BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Harran Ovası Kireçli Killi Toprak Özellikleri Üzerine Antepfıstığı Dış Kabuğu Biyokömür Uygulamasının Etkisi

Yıl 2016, , 301 - 312, 29.12.2016
https://doi.org/10.29050/harranziraat.282272

Öz

Antepfıstığı dış kabuğu biyokömürü (FDKB) uygulamalarının, toprağın bazı kimyasal özellikleri üzerine olan etkisini belirlemek amacıyla, Harran Ovası İkizce serisi toprağı ve FDKB kullanılarak 180 günlük bir inkübasyon çalışması kurulmuştur. Bu kapsamda, biyokömür materyali % 0 - 0.2 - 0.4 - 0.6 - 1.2 ve 2.4 doz oranında olmak üzere toprak örneği ile homojen bir şekilde karıştırılmış ve tarla kapasitesinin % 65’i oranında nemlendirilmiştir. Deneme tesadüf parselleri deneme desenine göre dizayn edilmiştir. İnkübasyon süresince toprak örneklemeleri 15, 60, 120 ve 180. günlerde yapılmıştır. Alınan toprak örneklerinde pH, organik madde (OM), toplam karbon (TC), toplam azot (TN), yarayışlı fosfor (P), katyon değişim kapasitesi (KDK), değişebilir katyon (DK) ve çözünebilir katyon (ÇK) değerleri belirlenmiştir. Deneme sonuçlarına göre elde edilen aralık değerlerinin; Toprak pH ‘sı 7.9, OM % 0.92-2.43, TC % 12.55-41.87, TN % 0.29-1.47, P 2.73-13.47 mg kg-1, KDK 31-42 cmol kg-1, ÇCa+2 3.72-27.23 me l-1, ÇK+ 0.45-1.53 me l-1, ÇMg+2 0.39-2.62 me l-1, ÇNa+ 0.84-11.61 me l-1, DCa+2 27.87-37.74  cmol kg-1, DK+ 0.63-1.63 cmol kg-1, DMg+2 0.99-1.89 cmol kg-1, DNa+ 0-0.02 cmol kg-1 değerleri arasında değiştiği belirlenmiştir. Bu sonuçlara göre artan doza bağlı değerlerde artış olduğu görülmüştür. Örnekleme zamanı bakımından ise OM dışındaki tüm sonuçlarda artan süreyle değerlerin yükseldiği tespit edilmiştir. En yüksek değer 180. gün % 2.4 uygulamalarında, en düşük ise 15. gün % 0 uygulamalarında belirlenmiştir. Organik madde için en yüksek değer 15. gün % 2.4 ve en düşük değerin 180. gün % 0 uygulamalarında görülmüştür. Genel olarak bakıldığında, FDKB materyalinin çalışılan topraklarda, organik toprak düzenleyicisi olarak kullanılabilecek bir potansiyele sahip olduğu değerlendirilmiştir. 

Kaynakça

  • Bremner, J.M., 1996. Nitrogen-total. In: Methods of soil analysis. Part III. Chemical Methods (Bartels, J.M., and J.M. Bigham eds.) 2nd Ed. ASA SSSA Publisher Agron. No: 5, Madison WI, USA, 1085–1121.
  • Chirenje, T., Lena Q.Ma ., 2002 Impact of high-volume wood-fired boiler ash amendment on soil properties and nutrients. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 33:1–17.
  • Dixon, J.B., and G. N. White. 2000. Soil mineralogy laboratory manual. 4th ed. Published by the authors, Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station.
  • Dong, X., Lena Q. Ma., Li, Y., 2011. Characteristics and mechanisms of hexavalent chromium removal by biochar from sugar beet tailing. Journal of Hazardous Materials 190:909–915.
  • Hoshi, T., 2001. Growth Promotion of Tea Trees by Putting Bamboo Charcoal in Soil. Proceedings of International Conference on O-cha (tea) CULTURE and Science. Tokyo. Japan. 147-150.
  • International Biochar Initivative (IBI). 2008 http://www.biochar-international.org/
  • Jeffery, S., Verheijen F.G.A., Van der Velde, M., Bastos A.C., 2011. A quantitative review of the effects of biochar application to soils on crop productivity using meta-analysis. Agriculture, Ecosystems Environment 144 (1). 175–187.
  • Kolb, S.E., Fermanich, K.J., Dornbush, M.E., 2009. Effect of Charcoal Quantity on Microbial Biomass and Activity in Temperate Soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 73(4): 1173-1181.
  • Leco TruSpec CHN-S. 2005. Carbon, Hydrogen and Nitrogen in Flour and Plant Tissue LECO Corporation 3000 Lakeview Avenue.
  • Lehmann, C.J., Rondon, M., 2006. Bio-char Soil Management on Highly-Weathered Soils in The Tropics. In: Uphoff. N.T. (Ed.). Biological Approaches to Sustainable Soil Systems. Boca Raton. 517-530.
  • Lehmann, J., Joseph, S., 2009. Biochar for Environmental Management: Science and Technology. Earthsan, London, UK, 416.
  • Lu, W., Ding, W., Zhang, J., Li, Y., Luo, J., Bolan, N., Xie, Z., 2014. Biochar suppressed the decomposition of organic carbon in a cultivated sandy loam soil: A negative priming effect Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 76: 12-21.
  • Mikan, C. J., and Mars, D., Abrams., 1995. Altered Forest Composition and Soil Properties of Historic Charcoal Hearths in Southeastern Pennsylvania. Can. Journal. Forest Res. 25. 687–696.
  • Nelson, R.E., 1982. Carbonate and Gypsum. In. A.L. Page. R.H. Miller and D.R. Keeney (ed.). Methods of Soil Analysis Part 2: Chemical and Microbiological Properties 2nd Edition. Agronomy Series No:9. Am. Soc. of Agronomy and Soil Sci. Soc. of Am. Inc. Publisher.Madison, Wisconsin USA, 181-196.
  • Olsen, S. R., Cole. C.V., Watanabe. F.S., Dean. I.A., 1954. Estimation of Available Phosphorus in Soils by Extraction with Sodium Bicarbonate. In. A.L. Page. R.H. Miller and D.R. Keeney (ed.). Methods of Soil Analysis Part 2: Chemical and Microbiological Properties 2nd Edition. Agronomy Series No:9. Am. Soc. of Agronomy and Soil Sci. Soc. of Am. Inc. Publisher.. Madison, Wisconsin USA. 181-196.
  • Peng, X., Ye, L.L., Wang, C.H., Zhou, H., Sun, B., 2011. Temperature- and duration-dependent rice straw-derived biochar: characteristics and its effects on soil properties of an Ultisol in southern China. Soil Tillage Research 112:159–166.
  • Rondon, M.A., Lehmann, J., Ramirezand, J., Hurtado, M., 2007. Biological nitrogen fixation by common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) increases with bio-char additions. Biology and Fertility Soils, 43: 699-708.
  • Shenbagavalli, S., Mahimairaja, S., 2012. Characterization and Effect of Biochar on Nitrogen and Carbon Dynamics in soil. I.J.A.B.R., VOL 2(2) 2012: 249-255 ISSN: 2250 – 3579.
  • Sohi, S., Lopez-Capel, E., Krull, E., Bol, R., 2010. Biochar climate change and soil: A review to guide future research. Rep. No. 05/09. CSIRO.
  • Soinne, H., Hovi J., Tammeorg P., Turtola E., 2014. Effect of biochar on phosphorus sorption and clay soil aggregate stability. Geoderma, 219 –220 162–167.
  • Steiner, C., Keshav, C.D., Garcia, M., Forster, B., Zech., W., 2008. Charcoal and smokeextract stimulate the soil microbial community in a highly weathered Xanthic Ferralsol. Pedobiologia, 51: 359-356.
  • Sumner, M.E., Miller, W.P., 1996. Cation Exchange Capacity and Exchange Coefficients. In. D.L. Sparks et. al.. (Ed.). Methods of Soil Analysis Part 3: Chemical Methods. SSSA Book Series No: 5. Am. Soc. of Agronomy and Soil Sci. Soc. Of Am. Inc. Publisher. Madison, Wisconsin USA, 1201-1230.
  • Tan, K.H., 1996. Soil Sampling and Analysis. Marcel Dekker. Inc. 270 Madison Avenue. New York. NY. 10016. 191.
  • Thomas, G.W., 1982. Exchangeable Cations. In. A.L. Page. R.H. Miller and D.R. Keeney (ed.). Methods of Soil Analysis Part 2: Chemical and Microbiological Properties 2nd Edition. Agronomy Series No: 9. Am. Soc. of Agronomy and Soil Sci. Soc. of Am. Inc. Publisher.Madison, Wisconsin USA, 159-164.
  • Thomas, G.W., 1996. Soil pH and Soil Acidity. In. D.L. Sparks et. al.. (Ed.). Methods of Soil Analysis Part 3: Chemical Methods. SSSA Book Series No: 5. Am. Soc. of Agronomy and Soil Sci. Soc. of Am. Inc. Publisher.Madison, Wisconsin USA. 475-490.
  • Topoliantz, S., Ponge, Jean-François., Arrouays, D., Ballof, S., and Lavelle, P., 2002. Effect of Organic Manure and Endogeic Earthworm Pontoscolex Corethrurus (Oligochaeta: Glossoscolecidae) on Soil Fertility and Bean Production. Biol. Fertil. Soils. 36. 313–319.
  • Tryon, E.H., 1948. Effect of Charcoal on Certain Physical. Chemical and Biological Properties of Forest Soils. Ecological Monographs. 18: 81–115.
  • Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu (TÜİK). 2015. Türkiye’nin antep fıstığı üretimi.
  • Van Zwieten, L., Kimber, S., Downie, A., Chan, K.Y., Cowie, A., Wainberg, R., Morris, S., 2007. Papermill Char: Benefits to Soil Health and Plant Production. Proceedings Conference of The International Agrichar Initiative. 30 April- 2 May 2007. Terrigal. NSW. Australia.
  • Verheijen, F.G.A., Jones, R.J.A., Rickson, R.J., Smith, C.J., 2009. Tolerable versus actual soil erosion rates in Europe. Earth-Science Reviews, 94 (1-4): 23-38.
  • Warnock, D.D., Lehmann, J., Kuyper, T.W., Rillig, M.C., 2007. Mycorrhizal responses to biochar in soil - concepts and mechanisms. Plant and Soil, 300: 9-20.
  • Zhai, L., Caiji, Z., Liu, J., Wang, H., Ren, T., Gai, X., Xi, B., Liu, H., 2014. Short-term effects of maize residue biochar on phosphorus availability in two soils with different phosphorus sorption capacities Biol Fertil Soils 51:113-122.
Yıl 2016, , 301 - 312, 29.12.2016
https://doi.org/10.29050/harranziraat.282272

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Bremner, J.M., 1996. Nitrogen-total. In: Methods of soil analysis. Part III. Chemical Methods (Bartels, J.M., and J.M. Bigham eds.) 2nd Ed. ASA SSSA Publisher Agron. No: 5, Madison WI, USA, 1085–1121.
  • Chirenje, T., Lena Q.Ma ., 2002 Impact of high-volume wood-fired boiler ash amendment on soil properties and nutrients. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 33:1–17.
  • Dixon, J.B., and G. N. White. 2000. Soil mineralogy laboratory manual. 4th ed. Published by the authors, Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station.
  • Dong, X., Lena Q. Ma., Li, Y., 2011. Characteristics and mechanisms of hexavalent chromium removal by biochar from sugar beet tailing. Journal of Hazardous Materials 190:909–915.
  • Hoshi, T., 2001. Growth Promotion of Tea Trees by Putting Bamboo Charcoal in Soil. Proceedings of International Conference on O-cha (tea) CULTURE and Science. Tokyo. Japan. 147-150.
  • International Biochar Initivative (IBI). 2008 http://www.biochar-international.org/
  • Jeffery, S., Verheijen F.G.A., Van der Velde, M., Bastos A.C., 2011. A quantitative review of the effects of biochar application to soils on crop productivity using meta-analysis. Agriculture, Ecosystems Environment 144 (1). 175–187.
  • Kolb, S.E., Fermanich, K.J., Dornbush, M.E., 2009. Effect of Charcoal Quantity on Microbial Biomass and Activity in Temperate Soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 73(4): 1173-1181.
  • Leco TruSpec CHN-S. 2005. Carbon, Hydrogen and Nitrogen in Flour and Plant Tissue LECO Corporation 3000 Lakeview Avenue.
  • Lehmann, C.J., Rondon, M., 2006. Bio-char Soil Management on Highly-Weathered Soils in The Tropics. In: Uphoff. N.T. (Ed.). Biological Approaches to Sustainable Soil Systems. Boca Raton. 517-530.
  • Lehmann, J., Joseph, S., 2009. Biochar for Environmental Management: Science and Technology. Earthsan, London, UK, 416.
  • Lu, W., Ding, W., Zhang, J., Li, Y., Luo, J., Bolan, N., Xie, Z., 2014. Biochar suppressed the decomposition of organic carbon in a cultivated sandy loam soil: A negative priming effect Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 76: 12-21.
  • Mikan, C. J., and Mars, D., Abrams., 1995. Altered Forest Composition and Soil Properties of Historic Charcoal Hearths in Southeastern Pennsylvania. Can. Journal. Forest Res. 25. 687–696.
  • Nelson, R.E., 1982. Carbonate and Gypsum. In. A.L. Page. R.H. Miller and D.R. Keeney (ed.). Methods of Soil Analysis Part 2: Chemical and Microbiological Properties 2nd Edition. Agronomy Series No:9. Am. Soc. of Agronomy and Soil Sci. Soc. of Am. Inc. Publisher.Madison, Wisconsin USA, 181-196.
  • Olsen, S. R., Cole. C.V., Watanabe. F.S., Dean. I.A., 1954. Estimation of Available Phosphorus in Soils by Extraction with Sodium Bicarbonate. In. A.L. Page. R.H. Miller and D.R. Keeney (ed.). Methods of Soil Analysis Part 2: Chemical and Microbiological Properties 2nd Edition. Agronomy Series No:9. Am. Soc. of Agronomy and Soil Sci. Soc. of Am. Inc. Publisher.. Madison, Wisconsin USA. 181-196.
  • Peng, X., Ye, L.L., Wang, C.H., Zhou, H., Sun, B., 2011. Temperature- and duration-dependent rice straw-derived biochar: characteristics and its effects on soil properties of an Ultisol in southern China. Soil Tillage Research 112:159–166.
  • Rondon, M.A., Lehmann, J., Ramirezand, J., Hurtado, M., 2007. Biological nitrogen fixation by common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) increases with bio-char additions. Biology and Fertility Soils, 43: 699-708.
  • Shenbagavalli, S., Mahimairaja, S., 2012. Characterization and Effect of Biochar on Nitrogen and Carbon Dynamics in soil. I.J.A.B.R., VOL 2(2) 2012: 249-255 ISSN: 2250 – 3579.
  • Sohi, S., Lopez-Capel, E., Krull, E., Bol, R., 2010. Biochar climate change and soil: A review to guide future research. Rep. No. 05/09. CSIRO.
  • Soinne, H., Hovi J., Tammeorg P., Turtola E., 2014. Effect of biochar on phosphorus sorption and clay soil aggregate stability. Geoderma, 219 –220 162–167.
  • Steiner, C., Keshav, C.D., Garcia, M., Forster, B., Zech., W., 2008. Charcoal and smokeextract stimulate the soil microbial community in a highly weathered Xanthic Ferralsol. Pedobiologia, 51: 359-356.
  • Sumner, M.E., Miller, W.P., 1996. Cation Exchange Capacity and Exchange Coefficients. In. D.L. Sparks et. al.. (Ed.). Methods of Soil Analysis Part 3: Chemical Methods. SSSA Book Series No: 5. Am. Soc. of Agronomy and Soil Sci. Soc. Of Am. Inc. Publisher. Madison, Wisconsin USA, 1201-1230.
  • Tan, K.H., 1996. Soil Sampling and Analysis. Marcel Dekker. Inc. 270 Madison Avenue. New York. NY. 10016. 191.
  • Thomas, G.W., 1982. Exchangeable Cations. In. A.L. Page. R.H. Miller and D.R. Keeney (ed.). Methods of Soil Analysis Part 2: Chemical and Microbiological Properties 2nd Edition. Agronomy Series No: 9. Am. Soc. of Agronomy and Soil Sci. Soc. of Am. Inc. Publisher.Madison, Wisconsin USA, 159-164.
  • Thomas, G.W., 1996. Soil pH and Soil Acidity. In. D.L. Sparks et. al.. (Ed.). Methods of Soil Analysis Part 3: Chemical Methods. SSSA Book Series No: 5. Am. Soc. of Agronomy and Soil Sci. Soc. of Am. Inc. Publisher.Madison, Wisconsin USA. 475-490.
  • Topoliantz, S., Ponge, Jean-François., Arrouays, D., Ballof, S., and Lavelle, P., 2002. Effect of Organic Manure and Endogeic Earthworm Pontoscolex Corethrurus (Oligochaeta: Glossoscolecidae) on Soil Fertility and Bean Production. Biol. Fertil. Soils. 36. 313–319.
  • Tryon, E.H., 1948. Effect of Charcoal on Certain Physical. Chemical and Biological Properties of Forest Soils. Ecological Monographs. 18: 81–115.
  • Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu (TÜİK). 2015. Türkiye’nin antep fıstığı üretimi.
  • Van Zwieten, L., Kimber, S., Downie, A., Chan, K.Y., Cowie, A., Wainberg, R., Morris, S., 2007. Papermill Char: Benefits to Soil Health and Plant Production. Proceedings Conference of The International Agrichar Initiative. 30 April- 2 May 2007. Terrigal. NSW. Australia.
  • Verheijen, F.G.A., Jones, R.J.A., Rickson, R.J., Smith, C.J., 2009. Tolerable versus actual soil erosion rates in Europe. Earth-Science Reviews, 94 (1-4): 23-38.
  • Warnock, D.D., Lehmann, J., Kuyper, T.W., Rillig, M.C., 2007. Mycorrhizal responses to biochar in soil - concepts and mechanisms. Plant and Soil, 300: 9-20.
  • Zhai, L., Caiji, Z., Liu, J., Wang, H., Ren, T., Gai, X., Xi, B., Liu, H., 2014. Short-term effects of maize residue biochar on phosphorus availability in two soils with different phosphorus sorption capacities Biol Fertil Soils 51:113-122.
Toplam 32 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Bölüm Araştırma Makaleleri
Yazarlar

Ebru Pınar Saygan

Salih Aydemir

Yayımlanma Tarihi 29 Aralık 2016
Gönderilme Tarihi 7 Aralık 2016
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2016

Kaynak Göster

APA Saygan, E. P., & Aydemir, S. (2016). Harran Ovası Kireçli Killi Toprak Özellikleri Üzerine Antepfıstığı Dış Kabuğu Biyokömür Uygulamasının Etkisi. Harran Tarım Ve Gıda Bilimleri Dergisi, 20(4), 301-312. https://doi.org/10.29050/harranziraat.282272

Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler

13435  19617   22065  13436  134401344513449 13439 13464  22066   22069  13466 

10749 Harran Tarım ve Gıda Bilimi Dergisi, Creative Commons Atıf –Gayrı Ticari 4.0 Uluslararası (CC BY-NC 4.0) Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.