Araştırma Makalesi

COMPARISON OF CLASSIFICATION PERFORMANCE OF MACHINE LEARNING METHODS IN PREDICTION FINANCIAL FAILURE: EVIDENCE FROM BORSA İSTANBUL

Cilt: 14 Sayı: 1 30 Haziran 2021
PDF İndir
EN TR

COMPARISON OF CLASSIFICATION PERFORMANCE OF MACHINE LEARNING METHODS IN PREDICTION FINANCIAL FAILURE: EVIDENCE FROM BORSA İSTANBUL

Abstract

This study aimed to predict the 1 to 2 year future time of the financial failure of 86 manufacturing companies that are operating in Borsa İstanbul. The data comprised of 2010-2012 period, and it depends on 8 quantitative financial variables. Beside 6 variables come from non financial statements. In the study, Artificial Neural Network (NN), Classification and Regression Trees (CART), Support Vector Machine (SVM) and k-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) were used to compare classification performances of related methods. ROC Curve was used to compare the classification performance of the methods. As a result of the analyseis, the overall classification accuracy from the highest to the lowest was SVM (92,31%), CART (88,46%), ANN (84,62%) and KNN (80,77%) 2 years before the financial failure. The overall classification accuracy from the highest to the lowest was CART (96,15%), ANN (92,31%), SVM (80,77%) and KNN (84,62%) 1 year before the financial failure. Return on Equity (ROE) and Return on Assets Ratio (ROA) were found as important variables in the creation of the CART decision tree. The fact that the four models obtained in thise study predicted financial success/failure at a higher rate, and it shows that the models obtained in this study can be included in the models used by relevant people.

Keywords

Kaynakça

  1. Akay, E. Ç. (2018), A New horizon in econometrics: big data and machine learning. Social Sciences Research Journal, 7(2), 41-53. Retrieved from: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ssrj/issue/37241/423147
  2. Akkaya, G. C., Demireli, E. and Yakut, Ü. H. (2009). Using artificial neural networks in financial failure prediction: an application in Borsa Istanbul. Journal of Social Sciences, Eskişehir Osmangazi University, 10(2), 187-216. Retrieved from: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ogusbd/issue/10996/131592
  3. Akpınar, H. (2014). Data mining data analysis. İstanbul: Papatya Publications.
  4. Alfaro, E., Garcia, M. G. N. & Elizondo, D. (2008). Bankruptcy forecasting: an empirical comparison of adaboost and neural networks. Decision Support Systems, 45, 110-122. doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2007.12.002
  5. Bilir, H. (2015). Definition and Market oriented solution of financial distress: debt structuring, asset sales and new capital injection. Sosyoekonomi,1, 9-24. Retrieved from: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/197806
  6. Chandra, D. K., Ravi, V. & Bose, I. (2009). Failure prediction of DOTCOM companies using hybrid intelligent techniques. Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 4830-4837. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2008.05.047
  7. Chen, Mu-Y. (2011). Predicting corporate financial distress based on integration of decision tree classification and logistic regression. Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 11261-11272. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.02.173
  8. Chen, M.-Y. (2011). Bankruptcy prediction in firms with statistical and intelligent techniques and a comparison of evolutionary computation approaches. Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 62(12), 4514-4524. doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2011.10.030

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

-

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

30 Haziran 2021

Gönderilme Tarihi

15 Şubat 2021

Kabul Tarihi

15 Haziran 2021

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2021 Cilt: 14 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA
Aksoy, B., & Boztosun, D. (2021). COMPARISON OF CLASSIFICATION PERFORMANCE OF MACHINE LEARNING METHODS IN PREDICTION FINANCIAL FAILURE: EVIDENCE FROM BORSA İSTANBUL. Hitit Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 14(1), 56-86. https://doi.org/10.17218/hititsbd.880658

Cited By

  Hitit Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi  Creative Commons Atıf-GayriTicari 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı (CC BY NC) ile lisanslanmıştır.