Dijital Okuryazarlık Düzeyinin Uzaktan Eğitimden Memnuniyete Etkisinde Uzaktan Eğitime Yönelik Tutumun Aracı Rolü

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, COVID-19 pandemi sürecinde akademisyenlerin dijital okuryazarlık düzeylerinin, uzaktan eğitim memnuniyetleri üzerindeki etkisinde uzaktan eğitime yönelik tutumlarının aracı rolünün olup olmadığını incelemektir. Araştırmanın amacına uygun olarak hazırlanan anket aracılığı ile İnönü Üniversitesi’nde uzaktan eğitim veren 341 akademisyenden veriler toplanmıştır. Araştırmanın bağımlı değişkeni olan akademisyenlerin uzaktan eğitimden memnuniyetleri iki faktörden oluşmuştur. Bu faktörler; dersin işlenişinden memnuniyet ve alt yapı memnuniyeti şeklindedir. Yapılan analiz sonucunda dijital okuryazarlık düzeyinin, uzaktan eğitimde dersin işlenişinden memnuniyet üzerindeki etkisinde uzaktan eğitime yönelik tutumun tam aracı rolüne sahip olduğu ve dijital okuryazarlık düzeyinin, alt yapı memnuniyeti üzerindeki etkisinde uzaktan eğitime yönelik tutumun kısmi aracı rolüne sahip olduğu tespit edilmiştir

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Covid-19
• Dijital Okuryazarlık
• Uzaktan Eğitim
• Memnuniyet
• Tutum

The Mediating Role of Attitude towards Distance Education in the Effect of Digital Literacy Level on Satisfaction with Distance Education

Öz

This study aims to examine whether the attitudes towards distance education have a mediating role in the effect of academicians’ digital literacy levels on their satisfaction with distance education during the COVID-19 pandemic. The data were collected from 341 academicians who teach distance education courses at Inonu University. The academicians’ satisfaction with distance education which is the dependent variable of the study, consisted of two factors. These factors are satisfaction with the teaching of the course and satisfaction with the infrastructure. As a result of the analysis, it was determined that the attitude towards distance education has a complete mediation role in the effect of digital literacy level on satisfaction with the teaching of the course in distance education, and that the attitude towards distance education has a partial mediation role in the effect of digital literacy level on satisfaction with the infrastructure

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Covid-19
• Digital Literacy
• Distance Education
• Satisfaction
• Attitude

Kaynakça

1. Adıgüzel, Z., Çakir, F. S., & Atalay, A. (2021). The mediation role of perceived organizational support in the effect of workplace spirituality on job control and organizational citizenship. Ataturk University Journal of Economics And Administrative Sciences, 35(1), 125–149.
2. Afşar, B., & Büyükdoğan, B. (2020). Assessments of FBAS and FSHS students about distance education during the Covid-19 pandemic period. Journal of Karatay Social Research, (5), 161–182.
3. Ağaç, S. (2020). Dijital okuryazarlığın finansal okuryazarlık üzerine etkisi: Batı akdeniz örneği (Unpublished master's thesis). Süleymen Demirel Üniversitesi, Isparta.
4. Akcil, U., & Bastas, M. (2021). Examination of university students' attitudes towards e-learning during the COVID-19 pandemic process and the relationship of digital citizenship. Contemporary Educational Technology, 13(1), ep291.
5. Akdemir, Ö. (2011). Distance education in Turkish higher education. Journal of Higher Education and Science, 1(2), 69–71.
6. Alnagar, D. K. F. (2020). Using artificial neural network to predicted student satisfaction in e-learning. American Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, 8(3), 90-95.
7. Alshangeeti, A., Alsaghier, H., & Nguyen, A. (2009). Faculty perceptions of attributes affecting the diffusion of online learning in Saudi Arabia: A quantitative study. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on E-Learning, 10–24.
8. Altuntaş, E. Y., Başaran, M., Özeke, B., & Yılmaz, H. (2020). Perception levels of university students about remote learning strategies and learning experiences in the Covid-19 pandemic process. International Journal of Public Relations and Advertising Studies, 3(2), 8–23.

9. Amsal, A. A., Lusia, S., Febri, P., Mellyna, R., & Yan, E. (2021). Perceived satisfaction and perceived usefulness of e-learning : The role of ınteractive learning and social influence. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Educational Development and Quality Assurance (ICED-QA 2020), 535–541.
10. Ariawan, V. A. N., & Pratiwi, I. M. (2020). Digital literacy abilities of students in distance learning. 4th International Conference on Language, Literature, Culture, and Education (ICOLLITE 2020), 592–598. Atlantis Press.
11. Arklan, Ü., & Taşdemir, E. (2013). The information society and communication: mass media and internet at the diffusion process of information. Journal of Selcuk Communication, 5 (3), 67-80.
12. Arslan, S. (2019). İlkokullarda ve ortaokullarda görev yapan öğretmenlerin dijital okuryazarlık düzeylerinin çeşitli değişkenler açısından incelenmesi (Unpublished master's thesis). Sakarya Üniversitesi, Sakarya.
13. Ateş, A., & Altun, E. (2008). Investigating preservice computer teachers’ attitudes towards distance learning regarding various variables. Gazi University Journal of Gazi Educational Faculty, 28(3), 125–145.
14. Aylin, Y., Yaylak, E., & Genç, G. (2020). Digital literacy levels of prospective preschool and primary school teachers. ODU Journal of Social Sciences Research, 10(2), 274–286.
15. Barış, M. F., & Çankaya, P. (2016). Opinions of academic staff about distance education. International Journal of Human Sciences, 13(1), 399-413.
16. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal Of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.
17. Bayrak Kök, S. (2010). İş tatmini ve örgütsel bağlılığın incelenmesine yönelik bir araştırma. Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 20(1), 291–317.
18. Biesanz, J. C., Falk, C. F., & Savalei, V. (2010). Assessing mediational models: Testing and interval estimation for indirect effects. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 45(4), 661-701.
19. Brinkerhoff, J., & Koroghlanian, C. M. (2005). Student computer skills and attitudes toward internet-delivered instruction: An assessment of stability over time and place. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(1), 27–56.
20. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2018). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
21. Can, E. (2020). Coronavirüs (Covid-19) pandemisi ve pedagojik yansımaları: Türkiye’de açık ve uzaktan eğitim uygulamaları. Journal of Open Education Applications and Research, 6(2), 11-53.
22. Çalık, D., & Çınar, Ö. P. (2009). Geçmişten günümüze bilgi yaklaşımları bilgi toplumu ve internet. XIV. Türkiye'de İnternet Konferansı, 12-13.
23. Çetin, O., Çalışkan, E., & Menzi, N. (2013). The views of academics about web-based instruction. Elementary Education Online, 12(3), 886–902.
24. Chen, G. D., Ou, K. L., Liu, C. C., & Liu, B. J. (2001). Intervention and strategy analysis for web group-learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17(1), 58–71.
25. Churchill, N., Ping, L. C., Oakley, G., & Churchill, D. (2008). Digital storytelling and digital literacy learning. Proceedings Of International Conference On Information Communication Technologies In Education (ICICTE), 418–430.
26. Çiçekdağı, M., Tekin, E., & Tekin, M. (2013). Uzaktan eğitim algısı ve imajı: selçuk üniversitesi öğrencileri üzerinde bir uygulama. Ulusal Uzaktan Eğitim ve Teknolojileri Sempozyumu, 81–91. Konya.
27. Coşkun, R., Altunışık, R., & Yıldırım, E. (2019). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri SPSS uygulamalı (10th ed). Sakarya: Sakarya Yayıncılık.
28. Dalğar, H., Alparslan, A. M., & Sungur, O. (2017). Factors affecting academic staffs’ university satisfaction: comparison between vocational schools and schools/faculties. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 9(21), 412–420.
29. Durak, G., Çankaya, S., & İzmirli, S. (2020). Examining the turkish universities’ distance education systems during the COVID-19 pandemic. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(1), 787-809.
30. Dursun, T., Oskaybaş, K., & Gökmen, C. (2013). The quality of service of the distance education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 103, 1133–1151.
31. Fidalgo, P., Thormann, J., Kulyk, O., & Lencastre, J. A. (2020). Students’ perceptions on distance education: A multinational study. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17, 1–18.
32. Fidan, M. (2016). Distance education students’ attitudes towards distance education and their epistemological beliefs. H. U. Journal of Education, 31(3), 536–550.
33. Gilster, P. (1997). Digital literacy. New York. John Wiley.
34. Gök, B., & Kılıç Çakmak, E. (2020). The Perception of distance education faculty members regarding distance education. Kastamonu Educational Journal, 28(5), 1915–1931.
35. Gökdaş, İ. & Kayri, M. (2005). E-learning – the problems and solution recommends in terms of turkey situation. Van Yuzuncu Yil University Journal of Education, 2(2).
36. Gürbüz, S. (2019). Sosyal bilimlerde aracı, düzenleyici ve durumsal etki analizleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
37. Gürcan, H. İ. (2011). İnternette medya okuryazarlığı yaklaşımı. XVI. Türkiye’de İnternet Konferansı, 30 Kasım-2 Aralık 2011, Ege Üniversitesi Atatürk Kültür Merkezi.
38. Gürer, M. D., Tekinarslan, E., & Yavuzalp, N. (2016). Opinions of instructors who give lectures online about distance education. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 7(1), 47-78.
39. Hamutoğlu, N. B., Güngören, Ö. C., Uyanık, G. K., & Erdoğan, D. G. (2017). Adapting digital literacy scale into Turkish. Ege Journal of Education, 18(1), 408–429.
40. Harrison, T. (2020). How distance education students perceive the impact of teaching videos on their learning. Open Learning, 35(3), 260–276.
41. Hayes, A. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76(4), 408-420.
42. Hayes, A. F., & Rockwood, N. J. (2017). Regression-based statistical mediation and moderation analysis in clinical research: Observations, recommendations, and implementation. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 39-57.
43. Hayes, A. F., & Scharkow, M. (2013). The relative trustworthiness of inferential tests of the indirect effect in statistical mediation analysis: Does method really matter?. Psychological Science, 24(10), 1918-1927.
44. Hebebci, M. T., Bertiz, Y., & Alan, S. (2020). Investigation of views of students and teachers on distance education practices during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science, 4(4), 267–282.
45. Hong, K. S. (2002). Relationships between students’ and instructional variables with satisfaction and learning from a web-based sourse. Internet and Higher Education, 5(3), 267–281.
46. Ilonga, A., Ashipala, D. O., & Tomas, N. (2020). Challenges experienced by students studying through open and distance learning at a higher education institution in Namibia: Implications for strategic planning. International Journal of Higher Education, 9(4), 116–127.
47. İnan, C. (2013). Evaluatıon of the views of faculty members from Dicle University about distance education. Electronic Journal of Education Sciences, 2(4), 66–73.
48. İstanbul Arel Üniversitesi. (2020). İstanbul Arel Üniversitesi pandemi dönemi uzaktan eğitim sistemi öğretim elemanı memnuniyet anketi. Retrieved from: https://www.arel.edu.tr/files/website/komisyonlar/akademik_degerlendirme_ve_kalite_gelistirme_komisyonu/Anket/2020/Pandemi Öğretim Elemanı Memnuniyet Anketi Rapor.pdf.
49. Jan, S. (2018). Investigating the relationship between students’ digital literacy and their attitude towards using ICT. International Journal of Educational Technology, 5(2), 26-34.
50. Jin, S. H. (2005). Analyzing student-student and student-instructor interaction through multiple communication tools in web-based learning. International Journal of Instructional Media, 32(1), 59–68.
51. Karabacak, Z. İ., & Sezgin, A. A. (2019). Digital transformation and digital literacy in Turkey. Türk İdare Dergisi, (488), 319–343.
52. Karagöz, Y. (2019). SPSS ve AMOS uygulamalı nitel-nicel-karma bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri ve yayın etiği (2nd ed.). Ankara: Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
53. Karatepe, F., Küçükgençay, N., & Peker, B. (2020). What are the perspectives of teacher candidates on synchronous distance education? A survey study. Journal of Social and Humanities Sciences Research, 7(53), 1262–1274.
54. Karavida, V., Charissi, A., & Tympa, E. (2021). Greek university students’ attitudes about distance education due to emergency circumstances. European Journal of Open Education and E-learning Studies, 6(1), 14-24.
55. Kaya, M., Çitil Akyol, C., Özbek, R., & Pepeler, E. (2017). Views of academicians in 'department of educational sciences' about 'distance education application' at post-graduate education programs. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 16(64), 1616–1627.
56. Keleş, M. (2020). Uzaktan eğitim platformlarının avantajları ve dezavantajları. Retrived from: https://binbiriz.com/blog/uzaktan-egitim-platformlarinin-avantajlari-dezavantajlari.
57. Keskin, M., & Özer Kaya, D. (2020). Evaluation of students’ feedbacks on web-based distance education in the COVID-19 process. İzmir Katip Çelebi University Faculty of Health Science Journal, 5(2), 59–67.
58. Koç, F. , Kaya, N. , Özbek, V., & Akkılıç, M. E. (2014). Mediation effect of perceived service quality between perceived price and consumer trust: A study toward comparison of banking and gsm industries. Journal of Marketing and Marketing Research, 7 (13) , 1-26.
59. Koloğlu, T. F. (2016). Öğretim elemanlarının uzaktan eğitime bakış açıları ve hazırbulunuşlukları: Ordu üniversitesi örneği (Unpublished master's thesis). Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi, Afyon.
60. Korkmaz, M. (2020). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin dijital okuryazarlık seviyelerinin belirlenmesi (Unpublished master's thesis). Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi, Eskişehir.
61. Korucuk, B. (2020). A Study on the rating of distance education satisfaction factors from classroom teachers: An example of Giresun. Instructional Technology and Lifelong Learning, 1(2), 189–202.
62. Kozan, M. (2018). Bilgisayar ve öğretim teknolojileri eğitimi bölümü öğretmen adaylarının dijital okuryazarlık düzeyleri ve siber zorbalığa ilişkin duyarlılıklarının incelenmesi (Unpublished master's thesis). Fırat Üniversitesi, Elazığ.
63. Kul, S. (2020). The investigation of the relationship of internet addiction with digital literacy and various other variables. International Journal of Management Information Systems and Computer Science, 4(1), 28–41.
64. Kurnaz, E., & Serçemeli, M. (2020). A research on academicans’ perspectives on distance education and distance accounting education in the COVID-19 pandemic period. International Journal of Social Sciences Academy, 2(3), 262–288.
65. Lee, J. A., & Busch, P. E. (2005). Factors related to instructors’ willingness to participate in distance education. Journal of Educational Research, 99(2), 109–115.
66. Lloyd, S. A., Byrne, M. M., & Mccoy, T. S. (2012). Faculty-perceived barriers of online education. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 8(1), 1–12.
67. Maphosa, C., & Bhebhe, S. (2019). Digital literacy: A must for open distance and e-learning (ODeL) students. European Journal of Education Studies, 5(10), 186–199.
68. Marek, M. W., Chew, C. S., & Wu, W. V. (2021). Teacher experiences in converting classes to distance learning in the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 19(1), 40–60.
69. Markova, T. (2021). Educators’ and students’ perceptions of online distance education before and amid COVID-19: Key concerns and challenges. In SHS Web of Conferences, 99, 01018.
70. Mohammadyari, S., & Singh, H. (2015). Understanding the effect of e-learning on individual performance: The role of digital literacy. Computers and Education, 82, 11–25.
71. Muilenburg, L. Y., & Berge, Z. L. (2005). Student barriers to online learning: A factor analytic study. Distance Education, 26(1), 29–48.
72. Murat, G., & Çevik, E. İ. (2008). The analysis of factors affecting academic personel satisfaction as stakeholder: The case of Zonguldak Karaelmas University. International Journal of Management Economics and Business, 4(8), 1–18.
73. Ocak, G., & Karakuş, G. (2018). Pre-service teachers’ digital literacy self-efficacy scale development. Kastamonu Education Journal, 26(5), 1427–1436.
74. Onursoy, S. (2018). Digital literacy levels of university youth: A research on the students of Anadolu University. Gumushane University e-journal of Faculty of Communication, 6(2), 989–1013.
75. Özdemir, A., & Gürbüz, A. (2020). Determination of satisfaction levels of the academists: Example of Ağrı İbrahim Çeçen University. International Journal of Human Studies, 3(5), 163–179.
76. Özoğlu, C. (2019). Öğretmen adaylarının yaşam boyu öğrenme eğilimleri ile dijital okuryazarlıkları arasındaki ilişki (Unpublished master's thesis). Anadolu Üniversitesi, Eskişehir.
77. Preacher, K. J., & Selig, J. P. (2012). Advantages of monte carlo confidence intervals for indirect effects. Communication Methods and Measures, 6(2), 77-98.
78. Prior, D. D., Mazanov, J., Meacheam, D., Heaslip, G., & Hanson, J. (2016). Attitude, digital literacy and self efficacy: Flow-on effects for online learning behavior. The Internet and Higher Education, 29, 91–97.
79. Sari, T., & Nayir, F. (2020). Challenges in distance education during the (Covid-19) pandemic period. Qualitative Research in Education, 9(3), 328–360.
80. Sayan, H. (2020). Assessment of faculty members' views on distance education during the COVID-19 pandemic process. AJIT-e: Online Academic Journal of Information Technology, 11(42), 100–122.
81. Sekaran, U. (2003). Research methods for business: A skill-building approach, (4th ed). John Wiley & Sons.
82. Shrout P.E., & Bolger N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and non-experimental studies: New procedures and reccomendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422–445.
83. Stone, C. A., & Sobel, M. E. (1990). The robustness of estimates of total indirect effects in covariance structure models estimated by maximum. Psychometrika, 55(2), 337-352.
84. Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociological Methodology, 13, 290–312.
85. Shen, D., Cho, M.-H., Tsai, C.-L., & Marra, R. (2013). Unpacking online learning experiences: Online learning self-efficacy and learning satisfaction. The Internet and Higher Education, 19, 10–17.
86. Shih, Hung-Pin, (2006), Assessing the effects of self-efficacy and competence on individual satisfaction with computer use: An it student perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(6), 1012-1026.
87. Sun, P. C., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y. Y., & Yeh, D. (2008). What drives a successful e-learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers and Education, 50(4), 1183–1202.
88. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th. ed). Boston: Pearson Education.
89. Tang, C. M., & Chaw, L.Y. (2016). Digital literacy: A prerequisite for effective learning in a blended learning environment?. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 14(1), 54-65.
90. Thach, E. C., & Murphy, K. L. (1995). Competencies for distance education professionals. Educational Technology Research and Development, 43(1), 57–79.
91. Tuncer, M., & Tanaş, R. (2011). The evaluation of academicians' views on distance education programs (The samples of Fırat and Tunceli Universities). Elementary Education Online, 10(2), 776–784.
92. TUIK.(2020). Hane halkı bilişim teknolojileri (BT) kullanım araştırması. Retrieved from: https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Hanehalki-Bilisim-Teknolojileri-(BT)-Kullanim-Arastirmasi-2020-33679.
93. Üstündağ, M. T., Güneş, E., & Bahçivan, E. (2017). Turkish adaptation of digital literacy scale and investigating pre-service science teachers’ digital literacy. Journal of Education and Future, (12), 19–29.
94. Uzun, Y., & Çelik, G. (2020). Changes in academicians' perception of literacy. International Journal of Society Researches, 15(22), 1134–1156.
95. Wang, L., & Preacher, K. J. (2015). Moderated mediation analysis using Bayesian methods. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 22(2), 249-263.
96. Wei, H.-C., & Chou, C. (2020). Online learning performance and satisfaction: Do perceptions and readiness matter?. Distance Education, 41(1), 48–69.
97. World Health Organization. (2019). Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. Retrieved from: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019.
98. Wilson, D., Varnhagen, S., Krupa, E., Kasprzak, S., Hunting, V., & Taylor, A. (2003). Instructors’ adaptation to online graduate education in health promotion: A qualitative study. Journal of Distance Education, 18(2), 1–15.
99. Yağcı, K., Efendi, M., & Akçay, S. (2019). Concept of distance education: From perspective of tourism guidance students. Journal of Travel and Tourism Research, (14), 118–136.
100. Yener, S. (2017). THE mediating role of psychological safety in the relation between employee voice and team collaboration. Dokuz Eylul University The Journal of Graduate School of Social Sciences, 19(2), 187–204.
101. Yeşildal, M. (2018). Yetişkin bireylerde dijital okuryazarlık ve sağlık okuryazarlığı arasındaki ilişki: Konya örneği (Unpublished master's thesis). Necbettin Erbakan Üniversitesi, Konya.
102. Zan, N., & Zan, U. B. (2020). Education in emergency at coronavirus: Overview of faculty of letters students included to distance education system from different regions of turkey. Turkish Studies, 15(4), 1367–1394.
103. Zhao, X., Lynch, J. G., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(3), 197-206.