Acil Serviste Kan Ürünü İstemlerinin Değerlendirilmesi: Prospektif Gözlemsel Bir Çalışma

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2, 178 - 185, 30.06.2024

Yasemin Özdamar Mehmet Cihat Demir İlter Ağaçkıran Nalan Metin Aksu

https://doi.org/10.52827/hititmedj.1399940

Öz

Amaç: Acil servis kan ürünü istemleri artıyor, ancak aşırı olup olmadığı belirsizdir. Acil hekimleri tarafından yapılan kan ürünü istemlerini ve kullanım oranlarını inceleyerek kan ürünleri istemlerinin aşırı olup olmadığını tespit etmeyi amaçladık.
Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu prospektif, gözlemsel ve tek merkezli çalışma, beş ay içinde üçüncü basamak bir yetişkin acil servisine başvuran 18 yaş ve üzeri hastaların demografik verilerini, kan transfüzyonu endikasyonlarını ve transfüzyon oranlarını incelemiştir.
Bulgular: Bin dört yüz yetmiş beş kan ürünü istemi (hasta başına ortalama 6,92 ünite) incelendi. Bu istemlerin %63,1’i kullanılmadı. Transfüzyon oranları eritrosit süspansiyonu için %40,89, trombosit süspansiyonu için %25,61 ve taze donmuş plazma için %44,34 idi. Kan ürünleri istemenin ana endikasyonları gastrointestinal kanama ve anemiydi. Gastrointestinal kanaması olan hastalarda spesifik olarak eritrosit süspansiyonlarının %30,04’ü, trombosit süspansiyonlarının %31,9’u ve taze donmuş plazmaların %60,56’sı kullanıldı. Travma hastalarında istenen eritrosit süspansiyonlarının %12,75’i, trombosit süspansiyonlarının %0,083’ü ve taze donmuş plazmaların %13,89’u kullanıldı.
Sonuç: Acil serviste kan ürünlerine yönelik aşırı istemler, kaynakların yanlış kullanılmasına neden olabilir. Transfüzyon komitesi, gereksiz istekleri azaltmak ve kaynak kullanımını optimize etmek için özel stratejiler geliştirmeli ve hekim farkındalığını arttırmalıdır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Eritrosit süspansiyonu, kan ürünleri, kaynak kullanımı, taze donmuş plazma, transfüzyon, trombosit süspansiyonu

Evaluation of Blood Product Requests in the Emergency Department: A Prospective Observational Study

Öz

Objective: Emergency department (ED) blood product requests are rising, but it is unclear if they are excessive. We aimed to examine the blood product requests and usage rates made by emergency physicians to determine whether the requests for blood products are excessive.
Material and Method: This prospective, observational, and single-center study analyzed demographic data indications for blood transfusion, and transfusion rates of patients aged 18 years and older admitted to a tertiary adult emergency department in five months.
Results: One thousand four hundred seventy-five blood product requests (with a mean of 6.92 units per patient) were examined. Of 63.1%, these requests were not used. The transfusion rates were 40.89 % for erythrocyte suspension, 25.61% for thrombocyte suspension, and 44.34% for fresh frozen plasma. The main indications for requesting blood products were gastrointestinal bleeding and anemia. Specifically, 30.04% of erythrocyte suspensions, 31.9% of thrombocyte suspensions, and 60.56% of fresh frozen plasma were used for patients with gastrointestinal bleeding. In trauma patients, 12.75% of requested erythrocyte suspensions, 0.083% of thrombocyte suspensions, and 13.89% of fresh frozen plasma were utilized.
Conclusion: Excessive requests for blood products in the emergency department can misuse resources. The transfusion committee should develop specialized strategies and increase physician awareness to reduce unnecessary requests and optimize resource utilization.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Erythrocyte suspension, blood products, fresh frozen plasma, resource utilization, transfusion, thrombocyte suspension

Etik Beyan

This study was initiated in the emergency department of a university hospital following the ethics committee's approval. (Hacettepe University Non-Invasive Clinical Research Ethics Committee, approval ID: GO 18/498-21, dated June 5, 2018.). No human rights were violated during this study, and the study was in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Destekleyen Kurum

None

Teşekkür

None

Kaynakça

• Díaz MQ, Borobia AM, García Erce JA, et al. Appropriate use of red blood cell transfusion in emergency departments: a study in five emergency departments. Blood Transfus 2017;15(3):199-206.
• World Health Assembly. Availability, safety and quality of blood products: report by the Secretariat. World Health Organization. 2010. Available from: URL: https://apps.who. int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA63/A63_20-en.pdf.
• Chow EY. The impact of the type and screen test policy on hospital transfusion practice. Hong Kong Med J 1999;5(3):275-279.
• Thabah R, Sailo L, Bardoloi J, et al. ‘Maximum Surgical Blood Order Schedule’in a newly set-up tertiary care hospital. Anaesthesia, Pain & Intensive Care 2019:28-32.
• Blatchford O, Murray WR, Blatchford M. A risk score to predict need for treatment for upper-gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Lancet 2000;356(9238):1318-1321.
• Amini Kafi-Abad S, Omidkhoda A, Pourfatollah AA. Analysis of hospital blood components wastage in Iran (2005-2015). Transfus Apher Sci 2019;58(1):34-38.
• Kurup R, Anderson A, Boston C, Burns L, George M, Frank M. A study on blood product usage and wastage at the public hospital, Guyana. BMC Res Notes 2016;9:307.
• Heitmiller ES, Hill RB, Marshall CE, et al. Blood wastage reduction using Lean Sigma methodology. Transfusion 2010;50(9):1887-1896.
• Kumari S. Blood transfusion practices in a tertiary care center in Northern India. J Lab Physicians 2017;9(2):71-75.
• Kelly SL, Reed MJ, Innes CJ, Manson L. A review of blood component usage in a large UK emergency department after implementation of simple measures. Emerg Med J 2013;30(10):842-845.
• Cobain TJ, Vamvakas EC, Wells A, Titlestad K. A survey of the demographics of blood use. Transfus Med 2007;17(1):1-15.
• Beckwith H, Manson L, McFarlane C, Reed MJ. A review of blood product usage in a large emergency department over a one-year period. Emerg Med J 2010;27(6):439-442.
• Subramanian A, Sagar S, Kumar S, Agrawal D, Albert V, Misra MC. Maximum surgical blood ordering schedule in a tertiary trauma center in northern India: A proposal. J Emerg Trauma Shock 2012;5(4):321-327.
• Dunbar NM, Olson NJ, Szczepiorkowski ZM, et al. Blood component transfusion and wastage rates in the setting of massive transfusion in three regional trauma centers. Transfusion 2017;57(1):45-52.
• He L, Li ZB, Zhu HD, Wu XL, Tian DA, Li PY. The prediction value of scoring systems in Mallory-Weiss syndrome patients. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019;98(22):e15751.
• Lee DH, Lee KM, Lee SM, et al. Performance of Three Scoring Systems in Predicting Massive Transfusion in Patients with Unstable Upper Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage. Yonsei Med J 2019;60(4):368-374.
• Alzoubaidi D, Lovat LB, Haidry R. Management of non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: where are we in 2018 Frontline Gastroenterol 2019;10(1):35-42.
• Sadeghi A, Belali S, Ali Asgari A, Morovat Z, Malekzadeh R, Emadi A. Inappropriate Packed RBC Transfusion in a Tertiary Care Center. Arch Iran Med 2017;20(2):83-85.
• Rossaint R, Bouillon B, Cerny V, et al. The European guideline on management of major bleeding and coagulopathy following trauma: fourth edition. Crit Care 2016;20:100.
• Carson JL, Grossman BJ, Kleinman S, et al. Red blood cell transfusion: a clinical practice guideline from the AABB*. Ann Intern Med 2012;157(1):49-58.
• Carson JL, Guyatt G, Heddle NM, et al. Clinical Practice Guidelines From the AABB: Red Blood Cell Transfusion Thresholds and Storage. Jama 2016;316(19):2025-2035.
• Reed MJ, Kelly SL, Beckwith H, Innes CJ, Manson L. Successful implementation of strategies to transform Emergency Department transfusion practice. BMJ Qual Improv Rep 2013;2(1):u201055.w690.
• Carson JL, Stanworth SJ, Guyatt G, et al. Red Blood Cell Transfusion: 2023 AABB International Guidelines. JAMA 2023;330(19):1892–1902.
• Szczepiorkowski ZM, Dunbar NM. Transfusion guidelines: when to transfuse. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 2013;2013:638-644.