THE JURISDICTION OF INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT: A CRITICAL LEGAL SCRUTINY ON THE PRINCIPLE OF COMPLEMENTARITY ADOPTED IN THE ROME STATUE

Öz

In this paper, our focus will be on the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) jurisdiction in the context of the complementarity principle. The subject of the jurisdiction, that is, crimes within the jurisdiction of the court, was not dealt with in detail while we aim to critically examine how the courts use their jurisdiction against the national powers of the states and what kind of mechanism is accepted in this regard. It has been argued that the jurisdictional relationship between the court and state parties has a horizontal framework. That is, national systems are prior, but international institutions might take the jurisdiction over when they (national systems) purely fail. Since the relationship between national states and international jurisdictions is not vertical, the principle of universal jurisdiction has not been preferred for the ICC. However, this required cooperation between states and international jurisdictions such as the ICC in criminal matters to prevent major international crimes.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Universal jurisdiction
• Complementarity principle
• International criminal court
• International crimes
• Sovereignty.

ULUSLARARASI CEZA MAHKEMESİ’NİN YARGI YETKİSİ: ROMA STATÜSÜ’NDE KABUL EDİLEN TAMAMLAYICILIK İLKESİ ÜZERİNE ELEŞTİREL HUKUKİ BİR İNCELEME

Öz

Bu çalışmada odak noktamız tamamlayıcılık prensibi bağlamında Uluslararası Ceza Mahkemesi’in yargı yetkisi üzerine olacaktır. Yargı yetkisinin konusu yani mahkemenin görev alanına giren suçlar çalışmada detaylı olarak ele alınmazken, amacımız yargı yetkisinin konusu yani mahkemenin görev alanına giren suçlar bu yazıda ele alınmazken, amacımız mahkemelerin yargı yetkisini devletlerin ulusal yetkileri karşısında nasıl kullandıklarını ve bu bağlamda nasıl bir mekanizma kabul edildiğini eleştirel bir gözle incelemektir. Mahkeme ile taraf devletlerarasındaki yetki ilişkisinin yatay bir çerçeveye sahip olduğu ileri sürülmüştür. Yani, ulusal sistemlerin yargı yetkisi önceliklidir, fakat ulusal sistemler yargılama konusunda tamamen başarısız olduklarında uluslararası kurumlar yetkiyi devralabilirler. Ulusal devletler ile uluslararası yargı yetkileri arasındaki ilişki dikey olmadığı için evrensel yargı ilkesi ICC için tercih edilmemiştir. Ancak bu, önemli uluslararası suçları önlemek için cezai konularda devletler ve ICC gibi uluslararası yargı mercileri arasında işbirliğini gerektirmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Evrensel yetki
• Tamamlayıcılık ilkesi
• Uluslararası ceza mahkemesi
• Uluslararası suçlar
• Egemenlik.

Kaynakça

1. Akande D, ‘The Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court over Nationals of Non-Parties: Legal Basis and Limits’ (2003) 1 Journal of International Criminal Justice 618.
2. Akdemir MŞ, ‘Egemenlik ve Evrensel Yargı Yetkisi İlişkisinin Uluslararası Ceza Hukuku Boyutu’ (2022) 8 Anadolu Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 261.
3. Alkrisheh MA and Mahameed W, ‘The International Criminal Court Statute and State Sovereignty: The Implicit Impact of the Complementarity Principle’ (2020) 6 Multicultural Education 1.
4. Ambos K, Internationales Strafrecht (5th edn C H Beck 2018).
5. Başak C, Uluslararası Ceza Mahkemeleri ve Uluslararası Suçlar (1st edn Turhan Kitapevi 2003).
6. Burke-White WW, ‘The International Criminal Court And National Courts in the Rome System of International Justice’ (2008) 49 Harvard International Law Journal 53.
7. Çelik Y, Türk Hukukunda Bireysel Başvuru ve Anayasa Mahkemesi Uygulaması (1st edn Adalet Yayınevi 2016).
8. Cryer R and others, An Introduction to International Criminal Law and Procedure (2nd edn Cambridge University Press 2010).

9. Damaška MR, ‘International Criminal Court between Aspiration and Achievement’ (2009) 14 University of
10. California Los Angeles Journal of International Law and Foreign Affairs 19.
11. Delmas-Marty M and others, İnsanlığa Karşı Suç (Berna Ekal tr, 1st edn İletişim Yayınları 2012).
12. Durmuş T, Erdem MR and Önok M, Uluslararası Ceza Hukuku (6th edn Seçkin Yayıncılık 2021).
13. Gioia F, ‘State Sovereignty, Jurisdiction, and “Modern” International Law: The Principle of Complementarity in the International Criminal Court’ (2006) 19 Leiden Journal of International Law 1095.
14. Gordon GS, ‘Complementary and Alternative Justice’ (2009) 88 Oregon Law Review 101.
15. Günal H, Hannah Arendt ve İnsanlığa Karşı Suçlar (1st edn Dost Kitapevi 2015).
16. Halatçı Ü, ‘Uluslararası Ceza Mahkemesinin Yargı Yetkisini Kullanabilmesinin Önkoşulları’ (2005) 1 Uluslararası Hukuk ve Politika 57.
17. Kaya S, 2017 Anayasa Değişiklikleri Çerçevesinde Anayasa Yargısı (1st edn Adalet Yayınevi 2018).
18. Kılıç AŞ, ‘Devletlerin Egemenliği Üzerine Ulusal Egemenlik Odaklı Bir İnceleme’ (2009) 58 Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 615.
19. Leonard EK, ‘Discovering the New Face of Sovereignty: Complementarity and the International Criminal Court’ (2005) 27 New Political Science 87.
20. Madjid M, ‘The Effect of Security Council Resolutions on the International Criminal Court Complementarity Regime’ (2021) 7 Journal of Legal Studies 266.
21. Marlies G, ‘Do International Criminal Courts Require Democratic Legitimacy’ (2012) 23 The European Journal of International Law 43.
22. Mayans-Hermida BE and Holá B, ‘Balancing ‘the International’and “the Domestic” Sanctions under the ICC Principle of Complementarity’ (2020) 18 Journal of International Criminal Justice 1103.
23. Melandri M, ‘The Relationship between State Sovereignty and the Enforcement of International Criminal Law under the Rome Statute (1998): A Complex Interplay’ (2009) 9 International Criminal Law Review 531.
24. Nmaju MC, ‘Violence in Kenya: Any Role for the ICC in the Quest for Accountability?’ (2009) 3 African Journal of Legal Studies 78.
25. Olsson A, ‘The Principle of Complementarity of the International Criminal Court and the Principle of Universal Jurisdiction’ (Thesis of Master, University of Lund, (Law Faculty) 2004).
26. Öztürk EÇ, ‘The International Criminal Court: Jurisdiction and the Concept of Sovereignty’ (2014) 10 European Scientific Journal 141.
27. Razesberger F, The International Criminal Court: The Principle of Complementarity (1st edn Peter Lang 2006).
28. Robinson D, ‘Serving the Interests of Justice: Amnesties, Truth Commissions and the International Criminal Court’ (2003) 14 European Journal of International Law 481.
29. Rothe DL and Collins VE, ‘The International Criminal Court: A Pipe Dream to End Impunity?’ (2013) 13 International Criminal Law Review 191.
30. Ryngaert C, ‘International Criminal Court and Universal Jurisdiction: A Fraught Relationship’ (2009) 12 New Criminal Law Review 498.
31. Sarwar MG, ‘Complementarity Principle in Prosecution of International Crimes: Assessing Its Necessity and Efficacy’ (2021) 32 Dhaka University Law Journal 161.
32. Schabas WA, An Introduction to the International Criminal Court (4th edn Cambridge University Press 2011).
33. Schrag M, ‘Lessons Learned from ICTY Experience’ (2004) 2 Journal of International Criminal Justice 427.
34. Sifris R, ‘Weighing Judicial Independence against Judicial Accountability: Do the Scales of the International Criminal Court Balance?’ (2008) 8 Chicago Kent J International & Comparative Law 88.
35. Stahn C, ‘Libya, the International Criminal Court and Complementarity A Test for ‘Shared Responsibility’ (2012) 10 Journal of International Criminal Justice 325.
36. Stegmiller I, ‘Complementarity Thoughts’ (2010) 21 Criminal Law Forum 159.
37. Symons L, ‘The Inherent Powers of the ICTY and ICTR’ (2003) 3 International Criminal Law Review 369.
38. Telli K, Cezasızlık Olgusuna Karşı Uluslararası Ceza Mahkemeleri ve Uluslararası Suçlar (1st edn On İki Levha Yayıncılık 2015).
39. Tokdemir S, ‘International Criminal Court within Global Realities, And Desires beyond the Cuff Mountain: “Is the ICC A Proper International Institution?’ (2013) XVII EÜHFD 163.
40. Tokdemir S, ‘The Powers of the Prosecutor in the Turkish Criminal Justice System’ (Thesis of Master (unpublished), University of Sussex (Law School) 2013).
41. Warbrick C, ‘International Criminal Courts and Fair Trial’ (1998) 3 Journal of Conflict and Security Law 45. Zafer H, ‘Ulusal Hukuk Sistemlerinin Roma Statüsü Ile Uyumlaştırılması-Alman Modeli’ (2007) 6 MÜHFD (Aydın
42. Aybay’a Armağan) 289. Outsourcing justice accessed on 19 December 2022. [in the legality of ‘outsourcing justice’] accessed 6 December 2022.