“My Dreams and My Career” on Higher Education: Opinions of Faculty of Sport Sciences Academicians on Organizational Socialization

Yıl 2024, , 108 - 117, 30.04.2024

Sena Nur Doğusan , Begüm Yaşar Sönmez , Cemal Yalçın , Funda Koçak

https://doi.org/10.5961/higheredusci.1372999

Öz

The purpose of this study is to investigate the organizational socialization experiences of the academic staff of the sport sciences in
terms of the behavioral and affective outcomes of organizational socialization. The Organizational Socialization Model (OSM) serves
as the foundation for the study’s theoretical framework. The phenomenological pattern in the interpretative paradigm served as the
foundation for this study’s qualitative research methodology. 11 academicians (3 females and 8 men) were willingly recruited for the
study using the maximum diversity sampling approach, one of the purposeful sampling techniques. A semi-structured interview form
with 15 open-ended questions and personal information questions was used to collect the data. The acquired data were analyzed using a
content analysis method. Validity and reliability were ensured in the study using the credibility, transferability, reliability, and verifiability
methodologies. Academics’ perspectives on affective results for organizational socialization were viewed as intrinsic work motivation and
job engagement, whereas their views on behavioral outcomes for organizational socialization were seen as staying in the organization
and being innovative and collaborating to achieve goals. It has been acknowledged that controls are required in academic advancement
standards and that financial support is insufficient for participation in international meetings and organizations, which are important for
academic socialization. It has been highlighted that the academicians from the Faculty of Sport Sciences who are taking part in the study
are well integrated with their field. Additionally, academics have argued that it’s important to maintain socially acceptable connections
throughout each phase of a professional development process. As a result, it is acknowledged that organizational socialization affects
professional development significantly.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Academician, Organizational socialization, Sports sciences

Yükseköğretimde “Hayallerim ve Meslek Hayatım”: Spor Bilimleri Fakültesi Akademik Personelinin Örgütsel Sosyalleşmeye İlişkin Görüşleri

Öz

Bu araştırmada spor bilimleri alanında görev alan akademik personelin örgütsel sosyalleşme sürecinde yaşadıkları deneyimleri, örgütsel
sosyalleşmenin davranışsal ve duyuşsal çıktıları açısından derinlemesine incelemek amaçlanmıştır. Araştırmanın teorik çerçevesi Örgütsel
Sosyalleşme Modeli’ne (ÖSM) dayanmaktadır. Nitel araştırma yaklaşımındaki çalışma yorumlayıcı paradigmada fenomenolojik desende
tasarlanmıştır. Amaçlı örnekleme yöntemlerinden maksimum çeşitlilik örnekleme yöntemine göre seçilen 11 akademisyen (3 kadın
ve 8 erkek) araştırmaya gönüllü olarak katılım göstermiştir. Veriler, kişisel bilgi formunun yanı sıra 15 adet açık uçlu soruyu içeren yarı
yapılandırılmış görüşme formu kullanılarak toplanmıştır. Elde edilen verilerin analizinde içerik analizi yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Araştırmada
geçerlik ve güvenirliği sağlamak amacıyla inandırıcılık, aktarılabilirlik, güvenilebilirlik ve doğrulanabilirlik stratejileri temel alınmıştır.
Akademisyenlerin örgütsel sosyalleşmeye yönelik davranışsal çıktılar üzerindeki görüşleri hedeflere ulaşmak için yenilik ve iş birliği
içerisinde olmak ve örgütte kalmak olarak görülürken, duyuşsal çıktılar üzerindeki görüşleri, işe katılım ve içsel iş motivasyonu olarak ifade
edilmiştir. Özellikle akademik sosyalleşme açısından önemli görülen uluslararası organizasyon ve toplantılara katılmada maddi desteklerin
yetersiz kaldığı ve akademik yükselme kriterlerinde düzenlemelere ihtiyaç duyulduğu anlaşılmıştır. Araştırmaya katılan Spor Bilimleri
Fakültesi akademisyenlerinin meslekleri ile bütünleşmelerinin üst düzeyde olduğu görülmüştür. Ayrıca akademisyenler tarafından
mesleki gelişim süreçlerinde sosyal olarak doğru etkileşimler içinde kalmanın önemli görüldüğü ifade edilmiştir. Sonuç olarak, örgütsel
sosyalleşmenin mesleki gelişim üzerinde önemli bir rol oynadığı anlaşılmaktadır

Anahtar Kelimeler

Akademik personel, Örgütsel sosyalleşme, Spor bilimleri

Etik Beyan

Çalışmanın etik kurul izni Ankara Üniversitesi Etik kurulundan alınmıştır. Ek dosya olarak sisteme yüklenmiştir.

Kaynakça

• Austin, A. E. (2002). Preparing the next generation of faculty: Graduate school as socialization to the academic career. The Journal of Higher Education, 73(1), 94-122.
• Ataman, F., & Kondakçı, Y. (2016). Predictors of Organizational Socialization of Instructors in Higher Education. Education & Science/Egitim ve Bilim, 41(184).
• Balcı, A. (2003). Örgütsel Sosyalleşme: Kuram ve Araştırma. PEGEMA Yayıncılık. Ankara.
• Balcı, A., Karabulut, N., Gürses Kürçe, S., & Ernas, S. (2019). Teachers’ organizational and professional socialization: The case of Ankara. Pegem Eğitim ve Öğretim Dergisi, 9(1), 305- 350, http://dx.doi.org/10.14527/pegegog.2019.010.
• Barrett, J. L., Mazerolle, S. M., & Rizzo, J. J. (2019). Exploring experiences of organizational socialization among physical therapy and athletic training junior faculty members. Journal of Physical Therapy Education, 33(4), 273-281.
• Bauer, H. H., Sauer, N. E., & Schmitt, P. (2005). Customer-based brand equity in the team sport industry. European Journal of Marketing, 39 (5/6), 496-513.
• Benson, A. J., & Eys, M. (2017). Understanding the consequences of newcomer integration processes: The sport team socialization tactics questionnaire. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 39(1), 13-28.
• Benson, A. J., Evans, M. B., & Eys, M. A. (2016). Organizational socialization in team sport environments. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 26(4), 463-473.
• Bilyalov, D. (2018). Organizational socialization and job satisfaction of faculty at Nazarbayev University in Kazakhstan. European Education, 50(3), 229-248.
• Birnbaum, R., & Edelson, P. J. (1989). How colleges work: The cybernetics of academic organization and leadership. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 37(3), 27-29.
• Bruner, M. W., Boardley, I. D., & Côté, J. (2014). Social identity and prosocial and antisocial behavior in youth sport. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 15(1), 56-64.
• Cawyer, C. S., & Friedrich, G. W. (1998). Organizational socialization: Processes for new communication faculty. Communication Education, 47(3), 234-245.
• Cinar, D. B., & Tanrıöğen, A. (2022). Üniversitelerin Örgüt Yapısı ile Akademisyenlerin Örgütsel Sosyalleşmeleri Arasındaki İlişki. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 20(2), 541-567.
• Commeiras, N., Loubes, A., & Bories-Azeau, I. (2013). Identification of organizational socialization tactics: The case of sales and marketing trainees in higher education. European Management Journal, 31(2), 164-178.
• Creswell, J. W. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. (Çev: M. Bütün & S. B. Demir). Ankara: Siyasal Kitabevi
• Creswell, J. W., Clark, V. L. P. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd Edition). Sage publications.
• Curtner‐Smith, M. D. (1997). The impact of biography, teacher education, and organizational socialization on the perspectives and practices of first‐year physical education teachers: Case studies of recruits with coaching orientations. Sport, Education and Society, 2(1), 73-94.
• Deenihan, J. T., & MacPhail, A. (2017). The influence of organizational socialization in preservice teachers’ delivery of sport education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 36(4), 477-484.
• Duncheon, J. C. (2020). “We are exposed to that college environment”: Exploring the socialization of early college high school students. Community College Review, 48(2), 173-194.
• Ensign, J., & Mays Woods, A. (2017). Navigating the realities of the induction years: Exploring approaches for supporting beginning physical education teachers. Quest, 69(1), 80-94.
• Feldman, D. C. (1981). The multiple socialization of organization members. Academy of Management Review, 6(2), 309-318.
• Fleming, S. S., Goldman, A. W., Correli, S. J., & Taylor, C. J. (2016). Settling in: The role of individual and departmental tactics in the development of new faculty networks. The Journal of Higher Education, 87(4), 544-572.
• Fontana, J. L., Cranmer, G. A., & Sollitto, M. (2021). “Next Person Up”: Understanding Collegiate Student-Athletes’ Socialization Experiences With Teammate Exit. Communication & Sport, 9(2), 308-329.
• Guba, E. G. (1981). Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. ECTJ, 29(2), 75.
• Hartley, K. C. (1992). Socialization by Way of Symbolic Interactionism and Culture Theory: A Communication Perspective. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the speech Communication Association (78th, Chicago, IL, October 29-November 1, 1992) Retrieved from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ ED355560.pdf
• Kelepçe, M. & Özbek, O. (2008). “Gençlik ve Spor Genel Müdürlüğü Personelinin Örgütsel Sosyalleşme Düzeyleri”. SPORMETRE Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 6(3), 113-123.
• Lee, J., Oh, S., & Burnett, G. (2016). Organizational socialization of academic librarians in the United States. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 42(4), 382-389.
• Leo, F. M., López-Gajardo, M. A., González-Ponce, I., García-Calvo, T., Benson, A. J., & Eys, M. (2020). How socialization tactics relate to role clarity, cohesion, and intentions to return in soccer teams. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 50, 101735.
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1986). “But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation”, New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1986 (30), 73-84. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.1427
• Louis, M. R. (1980). ‘Surprise and sense making: What newcomers experience in entering unfamiliar organizational settings’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 25, 226-251.
• Mensch, J., Crews, C., & Mitchell, M. (2005). Competing perspectives during organizational socialization on the role of certified athletic trainers in high school settings. Journal of Athletic Training, 40(4), 333.
• Merriam, S. B. (2015). Nitel Araştırma Desen ve Uygulama için Bir Rehber. (Çev. Ed. S. Turan). Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
• Murray, J. P. (2008). New faculty members’ perceptions of the academic work life. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 17(1-2), 107-128.
• Moyson, S., Raaphorst, N., Groeneveld, S., & Van de Walle, S. (2018). Organizational socialization in public administration research: A systematic review and directions for future research. The American Review of Public Administration, 48(6), 610-627.
• Nelson, D. L. (1987). Organizational socialization: A stress perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 8(4), 311-324. Nouri, H., & Parker, R. J. (2020). Turnover in public accounting firms: a literature review. Managerial Auditing Journal, 35(2), 294-321.
• Patton MQ. (2002). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. (3rd Edition). Thousands Oaks: Sage.
• Pitney, W. A., & Mazerolle, S. M. (2012). Organizational socialization experiences of athletic trainers working in the clinical context. Athletic Training and Sports Health Care, 4(6), 265-274.
• Porter, L. W., Lawler, E. E., & Hackman, J. R. (1975). Behavior in organizations. McGraw-Hill.
• Saks, A. M., & Gruman, J. A. (2011). Organizational socialization and positive organizational behaviour: Implications for theory, research, and practice. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l’Administration, 28(1), 14-26.
• Saks, A., & Gruman, J. A. (2014). Making organizations more effective through organizational socialization. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 1(3), 261-280.
• Schein, E. H. (2003). Organizational socialization and the profession of management. Organizational influence processes, 36(3), 283-294.
• Taormina, R. J. (2009). Organizational socialization: the missing link between employee needs and organizational culture. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 24(7), 650-676.
• Tierney, W. G. (1997). Organizational socialization in higher education. The Journal of Higher Education, 68(1), 1-16.
• Tierney, W. G., & Rhoads, R. A. (1993). Enhancing Promotion, Tenure and Beyond: Faculty Socialization as a Cultural Process. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 6. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports, The George Washington University, One Dupont Circle, Suite 630, Washington, DC 20036-1183.
• Quick, J. C. and Quick, J. D. (1984). Organizational Stress and Preventive Management, McGraw-Hill, New York.
• Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2016). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
• YÖK İstatistik, (2023). Retrieved from: https://istatistik.yok.gov.tr/. Zipp, G. P., Maher, C., & Falzarano, M. (2015). An observational study exploring academic mentorship in physical therapy. Journal of Allied Health, 44(2), 96-100.