Araştırma Makalesi

Phenotypic Correlations between Carcass Part Yields and Meat Quality Characteristics in Quails

Cilt: 63 Sayı: 1 1 Temmuz 2022
PDF İndir
TR EN

Phenotypic Correlations between Carcass Part Yields and Meat Quality Characteristics in Quails

Öz

Objective: This study aimed to determine phenotypic correlations between carcass part yields (breast and thigh yield) and meat quality characteristics (pHu, lightness, redness, yellowness, chroma, hue, thawing loss, cooking loss, water holding capacity, and texture) in Japanese quails.
Material and Methods: This study was carried out on a total of 130 Japanese quails with mixed sexes. Twenty-four hours after slaughter, pHu and color measurements were performed in the right breast muscle to determine meat quality characteristics.
Results: Mean breast and thigh muscle yields were determined as 24.19% and 14.41%, respectively. Significant phenotypic correlations were found for carcass part yields and meat quality characteristics in quail meat. While determined negative significant (p<0.05) phenotypic correlations for pHu and lightness (-0.193), yellowness (-0.288), chroma (-0.266), and thawing loss (-0.248); pHu’s relationships with redness, hue, water holding capacity and, texture were insignificant.
Conclusion: In this study, the significant negative phenotypic correlation determined between pHu and lightness shows that selection for breast meat lightness in quails can affect the ultimate pH and lead to an improvement in quality characteristics, and this situation can be used to reduce meat quality defects.

Anahtar Kelimeler

japanese quail, meat quality characteristics, pH, meat color, phenotypic correlation

Kaynakça

  1. Alkan S, Karabağ K, Galiç A, Karslı T, Balcıoğlu M S. 2010. Determination of body weight and some carcass traits in japanese quails (coturnix coturnix japonica) of different lines. Kafkas Universitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 16 (2): 277-280.
  2. Andersen H J, Oksbjerg N, Young J F, Therkildsen M. 2005. Feeding and meat quality a future approach. Meat Science (70) 543–554.
  3. Barbut S. 2002. Poultry products processing: an industry guide. Department of Animal and Poultry Science University of Guelph, CRC Press LLC.
  4. Barbut S, Zhang L, Marcone M. 2005. Effects of pale, normal, and dark chicken breast meat on microstructure, extractable proteins, and cooking of marinated fillets. Poultry Science 84:797–802.
  5. Barbut S, Sosnicki A A, Lonergan S M, Knapp T, Ciobanu D C, Gatcliffe L J, Huff-Lonergan E, Wilson E W. 2008. Progress in reducing the pale, soft and exudative (PSE) problem in pork and poultry meat. Meat Science 79, 46–63.
  6. Beauclercq S, Nadal-Desbarats L, Hennequet-Antier C, Collin A, Tesseraud S, Bourin M,§ Le Bihan-Duval E, and Berri C. 2016. Serum and muscle metabolomics for the prediction of ultimate ph, a key factor for chicken-meat quality. J. Proteome Res., 15, 1168−1178.
  7. Berri C, Wacrenier N, Millet N, and Le Bihan-Duval E. 2001. Effect of selection for improved body composition on muscle and meat characteristics of broilers from experimental and commercial lines. Poultry Science 80:833–838.
  8. Berri C, Debut M, Santé-Lhoutellier V, Arnould C, Boutten B, Sellier N, Baéza E, Jehl N, Jégo Y, Duclos M J & Le Bihan-Duval E. 2005. Variations in chicken breast meat quality: implications of struggle and muscle glycogen content at death. British Poultry Science Vol.46, pp. 572–579.
  9. Berri C, Le Bihan-Duval E, Debut M, Santé-Lhoutellier V, Baéza E, Gigaud V, Jégo Y and Duclos M J. 2007. Consequence of muscle hypertrophy on Pectoralis major characteristics and breast meat quality of broiler chickens. http://jas.fass.org/content/early/2007/04/12/jas.2006-398.citation.
  10. Bohrer B M. 2018. Correlation of chicken breast quality and sensory attributes with chicken thigh quality and sensory attributes. Canadian. J. Animal Science 99: 465–474.

Kaynak Göster

APA
Güler, H. C. (2022). Phenotypic Correlations between Carcass Part Yields and Meat Quality Characteristics in Quails. Journal of Animal Production, 63(1), 7-14. https://doi.org/10.29185/hayuretim.1011729
AMA
1.Güler HC. Phenotypic Correlations between Carcass Part Yields and Meat Quality Characteristics in Quails. Journal of Animal Production. 2022;63(1):7-14. doi:10.29185/hayuretim.1011729
Chicago
Güler, Hüseyin Cem. 2022. “Phenotypic Correlations between Carcass Part Yields and Meat Quality Characteristics in Quails”. Journal of Animal Production 63 (1): 7-14. https://doi.org/10.29185/hayuretim.1011729.
EndNote
Güler HC (01 Temmuz 2022) Phenotypic Correlations between Carcass Part Yields and Meat Quality Characteristics in Quails. Journal of Animal Production 63 1 7–14.
IEEE
[1]H. C. Güler, “Phenotypic Correlations between Carcass Part Yields and Meat Quality Characteristics in Quails”, Journal of Animal Production, c. 63, sy 1, ss. 7–14, Tem. 2022, doi: 10.29185/hayuretim.1011729.
ISNAD
Güler, Hüseyin Cem. “Phenotypic Correlations between Carcass Part Yields and Meat Quality Characteristics in Quails”. Journal of Animal Production 63/1 (01 Temmuz 2022): 7-14. https://doi.org/10.29185/hayuretim.1011729.
JAMA
1.Güler HC. Phenotypic Correlations between Carcass Part Yields and Meat Quality Characteristics in Quails. Journal of Animal Production. 2022;63:7–14.
MLA
Güler, Hüseyin Cem. “Phenotypic Correlations between Carcass Part Yields and Meat Quality Characteristics in Quails”. Journal of Animal Production, c. 63, sy 1, Temmuz 2022, ss. 7-14, doi:10.29185/hayuretim.1011729.
Vancouver
1.Hüseyin Cem Güler. Phenotypic Correlations between Carcass Part Yields and Meat Quality Characteristics in Quails. Journal of Animal Production. 01 Temmuz 2022;63(1):7-14. doi:10.29185/hayuretim.1011729