BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Yıl 2016, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2, 651 - 664, 19.12.2016

Arif Bağbaşlıoğlu

https://doi.org/10.17218/hititsosbil.280809
Cited By: 1

Öz

Kaynakça

  • BAĞBAŞLIOĞLU, Arif. (2015), Is NATO’s Presence Fading In Russian Near Abroad In Tımes of Change?”, Karadeniz Araştırmaları Dergisi, Vol. 12, No. 47, 1-16.
  • BBC. (2014), “Rusya’da Yeni Askeri Doktrin: En Büyük Tehdit NATO” (26 December 2014), BBC, (erişim adresi: http://www.bbc.com/turkce/haberler/2014/12/141226_rusya_askeri_doktrin) (erişim tarihi: 28 Temmuz 2016).
  • BORGER Julian and Nicholas Watt. (24 March 2014), “G7 Countries Snub Putin and Refuse to Attend Planned G8 Summit in Russia”, The Guardian, (erişim adresi: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/mar/24/g7-countries-snub-putin-refuse-attend-g8-summit-russia), (erişim tarihi: 28 Temmuz 2016).
  • BROWN, Bernard E. (2014), “Europe –and NATO- Are Back”, American Foreign Policy Interests, Vol. 36, No. 3, pp 201-209.
  • CBSNEWS. (01 May 2014), “Russia Now an Adversary, NATO Official Says” (erişim adresi: http://www.cbsnews.com/news/russia-now-an-adversary-nato-official-says/), (erişim tarihi: 28 Temmuz 2016).
  • CROSS, Sharyl. (2015), “NATO-Russia Security Challenges in the Aftermath of Ukraine Conflict: Managing Black Sea Security and Beyond”, Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, Vol. 15, No. 2, p. 151-177.
  • FORSBERG, Tuomas and Herd, Graeme. (2015), “Russia and NATO: From Windows of Opportunities to Closed Doors”, Journal of Contemporary European Studies, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 43-51.
  • GAIST, Thomas. (11 February 2016), “NATO to Send Thousands of Troops to Forward Bases in the Baltics and Eastern Europe”, World Socialist Web Site, (erişim adresi: https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2016/02/11/nato-f11.html), (erişim tarihi: 28 Temmuz 2016).
  • GÜNEY ATEŞOĞLU, Nurşin. (2016), “Rusya Ukrayna’dan Sonra Neyin Peşinde: Bugünden Yarının Yeni İttifaklarını Düşünmek”, Ortadoğu Analiz, Vol. 8, No. 72, pp. 14-18.
  • HERSZENHORN, David M. (17 April 2014), “Away from a Show of Diplomacy in Geneva, Putin Puts on a Show of His Own”, New York Times, (erişim adresi: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/18/world/europe/russia-ukraine.html?_r=0), (erişim tarihi: 28 Temmuz 2016).
  • KAMP, Karl-Heinz. (2014), “From Wales to Warsaw: NATO's Future beyond the Ukraine Crisis”, American Foreign Policy Interests: The Journal of the National Committee on American Foreign Policy, Vol. 36, No. 6, pp. 361-365.
  • KROENIG, Matthew. (2015), “Facing Reality: Getting NATO Ready for a New Cold War”, Survival:Global Politics and Strategy, Vol. 57, No. 1, p. 49-70.
  • KUFČÁK, Jakup. (2014), “NATO after the Wales Summit: Readying the Alliance for the Future”, The Web site of Association for International Affairs Policy Paper, 3/2014, (erişim adresi: http://www.amo.cz/editor/image/produkty1_soubory/amocz_pp_2014_03.pdf), (erişim tarihi: 28 Temmuz 2016).
  • KyivPost. (19 March 2014), “Dmitry Rogozin: Unipolar World is Over”, (erişim adresi: http://www.kyivpost.com/content/ukraine/dmitry-rogozin-unipolar-world-is-over-339928.html), (erişim tarihi: 28 Temmuz 2016).
  • LASCONJARIAS, Guillaume. (14-15 November 2014), NATO’s Posture after the Wales Summit, IAI Working Papers.
  • LUKASZ, Kulesa. (2016), “Towards a New Equilibrium: Minimising the Risks of NATO and Russia’s New Military Postures”, European Leadership Network Policy Brief, (erişim adresi: http://www.europeanleadershipnetwork.org/medialibrary/2016/02/07/180d69f6/Towards%20a%20New%20Equilibrium%202016.pdf) (erişim tarihi: 28 Temmuz 2016).
  • MISSIROLI, Antonio. (2013), Enabling the Future European Military Capabilities 2013-2025: Challenges and Avenues, Report no: 16, European Union Institute for Security Studies, Paris.
  • MORELLI, Vincent L. (2016), Ukraine: Current Issues and U.S. Policy, Washington D.C.: Congressional Research Service, (erişim adresi: https://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/row/RL33460.pdf), (erişim tarihi: 28 Temmuz 2016).
  • NATO. (01 April 2014), “Statement by NATO Foreign Ministers”, (erişim adresi: http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/news_108501.htm), (erişim tarihi: 28 Temmuz 2016).
  • North Atlantic Council (NAC). (2010), “Active Engagement, Modern Defence: Strategic Concept”, (erişim adresi: http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/official_texts_68580.htm), (erişim tarihi: 28 Temmuz 2016).
  • NAC. (2014a), “North Atlantic Council statement on the situation in Ukraine”, (erişim adresi: http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_107681.htm?selectedLocale=en), (erişim tarihi: 28Temmuz 2016).
  • NAC. (2014b), “Atlantic Council following meeting under article 4 of the Washington Treaty”, (erişim adresi: http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/news_107716.htm?selectedLocale=en), (erişim tarihi: 28Temmuz 2016).
  • NAC. (2014c), “Statement by the North Atlantic Council on the so-called referendum in Crimea”, (erişim adresi: http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/news_108030.htm?selectedLocale=en), (erişim tarihi: 28Temmuz 2016).
  • NAC. (2014d), “Wales Summit Declaration”, (erişim adresi: http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_112964.htm?selectedLocale=en), (erişim tarihi: 28Temmuz 2016).
  • Reuters. (2014), “Poland Requests more NATO consultations over Russia”, (03 March 2014) (erişim adresi: http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/03/03/us-ukraine-crisis-nato-meeting-idUSBREA221VS20140303), (erişim tarihi: 28 Temmuz 2016).
  • SLOAN, Stanley R. (10 September 2014), “A Succesful NATO Summit? Proof Will Be in the Pudding”, The Website of War on the Rocks, (erişim adresi: http://warontherocks.com/2014/09/a-successful-nato-summit-proof-will-be-in-the-pudding/#_), (erişim tarihi: 28 Temmuz 2016).
  • The White House. (2014), “FACT SHEET: European Reassurance Initiative and Other U.S. Efforts in Support of NATO Allies and Partners” (03 June 2014), The website of the White House, (erişim adresi: http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2014/06/03/fact-sheet-european-reassurance-initiative-and-other-us-efforts-support-), erişim tarihi: 28 Temmuz 2016).
  • UN General Assembly. (27 March 2014), “General Assembly Adopts Resolution Calling upon States Not to Recognize Changes in Status of Crimea Region”, (erişim adresi: http://www.un.org/press/en/2014/ga11493.doc.htm), (erişim tarihi: 28 Temmuz 2016).
  • WALT Stephen M. (1987), The Origins of Alliances, New York: Cornell University Press.
  • WALT Stephen M. (2014), NATO Owes Putin a Big Thank-You, The Website of Foreign Policy, (erişim adresi: http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2014/09/04/nato_owes_putin_a_big_thank_you_russia_ukraine), (erişim tarihi: 28 Temmuz 2016).
  • WEBBER Mark, Ellen Hallams and Martin A. Smith. (2014), “Repairing NATO’s Motors”, International Affairs, Vol. 90, No. 4, pp 773-793.

THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE UKRAINE CRISIS FOR NATO SOLIDARITY: NATO BETWEEN COOPERATIVE SECURITY AND COLLECTIVE DEFENCE

Yıl 2016, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2, 651 - 664, 19.12.2016

Arif Bağbaşlıoğlu

https://doi.org/10.17218/hititsosbil.280809
Cited By: 1

Öz

Abstract: The aim of this article is to assess the implications of the Ukraine crisis for NATO, which is fundamentally a defensive alliance. This article discusses the Ukraine crisis as a problem in which NATO’s deterrence function, which is vital for NATO to continue as a strong alliance, has been tested in the context of relations with the Russian Federation.The tension after the Ukraine crisis may affect the ranking of priorities among NATO's fundamental tasks, which may also disrupt cooperative security, which is one of NATO’s three essential core tasks. This article analyzes the Ukraine crisis and the violation of NATO member states’ air spaces within the scope of Russia’s military presence in Syria as examples that NATO’s solidarity and its deterrence capability are being tested. It evaluates NATO’s attitude about these issues to claim that Russia, which had sanctions imposed on it by NATO and the EU after the Ukrainian crisis, aims to transform differences in attitudes towards it among NATO’s European members into a political fracture. Whether this aim will be fulfilled or not depends on the level of solidarity among NATO countries.


UKRAYNA KRİZİNİN NATO’NUN DAYANIŞMASINA ETKİLERİ: İŞBİRLİĞİNE DAYALI GÜVENLİK İLE KOLLEKTİF SAVUNMA ARASINDA NATO 

Özet: Bu çalışma, Ukrayna’daki krizin, özünde bir savunma ittifakı olan NATO’ya yansımalarını konu almaktadır. Çalışmada, Ukrayna krizi, NATO’nun güçlü bir ittifak olarak devamı açısından hayati önem taşıyan caydırıcılık fonksiyonunun, Rusya ile olan ilişkiler bağlamında test edildiği bir sorun olarak ele alınmıştır. Ukrayna krizi sonrasında yaşanan gerilim NATO’nun temel görevleri arasında bir öncelik sıralamasını etkileyebilir ki bu durumda NATO’nun üç temel görevinden biri olan işbirliğine dayalı güvenliği geliştirme amacı zarar görebilir. Makale Ukrayna krizini ve Rusya’nın Suriye’deki askeri varlığı çerçevesinde İttifak üyelerinin hava sahalarını ihlal etmesini NATO dayanışması ve caydırıcılığının test edildiği örnekler olarak seçerek NATO’nun bu konulardaki tutumunu değerlendirmektedir. Bu çalışmanın temel iddiası, Ukrayna krizi sonrasında NATO ve AB’nin yaptırımlarına maruz kalan Rusya’nın, NATO’nun Avrupalı ülkeleri arasındaki kendisine karşı takınılacak tutum konusundaki farklılıkları İttifak içerisinde siyasi bir çatlağa dönüştürmeyi hedeflemesidir. Bu hedefin gerçekleşip gerçekleşmemesini NATO ülkeleri arasındaki dayanışma düzeyi belirleyecektir.


Kaynakça

  • BAĞBAŞLIOĞLU, Arif. (2015), Is NATO’s Presence Fading In Russian Near Abroad In Tımes of Change?”, Karadeniz Araştırmaları Dergisi, Vol. 12, No. 47, 1-16.
  • BBC. (2014), “Rusya’da Yeni Askeri Doktrin: En Büyük Tehdit NATO” (26 December 2014), BBC, (erişim adresi: http://www.bbc.com/turkce/haberler/2014/12/141226_rusya_askeri_doktrin) (erişim tarihi: 28 Temmuz 2016).
  • BORGER Julian and Nicholas Watt. (24 March 2014), “G7 Countries Snub Putin and Refuse to Attend Planned G8 Summit in Russia”, The Guardian, (erişim adresi: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/mar/24/g7-countries-snub-putin-refuse-attend-g8-summit-russia), (erişim tarihi: 28 Temmuz 2016).
  • BROWN, Bernard E. (2014), “Europe –and NATO- Are Back”, American Foreign Policy Interests, Vol. 36, No. 3, pp 201-209.
  • CBSNEWS. (01 May 2014), “Russia Now an Adversary, NATO Official Says” (erişim adresi: http://www.cbsnews.com/news/russia-now-an-adversary-nato-official-says/), (erişim tarihi: 28 Temmuz 2016).
  • CROSS, Sharyl. (2015), “NATO-Russia Security Challenges in the Aftermath of Ukraine Conflict: Managing Black Sea Security and Beyond”, Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, Vol. 15, No. 2, p. 151-177.
  • FORSBERG, Tuomas and Herd, Graeme. (2015), “Russia and NATO: From Windows of Opportunities to Closed Doors”, Journal of Contemporary European Studies, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 43-51.
  • GAIST, Thomas. (11 February 2016), “NATO to Send Thousands of Troops to Forward Bases in the Baltics and Eastern Europe”, World Socialist Web Site, (erişim adresi: https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2016/02/11/nato-f11.html), (erişim tarihi: 28 Temmuz 2016).
  • GÜNEY ATEŞOĞLU, Nurşin. (2016), “Rusya Ukrayna’dan Sonra Neyin Peşinde: Bugünden Yarının Yeni İttifaklarını Düşünmek”, Ortadoğu Analiz, Vol. 8, No. 72, pp. 14-18.
  • HERSZENHORN, David M. (17 April 2014), “Away from a Show of Diplomacy in Geneva, Putin Puts on a Show of His Own”, New York Times, (erişim adresi: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/18/world/europe/russia-ukraine.html?_r=0), (erişim tarihi: 28 Temmuz 2016).
  • KAMP, Karl-Heinz. (2014), “From Wales to Warsaw: NATO's Future beyond the Ukraine Crisis”, American Foreign Policy Interests: The Journal of the National Committee on American Foreign Policy, Vol. 36, No. 6, pp. 361-365.
  • KROENIG, Matthew. (2015), “Facing Reality: Getting NATO Ready for a New Cold War”, Survival:Global Politics and Strategy, Vol. 57, No. 1, p. 49-70.
  • KUFČÁK, Jakup. (2014), “NATO after the Wales Summit: Readying the Alliance for the Future”, The Web site of Association for International Affairs Policy Paper, 3/2014, (erişim adresi: http://www.amo.cz/editor/image/produkty1_soubory/amocz_pp_2014_03.pdf), (erişim tarihi: 28 Temmuz 2016).
  • KyivPost. (19 March 2014), “Dmitry Rogozin: Unipolar World is Over”, (erişim adresi: http://www.kyivpost.com/content/ukraine/dmitry-rogozin-unipolar-world-is-over-339928.html), (erişim tarihi: 28 Temmuz 2016).
  • LASCONJARIAS, Guillaume. (14-15 November 2014), NATO’s Posture after the Wales Summit, IAI Working Papers.
  • LUKASZ, Kulesa. (2016), “Towards a New Equilibrium: Minimising the Risks of NATO and Russia’s New Military Postures”, European Leadership Network Policy Brief, (erişim adresi: http://www.europeanleadershipnetwork.org/medialibrary/2016/02/07/180d69f6/Towards%20a%20New%20Equilibrium%202016.pdf) (erişim tarihi: 28 Temmuz 2016).
  • MISSIROLI, Antonio. (2013), Enabling the Future European Military Capabilities 2013-2025: Challenges and Avenues, Report no: 16, European Union Institute for Security Studies, Paris.
  • MORELLI, Vincent L. (2016), Ukraine: Current Issues and U.S. Policy, Washington D.C.: Congressional Research Service, (erişim adresi: https://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/row/RL33460.pdf), (erişim tarihi: 28 Temmuz 2016).
  • NATO. (01 April 2014), “Statement by NATO Foreign Ministers”, (erişim adresi: http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/news_108501.htm), (erişim tarihi: 28 Temmuz 2016).
  • North Atlantic Council (NAC). (2010), “Active Engagement, Modern Defence: Strategic Concept”, (erişim adresi: http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/official_texts_68580.htm), (erişim tarihi: 28 Temmuz 2016).
  • NAC. (2014a), “North Atlantic Council statement on the situation in Ukraine”, (erişim adresi: http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_107681.htm?selectedLocale=en), (erişim tarihi: 28Temmuz 2016).
  • NAC. (2014b), “Atlantic Council following meeting under article 4 of the Washington Treaty”, (erişim adresi: http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/news_107716.htm?selectedLocale=en), (erişim tarihi: 28Temmuz 2016).
  • NAC. (2014c), “Statement by the North Atlantic Council on the so-called referendum in Crimea”, (erişim adresi: http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/news_108030.htm?selectedLocale=en), (erişim tarihi: 28Temmuz 2016).
  • NAC. (2014d), “Wales Summit Declaration”, (erişim adresi: http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_112964.htm?selectedLocale=en), (erişim tarihi: 28Temmuz 2016).
  • Reuters. (2014), “Poland Requests more NATO consultations over Russia”, (03 March 2014) (erişim adresi: http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/03/03/us-ukraine-crisis-nato-meeting-idUSBREA221VS20140303), (erişim tarihi: 28 Temmuz 2016).
  • SLOAN, Stanley R. (10 September 2014), “A Succesful NATO Summit? Proof Will Be in the Pudding”, The Website of War on the Rocks, (erişim adresi: http://warontherocks.com/2014/09/a-successful-nato-summit-proof-will-be-in-the-pudding/#_), (erişim tarihi: 28 Temmuz 2016).
  • The White House. (2014), “FACT SHEET: European Reassurance Initiative and Other U.S. Efforts in Support of NATO Allies and Partners” (03 June 2014), The website of the White House, (erişim adresi: http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2014/06/03/fact-sheet-european-reassurance-initiative-and-other-us-efforts-support-), erişim tarihi: 28 Temmuz 2016).
  • UN General Assembly. (27 March 2014), “General Assembly Adopts Resolution Calling upon States Not to Recognize Changes in Status of Crimea Region”, (erişim adresi: http://www.un.org/press/en/2014/ga11493.doc.htm), (erişim tarihi: 28 Temmuz 2016).
  • WALT Stephen M. (1987), The Origins of Alliances, New York: Cornell University Press.
  • WALT Stephen M. (2014), NATO Owes Putin a Big Thank-You, The Website of Foreign Policy, (erişim adresi: http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2014/09/04/nato_owes_putin_a_big_thank_you_russia_ukraine), (erişim tarihi: 28 Temmuz 2016).
  • WEBBER Mark, Ellen Hallams and Martin A. Smith. (2014), “Repairing NATO’s Motors”, International Affairs, Vol. 90, No. 4, pp 773-793.
Toplam 31 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Arif Bağbaşlıoğlu Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 19 Aralık 2016
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2016 Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Bağbaşlıoğlu, A. (2016). THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE UKRAINE CRISIS FOR NATO SOLIDARITY: NATO BETWEEN COOPERATIVE SECURITY AND COLLECTIVE DEFENCE. Hitit Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9(2), 651-664. https://doi.org/10.17218/hititsosbil.280809
AMA Bağbaşlıoğlu A. THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE UKRAINE CRISIS FOR NATO SOLIDARITY: NATO BETWEEN COOPERATIVE SECURITY AND COLLECTIVE DEFENCE. hititsosbil. Aralık 2016;9(2):651-664. doi:10.17218/hititsosbil.280809
Chicago Bağbaşlıoğlu, Arif. “THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE UKRAINE CRISIS FOR NATO SOLIDARITY: NATO BETWEEN COOPERATIVE SECURITY AND COLLECTIVE DEFENCE”. Hitit Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 9, sy. 2 (Aralık 2016): 651-64. https://doi.org/10.17218/hititsosbil.280809.
EndNote Bağbaşlıoğlu A (01 Aralık 2016) THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE UKRAINE CRISIS FOR NATO SOLIDARITY: NATO BETWEEN COOPERATIVE SECURITY AND COLLECTIVE DEFENCE. Hitit Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 9 2 651–664.
IEEE A. Bağbaşlıoğlu, “THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE UKRAINE CRISIS FOR NATO SOLIDARITY: NATO BETWEEN COOPERATIVE SECURITY AND COLLECTIVE DEFENCE”, hititsosbil, c. 9, sy. 2, ss. 651–664, 2016, doi: 10.17218/hititsosbil.280809.
ISNAD Bağbaşlıoğlu, Arif. “THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE UKRAINE CRISIS FOR NATO SOLIDARITY: NATO BETWEEN COOPERATIVE SECURITY AND COLLECTIVE DEFENCE”. Hitit Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 9/2 (Aralık 2016), 651-664. https://doi.org/10.17218/hititsosbil.280809.
JAMA Bağbaşlıoğlu A. THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE UKRAINE CRISIS FOR NATO SOLIDARITY: NATO BETWEEN COOPERATIVE SECURITY AND COLLECTIVE DEFENCE. hititsosbil. 2016;9:651–664.
MLA Bağbaşlıoğlu, Arif. “THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE UKRAINE CRISIS FOR NATO SOLIDARITY: NATO BETWEEN COOPERATIVE SECURITY AND COLLECTIVE DEFENCE”. Hitit Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, c. 9, sy. 2, 2016, ss. 651-64, doi:10.17218/hititsosbil.280809.
Vancouver Bağbaşlıoğlu A. THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE UKRAINE CRISIS FOR NATO SOLIDARITY: NATO BETWEEN COOPERATIVE SECURITY AND COLLECTIVE DEFENCE. hititsosbil. 2016;9(2):651-64.

Cited By

New Generation War: Hybrid War Methods Used by Russia in Donbas
Hitit Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.17218/hititsbd.1066684
 Kapak Resmi İndir