The Impact of New Media on Democracy and Human Rights Advocacy in the Middle East: A Study of Turkey (2010–2024)

Yıl 2025, Sayı: Toplumsal Tedkikler, 305 - 332, 23.11.2025

Jıbrın Ubale Yahaya

https://doi.org/10.62156/habitus.1759664

Öz

This study looks at how digital media has changed democracy and human rights advocacy in the Middle East, with a special focus on Turkey between 2010 and 2024. Particularly as traditional media channels grew more constrained, new media platforms like social media, blogs, and digital outlets have offered substitute venues for political expression, activity, and mobilization. Notwithstanding Turkey's democratic system, dissent and free speech were hampered by the emergence of authoritarianism, media censorship, and human rights abuses. Although official surveillance, legal crackdowns, and digital repression pose serious obstacles to new media, which has developed as a crucial advocacy tool, questions have been raised regarding its viability and impact. Habermas's Public Sphere Theory, which highlights the media's function in promoting public discussions that are vital to democracy, serves as the study's compass. According to the study, new media was essential to massive mobilizations like the Gezi Park demonstrations because it revealed violations of human rights and raised awareness of Turkey's domestic conflicts throughout the world. However, the promise of new media to promote long-lasting democratic change was curtailed by repressive policies, internet shutdowns, and government targeting of digital activists. In order to maintain democracy and human rights advocacy, the report suggests bolstering protections for digital rights, stepping up foreign support for media freedom in Turkey, and funding independent media and digital literacy initiatives.

Anahtar Kelimeler

New Media , Democracy , Human Rights , Digital Activism , Turkey.

Proje Numarası

01

Kaynakça

• Akdeniz, Y. (2016). Freedom of Expression on the Internet in Turkey: Legal Limits and Future Challenges, Middle East Critique, 25(4), 403-419.
• Ake, C. (1996). Democracy and Development in Africa, Brookings Institution.
• Akgül, M., Kırlıdoğ, M. (2015). Internet censorship in Turkey: Users’ perspectives, Telecommunications Policy, 39(6), 499-508.
• Aristotle. Politics (Translated by Benjamin Jowett).
• Castells, M. (2012). Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age, Polity Press.
• Christensen, H. S. (2011). Political activities on the Internet: Slacktivism or political participation by other means?, First Monday, 16(2).
• Dahl, R. A. (1971). Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition, Yale University Press.
• Dahl, R. A. (1989). Democracy and Its Critics, Yale University Press.
• Dahl, R. A. (1998). On Democracy, Yale University Press.
• Diamond, L. (2008). The Spirit of Democracy: The Struggle to Build Free Societies Throughout the World, Times Books.
• Donnelly, J. (2013). Universal Human Rights in Theory and Practice (3rd ed.), Cornell University Press.
• Dryzek, J. S. (2010). Foundations and Frontiers of Deliberative Governance, Oxford University Press.
• Freedom House. (2022). Freedom on the Net: Turkey Report. Retrieved from [https://freedomhouse.org]
• Gyimah-Boadi, E. (2015). Africa’s Waning Democratic Commitment, Journal of Democracy, 26(1), 101-113.
• Habermas, J. (1996). Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, MIT Press.
• Howard, P. N., Hussain, M. M. (2013). Democracy’s Fourth Wave? Digital Media and the Arab Spring, Oxford University Press.
• Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide, NYU Press.
• Joyce, M. (2010). Digital Activism Decoded: The New Mechanics of Change, International Debate Education Association.
• Kalaycıoğlu, E. (2020). Cyber Laws, Fake News, and Digital Authoritarianism in Turkey, Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, 22(5), 617-635.
• Lievrouw, L. A., Livingstone, S. (2006). Handbook of New Media: Social Shaping and Consequences of ICTs, SAGE Publications.
• Locke, J. (1689). Two Treatises of Government.
• Morozov, E. (2011). The Net Delusion: The Dark Side of Internet Freedom, PublicAffairs.
• Papacharissi, Z. (2010). A Private Sphere: Democracy in a Digital Age, Polity.
• Papaoikonomou, A. (2024). A Multiple Regression Model on the Relationship Between Deliberative Democracy and Political Equity: The Cases of Greece and Turkey, İmgelem, 14, 401-424.
• Pariser, E. (2011). The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You, Penguin Press.
• Poster, M. (1995). The Second Media Age, Polity Press.
• Rousseau, J.-J. (1762). The Social Contract.
• Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, Harper.
• Shirky, C. (2008). Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing Without Organizations, Penguin Books.
• Tufekci, Z. (2017). Twitter and Tear Gas: The Power and Fragility of Networked Protest, Yale University Press.
• Yeşil, B. (2014). Authoritarian Turn or Continuity? Governance and Media in Turkey, Middle East Journal of Culture and Communication, 7(2), 246-261.
• Zakaria, F. (1997). The Rise of Illiberal Democracy, Foreign Affairs, 76(6), 22-43.