THE FUTURE OF MEAT: EXPLORING CULTURED MEAT PRODUCTION

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1, 1 - 18, 30.06.2025

Leyla Doğdu Uzunlar , Özlem Turgay

https://doi.org/10.51973/head.1622026

Cited By: 1

Öz

Biotechnology and food science have embarked on a quest for alternative protein sources to meet the increasing food demands due to global population growth. Thus, the foundations of cultured meat production also referred to in the literature by various names such as synthetic meat, clean meat, laboratory meat, and in vitro meat, were laid. Cultured meat is the transformation of stem cells taken from the embryos or muscle tissues of animals into edible biomass in a laboratory environment using advanced technological methods. It is thought that the cultured meat production technology can reduce some problems such as land degradation, resource scarcity, slaughter and post slaughter contamination risks, and greenhouse gas increase in traditional meat production, depending on the technique and scale of the production technology. A full harmony has not yet been achieved between the nutritional content and taste of traditional meat and cultured meat. Differences in production technology and inputs also lead to differences in content and taste. The transfer of cultured meat to the production sector depends on its economic suitability, standardization of production, long term health effects, and consumer acceptance. Consumer acceptance is also affected by cultural, religious, and ethical concerns, as well as the same reasons. It is thought that having knowledge about cultured meat will also increase the acceptance. In this review, articles on the historical development of cultured meat, production methods, advantages and disadvantages, consumer acceptance, and its future in the food industry were used.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Artificial meat , synthetic meat , clean meat , culture meat , laboratory meat , in vitro meat

Etik Beyan

bulunmamaktadır

Destekleyen Kurum

bulunmamaktadır

Proje Numarası

bulunmamaktadır

Teşekkür

bulunmamaktadır

ETİN GELECEĞİ: KÜLTÜRLENMİŞ ET ÜRETİMİNİ KEŞFETMEK

Öz

Biyoteknoloji ve gıda bilimi, küresel nüfus artışına bağlı olarak artan gıda taleplerini karşılamak için alternatif protein kaynakları arayışına girmiştir. Literatürde; sentetik veya yapay et, temiz et, laboratuvar eti, in vitro et gibi çeşitli isimlerle de ifade edilen kültürlenmiş et üretiminin temelleri böylelikle atılmıştır. Kültürlenmiş et, hayvanların embriyolarından veya kas dokularından alınan kök hücrelerin laboratuvar ortamında ileri teknolojik metotlarla yenilebilir biyokütleye dönüştürülmesidir. Kültürlenmiş et üretim teknolojisinin tekniğine ve ölçeğine bağlı olarak, geleneksel et üretimindeki arazi tahribatı, kaynak yetersizliği, kesim ve sonrası bulaşı riskleri ve sera gazı artışı gibi sorunlarının azaltılabileceği düşünülmektedir. Henüz geleneksel et ile kültürlenmiş etin besin içeriği ve lezzeti arasında tam manasıyla bir uyum sağlanmamıştır. Üretim teknolojisindeki ve girdilerdeki farklılıklar, içerik ve lezzette de farklara yol açmaktadır. Kültürlenmiş etin üretim sektörüne aktarılması, ürünün ekonomik uygunluğuna, üretiminin standardizasyonuna, uzun vadede sağlık üzerindeki etkilerine ve tüketici kabulüne bağlıdır. Tüketici kabulü ise aynı sebeplerin yanında, kültürel, dini ve etik kaygılardan da etkilenmektedir. Kültürlenmiş et hakkında bilgi sahibi olmanın, kabulü de arttıracağı düşünülmektedir. Bu derlemede, kültürlenmiş etin tarihsel gelişimi, üretim yöntemleri, avantaj ve dezavantajları, tüketici kabulü ve gıda endüstrisindeki geleceği konularındaki makalelerden yararlanılmıştır

Anahtar Kelimeler

Yapay et , sentetik et , temiz et , kültür eti , laboratuvar eti , in vitro et

Proje Numarası

bulunmamaktadır

Kaynakça

• Acevedo, C., Orellana, N., Avarias, K., Ortiz, R., Benavente, D., & Prieto, P. (2018). Micropatterning technology to design an edible film for in vitro. Food Bioprocess Technology, 11, 1267-1273. doi:10.1007/s11947-018-2095-4
• Aisen, P., Enns, C., & Wessling-Resnick, M. (2001). Chemistry and biology of eukaryotic iron metabolism. International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology, 33, 940-959.
• Alçay, A. Ü., Sağlam, A., Yalçın, S., & Bostan, K. (2018). Possible protein sources for the future. Akademik Gıda, 16(2), 197-204.
• Ashley, B. (2002). Edible weights of wildlife species used for country food in the Northwest Territories and Nunavut (Manuscript Report No. 138). Wildlife and Fisheries Division, Department of Resources, Wildlife and Economic Development, Government of the Northwest Territories.
• Aswad, H., Jalabert, A., & Rome, S. (2016). Depleting extracellular vesicles from fetal bovine serum alters proliferation and differentia-tion of skeletal muscle cells in vitro. BMC Biotechnology, 16(1), 1-12.
• Atay, O., Gökdal, Ö., Aygün, T., & Ülker, H. (2004). Aydın İli Çine İlçesinde Kırmızı Et Tüketim Alışkanlıkları. 4. Ulusal Zootekni Bi-lim Kongresi, 348-354.
• Balasubramanian, B., Liu, W., Pushparaj, K., & Park, S. (2021). The epic of in vitro meat pro-duction a fiction into reality. Foods, 10(6), 1395. doi:10.3390/foods10061395
• Benjaminson, M. A., Gilchriest, J. A., & Lo-renz, M. (2002). In vitro edible muscle protein production system (MPPS): Stage 1, fish. Acta Astronautica, 51(12), 879-889.
• Bekker, G. A., Fischer, A. R., Tobi, H., & van Trijp, H. C. (2017). Explicit and implicit atti-tude toward an emerging food technology: The case of cultured meat. Appetite, 108, 245-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2016.10.002
• Bhat, Z. F., Kumar, S., & Fayaz, H. (2015). In vitro meat production: Challenges and benefits over conventional meat production. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 14(2), 241-248.
• Bhat, Z. F., Kumar, S., & Bhat, H. F. (2017). In vitro meat: A future animal free harvest. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 57(4), 782-789.
• Bhat, Z. F., Morton, J. D., Mason, S. L., Bekhit, A. E. A., & Bhat, H. F. (2019). Technological, regulatory, and ethical aspects of in vitro meat: A future slaughter‐free harvest. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 18(4), 1192-1208. doi:10.1111/1541-4337.12473
• Bodiou, V., Moutsatsou, P., & Post, M. (2020). Microcarriers for upscalling cultured meat pro-duction. Frontiers in Nutrition, 7, 10. doi:10.3389/fnut.2020.00010
• Bryant, C., & Barnett, J. (2018). Consumer acceptance of cultured meat: A systematic re-view. Meat Science, 143, 8-17.
• Bryant, C. J., & Barnett, J. C. (2019). What's in a name? Consumer perceptions of in vitro meat under different names. Appetite, 137, 104-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2019.02.021
• Bryant, C., & Dillard, C. (2019). The impact of framing on acceptance of cultured meat. Fron-tiers in Nutrition, 6, 103. doi:10.3389/fnut.2019.00103
• Bryant, C., Szejda, K., Parekh, N., Desphande, V., & Tse, B. (2020). A survey of consumer perceptions of plant-based and clean meat in the USA, India, and China. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 3, 11.
• Bonny, S. P., Gardner, G. E., Pethick, D. W., & Hocquette, J. F. (2015). What is artificial meat and what does it mean for the future of the meat industry? Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 14(2), 255-263. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(14)60888-1
• Carrier, R. L., Rupnick, M., Langer, R., Schoen, F. J., Freed, L. E., & Vunjak-Novakovic, G. (2002). Perfusion improves tissue architecture of engineered cardiac muscle. Tissue Engineer-ing, 8(2), 175-188.
• Candoğan, K., & Özdemir, G. (2021). Sürdürülebilir et üretimi için yenilikçi yak-laşımlar. Gıda, 46(2), 408-427. https://doi.org/10.15237/gida.GD20137
• Choudhury, D., Tseng, T. W., & Swartz, E. (2020). The business of cultured meat. Trends in Biotechnology, 38(6), 573-577.
• Chriki, S., & Hocquette, J. F. (2020). The myth of cultured meat: A review. Frontiers in Nutriti-on, 7, 7. Çakaloğlu Ebcim, B., Nakilcioğlu Taş, E., & Ötleş, S. (2021). In vitro Etin Besleyici Değeri. Sinop Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 6(2). DOI:10.33484/sinopfbd.935965
• Datar, I., & Betti, M. (2010). Possibilities for an in vitro meat production system. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies, 11(1), 13-22.
• Dumont, B., Jouven, M., Bonaudo, T., Botreau, R., & Sabatier, R. (2017). A framework for the design of agroecological livestock farming systems. In A. Wesel (Ed.), Agroecological practices for sustainable agriculture principles, applications, and making the transition (pp. 263-291). World Scientific.
• Egolf, A., Hartmann, C., & Siegrist, M. (2019). When evolution works against the future: dis-gust’s contributions to the acceptance of new food technologies. Risk Analysis, 39(7), 1546-1559. doi:10.1111/risa.13279
• Ersoy, A. (2022). Bitkisel Bazlı Yapay Et Üretimi ve Üretilen Yapay Etlerin Bazı Fizikokimyasal Özelliklerinin Belirlenmesi (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). İstanbul Gelişim Üniver-sitesi.
• Ertbjerg, P., & Puolanne, E. (2017). Muscle structure, sarcomere length and influences on meat quality: A review. Meat Science, 132, 139-152.
• FAO. (2006). Livestock’s long shadow envi-ronmental issues and options. FAO Publica-tions. FAO. (2009). How to feed the world in 2050. FAO Publications.
• Florini, J. R., Magri, K. A., Ewton, D. Z., James, P. L., Grindstaff, K., & Rotwein, P. S. (1991). Spontaneous differentiation of skeletal my-oblasts is dependent upon autocrine secretion of insulin-like growth factor-II. Journal of Biolog-ical Chemistry, 266(24), 15917-15923.
• Fraeye, I., Kratka, M., Vandenburgh, H., & Thorrez, L. (2020). Sensorial and nutritional aspects of cultured meat in comparison to tradi-tional meat: much to be inferred. Frontiers in Nutrition, 7, 35.
• Future Food (2020). Cultured Meat. https://www.futurefood.org/in-vitro-meat/index_en.php April 16. Gomez-Luciano, C. A., Loyola, I. E. D. E. S., Vriesekoop, F., & Urbano, B. (2019). Towards food security of alternative dietary proteins: A comparison between Spain and the Dominican Republic. Amfiteatru Economic, 21(51), 393-407. doi:10.24818/EA/2019/51/393.
• Gross, R. (2014). How will religious authorities deal with lab grown meat? https://geneticliteracyproject.org/2014/09/17/how-will-religious-authorities-deal-with-lab-grown-meat/
• Heid, M. (2021). You asked: Should I be nerv-ous about lab grown meat. Time Magazine. https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/asked-nervous-lab-grown-meat-120000235.html
• Hocquette, A., Lambert, C., Sinquin, C., Pete-rolff, L., Wagner, Z., Bonny, S. P. F., Lebert, A., & Hocquette, J. F. (2015). Educated con-sumers don’t believe artificial meat is the solu-tion to the problems with the meat industry. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 14(2), 273-284.
• Hocquette, J. F. (2016). Is in vitro meat the solution for the future? Meat Science, 120, 167-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.04.036
• Hoek, A. C., van Boekel, M. A., Voordouw, J., & Luning, P. A. (2011). Identification of new food alternatives: How do consumers categorize meat and meat substitutes? Food Quality and Preference, 22(4), 371-383.
• Hopkins, P. D., & Dacey, A. (2008). Vegetarian meat: Could technology save animals and satis-fy meat eaters? Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 21(6), 579-596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-008-9110-0
• Javaid, M., & Haleem, A. (2019). 4D printing applications in medical field: a brief review. Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health, 7(3), 317-321.
• Karasungur, M. (2021). StartersHub, tridi ve biftek’e toplamda 162 bin 500 dolar yatırım yaptı. Girişim. https://girisim.io/startershub-tridi-ve-bifteke-toplamda-162-bin-500-dolar-yatirim-yapti/
• Kenigsberg, J. A., & Zivotofsky, A. Z. (2020). A Jewish religious perspective on cellular agri-culture. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 22 January 2020. doi:10.3389/fsufs.2019.00128
• Ko, H. J., Wen, Y., Choi, J. H., Park, B. R., Kim, H. W., & Park, H. J. (2021). Meat analog production through artificial muscle fiber inser-tion using coaxial nozzle-assisted three-dimensional food printing. Food Hydrocolloids, 120, 106898.
• Li, B. J., Li, P. H., Huang, R. H., Sun, W. X., Wang, H., Li, Q. F., Chen, J., Wu, W. J., & Liu, H. L. (2015). Isolation, culture and identifica-tion of porcine skeletal muscle satellite cells. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 28(8), 1171.
• Mancini, M. C., & Antonioli, F. (2019). Explor-ing consumers' attitude towards cultured meat in Italy. Meat Science, 150, 101-110.
• Mannello, F., & Tonti, G. A. (2007). Concise review: No breakthroughs for human mesen-chymal and embryonic stem cell culture: Con-ditioned medium, feeder layer, or feeder‐free; medium with fetal calf serum, human serum, or enriched plasma; serum‐free, serum replace-ment nonconditioned medium, or ad hoc for-mula? All that glitters is not gold! Stem Cells, 25(7), 1603-1609.
• Marcu, A., Gaspar, R., Rutsaert, P., Seibt, B., Fletcher, D., Verbeke, W., & Barnett, J. (2015). Analogies, metaphors, and wondering about the future: Lay sense-making around synthetic meat. Public Understanding of Science, 24(5), 547-562. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662514521106
• Martin, I., Wendt, D., & Heberer, M. (2004). The role of bioreactors in tissue engineering. Trends in Biotechnology, 22(2), 80-86.
• Mateti, T., Laha, A., & Shenoy, P. (2022). Arti-ficial meat industry: Production, methodology, challenges, and future. JOM, 74(9), 3428-3444.
• Okur, H. C., Onay, T., & Uçar, A. (2023). Al-ternatif protein kaynağı: Yapay et. BANÜ Sağlık Bilimleri ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(3), 272-281. doi:10.46413/boneyusbad.1285248
• Orellana, N., Sanchez, E., Benavente, D., Prieto, P., Enrione, J., & Acevedo, C. (2020). A new edible film to produce in vitro meat. Foods, 9(2). doi:10.3390/foods9020185
• Pandurangan, M., & Kim, D. H. (2015). A nov-el approach for in vitro meat production. Ap-plied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 99(13), 5391-5395.
• Pitesky, M. E., Stackhouse, K. R., & Mit-loehner, F. M. (2009). Clearing the air: Live-stock's contribution to climate change. In L. S. Donald (Ed.), Advances in agronomy (Vol. 103, pp. 1-40). Academic Press.
• Poinski, M. (2021). Aleph farms and the tech-nion reveal world’s first cultivated ribeye steak. Food Dive. https://www.fooddive.com/news/aleph-farms-unveils-worldsfirst-cell-based-ribeye-steak/594830/
• Post, M. J., & Hocquette, J.-F. (2017). New Sources of Animal Proteins: Cultured Meat. In P. P. Purslow (Ed.), New Aspects of Meat Qual-ity (pp. 425-441). Woodhead Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100593-4.00017-5
• Rolland, N. C. M., Markus, C. R., & Post, M. J. (2020). The effect of information content on acceptance of cultured meat in a tasting context. PLoS ONE, 15(10). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0231176
• Schneider, Z. (2013). In vitro meat: space trav-el, cannibalism, and federal regulation. Houston Law Review, 5, 991. Schnitzler, A. C., Verma, A., Kehoe, D. E., Jing, D., Murrell, J. R., Der, K. A., Aysola, M., Rapiejko, P. J., Punreddy, S., & Rook, M. S. (2016). Bioprocessing of human mesenchymal stem/ stromal cells for therapeutic use: current technologies and challenges. Biochemical En-gineering Journal, 108, 3-13.
• Smith, A. (2021). U.S. Views of technology and the future: Science in the next 50 years. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2014/04/17/us-views-of-technology-and-the-future
• Snyman, C., Goetsch, K. P., Myburgh, K. H., & Niesler, C. U. (2013). Simple silicone chamber system for in vitro three-dimensional skeletal muscle tissue formation. Frontiers in Physiolo-gy, 4, 349.
• Sürek, E., & Uzun, P. (2020). Geleceğin alter-natif protein kaynağı: Yapay et. Akademik Gıda, 18(2), 209-216. doi:10.24323/akademik-gida.758840
• Ünver Alçay, A., Sağlam A., Yalçın,S. & Bos-tan, K. (2018). Possible Protein Sources for the Future. https://doi.org/10.24323/akademik-gida.449865
• Tuomisto, H. L., & Teixeira de Mattos, M. J. (2011). Environmental impacts of cultured meat production. Environmental Science & Technology, 45(14), 6117-6123.
• Tuomisto, H. L., & Roy, A. G. (2012). Could cultured meat reduce environmental impact of agriculture in Europe. Proceedings of The 8th İnternational Conference in Life Cycle Assess-ment in The Agri-Food Sector, 615-619.
• Valente, J. D. P. S., Fiedler, R. A., Heidemann, M. S., & Molento, C. F. M. (2019). First glimpse on attitudes of highly educated con-sumers towards cell-based meat and related issues in Brazil. PLoS ONE, 14(8), 1-12. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0221129.
• Van Eelen, W. F. (2007). Industrial scale pro-duction of meat using cell culture methods (U.S. Patent No. 7, 270, 829). U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/00/69/34/1a632a16cfa069/US7270829B2.pdf
• Verbeke, W., Marcu, A., Rutsaert, P., Gaspar, R., Seibt, B., Fletcher, D., & Barnett, J. (2015). ‘Would you eat cultured meat?’ Consumers' reactions and attitude formation in Belgium, Portugal and the United Kingdom. Meat Sci-ence, 102, 49-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.11.013
• Wang, Y., Xiao, X., & Wang, L. (2020). In vitro characterization of goat skeletal muscle satellite cells. Animal Biotechnology, 31(2), 115-121.
• Weinrich, R., Strack, M., & Neugebauer, F. (2020). Consumer acceptance of cultured meat in Germany. Meat Science, 162, 107924. doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2019.107924
• Welin, S., & Van der Weele, C. (2012). Cul-tured meat: will it separate us from nature? In T. Potthast & S. Meisch (Eds.), Climate change and sustainable development. Wageningen Ac-ademic Publishers.
• Woll, S., & Böhm, I. (2018). In-vitro meat: a solution for problems of meat production and consumption? Ernahrungs Umschau, 65(1), 12-21. doi:10.4455/eu.2018.003
• Yetim, H., & Tekiner, İ. H. (2020). Alternatif protein kaynaklarından yapay et üretimi kavramına eleştirel bir bakış. Helal ve Etik Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(2), 85-100.
• Yıbar, A., & Çetin, E. (2014). Hayvan refahının et kalitesi üzerine etkileri. Uludağ Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 32(2), 31-37.
• Zhang, G., Zhao, X., Li, X., Du, G., Zhou, J., & Chen, J. (2020). Challenges and possibilities for biomanufacturing cultured meat. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 97, 443-450.