Robert A., How to Write & Publish a Scientific Paper, 5th Edition, Oryx Press, Phoenix,1998.
• GÜRBÜZ, Sait ve Faruk ŞAHİN, Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntemleri, Seçkin Yayıncılık, Ankara, 2016.
• KUMAR, Ranjit, Research Methodology, Sage Publications, London, 1999.
• SCHMID, Alex P., Political Terrorism: A Research Guide to Concepts, Theories, Data Bases and Literature, North-Holland Publishing, Amsterdam, 1984.
• SCHMID, Alex P. and Albert J. JONGMAN, Political Terrorism: A New Guide to Actors, Authors, Concepts, Data Bases, Theories, and Literature, Transaction Publishers, London, 1988.
• SCHMID, Alex P., (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Terrorism Research, London: Routledge, 2011.
• SILKE, Andrew, (ed.), Research on Terrorism: Trends, Achievements and Failures, Frank Cass, London, 2004.
• STAMPNITZKY, Lisa, Disciplining Terror, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2013. WILKINSON, Paul, Political Terrorism, The Macmillan Press, London, 1974.
• ACKERMAN, Gary A. and Lauren E. PINSON, “Speaking Truth to Sources: Introducing a Method for the Quantitative Evaluation of Open Sources in Event Data”, Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 2016, Vol: 39, Nos. 7-8, 617-640.
• CRENSHAW, Martha “Current Research on Terrorism: The Academic Perspective”, Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 1992, Vol: 15, No. 1, 1-11.
• CRENSHAW, Martha, “The Psychology of Terrorism: An Agenda for the 21st Century”, Political Psychology, 2000, Vol: 21, No. 2, 405-420.
• CRESWELL, John W. and Dana L. MILLER, “Determining Validity in Qualitative Inquiry”, Theory into Practice, 2000, Vol: 39, No. 3, 124-130.
• DEMİR, Cenker Korhan and Engin AVCI, “Turkish Terrorism Studies: A Preliminary Assessment”, All Azimuth, 2017, 1-23, http://dx.doi.org/10.20991/allazimuth.321155.
• ERALP Atila, “Uluslararası İlişkiler Disiplininin Oluşumu: İdealizm- Realizm Tartışması”, Atila Eralp, (der.), Devlet, Sistem ve Kimlik: Uluslararası İlişkilerde Temel Kavramlar, İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları, 1997.
• FLEMING, Marie, “Propaganda by the deed: Terrorism and anarchist theory in late nineteenth-century Europe”, Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 1980, Vol: 4, No. 1-4, 1-23.
• FREEDMAN, Benjamin, “Terrorism Research Centres: 100 Institutes, Programs and Organisations in the Field of Terrorism, Counter-Terrorism, Radicalisation and Asymmetric Warfare Studies”, http://www.terrorismanalysts.com/pt/index.php/pot/article/view/123/html (Erişim Tarihi: 13 Mayıs 2016).
• GORDON, Avishag, “Terrorism and the Scholarly Communication System”, Terrorism and Political Violence, 2001, Vol: 13, No. 4, 116-124.
• GORDON, Avishag, “Terrorism and Knowledge Growth: A Databases and Internet Analysis”, Andrew SILKE, (Ed.), Research on Terrorism: Trends, Achievements and Failures, Frank Cass, London, 2004.
• GORDON, Avishag, “Terrorism as an Academic Subject after 9/11: Searching the Internet Reveals a Stockholm Syndrome Trend”, Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 2005, Vol: 28, No. 1, 45-59.
• GORDON, Avishag, “Transient and Continuant Authors in a Research Field: The Case of Terrorism”, Scientometrics, 2007, Vol: 72, No. 2, 213-224.
• GORDON, Avishag, “Can Terrorism Become a Scientific Discipline? A Diagnostic Study”, Critical Studies on Terrorism, 2010, Vol: 3, No. 3, 437-458.
• GUEST, Greg, Arwen BUNCE ve Laura JOHNSON, “How may Interviews are Enough? An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability”, Field Methods 18, no. 1 (2006): 59-82.
• GURR, Ted Robert, “Empirical Research on Political Terrorism: The State of the Art and How It Might Be Improved”, R.O. SLATER ve Michael STOHL, (Eds.), Current Perspectives on International Terrorism, Macmillan, London, 1988, 115-154.
• HOFFMAN, Bruce, Inside Terrorism, New York, Columbia University Press, 2006.
• HULSSE, Rainer ve Alexander SPRENCER, “The Metaphor of Terror: Terrorism Studies in Constructivist Turn”, Security Dialogue, 2008, Vol: 39, No. 6, 571-592.
• JACKSON, Robert, “Constructing Enemies: ‘Islamic Terrorism’ in Political and Academic Discourse”, Government and Opposition, 2007, Vol: 42, No. 3, 394-426.
• JACKSON, Richard, “Knowledge, Power and Politics in the Study of Political Terrorism”, Richard Jackson et al., (eds.), Critical Terrorism Studies: A New Research Agenda, Routledge, London, 2009.
• JACKSON, Richard, “The Study of Terrorism 10 Years After 9/11: Successes, Issues, Challenges”, Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi, 2012, Vol: 8, No. 32, 1-16.
• JACKSON, Richard, “The Epistemological Crisis of Counterterrorism”, Critical Studies on Terrorism, 2015, Vol: 8, No. 1, 33-54.
• JENSEN, Richard, “Daggers, Rifles and Dynamite: Anarchist Terrorism in Nineteenth Century Europa”, Terrorism and Political Violence, 2004, Vol: 16, No: 1, 116-153.
• LENTINI, Pete, “Review Essay-Understanding and Combatting Terrorism: Definitions, Origins and Strategies”, Australian Journal of Political Science, 2008, Vol. 43, No. 1.
• LUM, Cynthia, Leslie W. KENNEDY, and Alison SHERLEY, “Are counter-terrorism strategies effective? The results of the Campbell systematic review on counter-terrorism evaluation research”, Journal of Experimental Criminology, 2006, Vol: 2, No. 4, 489-516.
• MERARI, Ariel, “Academic Research and Government Policy on Terrorism”, Terrorism and Political Violence, 1991, Vol: 3, No. 1, 193-202.
• RANSTROP, Magnus. “Mapping Terrorism Studies After 9/11: An Academic Field of
Old Problems and New Prospects”, Richard Jackson et al., (eds.), Critical Terrorism Studies: A New Research Agenda, Routledge, London, 2009, 13-33.
• RAPOPORT, David C., “The Four Waves of Rebel Terror and September 11”, Charles KEGLEY, (Ed.), The New Global Terrorism, Pearson, New Jersey, 2008, 36-52.
• REID, Edna O. F., “Evolution of a Body of Knowledge: An Analysis of Terrorism Research”, Information Processing and Management, 1997, Vol: 33, No. 1, 91-106.
• REID, Edna ve Hsinchun CHEN, “Domain Mapping of Contemporary Terrorism Research”, Hsinchun CHEN, Edna REID, J. SINAI, Andrew SILKE and Boaz GANOR, (Eds.), Terrorism Informatics: Knowledge Management and Data Mining for Homeland Security, Springer, New York, 2008, 3–26.
• ROSS, Jeffrey Ian, “Taking Stock of Research Methods and Analysis on Oppositional Political Terrorism”, The American Sociologist, 2004, 26-37.
• SAGEMAN, Marc, “The Stagnation in Terrorism Research”, Terrorism and Political Violence, 2014, Vol: 26, 565-580.
• SATANA, Nil S., Molly INMAN ve Johanna Kristin BINNIR, “Religion, Government Coalitions, and Terrorism”, Terrorism and Political Violence, 2013, Vol: 25, No. 1, 29-52.
• SCHMID, Alex P., “The Literature on Terrorism”, Alex P. Schmid, (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Terrorism Research, Routledge, London, 2011a, 457-474.
• SCHMID, Alex P., “Introduction”, Alex P. Schmid, (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Terrorism Research, Routledge, London, 2011b, 1-37.
• SCHMID, Alex P., “The Definition of Terrorism”, Alex P. Schmid, (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Terrorism Research, Routledge, London, 2011c, 39-98.
• SIL, Rudra ve Peter KATZENSTEIN, “Analytical Eclecticism in the Study of World Politics: Reconfiguring Problems and Mechanisms across Research Traditions”, Perspectives on Politics, June 2010, Vol: 8, No. 2, 411-431.
• SILKE, Andrew, “The Devil You Know: Continuing Problems with Research on Terrorism”, Terrorism and Political Violence, Winter 2001, Vol: 13, No. 4, 1-14.
• SILKE, Andrew and Jennifer SCHMIDT-PETERSEN, “The Golden Age? What the 100 Most Cited Articles in Terrorism Studies Tell Us”, Terrorism and Political Violence, Vol.29, N.4, 2017, 692-712.
• STAMPNITZKY, Lisa, “Disciplining an Unruly Field: Terrorism Experts and Theories of Scientific/Intellectual Production”, Qual Sociol, 2010, 1-19.
• THORNTON, Thomas P., “Terror as a Political Agitation”, Harry ECKSTEIN, (ed.), Internal War: Problems and Approaches, The Free Press of Glencoe, New York, 1964, 71-91.
• TOROS, Harmonie and Jeroen GUNNING, “Exploring A Critical Theory Approach to Terrorism Studies”, Richard JACKSON, Marie Breen SMYTH ve Jeroen GUNNING, (eds.), Critical Terrorism Studies: A New Research Agenda, London: Routledge, 2009.
• WALTER, Eugene V., “Violence and The Process of Terror”, American Sociological Review, Spring 1964, Vol: 29, No. 2, 48-257.
• WEINBERG, Leonard, Ami PEDAHZUR, and Sivan HIRSCH-HOEFLER, “The Challenges of Conceptualizing Terrorism”, Terrorism and Political Violence, 2004, Vol: 16, No. 4, 777-794.
• Bilge Adam Stratejik Araştırmalar Merkezi (BILGESAM) İnternet Sitesi, http://www.bilgesam.org/en (Erişim Tarihi: 05.06.2017).
• Global Terrorism Database. http://www.start.umd.edu/gtd/ (Erişim Tarihi: 06.07.2017).
• Kara Harp Okulu Savunma Bilimleri Enstitüsü Resmî İnternet Sitesi, http://www.kho.edu.tr/akademik/enstitu/enstitu_genel_bilgi.html (Erişim Tarihi: 26.04.2016).
• Ortadoğu Stratejik Araştırmalar Merkezi (ORSAM) İnternet Sitesi, http://www.orsam.org.tr/?c=orsa|english (Erişim Tarihi: 05.06.2017).
• Polis Akademisi Başkanlığı Güvenlik Bilimleri Enstitüsü Resmî İnternet Sitesi, http://www.pa.edu.tr/Default.aspx?page=Egitim Birimleri&GUID=dc9fb08d-0a56-4861-896e-043125798 cc6 (Erişim Tarihi: 26.04.2017).
• Siyaset, Ekonomi ve Toplum Araştırmaları Vakfı (SETA) İnternet Sitesi, http://www.setav.org (Erişim Tarihi: 13.06.2017).
• Terörizmle Mücadele Mükemmeliyet Merkezi Resmî İnternet Sitesi. http://www.tmmm.tsk.tr (Erişim Tarihi: 18.06.2017).
• TÜBİTAK-ULAKBİM Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi, http://cabim.ulakbim.gov.tr/tr-dizin/ (Erişim Tarihi: 22.05.2016).
• Türk Asya Stratejik Araştırmalar Merkezi (TASAM) İnternet Sitesi, http://www.tasam.org/en (Erişim Tarihi: 13.06.2017).
• Türkiye Ekonomi Politikaları Araştırma Vakfı (TEPAV) İnternet Sitesi, http://www.tepav.org.tr/en (Erişim Tarihi: 05.06.2017).
• Türkiye Ekonomik Siyasal ve Stratejik Araştırmalar Merkezi (TESAM) http://tesam.org.tr (Erişim Tarihi: 05.06.2017).
• Türkiye Ekonomik ve Sosyal Etüdler Vakfı (TESEV) İnternet Sitesi http://tesev.org.tr/en/ (Erişim Tarihi: 05.06.2017). 21. Yüzyıl Türkiye Enstitüsü İnternet Sitesi http://www.21yytr.org/tr/ (Erişim Tarihi: 04.07.2017).
• Yüksek Öğretim Kurulu Ulusal Tez Merkezi, www.tez.yok.gov.tr (Erişim Tarihi: 14.06.2017).