Characterization and suitability assessment of soils in rain forest zone southwest Nigeria for cassava, maize and rice production using parametric method

Yıl 2023, , 624 - 642, 27.12.2023

Fawole Ayofe , Julius Olayinka Ojetade Sikiru Adekoya Muda

https://doi.org/10.29050/harranziraat.1299165

Öz

The study assessed the properties of soils derived from medium-grained granite gneissdeveloped their taxonomic classification, established soil suitability groups for theselected arable crops production, and proposed sustainable land managementpractices to improve soil sustainability. Four soil profile pits were established along each of the two topo-sequences identified at the site in compliance with FAO/UNESCOstandards. From the identified genetic horizons, soil samples were collected and subjected to routine physical and chemical analyses in the laboratory for characterization and suitability assessment. Data generated from the analyses weresubjected to descriptive and inferential statistics. Employing a parametric approachland attributes observed in the field were merged with those established in thelaboratory and crop requirements to produce soil suitability classes. The soils encountered were classed according to the USDA classification system as TypiIsohyperthermic Paleustult, Plinthic Isohyperthermic Paleustult, and aquic Psamment.They were further classified as Lixisol, Plinthic Lixisol, and Fluvisol (WRB), in that order. The actual suitability revealed that all the soil series were presently unsuitable for cropproduction. Potentially Typic Isohyperthermic Paleustult soil was rated moderatelysuitable while Plinthic Isohyperthermic Paleustult and Ustipsamment soils were rated
marginally suitable for cassava and maize production. All the soils, however, are both actual and potentially unsuitable for rice production. Slope, soil nutrient availability and
nutrient retention together with physical characteristics were the key agronomicconstraints of the soils encountered in the studied area. Although the soils have acomplex relationship, the investigation indicated that they are not homogeneous and vary in potentiality with different physiographic units; as a result, differentmanagement techniques at different physiographic positions are required to ensure thesustainable use of soil resources.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Arable crops, Granite gneiss, isohyperthermic and Paleustult., Taxonomic classification, Soil suitability

Nijerya'nın güneybatısındaki yağmur ormanı bölgesindeki toprakların manyok, mısır ve çeltik üretimi için parametrik yöntem kullanılarak karakterizasyonu ve uygunluğunun değerlendirilmesi

Öz

Çalışmada, orta taneli granit gnaysı üzerinde oluşmuş toprakların özellikleri değerlendirilmiş, bunların taksonomik sınıflandırması yapılmış, mısır, maniok ve pirinç üretimi için toprak uygunluk sınıfları belirlenmiş ve toprak sürdürülebilirliğini artırmak için bir arazi yönetimi stratejisi önerilmiştir. İki topografik kesitte, FAO/UNESCO standartlarına uygun olarak her bir topografik kesit boyunca dört toprak profili açılmıştır. Tanımlanan genetik horizonlardan toprak örnekleri toplanmış ve karakterizasyon ve uygunluk değerlendirmesi için fiziksel ve kimyasal parametreler açısından analiz edilmiştir.
Analizlerden elde edilen veriler tanımlayıcı ve çıkarımsal istatistiklere tabi tutulmuştur. Parametrik ve CBS tekniklerinin kullanılmasıyla, saha gözlemlerinde gözlemlenen arazi özellikleri, laboratuvarda belirlenenler ve bitki gereksinimleri ile birleştirilerek toprak uygunluk sınıfları oluşturulmuştur. Çalışma bölgesinde haritalanan topraklar, USDA'ye göre Typic
isohyperthermic Paleustults, Plinthic isohyperthermic Paleustults ve Aquic Psamments olarak sınıflandırıldı. Bu topraklar WRB'ye göre sırasıyla Lixisol, Plinthic Lixisol ve Fluvisol olarak sınıflandırıldı. Gerçek uygunluk, tüm toprak serilerinin şu anda bitki üretimi için uygun olmadığını ortaya koymuştur. Potansiyel olarak Typic isohyperthermic Paleustults topraklar, orta
derecede uygun olarak değerlendirilirken, Plinthic isohyperthermic Paleustults ve Aquic Psamments topraklar, maniyok ve mısır üretimi için marjinal olarak uygun olarak değerlendirilmiştir. Ancak, tüm topraklar hem gerçekte hem de potansiyel olarak pirinç üretimi için uygun değildir. Çalışma alanındaki toprakların başlıca tarımsal kısıtlamaları, toprak fiziksel özellikleri, besin maddelerinin bulunabilirliği, besin maddelerinin tutulması ve eğim idi. Çalışma, topraklar yakın ilişkili olmalarına rağmen, homojen olmadıklarını ve farklı fizyografik birimlerde farklı potansiyellere sahip olduklarını ortaya koymuştur; bu nedenle, toprak kaynaklarının sürdürülebilir kullanımını sağlamak için farklı fizyografik konumlarda farklı yönetim tekniklerine ihtiyaç duyulmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Orta taneli granit gnays, Taksonomik sınıflandırma, Tipik İzohipertermik Paleustults, Plintik İzohipertermik Paleustults ve Aquic Psamments

Kaynakça

• Adepetu, J. A. 1986. Soil fertility and fertilizer requirement in Oyo, Ogun and OndoStates. Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Water Resources (Publ), Lagos.
• Akinbola, G. E., Ojetade, J. O. & Olaleye, A. O. (2006). Variability of soil properties along two toposequences on Basement Complex in southwestern Nigeria, Discovery and Innovation 18(1):44-52.
• Amusan, A. A. (1991). Pedogenesis in granitic gneiss of humid Tropical southwestern Nigeria. Ph.D. Thesis. Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria.
• Amusan, A. A. & Ashaye, T. I. (1991). Graniticgneiss derived soils in humid forest tropical southwestern Nigeria I: Genesis and classification. Ife Journal of Agriculture 13 (1 639& 2): 1-20.
• Bertsch, P. W. & Bloom, P. R. (1996). Aluminum. In Sparks, D. L. (ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis Part 3: SSSA Book Series No. 5. Soil Science Society of America Inc., American Society of Agronomy Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, 517 – 550pp.
• Bilzi, A. F., & E. J., Ciolkosz, (1977). A field morphology rating scale for evaluating pedological development. Journal of Soil Sci. 124:45-48.
• Blake, G. R. & Hartge, K. H. (1986). Bulk density. In Methods of Soil Analysis Part 1. SSSA Book Series No. 9 Soil Science Society of America Inc., American Society of Agronomy Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, 363 – 376pp.
• Blum WEH (1993). Soil protection concept of the council of Europe and integrated soil research. In: Eijsackers HAP, Hamers T, editors. Integrated Soil and Sediment Research: A Basis for proper protection. Kluwer Academic Publishers pp. 37-47.
• Bouyoucos, G. J. (1965). The hydrometer method improved making particle size analysis of soils. Soil Science Society of America Proceeding 26: 917 – 925.
• Brady, N. C. & Weil, R. R. (1999). The nature and properties of Soils. (12th edition), by Prentice- Hall, Inc. Pearson Education Upper Saddle River, New Jersey. Pp. 321 – 766.
• Bremner, J.M. (1996) Nitrogen Total. In: Sparks, D.L., Ed., Methods of Soil Analysis Part 3: Chemical Methods, SSSA Book Series 5, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin, 1085-1122pp.
• Briney, A. (2008). GIS. An overview. An overview of Geographical Information Systems. http://geography.about.com/od/geographyinter/a/gi soverview.htm. (Accessed 25 September 2009).
• De Groot R. S, Wilson M. A, and Boumans R. M. J., (2002). A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods, and services. Ecol. Econ 41: 393-408.
• Esu, I. E., (1987). Fertility status and management of some upland basement complex soils in the Nigerian tropical savanna region. Nig. J. Soil Sci., 7: 155-183.
• Esu, I.E., (2004). Soil characterization and mapping for food security and sustainable environment in Nigeria. Proceedings of the 29th Annual Conference of the Soil Science Society of Nigeria, December 6-10, 2004, University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Nigeria, pp: 20-24.
• European Commission (2006). Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the council establishing a framework for the soil protection of soil and amending directive 2004/35/EC. Brussels 22/09/2006 Com(2006)232 final, 30p.
• Ezedinma CI, Okafor C, Asumugha GN, & Nweke F (2006). Trends in farm labour Productivity and implications for cassava industrialization in Nigeria. Proceeding of the 40 th Annual Conference of the Agricultural Society of Nigeria held at NRCRI Umudike, Abia State. Oct. 16 th – 20 th, 109-115pp.
• FAO (2015). Crop Water Information: Maize. Food and Agriculture Organization Water Development and Management unit. Blum FAO/UNESCO, (2006). World Reference Base for Soil Resources: A Framework for International Classification, Correlation and Communication. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, Italy, ISBN-13: 9789251055113, 128pp.
• FMANR (Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Natural Resources) (1990). Literature review on soil fertility investigations in Nigeria.5 2:92-95; 5:252-261pp.
• Gee, G. W. & Or. (2002). Particle size analysis. In: J. H. Dane and G. C. Topp (eds) Methods of soil analysis part 4, Physical methods. Soil Science Society of America Book series no. 5, American Society of Agronomy and Soil Science Society of America, Madison, pp 255293.
• Hanlon, E.A., B.L. McNeal, & G. Kidder. (1993). Electrical Conductivity Interpretations. Fla. Coop. Extn. Ser., IFAS, Univ. of Fla., Gainesville, FL. (In Press).
• Kuo, S. (1996). Phosphorus. In Sparks, D. L. (ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis Part 3: SSSA Book Series No. 5. Soil Science Society of America Inc., American Society of Agronomy Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, pp 869 – 920.
• Landon, J. R., (1991). Booker Tropical Soil Manual. A Handbook of Soil Survey and Agricultural Land Evaluation in the Tropic and Subtropics. 1st ed. Longman, London, pp105.
• Mbagwu, J., Lal, R. & Scott, T. W. (1983). Physical properties of three soils in Southwestern Nigeria, Soil Science 136 (1):48-55.
• Meixner & Singer's (1981). Use of a field morphology rating system to evaluate soil formation and discontinuities. Soil Science 131(2): 114-123.
• Nelson, D. W. & Sommers, L. E. (1996). Total Carbon, Organic Carbon and Organic Matter. In Sparks, D. L. (ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis Part 3: SSSA Book Series No. 5. Soil Science Society of America Inc., American Society of Agronomy Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, pp 961-1010.
• NPC (National Population Commission} (2007), Result of 2006 National Population Census. Abuja: Federal Government Official Gazette.
• Nwite, J. N., Mbah C. N., Okonkwo, C. I., & Obi, M. E., (2012). Analysis of the physical conditions of a contaminated typic Haplustult amended with organic wastes. Int. Res. J. Agric. Sci. Soil Sci. 1(2):058-063.
• Ogunwale, J. A., Ashaye, T. T., Odu, C. T. & Fayemi, A. A. (1975). Characterization of selected sandstone derived soil in the ecological zones of Nigeria. Geoderma 13: 331-347.
• Ojanuga, A. G. (1978). Genesis of soils in the metamorphic forest & region of southwestern Nigeria Pedolomorphic pedologie xxviii. 1: 105-117.
• Ojanuga, A.G., (1975). Morphological physical and chemical characteristics of soils of Ife and Ondo areas. Nig. J. Sci., 9: 225-269.
• Orimoloye, J. R., Amadi Rapheal K. A. S. & Akinbola, G. E. (2019). Characterization and agricultural potentials of some pedons derived from sandstone parent rock near Abeokuta, Southwestern Nigeria. J. Soil Sci. Environ. Manage. Vol.10 (5), pp. 82-93, July 2019. https://doi.org/10.5897/JSSEM2018.0733.
• Okusami, T. A. & Oyediran, G. O. (1985). Slope-Soil relationship on an Aberrant Toposequence in Ife area of southwestern Nigeria; Variabilities in soils properties. Ife Journal of Agriculture. University of Ife, Nigeria 7 (1&2) 1-15.
• Opeyemi, Z. A., (2008). Monitoring the growth of settlement in Ilorin Nigeria. (A GIS and remote sensing approach). International Archives of photogrammetric, remote sensing and spatial information science, vol. xxxvii, part B6b. Beijing.
• Payne, D. (1988). Soil structure, tilth, and mechanical behaviour. p. 378–411. In A Wild (ed.) Russell’s soil conditions & plant growth. Longman Scientific & Technical, Burnt Mill, England.
• Periaswamy, S. P. & Ashaye, T. I. (1982) Updated classification of some south-western Nigerian soils. Ife J Agric. 4 (I & 2), 25-36.
• Rahaman, M. A (1988): Recent advances in the study of the basement complex of Nigeria. Symposium on the Geology of Nigeria, Obafemi Awolowo University, Nigeria.
• Sharu, M. B., M. Yakubu, S. S. Noma & A. I. Tsafe, (2013). Characterization and classification of soils on an agricultural landscape in dingyadi district, Sokoto State, Nigeria. Nig. J. Basic Applied Sci., 21: 137-147.
• Sims, J. T. (1996). Lime Requirement. In Sparks, D. L. (ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis Part 3: SSSA Book Series No. 5. Soil Science Society of America Inc., American Society of Agronomy Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, pp 491 – 516.
• Smyth, A. J. & Montogomery, R. F. (1962). Soils and land use in central western Nigeria. Western Nigeria Government, Ibadan Pp 265.
• Sobulo, R. A. & Adepetu, J. A. (1987). Soil Science for the Development of Africa. Soil fertility status of Africa soils. Paper presented at the 1st O. A. U. International Soil Congress, Accra, Ghana, Pages 18-22.
• Soil Survey Staff (2006). Keys to soil taxonomy, 10th edition. USDANRCS. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, USA. 332p.
• Solarin, L. O. & Ayolagha, G. A. (2006). Characterization and Classification of Cement dust-polluted soils in Sagamu area, southwestern Nigeria. Nigeria Journal of Soil Science 16: 24-34.
• Storie R.E. (1976): Storie Index Soil Rating (revised 1978). Spec. Publ. Div. Agric. Sci. No. 3203, University of California, Berkeley.
• Sumner, M. E. & Miller, P. W. (1996). Cation Exchange Capacity and Exchange Coefficients. In Sparks, D. L. (ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis Part 3: SSSA Book Series No. 5. Soil Science Society of America Inc., American Society of Agronomy Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, pp 1201 – 1230.
• Sys C., Van Ranst E., & Debaveye J. (1991): Land evaluation. Part II: Methods in Land Evaluation. Agric. Pub. No. 7, General Administration for Development Cooperation, Brussels.
• Sys, C. (1985) Land evaluation, Part I, 11 & 111. ITC, University of Ghent, Belgium, 343 p.
• Thapinta, A., & Hudak, P., (2003). Use of geographic information systems for assessing groundwater pollution potential by pesticides in Central Thailand. Environmental International 29, 87–93pp.
• Thomas, G. W. (1982). Exchangeable cations. Pp. 159–165. In A.L. Page et al., (ed.) Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. 2nd ed. Agron.Monogr.1 9. ASA and SSSA, Madison, WI.
• Thomas, G. W., (1996). Soil pH and Soil Acidity. In Sparks, D. L. (ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis Part 3: SSSA Book Series No. 5 Soil Science Society of America Inc., American Society of Agronomy Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, pp 363– 376pp.
• United States Department of Agriculture (2010). Soil Survey staff, 2010 Keys to Soil Taxonomy. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), 9th ed., Pages 263-285pp.
• Van Raij B. & Peech M. (1972). Electrochemical properties of some Oxisols and Alfisols of the Tropics. Soil Sci Soc Am J 36: 587-593.
• Wilkie, D.S. & Finn, J.T. (1996), Remote Sensing Imagery for Natural Resources Monitoring. Columbia University Press, New York. Pp 295.
• Yakubu, M. & A.G. Ojanuga, (2009). Pedogenesis, Weathering Status and Mineralogy of the Soils on Ironstone Plateau (Laterites). Sokoto, Nigeria.