Koroner Arter Bypass Cerrahisinde İnsidental Bulguların Cerrahi Planlama Üzerindeki Klinik Etkisi

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2, 244 - 254, 23.06.2025

Ufuk Türkmen , Görkem Yiğit , Ayla Ece Celikten , Mehmet Yalvaç

https://doi.org/10.52827/hititmedj.1675587

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, elektif izole koroner arter bypass greftleme (KABG) cerrahisi planlanan hastalarda, preoperatif dönemde uygulanan kontrastsız torakoabdominal bilgisayarlı tomografi (BT) ile saptanan insidentalomaların sıklığını belirlemek ve bu bulguların cerrahi planlama üzerindeki etkisini değerlendirmektir.
Gereç ve Yöntem: Ocak 2021 – Aralık 2024 tarihleri arasında elektif KABG uygulanan 534 hasta retrospektif olarak incelendi. Tüm hastalara, rutin preoperatif değerlendirme protokolü kapsamında kontrastsız torakoabdominal BT çekildi. Saptanan insidentalomalar klinik anlamlılıklarına göre sınıflandırıldı. Cerrahi plan değişikliği olan hastalar Grup 1, değişiklik olmayanlar insidentaloma varlığına göre Grup 2 ve 3 olarak gruplandırıldı. Demografik veriler, intraoperatif ve postoperatif sonuçlar karşılaştırıldı.
Bulgular: Hastaların %70.8’inde en az bir insidentaloma saptandı. Bu bulguların %12’si cerrahi planlamayı etkiledi. En sık değişiklik off-pump cerrahiye yönelim ve greft planlamasında oldu. Altı hastada operasyon iptal edilerek ileri merkeze yönlendirme yapıldı. Cerrahi plan değişikliği yapılan hastalar daha yaşlı ve sol ventrikül fonksiyonu daha düşük olan grubu oluşturuyordu. 30 günlük mortalite oranı gruplar arasında anlamlı fark göstermedi.
Sonuç: Elektif KABG hastalarında preoperatif kontrastsız torakoabdominal BT, hem cerrahi planlamaya hem de sistemik taramaya katkı sağlayarak hasta güvenliğini artırmaktadır. Uygun maliyeti ve yaygın erişilebilirliği ile bu yaklaşım, klinik uygulamada değerli bir araç olabilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Cerrahi planlama , İnsidentaloma , kontrastsız bilgisayarlı tomografi , koroner arter bypass greftleme , preoperatif değerlendirme

Clinical Impact of Incidental Findings on Surgical Planning in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery

Öz

Objective: To determine the frequency of incidental findings detected by preoperative non-contrast thoracoabdominal computed tomography (CT) in patients undergoing elective isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and to assess their impact on surgical planning.
Material and Method: This retrospective study included 534 patients who underwent elective CABG between January 2021 and December 2024. As part of the routine preoperative assessment protocol, all patients received a non-contrast thoracoabdominal CT scan. Incidental findings were classified by clinical significance. Patients were grouped based on whether surgical planning was altered (Group 1), unchanged with incidental findings (Group 2), or unchanged without findings (Group 3). Demographic, intraoperative, and postoperative data were compared across groups.
Results: At least one incidentaloma was detected in 70.8% of patients. Of these, 12% led to changes in surgical strategy, most commonly off-pump surgery or graft modification. Surgery was canceled in six patients due to high-risk findings. Group 1 patients were older and had lower left ventricular function. Thirty-day mortality did not differ significantly between groups.
Conclusion: Preoperative non-contrast thoracoabdominal CT in elective CABG candidates contributes significantly to both surgical planning and systemic evaluation, enhancing patient safety. Given its accessibility and cost-effectiveness, this method represents a valuable tool in routine preoperative assessment.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Coronary artery bypass grafting , Incidentaloma , non-contrast computed tomography , preoperative evaluation , surgical planning

Etik Beyan

Approval for the study was obtained from the Ethics Committee of Hitit University Faculty of Medicine on 12/03/2025. Decision no: 2025/54.

Kaynakça

• Virani SS, Newby LK, Arnold SV et al. 2023 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Chronic Coronary Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2023;148(9):9–119.
• Na KJ, Choi JW, Hwang HY, Kim KB. Usefulness of thoracoabdominal computed tomography angiography in coronary artery bypass patients. European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery 2018;54(6):1110–1115.
• Park KH, Lee HY, Lim C et al. Clinical impact of computerised tomographic angiography performed for preoperative evaluation before coronary artery bypass grafting. European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery 2010;37(6):1346–1352.
• Aviram G, Sharony R, Kramer A et al. Modification of surgical planning based on cardiac multidetector computed tomography in reoperative heart surgery. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery 2005;79(2):589-595.
• Nishi H, Mitsuno M, Tanaka H, Ryomoto M, Fukui S, Miyamoto Y. Who needs preoperative routine chest computed tomography for prevention of stroke in cardiac surgery? Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery 2010;11(1):30-33.
• Sirin G. Surgical strategies for severely atherosclerotic (porcelain) aorta during coronary artery bypass grafting. World Journal of Cardiology 2021;13(8):309-324.
• O’Sullivan JW, Muntinga T, Grigg S, Ioannidis JPA. Prevalence and outcomes of incidental imaging findings: umbrella review. BMJ 2018;361:k2387.
• Stachon P, Kaier K, Milde S, et al. Two-year survival of patients screened for transcatheter aortic valve replacement with potentially malignant incidental findings in initial body computed tomography. European Heart Journal. Cardiovascular Imaging 2015;16(7):731-737.
• Goitein O, Di Segni E, Eshet Y, et al. Non-Valvular Findings before Trans-Catheter Aortic Valve Implantation and their Impact on the Procedure. The Israel Medical Association Journal 2015;17(12):764-767.
• Hussien AF, Jeudy J, Kligerman SJ, White CS. Thoracic Incidental Findings in Preoperative Computed Tomography Evaluation for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI). Journal of Thoracic Imaging 2016;31(3):183-188.
• Trenkwalder T, Lahmann AL, Nowicka M et al. Incidental findings in multislice computed tomography prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation: frequency, clinical relevance and outcome. The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 2018;34(6):985-992.
• Markowiak T, Holzamer A, Hilker M, et al. Incidental thoracic findings in computed tomography scans before transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery 2019;28(4):559-565.
• Tobe A, Tanaka A, Tokuda Y et al. Incidental findings on computed tomography for preoperative assessment before transcatheter aortic valve implantation in Japanese patients. Heart and Vessels 2021;36(12):1911-1922.
• Bianchi N, Frascaro F, Zanarelli L, et al. Unexpected Clinically Relevant Findings Detected via Computed Tomography in Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis Who Are Candidates for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. Journal of Clinical Medicine 2025;14(2):467.
• Albacker TB, Alhothali AM, Alhomeidan M, et al. Does preoperative screening with computed tomography of the chest decrease risk of stroke in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery 2023;13(4):2507-2513.