POLİTİK KÜRESELLEŞME VE SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİR KALKINMA

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 2, 341 - 354, 29.12.2019

Taner Güney İclal Çöğürcü

https://doi.org/10.17218/hititsosbil.542493

Cited By: 1

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı gelişmiş ve gelişmekte olan
ülkelerde politik küreselleşmenin sürdürülebilir kalkınma üzerindeki etkisini
analiz etmektir. Bu amaçla 36 gelişmiş ve 84 gelişmekte olan ülkenin 1990-2015
dönemine ait verileri kullanılmıştır. Sistem-GMM yöntemleriyle elde edilen
tahmin sonuçlarına göre, hem gelişmiş hem de gelişmekte olan ülkelerde politik küreselleşme sürdürülebilir
kalkınma üzerinde pozitif yönlü ve istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir etkiye
sahiptir. Politik küreselleşmenin
sürdürülebilir kalkınma üzerindeki pozitif yönlü etkisi, gelişmekte olan
ülkelere göre gelişmiş ülkelerde daha yüksektir. Politik küreselleşmenin alt
dalları olan de facto politik küreselleşme ve de jure politik küreselleşmenin
sürdürülebilir kalkınma üzerindeki etkisi de analiz edilmiştir. Tüm ülkelerde
ve gelişmiş ülkelerde de facto ve de jure politik küreselleşme sürdürülebilir
kalkınmayı pozitif yönlü etkilemektedir. Bu ülkelerde, de jure politik küreselleşme
sürdürülebilir kalkınma üzerinde daha büyük bir etkiye sahiptir. Gelişmekte
olan ülkelerde ise de jure politik küreselleşme sürdürülebilir kalkınma
üzerinde pozitif yönlü etkiye sahipken, de facto politik küreselleşme
sürdürülebilir kalkınmayı negatif yönlü etkilemektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Politik Küreselleşme, Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma, Gelişmiş Ülkeler, Gelişmekte Olan Ülkeler

Political Globalization And Sustainable Development

Öz

The aim of this study is to analyze the impact of political globalization on sustainable development in developed and developing countries. For this purpose, the data of 36 developed and 84 developing countries, covering the period of 1990-2015, were used. According to the results of the system-GMM methods, political globalization has a positive effect on sustainable development in both developed and developing countries. The positive effect of political globalization on sustainable development is higher in developed countries than in developing countries. The impact of de facto political globalization and de jure political globalization on sustainable development has also been analyzed. In all countries and developed countries, de facto and de jure political globalization has a positive impact on sustainable development. In these countries, de jure political globalization has a greater impact on sustainable development. In developing countries, while jure political globalization has a positive effect on sustainable development, de facto political globalization negatively affects sustainable development.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Political Globalization, Sustainable Development, Developed Countries, Developing Countries, System-GMM

Kaynakça

• Aidt Toke S. (2010). Corruption and sustainable development. CWPE 1061. Cambridge: Faculty of Economics and Jesus College, University of Cambridge.
• Anderson, T. W. ve Hsiao, C. (1981). Estimation of dynamic models with error component,. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 76(375), 598–606.
• Arellano, M. ve Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277–297.
• Arellano, M., ve Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of econometrics, 68(1), 29-51.
• Ashford, N. A., ve Hall, R. P. (2011). Technology, globalization, and sustainable development: Transforming the industrial state. Yale University Press.
• Baltagi, Badi H. (2005). Econometric analysis of panel data, Third Edition, Canada: John Wiley & Sons.
• Barnett, C. (2001). Culture, geography, and the arts of government. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 19(1), 7–24.
• Blewitt, J. (2012). Understanding sustainable development. Routledge.
• Blundell, R., ve Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of econometrics, 87(1), 115-143.
• De, J. R. (1992). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development Rio de Janerio, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. Reproduction, 351(10.1007).
• Grainger, A. (2004). The role of spatial scale and spatial interactions in sustainable development. Exploring Sustainable Development: Geographical Perspectives, Earthscan, London, 50-83.
• Güney T. (2017). Governance and sustainable development: how effective is governance?. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 26(3), 316-335.
• Güney Taner (2018). Finansal küresellesmenin kalkınma üzerindeki etkisi. Al Farabi 3. Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Kongresi, 210-214.
• Güney Taner (2018). Ekonomik globalleşme ve sürdürülebilir kalkınma. Sosyal, Beşeri ve İdari Bilimler Alanında Yenilikçi Yaklaşımlar Cilt 2 içinde, Gece Kitaplığı.
• Güney T. 2019. Renewable energy, non-renewable energy and sustainable development. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology. doi: 10.1080/13504509.2019.1595214
• Hamilton, K., ve Clemens, M. (1999). Genuine savings rates in developing countries. The World Bank Economic Review, 13(2), 333-356.
• Hamilton, K. (2000). Sustaining economic welfare: Estimating changes in per capita wealth. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 2498, The World Bank, Washington DC.
• Held, D., McGrew, A., Goldblatt, D., ve Perraton, J. (2000). Global transformations: politics, economics and culture. In Politics at the Edge (pp. 14-28). Palgrave Macmillan, London.
• Homer-Dixon, T. (1999). Environment, Scarcity, and Violence. Princeton University Press.
• Karagül, Mehmet (2001), Küreselleşme küresel kriz ve Türkiye. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, 2( 2), 203- 217.
• Ki-Hoon Lee ve Byung Min (2014) Globalization and carbon constrained global economy: a fad or a trend?, Journal of Asia-Pacific Business, 15:2, 105-121.
• Köhler, J. (2014). Globalization and sustainable development: Case study on international transport and sustainable development. The Journal of Environment & Development, 23(1), 66-100.
• Mahtaney, P. (2013). Globalization and sustainable economic development: Issues, insights, and inference. Springer.
• Parnell, S. (2018). Globalization and sustainable development: at the urban crossroad. The European Journal of Development Research, 30(2), 169-171.
• Roodman, D. (2006). How to do xtabond2: an introduction to “difference” and “system” GMM in Stata. The Center for Global Development Working Paper Series, No. 103.
• Rondinelli, D. A. (2007). Globalization of sustainable development: Principles and practices in transnational corporations. Multinational Business Review, 15(1), 1-24.
• Shahbaz, M., Mallick, H., Mahalik, M. K. ve Loganathan, N. (2015). Does globalization impede environmental quality in India? Ecological Indicators, 52, 379-393.
• Shahbaz, M., Khan, S., Ali, A., ve Bhattacharya, M. (2017). The impact of globalization on CO2 emissions in China. The Singapore Economic Review, 62(04), 929-957.
• Shahbaz, M., Shahzad, S. J. H., Mahalik, M. K., ve Hammoudeh, S. (2018). Does globalisation worsen environmental quality in developed economies?. Environmental Modeling & Assessment, 23(2), 141-156.
• UN (2015). United Nations Paris Agreement. https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/english_ paris_agreement.pdf.
• Tatoğlu, F. Y. (2012). İleri panel veri analizi: Stata uygulamalı. İstanbul: Beta.
• Yay, G. G., ve Aksoy, T. (2018). Globalization and the welfare state. Quality & Quantity, 52(3), 1015-1040.