Yükseköğretimde Küresel Bir Değişim: Girişimci Üniversite Modeli

Yıl 2012, Sayı: 2, 92 - 99, 01.08.2012

Süreyya Sakınç Sibel Aybarç Bursalıoğlu

Öz

Üniversiteler, küreselleşme ve uluslararasılaşmanın yarattığı sosyal ve ekonomik değişimlerden etkilenmekte ve işlevleri, sorumluluk alanları, organizasyon yapıları, fon yaratma yetenekleri de bu değişime yanıt vermektedir. Günümüz bilgi toplumunda küreselleşmenin de yarattığı ivme sayesinde girişimci üniversite, şirket üniversitesi, sanal üniversite gibi yeni üniversite türleri ortaya çıkmıştır. Yükseköğretimde artan rekabet ve kitlesel eğitim talepleri üniversiteleri yeni kaynak arayışlarına iterek, girişimci bir niteliğe dönüştürmektedir. Neo-liberal eğitim anlayışının yükseköğretimdeki yansımaları üniversiteleri öğrenci odaklı, küresel kalkınmaya uygun eğitimi amaçlayan, girişimci ve yaratıcı insan kaynağı üreten ve buna uygun eğitim programları geliştiren birer kuruma dönüştürmüştür. Bu çalışmada, girişimci üniversite modelini yaratan ve geliştiren temel etkenleri ve nedenleri araştıran literatür üzerinden kapsamlı bir değerlendirme yapılacaktır. Çalışmanın amacı, literatür sentezine dayalı olarak, girişimci üniversite modelinin dinamik süreçlerini tanımlayan bir çerçeve oluşturmaktır. Çalışmanın katkısı, Türkiye için girişimci üniversite modelinin uygulanabilirliğini sonuç olarak ortaya koyabilme iddiasına bağlı olacaktır. Çalışmada, girişimci üniversite modeli karşılaştırmalı bir yaklaşımla “üçlü sarmal” olgusu ile analiz edilecektir

Anahtar Kelimeler

Girişimci üniversite, Küreselleşme, Bilgi toplumu, Girişimcilik

A Global Change in Higher Education: Entrepreneurial University Model

Öz

Universities are affected by the social and economic diversity stemmed from globalization and internationalization, and its functions, area of responsibility, organizational structure, funding capability respond this diversity. In today’s knowledge society, different new concepts regarding the university education system such as Entrepreneur University, Corporation University, virtual university etc. have been emerged with wave of globalization effect. The rising competition in academic education and the mass demands for education prompt to universities to get seeking new funds for fixing their financial situation, and hit them transforming into entrepreneurial identity. The reflections of neoliberal approach in education have transformed the universities into the corporations which are much more focused on entrepreneurial, student-oriented and aimed to appropriate education and producing creative human resources for global development. In this study, a comprehensive evaluation will be carried on regarding the entrepreneur university model through the litterateur research to investigate its causes and factors that impact and improve it. The aim of the paper is to generate a framework that identifies dynamic processes of entrepreneur university model, dependently the litterateur syntheses. The contribution of the paper will depend on its consequent argument that entrepreneur university model is viable for Turkey. In this paper, the entrepreneur university model will be analyzed by Triple Helix phenomenon with the comparative approach

Anahtar Kelimeler

Entrepreneur university, Globalization, Knowledge society, Entrepreneurship

Kaynakça

• Altbach, P.G., Reisberg, L. & Rumbley, L.E. (2009). Trends in Global Higher Education: Traking an Academic Revolution. UNESCO 2009 World Conference on Higher Education, France.
• Cheng, Y.C. (2001). Paradigm Shift in Higher Education: Globalization, Localization, and Individualization. Ford Foundation Conference on Innovations in African Higher Education, Nairobi, Kenya.
• Clark, B. (2001). The Entrepreneurial University: New Foundations for Collegiality, Autonomy, and Achievement, Higher Education Management, Journal of the Programme on Institutional Management in Higher Education, 13(2), 9 - 24.
• Çetin, M. (2007). Bölgesel Kalkınma ve Girişimci Üniversiteler, Ege Akademik Bakış, 7(1), 217-238.
• Eckel, P. (2002). Governing Entrepreneurial Strategic Alliances That Capitalize on the Curriculum. Changing Enterprises Project of American Council on Education. Retrieved from www.usc.edu/ dept/chepa/gov/rf2002/eckel.pdf
• Etzkowitz, H., & Zhou, C. (2007). Regional Innovation Initiator: The Entrepreneurial University in Various Triple Helix Models. Singapore Triple Helix VI Conference, Theme Paper.
• Fixari, D., Lefebvre, P., & Pallez, F. (2009). Competitiveness Clusters and New Approaches to Public Research: Uncertainties in the Development of the Triple Helix in France. International Colloquium Clusters and Regional Development, Paris.
• Guerrero-Cano, M., Kirby, D., & Urbano, D. (2006). A Literature Review on Entrepreneurial Universities: an Institutional Approach. 3rd Conference of Pre-communications to Congresses, Barcelona.
• Günay, D. (2007). Yirmibirinci Yüzyılda Üniversite, Değişim Çağında Yüksek Öğretim Global Trendler-Paradigmal Yönelimler, (Ed: Coşkun Can Aktan), Yaşar Üniversitesi, İzmir: Birleşik Matbaacılık.
• Jofre, S. & Andersen, P.D. (2009). A Triple Helix approach to the future innovation Flagship of Europe: Exploring the Strategic Deployment of the European Institute of Innovation and Technology, 7th Triple Helix International Scientific and Organising Committees.
• Jones-Evans, D. (1998). Universities, Technology Transfer and Spin-Off Activities-Academic Entrepreneurship in Different European Regions, Final Reports. University of Glamorgan, Targeted Socio-Economic Research Project No 1042.
• Kiper, M. (2010). Dünyada ve Türkiye’de Üniversite –Sanayi İşbirliği ve Bu Kapsamda Üniversite-Sanayi Ortak Araştırma Merkezleri Programı (ÜSAMP), TTGV.
• Klofsten, M., & Jones-Evans, D. (2000). Comparing Academic Entrepreneurship in Europe – The Case of Sweden and Ireland, Small Business Economics, 14 (4), 299-309.
• Leydesdorff, L., & Etzkowitz, H. (2001). The Transformation of University-Industry-Government Relations. Electronic Journal of Sociology, 5(4), 1-17.
• Odabaşı, Y. (2007). 21. Yüzyıl’ın Üniversite Modeli Olarak Girişimci Üniversiteler.
• Coşkun Can Aktan (Ed.), Değişim Çağında Yüksek Öğretim Global Trendler-Paradigmal Yönelimler. İzmir: Birleşik Matbaacılık.
• OECD (2005). Higher Education Management and Policy - Entrepreneurship, Special Issue. Journal of the Programme on Institutional Management in Higher Education, 17(3), 1-147.
• Perkin, H. (2007). History of Universities. In James J.F. Forest & Philip G. Altbach (Eds.), International Handbook of Higher Education (pp.159-205). Netherlands: Springer
• Rinne, R. (2009). The Changing Faces of Higher Education and Inclusion and Exclusion: Nordic Tunes. SANORD 2nd International Conference Inclusion and Exclusion in Higher Education, Rhodes University, Grahamstown, South Africa. Retrieved from http://www.sanord.uwc.ac.za.
• Robertson, I. (2008). Comment: How Universities and Graduates Can Thrive. Retrieved from http://www.independent.co.uk.
• Sabour, M. (2005). The Impact of Globalisation on the Mission of the University. Joseph I. Zajda (Eds.), International Hanbook on Globalisation, Education and Policy Research. Netherlands: Springer.
• Schulte, P. (2004). The Entrepreneurial University: a Strategy for Institutional Development. Higher Education in Europe, 29(2), 187-191.
• Shane, S.A. (2004). Academic Entrepreneurship: University Spinoffs and Wealth Creation, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
• Siegel, D.S., Waldman, D., & Link, A. (2003). Assessing the Impact of Organizational Practices on the Relative Productivity of University Technology Transfer Offices: An Exploratory Study. Research Policy, 32, 27-48.
• Subotzky, G. (1999). Alternatives to the Entrepreneurial University: New Modes of Knowlegde Production in Community Service Programs. Higher Education, 38(4), 401-440.
• Viale, R., & Ghiglione, B. (1998). The Triple Helix Model: A Tool for the Study of European Regional Socio-Economics Systems, in The IPTS Report. Retrieved from www.sociologiadip.unimib.it/ dipartimento_vecchio/Docita/Viale/triplex.PDF
• Yamaç, K. (2009). Bilgi Toplumu ve Üniversiteler, Ankara: Eflatun Yayınevi.
• Yokoyama, K. (2006). Entrepreneurialism in Japanese and UK Universities: Governance, Management, Leadership and Funding. Higher Education, 52(3), 523-555.